Steve Bertrand wrote:
Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote:
Am Donnerstag 04 Oktober 2007 22:16:29 schrieb Steve Bertrand:
This is what I am afraid of. Just out of curiosity, if I did try to read
the entire file into a Perl variable all at once, would the box panic,
or as the saying goes 'what could po
Gary Kline wrote:
Hi Folks,
Recently, a storm happened and the power surge blew me
off-line. Time to get serious about buying a UPS that will
handle my four main servers for at-most, a 10-second power
outage. After that, shut down my computers. It took me 90
m
Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
Rob wrote:
think. Most the draw in a residence is the HVAC.
what is this? HVAC?
Heating and air conditioning, I believe. No?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
Jona Joachim wrote:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:12:49 -0400
"E. J. Cerejo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not anymore! Every time I cvsup my ports tree and I see all of those
ports that need to be updated my belly aches and that's because
portupgrade doesn't work the way it used to work. It is not
I was curious with the information coming out regarding FreeBSD 7 what
option are available for virtualizing other OS's using FreeBSD as a host.
I've been running several servers (Windows of various versions and a
Linux system) as virtual machines under VMWare Server for Linux for
about a year
Erik Osterholm wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:57:20PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
There's a donation box on
http://www.rsync.net/resources/notices/2007cb.html for developers to get
VMWare Workstation working on FreeBSD but the status of the project is
unknown. There's also some indication someon
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Hi everyone, sorry for the off-topic, but im ready to pull the last hairs off
my head- a few months I downloaded an open source disk clone program for a
friend of mine but it was like 3 am, it worked great booted from floppy and
cloned the drive-
Now that I really need I
Rob wrote:
I am usually not the one to bring up these things but I feel very
strongly about this. Starting Monday, November 12 this website is
offering a give one get one deal. I believe the money will be well
invested. YMMV
http://xogiving.org/
I have to agree with many posters, this project i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007 2:52 PM, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am usually not the one to bring up these things but I feel very
strongly about this. Starting Monday, November 12 this website is
offering a give one get one deal. I believe the money will be well
invested. YMMV
h
David Benfell wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:31:51 -0500, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
We have adults who can't be bothered to tell the difference
between lose and loose in writing. Wonderful things encouraged by people
justifying their lazy writing styles.
This might be slightly unfai
Robert Huff wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
You're right in that top posting is a savings in effort.
I disagree. It's not a savings, it's a transfer - moves the
work from the poster to the reader.
Okay, I'll qualify my statement by saying it is a time a
Brent Jones wrote:
I for one prefer top posting, as usually I have read a particular thread
enough times that I like to cut to the chase and read the new input
without having to scroll down, sometimes navigating an endless nesting
of >>> For me, reading through top posted replies saves time an
Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
eBoundHost: Artur wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 08:12:36PM -0600, eBoundHost: Artur wrote:
1) first of all, i don't think that freebsd operating system is an
appropriate forum to express political views. so whether we are for
or against censorship or democra
Peo Nilsson wrote:
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 18:13 +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
it was the fascism that lost the war. He discarded his country for his
fascism.
*No* humans *win* any kind of "war".
They *all* loose...
Loose? Catch them then.
___
f
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Tuesday, November 27, 2007 01:19:50 -0500 "Aryeh M. Friedman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Beastie's Law:
Any demand of a modification of FreeBSD or it's website
using political incorrectness as
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
ls | wc
strange. i did
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/b]$ a=0;while [ $a -lt 1 ];do mkdir $a;a=$[a+1];done
completed <25 seconds on 1Ghz CPU
ls takes 0.1 seconds user time, ls -l takes 0.3 second user time.
unless you have 486/33 or slower system there is something wrong.
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
We started using FreeBSD for some network monitoring, but have found
that a hard reboot forces us to answer filesytem questions on boot. Is
there a way to mount each filesystem without this? Or how can we use
FreeBSD in a remote location without needing to intervene in
si
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I think I will just set the rc.conf variable to answer "Y" to fsck
questions unless there is a better way.
A side note, this system has been hard shutdown two times and each time
required intervention. We also use several Linux system ( reiserfs and
ext3 ) and raely do I
Chris Els wrote:
Chris Els
Mail :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: 011-542 1110
Cell : 082 783 7999
Fax: 0866975698
- PLEASE NOTE -
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed.
Your
On Jan 18, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Matias wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the essential difference
between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for instance)?
Where can I find any list of differences?
What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs Linux?
Greetings
Greg
_
On Feb 8, 2006, at 11:02 PM, Brian Astill wrote:
Greetings, all.
Can anyone help with this issue?
Person with deteriorating vision has discovered Dragon
Naturally Speaking which not only allows the construction of text
from speech but can also speak from received text. ie letter writing
and e
On Feb 10, 2006, at 9:50 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-02-10 09:44, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As long as the "new" slice had enough space, geometry shouldn't
matter to dump|restore
Right :) It also allows restoring in a
On Feb 10, 2006, at 11:11 AM, Peter wrote:
--- Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 10, 2006, at 9:50 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-02-10 09:44, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As long as the &quo
On Feb 17, 2006, at 8:23 AM, Kristian Vaaf wrote:
At 13:11 17.02.2006, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kristian
Vaaf
>Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:06 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: How would you imp
I'm totally drawing a blank on where to start out on this.
If I have a list of URLs like
http://www.happymountain.com/archive/digest.gif
How could I use Awk or Sed to strip everything after the .com? Or is
there a "better" way to do it? I'd like to just pipe the information
from the logs to
On Mar 6, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/6/06, Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm totally drawing a blank on where to start out on this.
If I have a list of URLs like
http://www.happymountain.com/archive/digest.gif
How could I use Awk or Sed to strip every
On Mar 24, 2006, at 3:05 PM, Oliver Iberien wrote:
I have never been on a list from which I have received as much help as
this
one, which raises a question for me. I would like to thank the people
who
post questions to my answers, such as the fellow below, but don't want
to
spam people's inbo
On Jun 15, 2004, at 11:20 AM, Chris Lynch wrote:
This thread cracks me up. No matter how many times the same subject
has been
brought up, I still can't stop laughing at the silliness of it all.
Maybe FreeBSD should make a fuzzy bunny that does a happy dance...but,
then
we'd be stepping on the Eas
On Jun 19, 2004, at 3:26 AM, Michael W. Oliver wrote:
On 2004-06-18T23:17:14-0700, Joe Schmoe wrote:
So the question is, has any person, anywhere, at any
time, successfully installed 5.2.1-RELEASE on any
hardware whatsoever ? Or is it just a practical joke
release ?
That's a tad caustic, don't you
On Aug 4, 2004, at 4:11 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
we are currently developing a small program/service for our customers
exactly for this purpose.
To just backup the data to a remote server is very easy, even on
Windows:
Use cygwin. It comes together w
On Aug 4, 2004, at 1:44 PM, Chris Shenton wrote:
Tim Aslat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Try one of the multitude of rsync based scripts, you can even get some
very good incremental backups happening,
I have been thinking about this for my own use. One problem with
basic rsync is that if (say) I tra
On Aug 10, 2004, at 6:25 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
Here's a good reason to top-post: I'm referring to the message as a
whole, rather than to the content.
What reference to a whole? Whole what?
This message came in while I was writing my previous message in this
thread. It shows *exactly* the
On Dec 22, 2004, at 12:29 PM, P. B. S. wrote:
I'm talking about 1 (one) computer! The FreeBSD partition is on the
same hard disk; the 2 operating systems are not working at the same
time. Samba, ftp, scp, etc. are not applicable here.
That's why I mentioned explore2fs... I wanted to be clear.
Wha
On Dec 22, 2004, at 1:42 PM, Joshua Lokken wrote:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 13:02:42 -0500, Bart Silverstrim
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 22, 2004, at 12:29 PM, P. B. S. wrote:
I'm talking about 1 (one) computer! The FreeBSD partition is on the
same hard disk; the 2 operating syst
On Jan 5, 2005, at 10:43 PM, Tom Vilot wrote:
Mark wrote:
So, we know BSD is capable of stupidly high uptime, but what
I'd like to know is how? I mean, we all have to patch things
now and again, recompile kernels etc. Does this mean these
sites are running thousand-day-old unpatched kernels,...
Yep
On Jan 5, 2005, at 5:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The "tranquility" of this list is apparently because the people on
this list
are too technically incompetent to realize how badly botched 5.x is.
"thank you master, thank you for helping me get my mouse working, let
me kiss your boots"
Quick
On Jan 21, 2005, at 4:02 AM, Stijn Hoop wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 05:22:36AM -0800, Sandy Rutherford wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:57:21 -0800,
"Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
This did teach me a lesson that I kind of knew already but
didn't think too much about. That is, a so
On Mar 7, 2005, at 10:05 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Jerry McAllister writes:
The only real thing you can do is to read back the tape and look
for a couple of files with fairly high inode numbers for each file
system dumped.If you can read them, you can assume the tape
is readable.
I'm surpris
I'm trying to set up postfix to reject messages to two specific
usernames on our domains. The FreeBSD server is taking the messages,
checking them for spam and viruses, then forwarding them on to our
internal mail server.
In the /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf file, I added the line:
smtpd_reci
On Mar 9, 2005, at 10:56 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Wednesday, March 09, 2005 10:43:05 AM -0500 Bart Silverstrim
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I then ran the commands
postmap /usr/local/etc/postfix/access
Should be:
postmap hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/access
man (1) postmap
I was runni
On Mar 9, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Jim Trigg wrote:
On Wed, March 9, 2005 10:43 am, Bart Silverstrim said:
In the /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf file, I added the line:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/access
Then using tail -f /var/log/maillog, I got the
On Mar 9, 2005, at 11:54 PM, Mike Hauber wrote:
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 10:53 pm, Luciano Musacchio wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering, how does this mailing list doesn't get any spam?
:), I need to set some filter on my mail server, can some one
here give me a hint on this?
thanks
heh... I'm working on
On Mar 11, 2005, at 1:34 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
Atkielski
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 3:25 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: how to deal with spam for good?
There's no
fundament
On Mar 11, 2005, at 1:37 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kirk Strauser
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 11:42 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: how to deal with spam for good?
You know, I'm no longer
On Mar 10, 2005, at 10:44 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Kris Kennaway writes:
Isn't this a non-problem if you use ntpd?
Unfortunately, no, because the TCP stacks on most systems don't use the
disciplined clock provided by NTP for the timestamps. Instead they use
a clock based directly on the RTC, w
On Mar 13, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Martin Schweizer wrote:
Hello
I've two X server: a client and a server. How I can contact from the
client
the server (I read some articles but did not find a solution)? I can
successfully start X applications over SSH but I can't contact the
xdm. What
do I wrong?
What
On Mar 12, 2005, at 2:45 PM, Chris wrote:
Aperez wrote:
Hello everybdody
I read an interview of Linus Torvald made by Linux Magazine. In that
interview Linus mentioned the following:
"On the other hand, no, Linux does not have that stupid notion of
having totally separate kernel development for
On Mar 13, 2005, at 4:34 PM, Loren M. Lang wrote:
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 01:24:42PM -0500, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Mar 12, 2005, at 2:45 PM, Chris wrote:
Aperez wrote:
Hello everybdody
I read an interview of Linus Torvald made by Linux Magazine. In that
interview Linus mentioned the following
On Mar 12, 2005, at 4:44 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 11, 2005, at 1:37 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kirk
Strauser Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 11:42 AM
To: freebsd-questions@free
On Mar 13, 2005, at 3:46 PM, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:38 pm, you wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:05 pm, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote:
If I just do:
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile && portmanager -u
Do I need portupgrade at all then?
Thanks.
Not for u
On Mar 14, 2005, at 12:38 AM, Martin Schweizer wrote:
Hello Bart
Am Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 01:20:14PM -0500 Bart Silverstrim schrieb:
On Mar 13, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Martin Schweizer wrote:
Hello
I've two X server: a client and a server. How I can contact from the
client
the server (I read
On Mar 14, 2005, at 7:39 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-03-13 16:53, Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On the contrary, there are numerous cases when local patches, specific
to the distribution of Linux that is used, are used:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lv
On Mar 18, 2005, at 6:23 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
I log in from a remote windows computer on my school using PuTTY w/
ssh2. What I'd like to know is how *safe* is the login from this
windows
machine? I mean, can my login to my FreeBSD server at home be
*monitored* by someone while I'm using this
On Mar 18, 2005, at 10:12 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
On 18 Mar Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Mar 18, 2005, at 6:23 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
I log in from a remote windows computer on my school using PuTTY w/
ssh2. What I'd like to know is how *safe* is the login from this
windows machine?
I
On Mar 20, 2005, at 1:18 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Duo writes:
And you failed to answer his question. Why not stop trying to avoid
it by
answering it.
I did answer it. I asked for a product that provides ALL the features
of Exchange. And he surely knows what all of the features of Exchange
ar
On Mar 20, 2005, at 4:03 PM, Duo wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Duo writes:
And yes, looking for non MS solutions, for the sake of it, is a valid
choice.
Not for many corporate managers. They don't care whether it's
Microsoft
or not, as long as it's the best tool for the job
On Mar 20, 2005, at 11:10 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Duo writes:
And now that embrace and extend has worked, Exchange, sits fairly
stagnant.
If it does the job, it doesn't have to change.
Then why new versions?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Mar 21, 2005, at 10:19 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Freminlins writes:
Alternatively, show us it is not a firmware problem first.
It ran for eight years without errors.
It's not throwing darts, it's sensible advice. NT is ancient, like
your firmware no doubt.
So your saying an anciety copy of NT
On Mar 22, 2005, at 1:14 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony -
I'm curious - with the issues you are having with the drives (SCSI
I think you mentioned) have you considered these ideas?
1. Upgrade the system BIOS
2. Upgrade the firmware in the SCSI controller
3. Upg
On Mar 22, 2005, at 4:13 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
I have told him to go into his Vectra BIOS and limit the sync
negotiation
on both disk drives to the same speed - 10Mbt. He refuses to try
doing
this.
You're incorrect. I have _already_ done it, at your suggestion; i
On Mar 22, 2005, at 4:25 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Freminlins writes:
On a different OS.
Exactly. With _identical_ hardware. So if the hardware ran under the
other OS, but not under this OS, where do you look first for the
problem?
Depends on the problem. Windows 98 needed more reboots than N
On Mar 22, 2005, at 5:26 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Freminlins writes:
So stick with NT. Why would you change from something that runs
perfectly for 8 years?
I was able to retire the legacy applications on the machine and I
wanted
to try something new.
And you ran into a snag that you can't work
On Mar 22, 2005, at 5:40 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Peter Risdon writes:
2. Does a version of FreeBSD that is contemporary with NT and your
machine (ancient, unsupported, like NT) drive this hardware OK?
I don't know. Why should I have to run an eight-year-old version of
FreeBSD?
Instead of a fi
On Mar 22, 2005, at 5:46 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
That is also when I discovered how Microsoft gets away with telling the
world that they will fix any problem that you call into their
$250-and-incident
tech support people. If you present them with a problem they cannot
figure out, they will jus
On Mar 22, 2005, at 6:39 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Peter Risdon writes:
You _are_ trying to run a version of FreeBSD equivalent to 2003/XP.
No, I'm just running FreeBSD 5.3. It has nothing to do with Windows.
This seems to be evidence that you're intentionally being obtuse.
Are you incapable of
On Mar 22, 2005, at 4:21 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
There is a third option. Microsoft can simply quite releasing new
versions of it's established products and go to work creating new
products that people would want to buy.
That business model doesn't work, which is why n
On Mar 22, 2005, at 10:19 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
Or it gave warnings that NT didn't. Or it showed problems that NT
didn't.
Unless someone can tell me what these messages mean, they are useless
to
me, warnings or not.
If it worked so well, why not put
On Mar 22, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
Depends on the problem. Windows 98 needed more reboots than NT did on
the same hardware. By your comparison they should be the same in
reliability and performance, no?
No, by my comparison they should experience the
On Mar 22, 2005, at 10:49 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
And you ran into a snag that you can't work through.
Yes, at least not with the time I have available.
Classic tune. I play it a lot too.
Most people if they were doing this on a lark would either replace the
har
On Mar 22, 2005, at 11:05 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
Instead of a five year old version of Windows? :-)
Why should it matter?
Comprehension on this matter is a little lagging. I seem to recall you
said you went from Windows 2000 (it's what, 5 years old?) to
On Mar 22, 2005, at 11:50 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
Obvious concern is that it is a warning that something's wrong (or not
set up correctly) and it may fail or cause problems down the road.
Who can tell me _exactly_ what it means?
I don't know...I'm n
On Mar 24, 2005, at 10:30 AM, Bob Johnson wrote:
Peter Risdon wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 10:05 +0100, Josh Ockert wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:51:51 +, Peter Risdon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 08:54 +0100, Josh Ockert wrote:
I've noticed that nobody responds negatively t
On Mar 24, 2005, at 12:34 PM, Peter Risdon wrote:
From: Peter Risdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: March 24, 2005 12:31:36 PM EST
To: Bob Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Josh Ockert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mot de passe root
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 10:30 -0500, Bob Johnson wrote:
No, I'm sorry b
On Mar 24, 2005, at 2:34 PM, Peter Risdon wrote:
I have no idea why you're trying to misrepresent what I was saying.
It's
starting to feel mildly bizarre.
You say this as if it is the first time, being a system admin, you have
had this feeling...
___
f
On Mar 27, 2005, at 11:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Firstly, anyone who uses their own server for lists is
a complete idiot.
Do you have an actual reason to back up this assertion?
Are you trying to insult everyone
who has found AOL or Yahoo or Gmail to be more
convenient for not clogging their
On Mar 27, 2005, at 11:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently you can't read. I didn't say you were an
idiot for running your own server.
Can't read what? I'm not sure what line you're specifically
referencing here, probably because you didn't inline the comment. But
that's okay...we'll use
On Mar 26, 2005, at 2:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the kind of disinformation I have been
referring to
What in particular are you referring to?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On Mar 26, 2005, at 5:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the theory is very nice; you've done a nice
job reading Intel's marketing garb.
What theory? All I see is "On Mar 26, 2005, at 5:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:"
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.o
On Mar 27, 2005, at 7:01 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chris writes:
Tell that to the MS developers then - perhaps they will listen to you.
Done.
What did they say?
Tell them to stop producing bloated code.
I've tried, but that is both a tendency of many developers (especially
PC developers) and a
On Mar 28, 2005, at 3:08 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chris Warren writes:
I'm not an NT fan myself, but from reading your past posts, it seems
to
do everything you need far better than freebsd. Why not just stick
with
NT/2k? Just curious.
I wanted to diversify my experience.
In arguing?
___
On Mar 28, 2005, at 9:21 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chris writes:
Yay! *claps*
Isn't that what Ted has been telling you to an extent - that it's the
HP/Compaq microcode in the drivers?
No. He and most other people have been trying to convince me that it's
defective hardware, and not a deficiency
On Mar 29, 2005, at 9:28 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chris writes:
I disagree - If FBSD does not (or did not) know of the HP/Compaq
tweakes
in the microcode, how can you claim it's broken?
Because it works with Windows NT.
If a machine with a gig of memory runs fine under DOS but actually has
a
On Mar 29, 2005, at 11:09 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
What did they say?
MS developers are much like most other developers: it's never their
fault.
From the way you were complaining, I had the impression that MS was
bending backwards to help in issues while the Fr
On Mar 29, 2005, at 11:18 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
I think, correct me if I'm wrong Ted (et al), that he's saying the
microcode in the hardware was modified, thus has a bug proprietary to
the HP implementation of that controller, and the driver/interface in
On Mar 29, 2005, at 11:23 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
If a machine with a gig of memory runs fine under DOS but actually has
a bad big of memory hardware near the 512 meg address range, it would
probably still run "flawlessly" for a very very long time...
This m
On Mar 29, 2005, at 11:25 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Duo writes:
Does it work on an Apple Friggin IIe?
?
Apple IIe? you've never heard of it?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On Mar 29, 2005, at 1:50 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chris writes:
No - NOT the PC - the hardware that's in question. The Adaptec WITH
the
modified code. I'm willing to bet, it's not.
Should I check for restrictions on chipset temperature, relative
humidity, and atmospheric pressure as well?
Are
On Mar 29, 2005, at 2:01 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
He is saying that the microcode was modified and that we speculate
that
the mods contain a bug proprietary to the HP implementation of that
controller.
What makes it a _bug_? Why would the modified firmware contain a b
On Mar 29, 2005, at 4:03 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
It's deduction.
It can't be. There's nothing to deduct from.
Your description of the problem.
Tell me again what those messages said, exactly?
Can't. I didn't tell you the first time.
Reall
On Mar 30, 2005, at 2:00 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
Can I use dd to copy an *.exe file from ~/ to my floppy;
then have present the file to a:\ under DOG?
Don't know...don't think so easily, though. Wouldn't it be easier to
use something like mtools?
__
I had (have?) several packages in the ports collection that needed
updating, and recently someone in the list was talking about using
portmanager -u to save on problems with updating; it doesn't touch the
ports database, it won't mess up the collection, it walks dependencies
automagically,
On Jan 26, 2005, at 4:38 AM, cali wrote:
I had (have?) several packages in the ports collection that needed
updating, and recently someone in the list was talking about using
portmanager -u to save on problems with updating; it doesn't touch
the ports database, it won't mess up the collection, i
On Jan 26, 2005, at 10:40 AM, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Thanks Bart for your patience, this one required me to set up
XFree86-4 on a FreeBSD 4.11 machine and back date all of the ports.
Perfectly understandable and I thank you for the efforts you're going
through to get portmanager updated so quick
On Jan 31, 2005, at 1:53 PM, Billy Newsom wrote:
Jerry McAllister wrote:
Well, I guess I completely do not understand what you are asking.
From anything I can get from what you write here, its behavior is
normal and expected. What is the problem and what are you trying to
fix or to get it to do?
On Feb 2, 2005, at 4:49 PM, Erik Norgaard wrote:
Sorry to join in on the noise:
=quote=
This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy
On Feb 5, 2005, at 3:01 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Erik Norgaard
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 11:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: favor
Mike Hauber wrote:
Fact is, t
On Feb 7, 2005, at 3:34 AM, markzero wrote:
* Erik Trulsson [2005-02-05 23:55 +0100]
Also keep in mind that if you leave the computer running all the
time
it will show up on your electricity bill, so if you wish to save
power
you should shut down your computer over night.
Given that your house
On Feb 7, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Eric Kjeldergaard wrote:
EK> Let us make an analogue betwixt our Valerie and one who submits
to the
EK> local newspaper. There is a roughly equal level of consent given
in
EK> both cases ...
Not so, on two points: (1) the newspaper is obviously available to
anyone (
On Feb 7, 2005, at 11:37 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Eric Kjeldergaard writes:
EK> To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the
EK> freebsd-questions Archives.
EK>
EK> Since we are discussing implicit contracts, I would think that the
EK> announcement that the collection of prior
On Feb 11, 2005, at 2:18 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
That is so not true that it makes me almost as angry as the original
debate.
Maybe getting angry about a mere logo is a bad sign.
Just to sum up things as I understand it...
People want to change the logo from Beastie to
1 - 100 of 328 matches
Mail list logo
