Hi:
I have inherited a problem that is no cause for envy, the previous
administrators had no idea what they were doing, so problems with a
permission denied would be solved by chown -R 777 /whatever! Needless to
say, it's a mess, and ofcourse everything is "critical" there is no room
for inte
On 19/07/2012 07:55, Erik Nørgaard wrote:
> So, how can I
>
> - determine if files are actually unix executables or just plain files
> (or windows executables)?
file(1) should help.
> - determine which users actually need read or write access to these files?
This is in most cases entirely a loc
administrators had no idea what they were doing, so problems with a
permission denied would be solved by chown -R 777 /whatever! Needless to say,
great.
rm -rf /whatever would be even better!
it's a mess, and ofcourse everything is "critical" there is no room for
interruption of service.
Now
developed countries.
Not really sure what you wanted to imply,
as "SMB" looks like americanism to me.
as well as SOHO.
As not the first time, some people here when lacking arguments say "i work
for larger company". "We have more servers in one place".
Esp. second is nopt something to be pro
1) There's a _reason_ the gov't requires hard drives with anthing higher
than 'somewhat' classified data on them to be =physically= destroyed
before leving the secure area.
no. for modern hard drives it was already proved that
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/disk bs=1m
is enough to make data
entitled to have opinions, *BUT* the "Gospel According to Wojciech" is -not-
'the answer' for everybody, in every situation. *IF* you ever learn that,
Seems like you have 45 years of experience in words. nothing more.
Aggression is normal today from such people, that have "good position" in
so
Hi Folks,
I'm failed to access E173 modem on FreeBSD 9.0 using serial port. Yes, I
got information from the web that this device is not supported yet by the
default driver, and the u3g driver need to be updated. (
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/usb-159919-Patch-for-HUAWEI-E173-u3g-umodem-td47
18.07.2012 4:01, Wojciech Puchar пишет:
and the other running 9.0-STABLE. After updating Firefox from 12.0 to
13.0.1, whenever I access twitter.com, I can log in but after that a
message appears saying that "Twitter.com is loading slowly", and the
site is practically unusable - clicking on any
Le Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:53:00 +0300,
Виталий Туровец a écrit :
Hello,
> > The general advice is mail the patch to -hackers for review. If you
> > don't get a reply or if people like it, submit a PR so it doesn't
> > get lost. Be aware that the latency for some patches could be
> > longer than you
2012/7/19 Patrick Lamaiziere :
> Le Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:53:00 +0300,
> Виталий Туровец a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
>> > The general advice is mail the patch to -hackers for review. If you
>> > don't get a reply or if people like it, submit a PR so it doesn't
>> > get lost. Be aware that the latency for
Jerry seibercom.net> writes:
> ...
> I couldn't have said it better myself. Wojciech lives in his own little
> world, which is fine as long as he doesn't try to visit mine. He sounds
> like he works at a small Polish SMB, more commonly referred to as a
> SOHO in more developed countries. I have
Otherwise, you may run the danger of building a wall around yourself.
everyone should judge by his/her own brain which opinions are right.
Actually in every moment i try to encourage EVERYONE to turn on his/her
brain that we all have but rarely use.
To be ever able to use ones brain properly
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:15:17 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar articulated:
> > 1) There's a _reason_ the gov't requires hard drives with anthing
> > higher than 'somewhat' classified data on them to be =physically=
> > destroyed before leving the secure area.
>
> no. for modern hard drives it was al
for very old drives it may not
Would you be so kind as to point out the proof of that statement?
sorry but i didn't save that article on hard drive. So no proof if you
don't believe me i've actually read it.
The main point is that you have
- track
- intra-track gap
- finite precision of wr
ports lately and not everyone can or wants follow all the patches
flying around, I'd like to share that the Linux binary build runs
fine for me.
I downloaded Linux' x86 tar package, did tar xf to get RPMs
and finally:
for i in *rpm; do rpm2cpio $i | cpio -ivd; done
That created opt/libreoffice3.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>> ports lately and not everyone can or wants follow all the patches
>> flying around, I'd like to share that the Linux binary build runs
[...]
>>
>> May this help someone lazy or impatient like me...
>
>
> what's wrong in /usr/ports/editor
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Vaclav Kadlcik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since there has been various issues building LibreOffice from
> ports lately and not everyone can or wants follow all the patches
> flying around, I'd like to share that the Linux binary build runs
> fine for me.
>
> I downloaded Lin
This topic went totally off, but anyway there are interesting bits,
do you say that e.g. Gutmann method is totally unneeded?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/fsck-on-FAT32-filesystem-tp5727015p5728126.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:49:50 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar articulated:
> > Otherwise, you may run the danger of building a wall around
> > yourself.
>
> everyone should judge by his/her own brain which opinions are right.
>
> Actually in every moment i try to encourage EVERYONE to turn on
> his/
Vaclav Kadlcik writes:
> since there has been various issues building LibreOffice from
> ports lately and not everyone can or wants follow all the patches
> flying around, I'd like to share that the Linux binary build runs
> fine for me.
Excellent work.
Two questions:
How it works?
We have a team of resourcers.
You post your contract job.
Our in house resourcers find matching candidates on our 600,000 strong
contractor database for your live role.
We send your live job to the top 100-200 matching candidates.
You receive only the highest quality a
Am 19.07.2012, 13:27 Uhr, schrieb Jakub Lach :
This topic went totally off, but anyway there are interesting bits,
do you say that e.g. Gutmann method is totally unneeded?
You may be interested in the epilogue to Gutmann's paper:
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/secure_del.html#Epi
what's wrong in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3
Oracle
oracle donated everything to apache foundation.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr
can add "FreeBSD knowledge" to their CV.
That statement goes beyond stupid. At some point, everyone is a
You proved well enough about what "stupid" means.
esp your mail "carmel...@hotmail.com"
that's truly a mail address that System Admin should be proud of ;)
At least you don't worry about b
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> what's wrong in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3
>>>
>>
>> Oracle
>
>
> oracle donated everything to apache foundation.
>
Yes, but not before creating a big mess, stagnating development and
forcing the core team out of Oracle to c
On 07/19/12 09:41, Vaclav Kadlcik wrote:
Hi,
since there has been various issues building LibreOffice from
ports lately and not everyone can or wants follow all the patches
flying around, I'd like to share that the Linux binary build runs
fine for me.
I downloaded Linux' x86 tar package, did ta
Wojciech Puchar wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> writes:
> ...
This should clear up some confusion. Will it ?
Disk Wiping One Pass Is Enough
http://www.anti-forensics.com/disk-wiping-one-pass-is-enough
...
---
http://www.anti-forensics.com/disk-wiping-one-pass-is-enough-part-2-this-time-wi
th-screensh
Alexander Kapshuk writes:
> Just upgraded libreoffice to version 3.5.5 using ports. Didn't have any
> trouble installing is, nor upgrading it.
> What sort of errors did you encounter while building the package using
> the ports?
Check the last few weeks of office@ and
On 07/19/12 15:46, Robert Huff wrote:
Check the last few weeks of office@ and ports@; there are multiple
people (including me) reporting problems, especially with 9.recent and
-Current. Robert Huff
Could be because I'm running the RELEASE version then.
___
Follow up is even more interesting than epilogue,
especially:
"Another problem with the article is the fact that
a magnetic force microscope, which is a scanning
probe microscope, is nothing like an electron
microscope, and yet the article repeatedly refers to
using an electron microscope to t
On 19/07/2012 09:15, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
no. for modern hard drives it was already proved that
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/disk bs=1m
is enough to make data unreadable.
for very old drives it may not
How about data stored in remapped sectors, or any flash cache?
The Secure Erase command
(htt
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Carmel wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:15:17 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar articulated:
1) There's a _reason_ the gov't requires hard drives with anthing
higher than 'somewhat' classified data on them to be =physically=
destroyed before leving the secure area.
no. for mo
How about data stored in remapped sectors, or any flash cache?
how about being able to restore random 0.1% of former user data.
Not really useful.
Flash cache is quite recent idea, nobody serious would like to scrap such
a drive instead of reuse.
__
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:55:29 +0200, Erik Nørgaard wrote:
> Now, I have no idea which processes actually require access to those
> files, what privileges these processes run with and which files are
> actually executable or just plain files.
For differentiating "files' nature", use "file "
to ide
agencies recover overwritten data?" at
http://www.nber.org/sys-admin/overwritten-data-gutmann.html
at first - it should be asked "can agencies recover your data without
being overwritten" first.
just use geli(8)
then second problem is even less problem.
Finally use geli (or similar metho
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:26:57 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > agencies recover overwritten data?" at
> >
> > http://www.nber.org/sys-admin/overwritten-data-gutmann.html
>
> at first - it should be asked "can agencies recover your data without
> being overwritten" first.
Sure, because i
is there any simple way to get data about workstation that prints using
lpd from samba?
what i need is to get IP/name of workstation that queued a print job to
lpd subsystem through samba.
or is the only way to change everything to print to lpd directly using lpd
protocol? quite a bit of wor
Most of http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide
is for i386 and amd64.
I'm using zfs on ia64 r238540.
Not sure how much of the advice given apply in my case.
I have:
# grep ZFS /var/run/dmesg.boot
ZFS filesystem version: 5
ZFS storage pool version: features support (5000)
# zpool upgrade -v |tail
> "Alejandro" == Alejandro Imass writes:
Alejandro> Yes, but not before creating a big mess, stagnating
Alejandro> development and forcing the core team out of Oracle to create
Alejandro> LO and I guess [pure speculation] that in the end it
Alejandro> backfired and Larry (aka "we'll simply ta
>What sort of errors did you encounter while building the package using
>the ports?
The first problem is that it now demands clang-devel, which conflicts
with chromium which still wants regular clang.
Any idea how likely it is that chromium will build if I tell it to use
clang-devel?
R's,
John
The only good thing they seem *not* to have screwed with is VirtualBox.
not really. The "backend" part of virtualbox is great.
The frontend with is UUIDS for everything, XML and other trash is plain
terrible. But still - nothing better exist for the need now.
_
I didn't try by myself, but what about something like
print command = /usr/bin/lpr -P%p -J"%J" -U"%I" -r %f
in smb.conf?
I'm sorry to say that you additionally probably have to change
/usr/src/usr.sbin/lpr/common_source/ctlinfo.c
near line 87 to
#define OTHER_USERID_CHARS "-_." /* special
I didn't try by myself, but what about something like
print command = /usr/bin/lpr -P%p -J"%J" -U"%I" -r %f
in smb.conf?
I'm sorry to say that you additionally probably have to change
/usr/src/usr.sbin/lpr/common_source/ctlinfo.c
near line 87 to
#define OTHER_USERID_CHARS "-_." /* speci
43 matches
Mail list logo
