Martin Laabs writes:
> Hi,
>
> maybe you know the input subsystem of linux that is very flexible in terms
> of various input data interpretations.
> Are there plans to implement something comparable into the freebsd system?
> The background is, that I currently write a joystick driver supporting
Regarding all the recommendations on "how to determine if ZFS is
available on the system":
Do not run commands like /sbin/zfs or /sbin/zpool right off the bat.
This will result in the underlying kld bits dynamically loading zfs.ko
and opensolaris.ko on the fly -- even if there aren't any ZFS
files
4. lsvfs output?
--
Devin
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org]
on behalf of Jeremy Chadwick [j...@koitsu.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:16 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: fb...@a1poweruser.com;
Hi,
I'm trying to build libtorrent/rtorrent using gcc 4.8. The reason I'm
using gcc 4.8 rather than the version in base is because there is
apparently a bug in gcc 4.2 - http://libtorrent.rakshasa.no/ticket/926
I installed gcc 4.8 based on these instructions
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/article
Robert Huff writes:
> "man tunefs" mentions two types of ACLs: POSIX.1e and NFSv4.
> Am I correct in assuming an unqualified "ACL" in general usage
> defaults to the former, not the latter?
Nearly all ACL functionality is implemented in a single module, with NFS
ACLs being one of sev
Jeff Tipton writes:
> Thank you, Damien, for the reply. AFAIK, STABLE gets updated every 2
> weeks but not every day, and it seems to be that because of the
> intrusion, it has not been updated for long. The versions of the ports
> that come with the 9.1-RELEASE are even slightly newer than those
On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Jeff Tipton wrote:
> On 02/17/2013 13:13, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> On 16 Feb 2013, at 16:56, Jeff Tipton wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I upgraded 9.0 -> 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that there are
>>> no packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:09:07AM +, Teske, Devin wrote:
> 4. lsvfs output?
> --
> Devin
>
>
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
> [owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] on behalf of Jeremy Chadwick
> [j...@koitsu.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, Februa
Hello Folks,
/**/
When the FreeBSD 9.1 Update functionality gets rebuilt and back on-
line so that fetch freebsd-update will get updates for FreeBSD 9.1, how will
users be notified? I am unsure of which Mailing Li
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:26:18 -0600
Denzel Turner wrote:
> Hello Folks,
>
> /**/
>
> When the FreeBSD 9.1 Update functionality gets rebuilt and back on-
>
> line so that fetch freebsd-update will get updates for Fr
On 02/19/13 13:43, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:26:18 -0600
Denzel Turner wrote:
Hello Folks,
/**/
When the FreeBSD 9.1 Update functionality gets rebuilt and back on-
line so that fetch fre
Hello Gentlemen and thank you for the prompt response. I thought
freegsd-update for FreeBSD 9.1 only updated with FreeBSD 9.0 Packages as
the Update Functionality Infrastructure was being rebuilt. I might be wrong
about this but I thought this was put out in the FreeBSD 9.1 Announcement.
I am learn
On 02/19/13 14:03, Denzel Turner wrote:
Hello Gentlemen and thank you for the prompt response. I thought
freegsd-update for FreeBSD 9.1 only updated with FreeBSD 9.0 Packages as
the Update Functionality Infrastructure was being rebuilt. I might be
wrong about this but I thought this was put out i
David Collins writes:
> I'm trying to build libtorrent/rtorrent using gcc 4.8. The reason I'm
> using gcc 4.8 rather than the version in base is because there is
> apparently a bug in gcc 4.2 - http://libtorrent.rakshasa.no/ticket/926
You do realize that the bug was worked around in the libtorr
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:03:56 -0600
Denzel Turner wrote:
> Hello Gentlemen and thank you for the prompt response. I thought
> freegsd-update for FreeBSD 9.1 only updated with FreeBSD 9.0 Packages as
> the Update Functionality Infrastructure was being rebuilt. I might be
> wrong about this but I th
Hello,
I am about to start deploying a large system (about 18 To which can grow up to
36 To) based on a big Intel platform with lot's of fancy features to have turbo
boosted platform (ZIL on SSD + system on dongle if I go for FreeNAS). Since I
want to move on quite fast I might decide to use F
On 19-02-2013, Tue [23:20:41], b...@todoo.biz wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I am about to start deploying a large system (about 18 To which can grow up
> to 36 To) based on a big Intel platform with lot's of fancy features to have
> turbo boosted platform (ZIL on SSD + system on dongle if I go for Free
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of b w
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 2:34 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: convert date and time to epoch in awk
>
> I want to write a script th
Hi,
What's the difference between:
zpool create -m /desired_destination POOL_NAME disk_device
and
zpool create -m none POOL_NAME disk_device
zfs create -m /desired_destination POOL_NAME/foo
We would prefer the former, but see more uses of the latter.
The whole point is that we want to "keep t
On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:20 PM, "b...@todoo.biz" wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I am about to start deploying a large system (about 18 To which can grow up
> to 36 To) based on a big Intel platform with lot's of fancy features to have
> turbo boosted platform (ZIL on SSD + system on dongle if I go for
Sounds like a major headache. I'd just deploy NetApp with OnTap 8.X or
isilon, both BSD based now.
On Feb 19, 2013 7:15 PM, "Fleuriot Damien" wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:20 PM, "b...@todoo.biz" wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > I am about to start deploying a large system (about 18 To whic
>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:34:21 +0100,
>> b w said:
b> I want to write a script that parses the last, say, 10 minutes of a log
b> file looking for a certain string, like 'error', or failed', and returns
b> how many times it shows up. The script would be run by Nagios and if it
b> returns > 0 an
>> So, is there a way to compare two dates in FreeBSD's awk or convert
a date
>> to epoch? Or some other fast way to select the last 10 minutes from
a log
>> file? An example would be appreciated, if possible.
>
>
> Converting a date to an epoch is easy with date(1) (note: awk can
make a sys
b> I want to write a script that parses the last, say, 10 minutes of a log
b> file looking for a certain string, like 'error', or failed', and returns
b> how many times it shows up. The script would be run by Nagios and if it
b> returns > 0 an alert is raised. Each line of the log file starts w
I'm migrating a lot of services to a new server running 9.1 amd64.
I have a VMWare FreeBSD 3.3 server I want to decommission, which is
running a client's website with a shopping cart system in an a.out
binary (source code lost long ago).
I have just tried to build a new kernel on the 9.1/amd64
On 02/18/2013 08:06 AM, Jonni Nakari wrote:
> It seems, that while testing suspend to RAM on my machine by running
> "acpiconf -s 3" I managed to break a RaidZ zpool. The machine went to
> sleep fine, but after waking up commands (e.g. reboot) reported I/O
> error. When booting after a hard reset t
Le 20 févr. 2013 à 02:14, Fleuriot Damien a écrit :
>
> On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:20 PM, "b...@todoo.biz" wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I am about to start deploying a large system (about 18 To which can grow up
>> to 36 To) based on a big Intel platform with lot's of fancy features to have
>>
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:49-0800, Devin Teske wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the difference between:
>
> zpool create -m /desired_destination POOL_NAME disk_device
>
> and
>
> zpool create -m none POOL_NAME disk_device
> zfs create -m /desired_destination POOL_NAME/foo
>
> We would prefer the former,
28 matches
Mail list logo
