Starting Apache 2.0.52 in rc.conf under FreeBSD 5.3

2004-12-25 Thread Anthony Atkielski
I installed Apache 2.0.52 on my fresh reinstallation of FreeBSD 5.3, but I can't figure out how the new rc.conf system works. How do I set things up so I can start Apache in rc.conf? I installed Apache directly from the downloaded source rather than from the ports, so this wasn't done automatical

Using healthd at securelevel 3

2004-12-26 Thread Anthony Atkielski
I started setting securelevel=3 at boot, and I notice that healthd refuses to run, giving the message "InitMBInfo: Operation not permitted" even from root. I assume this is because of the higher securelevel. Is there a way to make healthd work with this higher level (assuming that's the problem)?

Re: Starting Apache 2.0.52 in rc.conf under FreeBSD 5.3

2004-12-28 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Bill Moran writes: BM> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-rcng.html BM> BM> Unfortunatly, this document doesn't fully explain how /usr/local/etc/rc.d BM> has changed, but it's a good start nonetheless. More can be gleaned BM> by following the links to other ma

Re: Starting Apache 2.0.52 in rc.conf under FreeBSD 5.3

2004-12-28 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Joshua Lokken writes: JL> I have apache2 working fine on FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p13. JL> In /etc/rc.conf I have a line that reads: JL> JL> apache2_enable="YES" JL> JL> and in /usr/local/etc/rc.d, I have: JL> JL> -rwxr-x--x 1 root wheel 183 Dec 28 13:55 000.apache2libs.sh JL> -rwxr-x--x 1 root

Re: Starting Apache 2.0.52 in rc.conf under FreeBSD 5.3

2004-12-29 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Joshua Lokken writes: JL> # cat /usr/local/etc/rc.d/000.apache2libs.sh [...] Thanks. I couldn't get that to work, either. After trying several things, I finally copied the moused script and modified that, and cooked up something that seems to work. So I guess the problem is solved, even if it

Running top on system console without being logged on

2005-01-03 Thread Anthony Atkielski
I'd like to run top on the system console to keep an eye on the system, but I'd prefer not to have the console logged on to do so. Is there an elegant way to do this? I know I can start top and redirect output to /dev/console and detach it from the current terminal with "top -s 3 >/dev/console &"

Re: Running top on system console without being logged on

2005-01-05 Thread Anthony Atkielski
> How about creating a user like this with vipw: > topper::userno:groupno::0:0:Topper Harley:/nonexistent:/usr/bin/top > and then just logging in on spare console screen as topper? > > I'm not sure if there are security implications though, even if the user > is not member of the wheel group etc.

Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java

2005-01-05 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Tom Vilot writes: TV> I prefer to use just about any other tool (except, of course, for TV> JSP/.NET, etc). Python, Perl, ... any other tool will do the jobs I TV> need done and I can avoid the sluggishness of Java, the licensing TV> ambiguities, and the dependence on a company that is *not* a TV>

Re: Running top on system console without being logged on

2005-01-06 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Reko Turja writes: RT> Actually not command line options as such, but you can make a login RT> class for the top user in /etc/login.conf and feed the options via TOP RT> environment variable from there. RT> RT> You cant shell out from top and renicing from non root account is RT> impossible (exce

Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java

2005-01-06 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Dick Davies writes: DD> The phrase 'Java is the COBOL of the nineties' springs to mind At least COBOL served a useful purpose (and still does). -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f

Re: Hardware or OS problem? System Crashing...

2005-01-06 Thread Anthony Atkielski
I had a very similar problem over the holidays. After a power failure over a month ago, I noticed some anomalies in FreeBSD, but they were very insidious and didn't seem like hardware (and the system was on a UPS plus a surge protector, so I didn't think the PF alone could have done damage, unless

Is there a problem with syslogd -a?

2005-01-07 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Is there any kind of problem with syslogd and the -a option? I've tried all sorts of variations (-a 10.0.0.x, -a 10.0.0.x/24, -a myrouter.mydomain, -a myrouter.mydomain/24, etc.) and it just doesn't seem to let anything through. Starting syslogd without any option works (my router can write to the

Re: Is there a problem with syslogd -a?

2005-01-07 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Rob writes: R> On 5.3, I have following in rc.conf: R> syslogd_flags="-a 192.168.123.0/24 -b 192.168.123.254" R> R> on the machine that has IP 192.168.123.254. R> It serves a cluster of 192.168.123.X with X = 1 to 7 R> R> /etc/syslog.conf on the 192.168.123.X PCs has: R>*.* @192.168.123.

Re: Reboot fails: 5 beeps and a freeze

2005-01-08 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Billy Newsom writes: BN> ...and that's all I ever see. But while this is being printed to the BN> screen, I get five beeps. I don't remember that many beeps in FreeBSD 4.x. BN> BN> BEEP, beep beep beep, BEEP See http://bioscentral.com for a list of beep codes for many different BIOS. Most BIOS

Re: Freebsd 5.3 Performance

2005-01-09 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Robert Watson writes: RW> All I know is that the XP bits don't crash every week, they crash every RW> three weeks. :-) My NT4 box crashed almost continuously. I have three machines, running FreeBSD, NT, and XP. All of them will run until I boot them. They don't crash, or at least I can't reme

Re: Freebsd 5.3 Performance

2005-01-09 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Mark writes: M> Ah, this point fascinates me. Running for years? Do you ever have M> to recompile your kernel? :) Usually once when I first install the OS, then never again (unless I change something in the hardware, which I hardly ever do). Windows often has to be rebooted just to install a new

Re: Freebsd 5.3 Performance

2005-01-09 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Robert Watson writes: RW> The problems I have on the Windows XP platform appear to come from a RW> lack of robustness in the face of nasty application failure. A problem with the Windows environment as a whole is that applications tend to assume that they have the entire machine to themselves, an

Copying directory trees only for new files

2005-01-09 Thread Anthony Atkielski
What's the safest and most elegant way to copy an entire directory tree such that only newer files and directories are actually copied? Essentially I have one directory that contains my test version of my Web site, and another directory that contains the production version of the site. Normally t

Re: Copying directory trees only for new files

2005-01-09 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Giorgos Keramidas writes: GK> cpio(1) does that by default ... Looks like that's just what I need--thanks. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any

Re: Copying directory trees only for new files

2005-01-09 Thread Anthony Atkielski
J65nko BSD writes: JB> Have a look at "rsync" http://rsync.samba.org/ It is in ports ;) I did look at it, but cpio seems to do what's required and it's already on the system. Thanks anyway. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Freebsd 5.3 - long uptimes...

2005-01-09 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Chris writes: C> Long uptimes = unsecured+unpatched boxes. C> Long uptimes? No thanks. Most vulnerabilities are in daemons or other programs outside the kernel, so one need not necessarily boot the machine to fix them. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questio

Re: Which OS should we use?

2005-01-11 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Frank J. Laszlo writes: FJL> Yahoo most likely runs some home-brewed version of FreeBSD. highly FJL> customized for their needs. Why do you say that? -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Hyperthreading hurts 5.3?

2005-01-11 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Olivier Nicole writes: ON> Maybe for the same reason you should better not use a non-SMP kernel ON> if you have 2 CPU in your box. Is a hyperthreading CPU identical to a second CPU from the software's standpoint? If not, what are the differences? -- Anthony __

Re: Hyperthreading hurts 5.3?

2005-01-11 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Jonathan Chen writes: JC> Not true on 5.3+ GENERIC systems. If you look at dmesg, you'll see the JC> second virtual CPU launched as well as the extra column in top(1) if JC> you enable HTT in the BIOS. Well, now I'm confusing. I have an Asus P4P800-E Deluxe MB with an Intel P4 processor mounted

Re: Hyperthreading hurts 5.3?

2005-01-12 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Giorgos Keramidas writes: GK> You need to enable SMP too, to allow the FreeBSD kernel to use the GK> second (hyper-threaded) CPU. I found it, in a file called SMP. Why is the SMP option tucked away in a separate file? I stuck this into the config and rebuilt the kernel. Seems to run fine. I see

Re: Hyperthreading hurts 5.3?

2005-01-12 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Scott Bennett writes: SB> Well, no, not exactly. The dual-cored CPUs share certain resources SB> on the chip that are not shared in a multi-CPU situation, and that sharing SB> means certain operations have to be handled differently. An MP setup has SB> separate cache and TLB managment in ea

Re: Hyperthreading hurts 5.3?

2005-01-12 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Giorgos Keramidas writes: GK> The 'separate file' is NOTES. This file is actually the complete GK> reference of options that the kernel supports, so it's not like the SMP GK> option is hidden or something. I must have a magic special version of FreeBSD: # cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf # grep SMP *

Re: Hyperthreading hurts 5.3?

2005-01-12 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Andrea Venturoli writes: AV> FWIW I tried numerical computations on a P4 with HT enabled: I expected AV> using 2 threads might give *at least slightly* better results, but I AV> could come to the conclusion that with 1, 2 or 4 threads the performance AV> gain (or loss) was exactly zero. Where the

Re: Hyperthreading hurts 5.3?

2005-01-12 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Scott Bennett writes: SB> I notice that the 5.2.1 boot messages refer to the second core as an SB> AP, which I'm guessing stands for "attached processor". If that SB> guess is correct, then it means that only the first core is able to SB> perform certain functions, and the AP core has to get the f

Definitions of process states in top

2005-01-12 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Is there someplace where I can find definitions of the process states that I see in the STATE column of top? RUN and CPU1 are easy enough to figure out, but most of the rest are mysterious. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list ht

Re: Hyperthreading hurts 5.3?

2005-01-12 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Olivier Nicole writes: ON> Not always true, I had a P4 1.5 die on me for lack of fan. I understood that all recent Intel processors will first slow the clock and then halt completely if the die temperature rises too much, but there may be exceptions (or perhaps some processors run so hot that the

Re: Hyperthreading hurts 5.3?

2005-01-12 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Subhro writes: S> This *used* to be true. I am using a AMD64 3000+ and the idle S> temperature is 28C. The room temp is around 12-14C. After asking this S> kid to crunch FPs for over 16 hrs, the processor temperature rose to S> only 38C. I am not using any special cooling gears, just the stock S>

Re: Hyperthreading hurts 5.3?

2005-01-13 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Andrea Venturoli writes: AV> Not exactly the same algorithm and on different set of data. But similar machine instructions, perhaps? AV> Yes. Just the contention for the FPU alone might have had the effect of single-threading the workload. That plus the SMP overhead might give you a zero or ne

Re: Hyperthreading hurts 5.3?

2005-01-13 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Olivier Nicole writes: ON> It was dead for good, well it is still dead as a matter of fact :) The AMD processor on my XP system overheated and stalled a few times, before I realized that the (brand-new) fan had failed. It still runs okay now, though, with a reliable fan. The other AMD processor

Re: Memory Question

2005-01-13 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Colin J. Raven writes: CJR> I always understood in FreeBSD that "Free Memory is wasted memory" In any operating system, free memory is wasted memory. But if you suddenly need more memory and you don't have it, system performance will slide right down into the abyss, no matter which OS you are us

Re: Hyperthreading hurts 5.3?

2005-01-13 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Andrea Venturoli writes: AV> I've come to the same conclusion. Still I can't put this together with AV> 100% load on both processors. If, as someone said, there is only one AV> FPU, *how* are these figures coming out??? The operating system tracks a dispatch of a processor into a process thread.

Re: Thank you!

2005-01-13 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Boris Spirialitious writes: BS> Oh, but I do understand! FreeBSD is not good choice for companies BS> that need support for the latest hardware. It's not a question of latest, it's a question of which hardware. FreeBSD, like all operating systems, targets a broad but not universal user base, and

Re: Thank you!

2005-01-14 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Ramiro Aceves writes: RA> So, why do we start always the war? The real war should be against the RA> Bill Gates OSes, instead of fighting among us. Professionals and serious amateurs in IT never wage "wars" at all. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@f

Re: Thank you!

2005-01-14 Thread Anthony Atkielski
lord grinny writes: lg> Don't they?? Then what are all the law suits about? Business. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROT

Re: Thank you!

2005-01-14 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Ramiro Aceves writes: RA> I do not like to start wars among free OSes, I enjoy fighting the RA> Bill OSes. There are plenty of challenging video games on the market if you like to fight. RA> For me, making the war against Bill OSes means using Free Software RA> OSes (Debian, Gentoo, FreeBSD.

Re: Thank you!

2005-01-14 Thread Anthony Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Fac> The entire point of this extended discussion, for those who have Fac> paid attention, is that FreeBSD 4.x, which is admittedly the Fac> fastest version available, DOES NOT work with intel's fastest CPUs Fac> because it doesnt support the necessary chipsets ... While

Re: Thank you!

2005-01-14 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Len Zettel writes: LZ> Better to expend resources on making 5.3 faster than 4.10 on all LZ> chipsets or retrofit 4.10 to the new ones? New OS versions should always provide either better functionality with the same performance, or better performance with the same functionality. Ideally they'd pro

Re: Backups / Dump etc

2005-01-14 Thread Anthony Atkielski
John writes: J> If you are running FreeBSD 5.x, you get the cool "L" option on J> dump which will automatically snapshot the mounted filesystems. What exactly is meant by a "snapshot," and how much extra disk space does it require when dump runs? I've seen the warnings when I run dump on a runni

Re: Thank you!

2005-01-14 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Paul Schmehl writes: PS> Not to pick a nit...well, ok...to pick a nit...developers do not PS> support systems. Support organizations do. If you're going to be PS> using FreeBSD in a corporate environment then you need to find a PS> good *support* company that can backstop your local admins. *Then*

Re: FreeBSD I LOVE YOU

2005-01-19 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Xian writes: X> I installed FreeBSD on a machine with an Athlon 3200 that I accident under X> clocked to 1.4GHz. I didn't notice for quite a while as the performance was X> amazing any way. It didn't half go some when I put the clock speed up to X> 2.2GHz. I think people nowadays forget how fast

Re: FreeBSD I LOVE YOU

2005-01-19 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Jorn Argelo writes: JA> Either way, I never want another server OS again. This is great. If I had to install a dozen more servers today, they would all get FreeBSD. It makes extremely good use of whatever hardware you care to give it. Indeed, FreeBSD can turn even junky old PCs into productive

Re: FreeBSD I LOVE YOU

2005-01-19 Thread Anthony Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Fac> I think the "junky old PC" market is just what the current FreeBSD "team" Fac> is targeting. At least someone is thinking of it. There are a lot of PCs out there that are still in perfect working order, but are too slow to run the hugely bloated desktop operating s

Re: FreeBSD I LOVE YOU

2005-01-19 Thread Anthony Atkielski
faisal gillani writes: fg> hmmm exactly right .. u know i have a 750MHz At halon fg> with 256MB ram .. & still my processor is 80% idle fg> most of the time .. fg> i also have some windows server on my network but fg> thats a compulsory rather then choice . I'm gradually migrating legacy aps off

Re: Security for webserver behind router?

2005-01-19 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Jay O'Brien writes: JOB> Thanks, but what I want to know is what risk I have with port 80, JOB> and only port 80 open. The risk depends on Apache, since that's the daemon answering the phone when someone calls in on port 80. Just make sure you're using the latest version of Apache (1.3.33, if y

Re: FreeBSD I LOVE YOU

2005-01-19 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Mike Jeays writes: MJ> I presume you have tried changing the boot order in the BIOS settings? MJ> You should be able to make the CD or floppy drive come ahead of the hard MJ> disk in the boot sequence. Yes, I've tried lots of stuff. It's a HP motherboard and apparently a HP BIOS. I've tried all

Re: FreeBSD I LOVE YOU

2005-01-19 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Giorgos Keramidas writes: GK> I've seen Windows machines "lose" CD-ROM or floppy drives, on perfectly GK> working systems. You may find that booting the installation CD-ROM of GK> some FreeBSD version locates the floppy drive just fine. The problem is external to Windows. The machine won't even

Re: FreeBSD I LOVE YOU

2005-01-19 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Matthias Buelow writes: MB> And where do you think would they "find" this "junk PC"? The first world could send it to them, instead of throwing perfectly good PCs into a landfill. MB> Don't you think that's a bit condescending? No, I think it's pretty realistic. Right now a lot of completely u

Re: FreeBSD I LOVE YOU

2005-01-20 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Scott Bennett writes: SB> The recent discussion in this thread causes me to wonder whether SB> FreeBSD's performance on older, slower equipment could be a SB> contributing factor to why hardware vendors like Dell and ATI are SB> willing to provide only limited support for LINUX and none at all SB>

Re: FreeBSD I LOVE YOU

2005-01-20 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Giorgos Keramidas writes: GK> This is likely too. Floppies have mechanical moving parts that are GK> more prone to failure than other pieces of hardware. The eerie part is that the diskette drive worked find right up until the moment where I tried to boot from it. Now it doesn't seem to work at

Re: FreeBSD I LOVE YOU

2005-01-20 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Colin J. Raven writes: CJR> Eh? Surely you don't meant trashed - physically annihilated? Absolutely. That's the only safe way to protect data. Any disk drive with platters that are even remotely intact can still be read. I have yet to throw away any disk drives for this reason (can't find a co

Re: FreeBSD I LOVE YOU

2005-01-20 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Colin J. Raven writes: CJR> I always thought that formatting/fdisk'ing twice completely erased CJR> *permanently* whatever had been on the disc. Information can be recovered from disks even after a dozen or more overwrites. The data is never safe with the platters intact. -- Anthony

Re: FreeBSD I LOVE YOU

2005-01-20 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Matthias Buelow writes: MB> Wake up from your pipe dreams. Shipping decommissioned computers to the MB> 3rd world is not going to solve any development problem. It helps solve an environmental problem, though. And they need not be shipped anywhere. It is sufficient to just continue using them,

Re: FreeBSD I LOVE YOU

2005-01-20 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Matthew Seaman writes: MS> If your drive contains or once contained military secrets, then in the MS> USA and probably anywhere in the West, standard disposal procedure is MS> that the drive be completely overwritten with specific patterns of MS> random data several times, and then taken to a secu

Re: FreeBSD I LOVE YOU

2005-01-20 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Erik Norgaard writes: EN> Many larger companies have a fixed upgrading schedule, a pc lives 3 EN> years. One must wonder why. After all, they don't rebuild their offices every three years (although some seem to replace company cars fairly quickly--but mostly due to wear and tear, I presume, whic

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Pat Maddox writes: > I forgot to give a bit of info. My local machine has the correct time > of 10:05PM, and the server has the correct time of 11:05PM. If I send > an email from a mail account on the server to gmail, it has the > correct time. If I send an email from gmail back to the server,

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
John writes: > I suppose I'm nit-picking here, but you would cron it rather than running it > by hand. It's mostly the space that I prefer not to part with. > How much space have you got to play with? About 2 GB total remaining on /usr. Just installing X stuff gobbled up a few hundred megabyte

Re: Constant mysterious SCSI errors

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Dan Nelson writes: > Try lowering the max tags for that drive: "camcontrol tags da0 -N 32". Tried it. I still get the same error; it doesn't seem to have diminished. I get the "queue full" stuff in bursts, then the process trying to do the I/O stalls, then after 30-40 seconds I get one of those

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Pat Maddox writes: > I've included the headers of messages from both Gmail and Hotmail, to > show that it's not on Gmail's end. Also, here's the output from date: > %date > Sun Feb 27 02:42:21 CET 2005 That can't be right. You sent your message in reply to a message I sent at 9:34 CET. The tim

Re: Is Yahoo! moving from FreeBSD?

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Ted Mittelstaedt writes: > Cisco's online knowledgebase is far superior. Since Cisco equipment is outside my budget, I've never had any occasion to look at theirs, but I'll take your word for it. (Then again, hopefully I wouldn't _need_ the knowledgebase if I had Cisco gear.) -- Anthony

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Pat Maddox writes: > Alright, I got it all working now. Not sure how to change the time > zone with config files, so I just used sysinstall to change it to MST > (time zone is arbitrary, but since this is the zone I live in, it's > convenient for me). Well, no, time zone isn't arbitrary, it need

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Ramiro Aceves writes: > If you have 2 GB remaining in /usr, install the ports tree, it will eat > about 350 MB. I tried it. The system generates so many SCSI errors that it panics before the entire tree is installed. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-question

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Leonard Zettel writes: > My own experiences have given me a definite bias toward using the > ports system to compile stuff to be added to my system rather than > going with the binary packages. I get the impression that many > port maintainers who are fairly careful about keeping their port > ver

Re: recovering lost data

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I have a question in regards to file recovery, to be precise, recovering > an entire directory [with files] that may have been deleted/moved. Just restore from backup. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing

WRITE_DMA errors on SATA drive under 5.3-RELEASE

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
I've gotten two messages like the ones below today on my production server (5.3-RELEASE): messages:Feb 27 14:48:17 freebie kernel: ad10: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=4848803 messages:Feb 27 14:48:17 freebie kernel: ad10: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA timed out What do these messages m

Odd message from cron daemon

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
I get an e-mail like the following every eleven minutes on my test system: = From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 27 16:55:00 2005 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:55:00 +0100 (CET) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj

Re: WRITE_DMA errors on SATA drive under 5.3-RELEASE

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Theoretically, one could use 'fsdb -r' in a scripted manner, to > generate a mapping of file names to blocks (relative to the partition > of the file system you are mapping). Once you have the blocks, you'll > need to do so artithmetics to map those blocks to LBA addres

Re: Odd message from cron daemon

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Roland Smith writes: > The save-entropy script is being run from cron. See /etc/crontab. The first > line of this script after the header begins with "# This". It looks like > the hash mark was removed, and the shell is trying to find the "This" > command and fails. I checked both /usr/libexec/sa

Re: Odd message from cron daemon

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
David Fleck writes: > As a wild guess, check to see that line 29 in /usr/libexec/save-entropy > has a comment mark at the start of it: > > # This script is called by cron to store bits of randomness which are It does. It looks identical to the same file on my production system. The only differen

Re: Odd message from cron daemon

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Roland Smith writes: > Could it be that the cron output is mailed to someone else on the > production machine? I checked my aliases and stuff and sent some test messages to operator, and they get through okay. Apparently it's not happening on my production box, only on the test box. > It works

Re: Odd message from cron daemon

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
David Fleck writes: > Hmmm. Well, I don't know, but I'd try running the save-entropy script > manually and see if you can recreate the message that way. If so, add a > -x to the first line > >#!/bin/sh -x > > and run it manually again - you should be able to see what command > precedes the

Re: WRITE_DMA errors on SATA drive under 5.3-RELEASE

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Actually, it's not that hard. You need three mappings: > > 1. (lba address, (filesystem, block #)) > 2. ((filesystem, block #), (filesystem, inode #)) > 3. ((filesystem, inode #), (list of filenames linking to inode #)) Seems like it would be straightforward with adequ

Re: WRITE_DMA errors on SATA drive under 5.3-RELEASE

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Mike Tancsa writes: > Could be a bad sector on the drive, or bad cable. Hard to say. Try > /usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools/ > > It can read all sorts of info off the drive and help you narrow down > what the problem might be. Wow! That is a very cool tool. There's even a Windows port so I ca

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
John writes: > 1. you mentioned that you had the ports tree on another machine. Can you nfs > mount it? I pulled all the NFS stuff out of the kernel, alas! > 2. As others have mentioned, firebird is a fast-moving target. You *need* a > cvsupped ports in order to keep up with it. So why not insta

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Chris Hodgins writes: > It should be trivial to update your kernel config and rebuild and > install the new kernel. Remember to reboot when you are done. It's trivial in principle, but this is a production server. The golden rule for production servers is never to change anything unless you hav

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Chris Hodgins writes: > Well if you are doing all this you will carry out the updates to your > test machine first and validate everything works fine. Once you are > happy build a package from it and add it to your production server. I > am not sure how you would verify a package as big as firef

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
John writes: > well, put it back in then :) You'd only need the client stuff on the > small-harddrive machine of course. Is it also stripped out of the server? Yes. I saw it as an unnecessary overhead and a security risk. > I extended the usable lifetime of a p90 laptop like this. It was short

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Chris writes: > Hmmm, what exactly are Windows Updates? Unnecessary. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-28 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Ted Mittelstaedt writes: > One of the several techs that work for that company has your > attitude. He's been burned a few times when he's installed patches > that broke existing software at a customer. > > However, the customers that he cares for have the highest percentage > of broken-into serv

Re: WRITE_DMA errors on SATA drive under 5.3-RELEASE

2005-02-28 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Ted Mittelstaedt writes: > Rule of thumb on IDE hard drives, if they show more than a few errors > with a tool like smartmon, they need to be thrown in the garbage. Seems prudent to me, but right now I don't have the budget to replace this drive (yes, 40 GB IDE drives are cheap, but I don't have

Re: WRITE_DMA errors on SATA drive under 5.3-RELEASE

2005-02-28 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Garance A Drosihn writes: > First question: which SATA controller are you using? The controller is built into the Asus P4P800-E motherboard, and is based on the Intel ICH5R southbridge chipset. There's also a Promise 20378 RAID controller on board but I do NOT use it (disabled in BIOS). > And w

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-28 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Ted Mittelstaedt writes: > I agree Ramiro, I've setup dozens and dozens of different SCSI setups, > and I think that his problem is hardware, such as incorrect > termination, a bad scsi cable, bad connectors on the cable, or an > incompatible SCSI/disk combination (which is rare, but it does happe

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-28 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Ramiro Aceves writes: > Anthony, I understand your frustration. I think you should fix the SCSI > problems before doing anything. If I could find out what is causing them, I would. The only thing I know right now is that it's not hardware. -- Anthony _

Re: Is Yahoo! moving from FreeBSD?

2005-02-28 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Ted Mittelstaedt writes: > One word: ebay I don't trust used equipment. You never know where it's been. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any m

Re: Why can't I access my floppy disk?

2005-02-28 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Ruben de Groot writes: > 1 Secure mode - the system immutable and system append-only flags may >not be turned off; disks for mounted file systems, /dev/mem, >/dev/kmem and /dev/io (if your platform has it) may not be opened >for writing; kernel modules (see kld(4)) may

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-28 Thread Anthony Atkielski
RacerX writes: > The hardware has ran for over 8 years - you don't think that after 8 years > its going to show wear and tear? I do/would. It's not going to suddenly fail on the very day and hour that I install FreeBSD. > We as humans are not perfect - so that means the things we make can't be >

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-28 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Chris Hodgins writes: > Sounds like the perfect time for them to go wrong. They have been doing > the same thing for 8 years without problem. They are still doing the same thing today. There is no additional stress in changing operating systems. > Suddenly you come along and give them a good o

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-28 Thread Anthony Atkielski
John writes: > Have you considered the possibility that windows just didn't > report the error? Yes. If that's true, and if no actual data loss is occurring, then I'm not worried about the error ... although I'd like to know how to remove the error messages, in that case. FreeBSD actually stall

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-28 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Chris writes: > So - it "could" be it. Never dismiss anything when it comes to hardware. > Even the littlest thing can cause the greatest catastrophes. It's illogical to dismiss the extremely high probability of a software bug or configuration error while embracing the extremely low probability

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-28 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Robert Marella writes: > Perhaps you could try a live CD. Knoppix or Freesbie and see if the > trouble is gone. This machine won't boot from a CD. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-02-28 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Ted Mittelstaedt writes: > But that was under NT I understand, using NT drivers, right? Yes. > I wouldn't put it past the NT driver author of your SCSI card, in an > effort to avoid problems, to have written the NT driver so that ALL > transactions on the SCSI bus are asynchronous. I don't know

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-03-01 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Ted Mittelstaedt writes: > I have an Adaptec AAA-131 Ultra 2 card here that is just jumping up and > down to prove you wrong. This is an AIC7880. When you have one of those, let me know. > However, I CAN tell you how to go about finding out what you need to > change. Do you want to do this? I

Re: Is Yahoo! moving from FreeBSD?

2005-03-01 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Ted Mittelstaedt writes: > Do you always buy new cars? New homes? Yes. And new PCs. > If you were tasked with going out and buying Windows server hardware > and you had a maximum of $200 to spend, you would be pretty stupid to > go down to Fry's and get one of their $199 on-sale computers when

Re: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere?

2005-03-01 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Chris Hodgins writes: > I might have missed it but I can't find any information about what SCSI > errors you are receiving. Why don't you post the errors you are seeing > and/or perhaps your dmesg output as well and maybe someone can help > you. Without more information noone can do more than gu

Re: Strange SCSI logs

2005-03-01 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Andrea Venturoli writes: > Hello. > On a 5.3 machine I'm getting the following log messages. It appears they > started when I activated smartd from smartmontools. Now I disabled it, > but I'd like to have some more insight. > Any info? I've been getting strange messages of similar character on my

Re: Default security: other users can ACCESS MY HOMEDIR?!

2005-03-01 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Fafa Diliha Romanova writes: > i didn't realize all my users had full access to my homedir! They don't. They have read and execute access by default, but not write. I'll agree that it's probably not a good idea to default to this, but it has been that way on UNIX for a long time. -- Anthony

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >