On Wednesday 21 August 2013 07:54:06 Antonio Kless wrote:
> Is there any way to be noticed, when security updates or new releases are
> available?
>
> https://twitter.com/freebsd nearly would be a solution, if it did not
> repostquestions from its
> subscribers and other information that is not re
face="Verdana, sans-serif">Freebsddiary.org color="#ff">Team,
I
thought you might like to know some reasons why you are not getting
enough Social Media and Organic search engine traffic
forFreebsddiary.org
1.
Your website Freebsddiary.org is
not ranking top in Google organic searches for ma
--On 20 August 2013 18:02 +0100 Arthur Chance wrote:
And that's just made me think of something else - I have a horrible
feeling that jexec will attach to the jail using whatever fib it's
running under, i.e. the fib from the host environment. Do you have (or
can you enable) ssh running in the
On 21/08/2013 08:10, dgmm wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 August 2013 07:54:06 Antonio Kless wrote:
>> Is there any way to be noticed, when security updates or new releases are
>> available?
>>
>> https://twitter.com/freebsd nearly would be a solution, if it did not
>> repostquestions from its
>> subscrib
On 21/08/2013 11:35, Karl Pielorz wrote:
--On 20 August 2013 18:02 +0100 Arthur Chance wrote:
And that's just made me think of something else - I have a horrible
feeling that jexec will attach to the jail using whatever fib it's
running under, i.e. the fib from the host environment. Do you h
Hello,
On my system legacy users come with UID starting from 200 upward, and
all users come with GID lower that 100.
I know it's not a good idea, but consider that some accounts are over 20
years old!
This is not too much a problem with FreeBSD as I can renumber the few
FreeBSD services that hav
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 7:36, Olivier Nicole wrote:
>
> Is there a clever/fast way to do that (other than find -exec chown)?
>
Maybe! I haven't tried this myself yet, but next time I need to do this
I think I'm going to take an mtree backup of the entire filesystem,
change the UIDs and GIDs (vi
On 21/08/2013 13:36, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Hello,
On my system legacy users come with UID starting from 200 upward, and
all users come with GID lower that 100.
I know it's not a good idea, but consider that some accounts are over 20
years old!
This is not too much a problem with FreeBSD as I c
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 11:12, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
> On 21/08/2013 13:36, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On my system legacy users come with UID starting from 200 upward, and
> > all users come with GID lower that 100.
> >
> > I know it's not a good idea, but consider that some accoun
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 11:36, Mark Felder wrote:
>
> Those solutions sound pretty handy if I need to move the files at the
> same time. mtree should do this in-place with minimal fuss as it's just
> confirming permissions and ownership on all files.
>
I also just thought of an idea I need to be
Thanks for the support.
I want to use the uuid's found using sysctl -a in fstab.
/dev/gptid/ has only uuid for boot partition.
Cheers
Sainath
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> /dev/gptid/$UID
>
> maybe what you are looking for?
>
> Warner
>
> On Aug 21, 2013, at 12:16 AM,
I just update snort (using portmaster -PP snort) and now I'm getting this:
# pkg_info | grep ^snort
pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without
argument), ignoring
pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without
argument), ignoring
pkg_info:
You have been invited to the following event.
Title: Hello dear
Hello,
My name is Miss Hellen Tolbert, It give me a great pleasure to write you. I
was browsing when i came across your email and I was attracted to write to
you so that we can be friends if you will have the desire as me. i wil
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1619404
It is helpful too…
On Aug 15, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 15 August 2013, at 06:37, ajtiM wrote:
>
>>
>> How will be ATI supported in FreeBSD 9.2, please? I like bluetooth mouse. Is
>> it supported?
>>
>> I try Linux Mi
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I believe
its also in 9.1. The command:
dig freebsd.org +trace
Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. Running the
same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a complete trace with lots of useful
informatio
On 22/08/2013 00:34, Doug Hardie wrote:
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I believe
its also in 9.1. The command:
dig freebsd.org +trace
Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. Running the
same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a comp
On 21 August 2013, at 17:02, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 21 August 2013, at 16:46, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
>
>> On 22/08/2013 00:34, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I
>>> believe its also in 9.1. The command:
>>>
>>> dig freebsd.org
> > There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in
> > 9.2. I believe its also in 9.1. The command:
> >
> > dig freebsd.org +trace
> >
> > Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is
> provided. Running the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a
> complete tra
On 22/08/2013 9:34 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I believe
its also in 9.1. The command:
dig freebsd.org +trace
Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. Running the
same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a co
Thank you,
>> Those solutions sound pretty handy if I need to move the files at the
>> same time. mtree should do this in-place with minimal fuss as it's just
>> confirming permissions and ownership on all files.
> I also just thought of an idea I need to benchmark: running mtree with
> and withou
Hello freebsdquestions i havent seen anything work as well as this on the first
try http://bitly.com/13C7n5L quit your nine to five in three weeks or less
guaranteed
___
freebsd-questions@
21 matches
Mail list logo
