On Saturday 18 August 2012 21:16:09 Antonio Olivares wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, ajtiM wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > There are vulnerabilities in libxul-1.9.2 very long time and looks like
> > nothing is better. Are there a new libxul version somewhere to download,
> > please?
> >
> >
>
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 428, Issue 7, Message: 4
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:51:07 -0600 Gary Aitken wrote:
> On 08/16/12 00:04, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > On 16/08/2012 05:45, Gary Aitken wrote:
> ...
> >> Running 9.0 release on an amd 64 box, standard kernel, 16GB, SSD (/,
> >> /usr, /va
In attempting to zero in on my system crash problem,
I need to customize xorg.conf.
As I read the documentation,
there is no way for an ordinary user to provide an xorg.conf;
Xorg looks for files in the normal server search path,
which does not include any user directories --
unless the user is r
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:44:15 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
> In attempting to zero in on my system crash problem,
> I need to customize xorg.conf.
> As I read the documentation,
> there is no way for an ordinary user to provide an xorg.conf;
> Xorg looks for files in the normal server search path,
>
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, ajtiM wrote:
On Saturday 18 August 2012 21:16:09 Antonio Olivares wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, ajtiM wrote:
Hi!
There are vulnerabilities in libxul-1.9.2 very long time and looks like
nothing is better. Are there a new libxul version somewhere to download,
ple
On 08/19/2012 20:51, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:44:15 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
In attempting to zero in on my system crash problem,
I need to customize xorg.conf.
As I read the documentation,
there is no way for an ordinary user to provide an xorg.conf;
Xorg looks for files in the
HI,
OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even
for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can not provide
package for LAME the same way as OpenBSD does?
Regards,
vermaden
--
...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:44:15 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
In attempting to zero in on my system crash problem,
I need to customize xorg.conf.
As I read the documentation,
there is no way for an ordinary user to provide an xorg.conf;
Xorg looks for files in th
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:33:49 +0200, vermaden wrote:
> HI,
>
> OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even
> for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can not provide
> package for LAME the same way as OpenBSD does?
j00 CAN haz pakagez. =^_^=
Packages for _everything_ is impossible because of th
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 21:38:30 +0300, Jeff Tipton wrote:
> On 08/19/2012 20:51, Polytropon wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:44:15 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
>>> In attempting to zero in on my system crash problem,
>>> I need to customize xorg.conf.
>>> As I read the documentation,
>>> there is no way
On 08/19/12 10:11, Ian Smith wrote:
> In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 428, Issue 7, Message: 4
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:51:07 -0600 Gary Aitken
> wrote:
> > On 08/16/12 00:04, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > > On 16/08/2012 05:45, Gary Aitken wrote:
> > ...
> > >> Running 9.0 release on an amd
Combining a couple of responses into one to cut down traffic...
On 08/19/12 11:51, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:44:15 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
>> In attempting to zero in on my system crash problem,
>> I need to customize xorg.conf.
>> As I read the documentation,
>> there is no way
Hai ;)
"Polytropon" :
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:33:49 +0200, vermaden wrote:
> > HI,
> >
> > OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even
> > for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can not provide
> > package for LAME the same way as OpenBSD does?
>
> j00 CAN haz pakagez. =^_^=
>
> Packages
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 14:38:13 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
> Combining a couple of responses into one to cut down traffic...
>
> On 08/19/12 11:51, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:44:15 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
> >> In attempting to zero in on my system crash problem,
> >> I need to cust
... I even got a screenshot of how these *flavours*
and *subpackages* work, here:
http://ompldr.org/vZjV2bQ
"Polytropon" pisze:
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:33:49 +0200, vermaden wrote:
> > HI,
> >
> > OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even
> > for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 22:54:52 +0200, vermaden wrote:
> "Polytropon" :
> > On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:33:49 +0200, vermaden wrote:
> > > HI,
> > >
> > > OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even
> > > for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can not provide
> > > package for LAME the same way as Ope
On 08/19/12 15:01, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 14:38:13 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
>> Combining a couple of responses into one to cut down traffic...
>>
>> On 08/19/12 11:51, Polytropon wrote:
>>> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:44:15 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
In attempting to zero in on my
Hi,
I have a problem when I try to build my own kernel. I had never got such a one;
here is my kernel configuration file and the building errors that it makes.
"#device tun # Packet tunnel.
device pty # BSD-style compatibility pseudo ttys
device
antonin tessier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem when I try to build my own kernel. I had never got such a
> one; here is my kernel configuration file and the building errors that it
> makes.
>
[snip]
>
> "# make kernel KERNCONF=GOLLUM
>
> MAKE=make sh /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh GOLLUM
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 15:45:28 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
> On 08/19/12 15:01, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 14:38:13 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
> >> Combining a couple of responses into one to cut down traffic...
> >>
> >> On 08/19/12 11:51, Polytropon wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:4
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:27:54PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 23:27:54 +0200
> From: Polytropon
> Subject: Re: I Can Has Packages?
> To: vermaden
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2)
>
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 2
> "Polytropon" == Polytropon writes:
Polytropon> I just assume providing packages for every imaginable
Polytropon> combination requires lots of resources. As an example
Polytropon> take OpenOffice: Every language variant, then integration
Polytropon> with KDE, Gnome, or none of them, and pr
On 20/08/2012 04:07, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>> "Polytropon" == Polytropon writes:
>
>
> Polytropon> I just assume providing packages for every imaginable
> Polytropon> combination requires lots of resources. As an example
> Polytropon> take OpenOffice: Every language variant, then integr
23 matches
Mail list logo