options used to compile packages

2011-07-16 Thread David Arendt
not, it would be very good to make it available as ports default options seem to be different from options used to compile official packages. Thanks in advance Bye, David Arendt ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: options used to compile packages

2011-07-16 Thread David Arendt
correctly. Therefore I thought there might be other default options. I am sorry that I cannot be more precise, but I tried it 2 months ago, so I do not remember exactly. I think I will try it again from scratch with latest ports tree and give you more precise information. Bye, David Arendt On Sat,

Re: options used to compile packages

2011-07-17 Thread David Arendt
, I did this test on a fresh installation. But anyway it doesn't matter as I have a workaround. Thanks for your valuable information, Bye, David Arendt On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 18:12 -0400, b. f. wrote: > > well I don't actually now which package it was, but I compiled gdm (so > &g

Re: zfs clone, nfs and pxeboot

2011-07-28 Thread David Arendt
Hi, yes, I know, but it would be interesing to know if there is a general problem with zfs clones shared over nfs or if it is pxeboot related. Bye, David Arendt On 07/28/11 13:10, krad wrote: On 28 July 2011 11:41, wrote: Hi, I wanted to experiment a bit with pxeboot. Therefore I