Hello, when i try to debug a program with threads (with gdb) gdb complains
about not being able to find thread start point and kind of hangs (see
below). It is quite likely i misconfigured something, but i have no idea
what that something would be (maybe forgot to put stuff in kernel?).
I tried in
Ok let me try again (more explanation/question below).
Also sorry that i screwed up the script output by having a copy of the text
in it... not sure how that happened!
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 05:53:09PM +, Jurjen Middendorp wrote:
>Hello, when i try to debug a program with threads (with
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:03:14AM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
>
>Well I pretty much went this way:
>
>abrwm (evilwm) (tinywm didn't have vwindows), fbpanel, xv, idesk,
>transset-dt, I have not selected a fm yet... For the most part I really
>like it (lean and mean) but one feature that se
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:43:24PM -0800, kasthurirangan balaji wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am using FreeBSD 6.1 on my laptop. I understand that
>FreeBSD 7.0 will have ZFS file system. I did go
>through the sun website to understand the advantages
>of ZFS. Given that, will FreeBSD have a
>BTree/B+Tree(replica
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:32:37AM +0100, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
>On Sunday 02 December 2007, Lennart Koopmann wrote:
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> i am going to port a server that i am currently working on to FreeBSD.
>> I don't have much experience with FreeBSD yet. The only real big thing
>> i have to
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:22:19PM +0100, clemens fischer wrote:
>> Jeremy Chadwick:
>
>> I think the bottom line here is that until someone steps up and
>> actually volunteers to fix the code, it will remain broken. (I don't
>> normally tote this attitude, but in this case it's applicable: this i
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 09:40:37PM +1100, fbsd wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am looking for a good laptop to put FreeBSD (PCBSD) on. The general
> consensus
> seems to be that IBM make good units and that the T60 is a good choice. But
> when I look at the three components that seem to cause most troubl
I posted this to the freebsd-security list, but i believe that is
not the right list to this question (sorry! this is my first message
to the freebsd mailing-lists). I hope this is the right list! :)
anyway:
I tried making a firewall for my laptop..but i'm not sure if i
forgot anything. And things
both and then decide which one gives
me the least trouble :)
greetings,
jurjen.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 04:29:06AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>On 2006-12-16 18:01, Jurjen Middendorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I tried making a firewall for my laptop..but i'm not sure
Ok, i changed my original rules. I'm going to use both the ruleset you
recommended
and these ones (not at the same time though :). And see which one gives me the
least trouble.
greetings,
jurjen.
#!/bin/sh
ipfw -q flush
cmd="ipfw -q add"
ks="keep-state"
oif="ath0"
#sort in en out packets
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2006-September/035268.html
maybe this works? haven't tried it myself though, because make-ing the port
worked without problems...
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 11:55:16AM -0500, Joe Auty wrote:
>
>On Dec 29, 2006, at 11:38 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>
>>J
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 02:49:48AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
>I originally posted this to -mobile three months ago, but got no
>nibbles. The T23 is is running 6.1-RELEASE presently. Anyone?
>
>-- Forwarded message --
>Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 05:18:23 +1000 (EST)
>From: Ian Smith <[EM
Hello,
i have configured my firewall, but after i do "ipfw -q flush" i am still
able to visit websites, download my e-mail, etc. I thought the default action of
ipfw was to deny everything and ipfw show confirms that... Why am i able to go
on the internet? Is this weird behaviour or is there somet
I'm sorry, (don't laugh too hard) i had a litle startup script that read: ipfw
disable firewall, i put that there before i had actually made my firewall
rules...
Once i removed it it turned out my rules weren't as decent as i thought, but now
they work!
And i was being so happy that i had made su
Hello, i have a very weird problem and am not sure what is wrong. I have
deinstalled my fpc compiler a while ago, but i wanted to install it again
today, but make-ing the port failed with some errors... not sure where to
send it to or what those errors mean, so i'll put them at the end of the
e-mai
Putting the COMPAT_FREEBSD4 and 5 options back in the kernel config solved
the problem for not being able to use the binaries (the ones i had compiled
with fpc and the fpc i get with pkg_add itself) so all is good now.
Is it just a Bad Idea to put them out of the kernel or is freepascal a
litle ou
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 11:34:50PM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote:
>On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 22:26 -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
>> Tom McLaughlin wrote:
>> >> Now that you mention pdksh, have you tried mksh (in Ports too)?
>> >>
>> >> I've installed it and successfully run moderately large ksh scripts
>> >>
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:32:38PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
>Jurjen Middendorp wrote:
>>>> If you're familiar with pdksh, are you also familiar with ksh93, which
>>>>is (I believe) Mr. Korn's own shell? If you are, I would be interessted
>>>>
Hello, i am trying to connect to the vpn at university from home.
I have made a new kernel with what i think (thought) was needed for ipsec
from reading the handbook, my kernel file looks like:
include GENERIC
ident MYCO
19 matches
Mail list logo
