>> Could you guys google for fixphpextorder.sh and see if that would help.
>> It did help me last year when I had this problem and I always rely on it
>> during upgrade, but I'm not saying I guarantee it will:-)
>
> still cores
>
> # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache22 start
> Performing sanity check on a
> OK I've narrowed down my problem to:
>
> extension=mhash.so
>
> in extensions.ini
>
> If I comment out that php extension, I'm good. If I don't, I crash when
> sending HUP signal to parent apache process. I experimented with the
> order of the extensions.ini file but could not get to work re
> Cost wise, AMD Opteron 246 is roughly the same cost
> as a 3.0Ghz Xeon ... But
> how do they compare performance wise; specifically
> related to FreeBSD?
We have a dual xeon (nocona) @ 3.2 GHz and a dual
opteron @ 2 GHz, both with 4 GB RAM and running the
amd64-port. My impression is that the op
Hi.
--- Robin Breathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm interested to know if anyone is successfully
> running ipf/ipnat under
> -STABLE from after the merge on the 31st of August
I have installed stable 4.6.2 and did a cvsup on sept.
8-9'th of Sept. and did a make world and make ke
> >> You should configure squid to use no more than about 60 - 70% of the
> >> available physical RAM-- ie, set the cache_mem parameter to about 2.5
> >> or 3GB.
> >>
> >
> > Better yet, don't run Squid at all.
>
> Ok, then what do you recommend instead of Squid?
Varnish.
http://varnish.projects.
I just updated my 6.2 box to the new Xorg 7.2 distro. I followed all
the directions in the UPDATING file. It appears all the directories
have been properly built. I also successfully ran the "mergebase.sh"
script from the Tools/scripts directory. However, when I try to run
X, I get the followi
We're going to build a server with some 1Tb of over 500 million small
files with size from 0,5k to 4k. I'm wonder if the ufs2 can handle
this kind of system well. From newfs(8) the min block size is 4k. This
is not optimal in our case, a 1k or 0,5k block is more effective IMHO.
I'd be happy if an
> approx. 15 partitions ranging from 400 GB to 2 TB in size. If the
> server for some reason had crashed the webservers were unable to
the question is about the reason it crashed...
> access the nfs-mounted partitions during the period the server did a
> snapshot of a partition, in order to per
> Try zfs on amd64 unless your app doesn't work well with zfs or your
does zfs have RELIABLE and USABLE software allowing to efficiently backup
large filesystems to other media? (DVD's, tapes, other hard discs)
Zfs has send/receive where you can do snapshots and send them to a
different host. T
> > we have a FreeBSD 7.0 NFS client (csup today, built world and kernel).
> > It mounts a Solaris 10 NFS share.
> > We have bad performance with 7.0 (3MB/s).
> > We have tried both UDP and TCP mounts, both sync and async.
> > This is our mount:
> >
> > nest.xx.xx:/data/export/hosts/bsd7.xx.xx/ /mn
Hi.
I'm trying to nfs-mount a FreeBSD 5.1 client on a
Redhat 7.3 nfs-server. I have the line
nfs_client_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf and
nfsclient.ko is loaded.
The error I get is
[udp] nfs-srv:/mount/a: RPCMNT: clnt_create: RPC:
Program not registered
The mount-command is
mount_nfs -o port=204
11 matches
Mail list logo
