Thanks very much. Please could I make a suggestion that this be included in
the handbook page?
On 8 Oct 2013 01:31, "Warren Block" wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Andy Zammy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I used the second section of the handbook (20.4) to create a gmirror. In
>> my
>> particular setup I had
Colleagues,
I have several Supermicro-based servers with the mpt RAID adapter:
# mptutil show adapter
mpt0 Adapter:
Board Name: UNUSED
Board Assembly:
Chip Name: C1068E
Chip Revision: UNUSED
RAID Levels: none
#
The problem is, I cannot configure any RAIDs (please see
On 5 October 2013, at 05:08, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>
>> On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fr
Olivier Nicole wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> The mailing list message linked above suggests that the handbook
>> information is the "old way" and that the correct way is to set
>> ipfw_enable and natd_enable in rc.conf. "Then /etc/rc.d/ipfw will
>> load ipfw.ko, and if natd_enable is set, will invoke /etc/
Hello,
I have prepared a boot-able USB-key (to be exactly a disk image of it)
the usual way:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=da0 bs=8m count=1868
# mdconfig -a -t vnode -f da0
md0
# fdisk -I md0
# fdisk -B md0
# bsdlabel -w md0s1 auto
# bsdlabel -B md0s1
# bsdlabel -e md0s1 # edit the disk label and cha
Not a bad idea.
From: Mark Felder
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: munin related
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013, at 12:57, Laszlo Danielisz wrote:
> Dear Dan,
>
> Yep killing nscd help me to get out of this troubl
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 1:15, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 19:57+0200, Laszlo Danielisz wrote:
>
> > Yep killing nscd help me to get out of this trouble.
>
> I have long suspected nscd to reinitialise the timers whenever an
> entry is requested while still held in the cache, be it
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 6:16, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> So far so good. Now I want install the packages as well into the image
> in /mnt. What would be the best method for this? Run pkg_add with the
> flag --chroot chrootdir, or use chroot(8) directly? Or any other idea?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
El día Tuesday, October 08, 2013 a las 07:58:06AM -0500, Mark Felder escribió:
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 6:16, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >
> > So far so good. Now I want install the packages as well into the image
> > in /mnt. What would be the best method for this? Run pkg_add with the
> > flag --
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 8:07, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Tuesday, October 08, 2013 a las 07:58:06AM -0500, Mark Felder
> escribió:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 6:16, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > >
> > > So far so good. Now I want install the packages as well into the image
> > > in /mnt. What w
On 10/08/2013 4:27 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 5 October 2013, at 05:08, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wr
El día Tuesday, October 08, 2013 a las 08:12:31AM -0500, Mark Felder escribió:
> > No. The r255948 was built on a clean, empty environment but with
> >
> > $ cat /etc/src.conf
> > WITH_PKGTOOLS=yes
> >
>
> Ok, I won't question your needs for pkg_* as you seem to be aware of
> what you're doing
> Use PACKAGESITE=http://pkg-test.freebsd.org/pkg-test-${ABI}/latest
>
> That's the kit that will form the official FreeBSD package repository;
> it just lacks the crypto bits for signing the packages, which is why
> it's calling itself 'pkg-test'
>
> Oh -- there isn't an A record in the DNS for
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 10:58, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> > Use PACKAGESITE=http://pkg-test.freebsd.org/pkg-test-${ABI}/latest
> >
> > That's the kit that will form the official FreeBSD package repository;
> > it just lacks the crypto bits for signing the packages, which is why
> > it's calling itself '
Yeah!!! 96.47.72.120 works! Thanks!
> Depends. Where are your other installed packages from? I'd probably
> re-install all of them from the pkg-test repository just to be safe.
I installed 9.1 on new node and compiled from ports.
It took a long time, which I want to avoid right now.
Here is what
On 8 October 2013, at 06:22, dweimer wrote:
> On 10/08/2013 4:27 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 5 October 2013, at 05:08, Polytropon wrote:
>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug
This is actually trickier than it first looked. First I got into single
user mode by supplying 'shutdown now', but the tunefs commands all failed
with the following:
#tunefs -j disable /dev/ada0s1a
Clearing journal flags from inode 4
tunefs: Failed to write journal inode: Operation not permitted
tu
I
On 8 October 2013 01:31, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Andy Zammy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I used the second section of the handbook (20.4) to create a gmirror. In
>> my
>> particular setup I had a 1GB /, 6GB swap, 1GB /tmp and the rest of the 1TB
>> drive was left for /usr
>>
>> I had
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Andy Zammy wrote:
This is actually trickier than it first looked. First I got into single user
mode by supplying 'shutdown now', but the tunefs commands all failed with the
following:
#tunefs -j disable /dev/ada0s1a
Clearing journal flags from inode 4
tunefs: Failed to writ
# gpart show ada0s1
gpart: No such geom: ada0s1
By the way, this is after a restart of the machine.
There's nothing to back up, I'm installing a fresh os, so I just install on
one drive, plug the other in, and start following the handbook instructions
for this method. So the only thing in loader.
Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> The Thick Plottens…
>>> I received the drives and installed them on a working system. The
>>> failed system is structured with a single partition for the system and
>>> another for swap. For some unknown reason, the BIOS got left
>>> configured to boot the extra disk if its
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Andy Zammy wrote:
Thanks very much. Please could I make a suggestion that this be included in the
handbook page?
Please do not top-post, it makes replies more difficult.
I have added a warning about SUJ to the top of the gmirror section in
the Handbook.
___
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Andy Zammy wrote:
# gpart show ada0s1
gpart: No such geom: ada0s1
By the way, this is after a restart of the machine.
There's nothing to back up, I'm installing a fresh os, so I just install on one
drive, plug the other in, and start following the handbook instructions for
Andy Zammy wrote:
> # gpart show ada0s1
> gpart: No such geom: ada0s1
>
> By the way, this is after a restart of the machine.
>
> There's nothing to back up, I'm installing a fresh os, so I just install
> on one drive, plug the other in, and start following the handbook
> instructions for this m
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I tried downloading the src with:
>
> svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
>
> I didn't get Release 9.2. The first entry in UPDATING is:
>
> 20130705:
> hastctl(8)'s `status' command output changed to
Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I tried downloading the src with:
>>
>> svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
>>
>> I didn't get Release 9.2. The first entry in UPDATING is:
>>
>> 20130705:
>> hastctl(8)'s `status'
I tried creating the mirror before the install. As the drives are now
mirrored, the installer picked up on the face that there are two gm0 nodes
- one on each hard drive. I installed onto ada0's gm0 node.
After it reboots, the bootloader stops at the manual prompt. From what I
can see that's not d
alexus wrote:
> ok, I just did fetch & install and got bumped from p5 to p9
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD XX.X.org 7.4-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 7.4-RELEASE-p9 #0: Mon Jun 11
> 19:47:58 UTC 2012
> r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
> amd64
> #
>
> can I take it all the way t
*
*
--
There are few different ways to set-up geli with ZFS. I just want to get
some opinions (benefits and disadvantages) about the below two options
*First option*: (most commonly encountered set-up)
Have geli on the block device and ZFS on top of the geli provider
29 matches
Mail list logo
