Hello,
I am currently running 1 HTTP server on FreeBSD 6.0
Offcourse, like anyone that likes security, i am running IPFW and set
the kernel to block by default.
Behind that HTTP server i am running 2 Linux boxes.
The problem is that when i enable the firewall and openup ports from
rpcinfo -
fbsd_user schreef:
Post complete content of your rules file for review by people here
on list.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Frasa
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 4:04 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: IPFW / NFSD
Chuck Swiger schreef:
Mark Frasa wrote:
I am currently running 1 HTTP server on FreeBSD 6.0
Offcourse, like anyone that likes security, i am running IPFW and set
the kernel to block by default.
Behind that HTTP server i am running 2 Linux boxes.
The problem is that when i enable the
Hello,
I am using a djbdns DNS server which operates almost perfect.
There is 1 small problem, i have for my domain frasa.net 2 namservers:
frasa.net. 3600IN NS ns1.frasa.net.
frasa.net. 3600IN NS ns2.frasa.net.
This is when i resolve direct
On 2004.10.11 10:43:02 +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
>
> Overlong lines.
>
> On Sunday, 10 October 2004 at 19:23:24 +0200, Mark Frasa wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > After installing F
- Forwarded message from Mark Frasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Mark Frasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Adding network & IP to hosts.deny
To: Pelle Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Mark Frasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:05:04 +
On 2004.10.11 21:17:01 -0700, Sex Maniac wrote:
> Hello, I am using FreeBSD 4.9.
>
> 1. Using NATD
> I previously using "natd". In my natd.conf there was a
> line like this :
>
> redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.2:2000-3000 2000-3000
>
> 2. Using IPNAT
> Recently I switched to ipnat.
> So I am using
On 2004.10.11 21:33:32 +0200, Elmer Skjdt Henriksen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When will 5.3 Final approx. be released? (i can't wait :P)
>
> And which version of KDE will be included in 5.3?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> (sorry for my english)
>
>
> --
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG A
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Banning
Sent: Wed 10/13/2004 7:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Luke Kearney; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ipfw - denying all - what port for OE
My server is my desktop. My ipfw rules follow. Whenever I take
out line 12000 is run
Hi, I wish to stop sendmail from starting during boot up completely
since I don't need it. And I found this on the net:
> By the way, if getting rid of Sendmail is your goal, then
> sendmail_enable="NONE", while working, is not the best solution.
> sendmail_enable, like the other sendmail_* kno
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Banning
Sent: woensdag 13 oktober 2004 7:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Luke Kearney; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ipfw - denying all - what port for OE
My server is my desktop. My ipfw rules follow. Whene
Hello,
Is there anyone who can tell me when Build and release of 5.3-RELEASE will be there?
I am closely following this link last weeks:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/schedule.html
But even the 5.3-RC1 is not out yet. Because there is a error in vinum for
5.2.1-RELEASE i need the new g_
Hello,
First i want to quote something:
>Vinum is being rewritten; the new one is called gvinum or geom_vinum.
>
> It handles swap, and it should be in 5.3.
>
> Greg
Here Greg tells me that Vinum should be in 5.3 Yesterday after 5.3-RC1 came trough, i
downloaded the ISO and installed 5.3-RC1.
On 2004.10.19 22:36:10 +, alvaro rosales wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I have installed a FReebSD 5.1 Box, and I had enabled
> the FTP
> daemon in inetd,after I restarted inetd I can connect
> locally doing ftp
> localhost from the server, but I can not connect to
> the server from a
> workstation i
Hello,
I have found this link:
http://www.freebsd.de/archive/de-bsd-questions/de-bsd-questions.200410/0112.html
There is a statement in there:
>Ab -- wahrscheinlich so -- 5.5-RELEASE wird vinum komplett durch
>(ein formatkompatibles) geom-basiertes Vinum-Framework (g_vinum) ersetzt
>(vielen Dank
On 2004.10.21 12:57:53 +, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> On Thursday 21 October 2004 12:21, Mark Frasa wrote:
>
> > Arg stupid, off course..
>
> Nah. There's a lot of information there to go through. I didn't realize
> how ready gvinum was for production until
On 2004.10.22 10:26:25 +, Mark Frasa wrote:
> On 2004.10.21 12:57:53 +, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 October 2004 12:21, Mark Frasa wrote:
> >
> > > Arg stupid, off course..
> >
> > Nah. There's a lot of information there to go through
On 2004.10.26 14:06:23 +, Leighton Reed wrote:
> When I run "Standard Installation" from sysinstall I get the following
> error messages:
> -unable to make new root file system on /dev/ad0sla! command returned
> status 36
> -Couldn't make filesystems properly. Aborting
> Can anyone recomend a
On 2004.10.27 11:26:00 +, Florian Hengstberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm compiled a Kernel using the GENERIC config-file that
> comes with the default 5.2.1 installation adding support
> for ipfw.
> I tried to scan my computer with a linux machine running nmap,
> but nmap tells me that the host see
On 2004.10.27 12:18:03 +, Jaime Moss wrote:
> I am looking at non Microsoft platforms for a mail server.
>
> Does FreeBSD have one in it ?
>
> I will also be looking at Linux.
>
> What is the differnce between FreeBSD and Linux?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Jaime Moss
Freebsd has one: Sendmail, a
"h0444lp6" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I do wonder a little about the difference in the size for my
> /dev/vinum/usr reported by ¡§vinum list¡¨ and ¡§df ¡Vh¡¨.
> I concatenated three 1303MB partitions. "vinum list" shows as expected a
> size of 3909MB for volume usr, but df -h sho
Hello,
I was wondering wheter it's possible that pop3d and imapd don't log to
maillog
My syslog.conf is like this:
mail.info /var/log/maillog
!imapd
*.* /var/log/imapd.log
!pop3d
*.*
22 matches
Mail list logo
