Re: nssswitch - anyone using nss_X ? nss/freebsd complete?

2005-11-04 Thread Harti Brandt
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Nathan Vidican wrote: NV>Anyone using any sort of nss_X.so module? Are there any open issues with NV>FreeBSD/amd64 and nssswitch? I've been reading a good deal of archived NV>mailing list messages regarding development/threading issues, but to no avail NV>have I found any defin

Re: PDP-11 (with RSTS/E) emulator for FreeBSD

2003-02-11 Thread Harti Brandt
d build out of the box on FreeBSD, because that is were I do my development. I'l look into the port stuff. The latest versions of p11 and libbegemot are at ftp://ftp.fokus.{fraunhofer,gmd}.de/pub/cats/usr/harti/p11 harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hart

Re: make ".if exists" problem/question

2005-09-05 Thread Harti Brandt
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Emanuel Strobl wrote: ES>Am Donnerstag, 25. August 2005 20:10 CEST schrieb David Kirchner: ES>> On 8/25/05, Emanuel Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ES>> > Dear make gurus (bsd make, not gmake), ES>> > ES>> > it seems that make checks .if directives only at statrup. How can I

Re: gmake/make dependency problem

2005-09-20 Thread Harti Brandt
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: GK>On 2005-09-19 19:00, Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: GK>> I'm confused. GK>> GK>> I believe that: GK>> GK>> a: b GK>> GK>> means that 'a' depends on 'b', and if 'b' has a later timestamp than 'a' GK>> then the rule will be invoked to produc

Re: gmake/make dependency problem

2005-09-20 Thread Harti Brandt
[I answer to this mail; because I did not see the original one] On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: GK>On 2005-09-19 19:00, Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: GK>> I'm confused. GK>> GK>> I believe that: GK>> GK>> a: b GK>> GK>> means that 'a' depends on 'b', and if 'b' has a lat

Re: gmake/make dependency problem

2005-09-20 Thread Harti Brandt
Hi Harlan, On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Harlan Stenn wrote: HS>I guess it depends on your definition of a "source" file. That's fairly easy: what's left of the ':' is the target, what's right of it is the source. This is just the terminology make is using. HS>I think of a Makefile in terms of "target"

Re: gmake/make dependency problem

2005-09-20 Thread Harti Brandt
Harlan, On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Harlan Stenn wrote: HS>It is ugly to add $(srcdir) to the targets (and perhaps dependencies), HS>but that may have to happen. For the 'foreseeable future' - yes. HS>If I say: HS> HS>srcdir=wherever HS>VPATH: $(srcdir) HS> HS>a: b HS> HS>b: c HS> cd $(srcdir) && sc