c++11 question: clang++ 3.3 header not found

2013-08-27 Thread Quark
% uname -a FreeBSD cobalt 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 #0 r254795: Sat Aug 24 20:25:04 UTC 2013     r...@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64 % clang++ --version FreeBSD clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final 183502) 20130610 Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2 Thread model: posix

clang and c++11 question

2013-08-27 Thread Quark
% uname -a FreeBSD cobalt.corp.nai.org 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 #0 r254795: Sat Aug 24 20:25:04 UTC 2013     r...@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC   amd64 % clang++ --version FreeBSD clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final 183502) 20130610 Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2 Threa

c++11 and clang question

2013-08-27 Thread Quark
% uname -a FreeBSD cobalt 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 #0 r254795: Sat Aug 24 20:25:04 UTC 2013     r...@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64 % clang++ --version FreeBSD clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final 183502) 20130610 Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2 Thread model: posix

Re: c++11 question: clang++ 3.3 header not found

2013-08-27 Thread Quark
list, please pardon my stupid mail client hung, giving me impression that e-mail was not sent. apologies for spam. - Original Message - > From: Quark > To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, 27 August 2013 12:52 PM > Subject: c++11 question: clang++ 3.3 header not

Re: c++11 question: clang++ 3.3 header not found

2013-08-27 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:22:49 +0800 (SGT) Quark wrote: > % uname -a > FreeBSD cobalt 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 #0 r254795: Sat Aug 24 20:25:04 UTC > 2013     r...@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64 > > % clang++ --version > FreeBSD clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final 18350

Fwd: c++11 question: clang++ 3.3 header not found

2013-08-27 Thread Константин Беседин
AFAIK, the easiest way to get C++11 support in clang is to use libc++ (see http://blogs.freebsdish.org/theraven/2013/01/03/the-new-c-stack-in-9-1/). See also https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/2013-May/000841.html . 2013/8/27 Quark > % uname -a > FreeBSD cobalt 9.2-RC3 FreeBS

Re: c++11 question: clang++ 3.3 header not found

2013-08-27 Thread Quark
- Original Message - > From: Tijl Coosemans > To: Quark > Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" > Sent: Tuesday, 27 August 2013 1:41 PM > Subject: Re: c++11 question: clang++ 3.3 header not found > > On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:22:49 +0800 (SGT) Quark wrote: >> % uname -a >> FreeBSD cob

CURDIR-relative paths in ports' Makefiles

2013-08-27 Thread Koslov Sergey
Hello I've noticed that many ports are using ${.CURDIR}/../../some/port construction in their Makefiles. But if you copy on of these ports elsewhere it won't work as expected because of the relative path. Shouldn't they use ${PORTSDIR}/some/port instead? Thanks for the replies. Kozlov Serg

TEMPer1 on FreeBSD

2013-08-27 Thread TJ
Hi guys, I have just purchased a TEMPer1 for monitoring the temperature of our rack. I have been looking at way of getting this working as the default drivers pick it up as a keyboard and mouse. Aug 27 12:13:41 test-1 kernel: ukbd0: 2.00/0.01, addr 2> on usbus1 Aug 27 12:13:41 test-1 kernel: k

Re: CURDIR-relative paths in ports' Makefiles

2013-08-27 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 27/08/2013 13:04, Koslov Sergey wrote: > Hello > > I've noticed that many ports are using ${.CURDIR}/../../some/port > construction in their Makefiles. > > But if you copy on of these ports elsewhere it won't work as expected > because of the relative path. > Shouldn't they use ${PORTSDIR}/som

Re: Way to be announced about security updates and new releases

2013-08-27 Thread Zyumbilev, Peter
http://www.freebsd.org/security/rss.xml ? Peter On 21/08/2013 09:54, Antonio Kless wrote: > Is there any way to be noticed, when security updates or new releases are > available? > > https://twitter.com/freebsd nearly would be a solution, if it did not > repostquestions from its > subscribers an

Fatal trap 12 after upgrading from 8.2 to 8.4

2013-08-27 Thread Patrick
I've got a system running on a VPS that I'm trying to upgrade from 8.2 to 8.4. It has a ZFS root. After booting the new kernel, I get: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x40 fault code = supervisor read data, page not pres

Re: f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected; terminated

2013-08-27 Thread alexus
snmpd.config is standard [alexus@f9 ~]$ head -1 /etc/snmpd.config # $FreeBSD: release/9.1.0/etc/snmpd.config 216595 2010-12-20 17:28:15Z syrinx $ [alexus@f9 ~]$ On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:03 PM, alexus wrote: > f9# gdb `which bsnmpd` /bsnmpd.core > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > Copyright 2004 Fre

Jail with public IP alias

2013-08-27 Thread Alejandro Imass
Hi, I have a machine with several public IPs on the same NIC and I bound one of those IPs to a jail created with EzJail. Suppose the scenario is something like this: em0 190.100.100.1 190.100.100.2 190.100.100.3 190.100.100.4 In the jail we are bound only to 190.100.100.4 The default router is

Re: f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected; terminated

2013-08-27 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
El 27/08/2013 05:03, "alexus" escribió: > > f9# gdb `which bsnmpd` /bsnmpd.core > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certa

Re: Jail with public IP alias

2013-08-27 Thread Alejandro Imass
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > Hi, > > I have a machine with several public IPs on the same NIC and I bound > one of those IPs to a jail created with EzJail. Suppose the scenario > is something like this: > > em0 > 190.100.100.1 > 190.100.100.2 > 190.100.100.3 > 190.100.

Re: Jail with public IP alias

2013-08-27 Thread Patrick
That's not the behaviour I see. My jail has a private and public IP. $ ifconfig bce1 bce1: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=c01bb ether a4:ba:db:29:7a:1b inet 192.168.42.23 netmask 0x broadcast 192.168.42.23 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT )

Re: Jail with public IP alias

2013-08-27 Thread Alejandro Imass
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Patrick wrote: > That's not the behaviour I see. My jail has a private and public IP. > Hi Patrick, thanks for your reply. The issue is actually more basic and it's because the same network card has multiple IPs on the same subnet so the routing table always choo

Re: Way to be announced about security updates and new releases

2013-08-27 Thread Olivier Nicole
FreeBSD announce mailing list... Sexurity announcement (at least) are also cross posted on FreeBSD questions. Olivier On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote: > http://www.freebsd.org/security/rss.xml > > ? > Peter > > On 21/08/2013 09:54, Antonio Kless wrote: >> Is there any wa

Re: Jail with public IP alias

2013-08-27 Thread Patrick
Hi Alejandro, That's how I've got things setup, too, but I'm not seeing the same behaviour. So I was wondering if there was something different about your setup such as using NAT to allow a jail with a private IP to access the internet at large. Patrick On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Alejandr

distfiles changed to new path

2013-08-27 Thread Fbsd8
I just did a portsnap run that updated the base port system. Now I see a port's distfile going to /var/ports/distfiles instead of /usr/ports/distfiles. Is this a error in the newly updated base port system which contains the default port make environment? _

Re: Renumber users and groups

2013-08-27 Thread Olivier Nicole
One last comment, for the records, >>> Those solutions sound pretty handy if I need to move the files at the >>> same time. mtree should do this in-place with minimal fuss as it's just >>> confirming permissions and ownership on all files. >> I also just thought of an idea I need to benchmark: run