On 05/06/12 01:55, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-05-05 17:54, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> Since Friday, I have on all of our FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 boxes
>> massive trouble with net/openldap24-server (SASL enabled, so it is
>> openldap-sasl-server).
>>
>> Last time OpenLDAP worked was Thursday las
On 05/05/2012 19:30, Carmel wrote:
> I just updated my system to "FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0" from version 8.2. I
> was getting warning messages regarding "webcamd" at boot-up; however, I
> got them fixed (I think) I loaded: cuse4bsd_load="YES" in the
> loader.conf file and placed: webcamd_enable="YES"
On Sun, 6 May 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 05/05/2012 19:30, Carmel wrote:
All I guess I really have to get corrected is the "dhclient" thing,
assuming it is a real problem and just not some useless noise.
The 'dhclient already running' message is untidy, but harmless. It's
the rc system
On Sat, 05 May 2012 10:21:10 -0500
Joshua Isom articulated:
>I currently use my FreeBSD system as my generic unix server and some
>coding, along with occasional multimedia. I'd installed postfix years
>ago and kept using it. Right now, I use getmail with cron, dspam, and
>dovecot to handle my
On Sun, 6 May 2012 04:25:52 -0600 (MDT)
Warren Block articulated:
>On Sun, 6 May 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 05/05/2012 19:30, Carmel wrote:
>
>>> All I guess I really have to get corrected is the "dhclient" thing,
>>> assuming it is a real problem and just not some useless noise.
>>
>> The
On Sun, 06 May 2012 10:48:31 +0100
Matthew Seaman articulated:
>On 05/05/2012 19:30, Carmel wrote:
>> I just updated my system to "FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0" from version
>> 8.2. I was getting warning messages regarding "webcamd" at boot-up;
>> however, I got them fixed (I think) I loaded: cuse4bsd_lo
In the "Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64", if I do
not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry?
# Floppy drives
device fdc
Are there any other entries that I could eliminate if I do not have a
floppy drive?
Also, according the the "webcamd" documenta
Carmel wrote;
>
> In the "Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64", if I do
> not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry?
>
> # Floppy drives
> device fdc
Definitely, "yes".
>
> Are there any other entries that I could eliminate if I do not have a
> floppy
On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT)
Robert Bonomi articulated:
>Carmel wrote;
>>
>> In the "Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64", if I do
>> not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry?
>>
>> # Floppy drives
>> device fdc
>
>Definitely, "yes".
>>
>>
On Sunday 06 May 2012 10:34:12 Carmel wrote:
> On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT)
>
> Robert Bonomi articulated:
> >Carmel wrote;
> >
> >> In the "Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64", if I do
> >> not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry?
> >>
> >> # Fl
On 06/05/2012 14:34, Carmel wrote:
>>> Is there a way that I can simply compile it into the kernel? Would a:
>>>
>>> device cuse4bsd# Required by webcamd
>>>
>>> entry in the kernel file work? I cannot find any documentation on
>>> that.
cuse4bsd is a third party module. This means that th
I have a problem with Samba, well I "think" it is samba as one machine I have
access to when I try to perform an action like create a new folder in my home
folder windows spouts that I need permission and would I like to try again.
I guess some background would be useful at this point, I have 3
On Sun, 06 May 2012 14:58:39 +0100
Matthew Seaman articulated:
>cuse4bsd is a third party module. This means that the sources aren't
>available as part of the base system, so making work as compiled-in
>code in the kernel will require you to create patches for your kernel
>source tree. Not impos
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 413, Issue 11, Message: 21
On Sat, 5 May 2012 19:26:00 -0400 (EDT) Chris Hill wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2012, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
> > Anton Shterenlikht wrote;
>
> [snip]
>
> >> ...I still find the whole networking area perfectly impenetrable. (If
> >>
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun May 6 08:36:52 2012
> Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 09:34:12 -0400
> From: Carmel
> To: FreeBSD
> Subject: Re: kernel configuration file
>
> On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT)
> Robert Bonomi articulated:
> >
> >If you use the "traditional" kernel-hui
On Sun, 6 May 2012 13:23:08 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
> > From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun May 6 08:36:52 2012
> > Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 09:34:12 -0400
> > From: Carmel
> > To: FreeBSD
> > Subject: Re: kernel configuration file
> >
> > On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT)
On 06/05/2012 17:31, Ian Smith wrote:
Anton, I'm not sure what the state of the art is for multiple network
profiles for such as wireless vs wired, home and work etc, but look
around. I recall one called just 'profile' from years ago, and more
recently talk of 'failover' setups for wired/wireles
--As of May 5, 2012 10:21:10 AM -0500, Joshua Isom is alleged to have said:
I currently use my FreeBSD system as my generic unix server and some
coding, along with occasional multimedia. I'd installed postfix years
ago and kept using it. Right now, I use getmail with cron, dspam, and
dovecot t
18 matches
Mail list logo
