Greetings everyone:
I am planning to build a few new boxes which will run -RELEASE and -CURRENT and
I have a question about the swap file. In the past, I had always used a swap
partition of 256MB since I originally had 128MB system memory in the 1990's but
my system has been upgraded to 2GB an
really not
offer anything?
John
- Original Message
From: Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Aloha Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2007 12:16:37 PM
Subject: Re: swap file vs swap partition
Aloha Guy wrote:
> Gre
nts of RAM.
John
- Original Message
From: Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Aloha Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2007 2:28:47 PM
Subject: Re: swap file vs swap partition
Aloha Guy wrote:
> Thanks for the input.
Greetings everyone:
I'm using a FreeBSD based notebook (P4-M2.6Ghz, 2GB RAM) on the built in 3COM 920c
(905c compatible) using the xl0 driver with the firewall enabled and set to open and
rc.conf basically has:
xl0 configured as 208.204.x.224 netmask 255.255.255.0 with the alias 192.168.0.1
Chris Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Aloha Guy wrote:
> Any ideas what is causing this? Is it the xl0 driver because I've
> used FreeBSD machines as ethernet routers before with a similar
> setup except there was no NAT involved and used the fxp driver
Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 26, 2004, at 4:53 PM, Aloha Guy wrote:
> Here is the HZ setting:
>
> kern.clockrate: { hz = 100, tick = 1, profhz = 1024, stathz = 128 }
There's your issue right there: if you care about the millisecond level
granularit
Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 26, 2004, at 5:59 PM, Aloha Guy wrote:
> Charles Swiger wrote:
>> There's your issue right there: if you care about the millisecond
>> level
>> granularity of network traffic going by this router, you ought to se
Chris Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Aloha Guy wrote:
> Already tried that and it did improve things a little. I tried
> setting the HZ to 1000 and it didn't make much of a difference. Is
> there a larger number that actually works well?
You can try hi
Chris Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Aloha Guy wrote:
> You're right that additional delay while adding a hop is to be
> expected, which is less than 0.1ms to the FreeBSD box but everything
> past the FreeBSD machine is adding atleast 5ms up to 300ms
Chris Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Aloha Guy wrote:
> > What do you have HZ set to (see sysctl kern.clockrate)? I think I
> > remember your original message showing you using pipes and queues
> > and the HZ setting can affect those. Also see if y
10 matches
Mail list logo
