I somewhat agree, but it wasn't a person. I am the only administrator,
the only one with root access. The jails were effectively moved to the
/usr/local/etc/apache22 of the single that survived at the top level.
I'm thinking something between mount, EzJail, the journal and the way
MySQL created a
/usr/ports/net/rsync
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Frank Staals wrote:
Hey Everyone,
I'm looking for a way to synchronise two jails. More specifically, I
would like to keep/maintain an exact copy of a given jail. As an
example: Suppose I build a jail A on some system (in my particular case
build with
does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
subsystem ?
IMHO no. OSX is somehow-microkernel based, they did take things from
FreeBSD but not this IMHO.
anyway - who cares
Something is deeply broken in OS X memory management
http://workstuff.tumblr.com/post/20464
most importantly networking but certainly not memory subsystem.
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Apr 25, 2012, at 5:31 AM, jb wrote:
does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
subsystem ?
The simple answer is no. A more complex answer:
% grep -ri fr
"2) Inactive memory (which is memory that has been recently used but is no
longer) is supposed to be seamlessly reclaimed automatically by the OS when
needed for new programs. In practice, I?ve found that this isn?t the case, and
my system slows to a crawl and starts paging out to disk when free
If you really are having a problem with FreeBSD you are going to have to do
a lot better than this in terms of providing some data points which define
the problem. I am in agreement with Adam here: either you can work the
problem or you can troll. I don't see any indication yet of any real problem
is relatively new. My guess is that if there is a problem it's ZFS
specific. If it were a more general problem I think we'd see a lot more
complaints, whereas ZFS already has a reputation for needing lots of
memory.
you may precisely set up a limits of memory that ZFS would use at most. or
just
Wojciech Puchar wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> writes:
>
> >
> > "2) Inactive memory (which is memory that has been recently used but is no
> > longer) is supposed to be seamlessly reclaimed automatically by the OS when
> > needed for new programs. In practice, I?ve found that this isn?t the case,
> >
Wojciech Puchar wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> writes:
>
> > does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
> > subsystem ?
>
> IMHO no. OSX is somehow-microkernel based, they did take things from
> FreeBSD but not this IMHO.
>
> anyway - who cares
>
Well, I quoted the so
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 07:41:18 +0200
Polytropon articulated:
>On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:46:52 -0400, Jerry wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:58:40 -0600
>> Chad Perrin articulated:
>>
>> >On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:57:10PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:32:24 -0600 Chad Perrin articul
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>> I somewhat agree, but it wasn't a person. I am the only administrator,
>> the only one with root access. The jails were effectively moved to the
>> /usr/local/etc/apache22 of the single that survived at the top level.
>> I'm thinking somet
Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Wojciech Puchar
> wrote:
> >> I somewhat agree, but it wasn't a person. I am the only administrator,
> >> the only one with root access. The jails were effectively moved to the
> >> /usr/local/etc/apache22 of the single that survived at
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 07:36:03 -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 07:41:18 +0200
> Polytropon articulated:
>
> >On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:46:52 -0400, Jerry wrote:
> >> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:58:40 -0600
> >> Chad Perrin articulated:
> >>
> >> >On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:57:10PM -0400, Jerry wr
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Robert Bonomi
wrote:
>
> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Wojciech Puchar
>> wrote:
>> >> I somewhat agree, but it wasn't a person. I am the only administrator,
>> >> the only one with root access. The jails were effectively moved to t
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Robert Bonomi
> wrote:
>>
>> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Wojciech Puchar
>>> wrote:
>>> >> I somewhat agree, but it wasn't a person. I am the only administrator,
>>> >>
Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Robert Bonomi
> wrote:
> > Alejandro Imass wrote:
> >> After a little more research, ___it it NOT unlikely at all___ that
> >> under high distress and a hard boot, UFS could have somehow corrupted
> >> the directory structure, whilst m
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Robert Bonomi
>> wrote:
>> > Alejandro Imass wrote:
>> >> After a little more research, ___it it NOT unlikely at all___ that
>> >> under high distress and a hard boot, UFS coul
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:52:02 -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Robert Bonomi
> wrote:
> >
> > Alejandro Imass wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Robert Bonomi
> >> wrote:
> >> > Alejandro Imass wrote:
> >> >> After a little more research, ___it it NOT
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:52:02 -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Robert Bonomi
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Alejandro Imass wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Robert Bonomi
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Alejandro Ima
On 28/04/2012 19:52, Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Robert Bonomi
wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
After a little more research, ___it it NOT unlikely at all___ that
under high distress
On 04/28/2012 11:16 AM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
That is what worries me, is that it wasn't just some random bit or
cosmic ray, but the potential of happening again. I am not so sure
that it is*impossible* that a jail could affect other jails with
EzJail.
Sorry I'm late to the party. How about
Le 27/04/2012 ? 12:14:04-0500, Adam Vande More a écrit
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Albert Shih wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > I've got two very strange problem
> >
> > I'm running 9-stable on a Dell Laptop E4200.
> >
> > Since this morning when I put a USB mouse (I've try three mouses to be
Hi,
On Saturday 28 April 2012 20:15:25 Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Wojciech Puchar
> wrote:
> >> I somewhat agree, but it wasn't a person. I am the only administrator,
> >> the only one with root access. The jails were effectively moved to the
> >> /usr/local/etc/apa
On 28/04/2012 22:52, Albert Shih wrote:
Le 27/04/2012 ? 12:14:04-0500, Adam Vande More a écrit
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Albert Shih wrote:
Hi all
I've got two very strange problem
I'm running 9-stable on a Dell Laptop E4200.
Since this morning when I put a USB mouse (I've try th
On 2012-04-24 11:50, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
My daughter is doing a touch typing course
that presumes MS Word. So far she was fine
with pico, but now they want the kids to
practice CTRL/B (bold), CTRL/I (italic),
CTRL/U (underline). She really needs to use
these particular combinations because
Alejandro Imass wrote:
> 3) the directories were moved at reboot by journal recovery,
> fsck or something else
I think it's *extremely* unlikely that fsck was involved, because
it just doesn't do things like that. It might move an orphaned
directory (or file) to lost+found, but nowhere else. T
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Erich Dollansky
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 28 April 2012 20:15:25 Alejandro Imass wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Wojciech Puchar
>> wrote:
>> >> I somewhat agree, but it wasn't a person. I am the only administrator,
>> >> the only one with root acces
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 3:26 AM, wrote:
> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
[...]
>
> Any chance that your base system -- rather than one of the jails --
> has somehow been cracked; maybe even that the cracker precipitated
> the crash? It might be wise to restore the whole system from backup,
> the ba
Hi,
On Sunday 29 April 2012 08:58:17 Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Erich Dollansky
> wrote:
> > On Saturday 28 April 2012 20:15:25 Alejandro Imass wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Wojciech Puchar
> >> wrote:
> >> >> I somewhat agree, but it wasn't a person
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Erich Dollansky
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 29 April 2012 08:58:17 Alejandro Imass wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Erich Dollansky
>> wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Hi Erich, thanks for your reply.
>>
>> I don't know what links you are referring to, but please po
30 matches
Mail list logo
