problem had nothing
to do with FreeBSD against Linux. I appears that the fresh setup fixed
it.
--
Manfred Usselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
f Windows XP (Luna)
in any other color than blue, olive green and silver. LOL.
The only advantage Windows has is that many people are used to it.
--
Manfred Usselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:29:54 +0100
bsd wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been provided with a 1To backup space by my hosting company…
> unfortunately It is only accessible by FTP which does not allow me to
> do the regular backup / restore I use to do using RSYNC.
>
>
> What are the options I have
Hi,
I can't get the linux emulation installed under FreeBSD 4.9:
===> linux_base-rh-9 depends on executable: rpm - found
===> linux_base-rh-9 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg_info - found
kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 -> 3
glibc-2.3.2-27.9.7.i386.rpm
execution of glibc-2.3.2-27.9.7 script fa
Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 07
Feb 2006 10:16:49 -0500:
> "Manfred Usselmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I can't get the linux emulation installed under FreeBSD 4.9:
> >
> > ===> linux_base-rh-9 depends on executa
Stop in /usr/ports/finance/gnucash.
- - - - - - - -
What can I do?
This is with FreeBSD 4.7 Release and an up-to-date ports tree.
Thanks,
Manfred
Manfred Usselmann - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
On 12 Feb 2003 18:28:45 -0500
Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 02:06, Manfred Usselmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm having problems to build the soup port which I need for the latest GnuCash
>port:
>
> Do a forced up
hand correct these one by one, I thought I'd
> ask if I was doing something wrong.
>
> P.S. I ran perl-after-upgrade after upgrading perl.
Did you run
perl-after-upgrade -f
?
Without '-f' it just tells you what it would d
