Hi ：
I use a dell server making Link Aggregation with 6 ports and make
it be a FTP server. When I use 2 pc connect the server at the same
time. The top speed of the server can be 200MB/S. And in the
transmission I cut off one of working ports,the discard connetion will
be use another working p
On 03/09/12 14:56, Bruno Comerci wrote:
Hi guys.
Instead of wasting your time and man power, why wont you join to the ReactOS
project?
It would be more beneficial to the internet community and to the users around
the world who wants a free OS with similar looking and functions than Windows,
Well that's exactly what I'm trying to show you.
Link aggregation will *NOT* allow you to get 200mbs between 2 servers by
sending data over the 2 cables.
As per the example I pasted below, link aggregation uses a load
balancing algorithm to share the traffic across several links.
It will *NOT*
On 03/09/12 16:56, Hexing B wrote:
Isn't it illegal to emulate windows OS?
Wine would be illegal then. This is Wine on steroids, and then some.
Poke a needle in for testing and it will pop ;)
Frankly, its not as good as winblow$ and cant do pretty much anything
else with it, so its hopeless.
On 3/8/2012 11:56 PM, Bruno Comerci wrote:
>
> Hi guys.
>
>
> Instead of wasting your time and man power, why wont you join to the
> ReactOS project? It would be more beneficial to the internet
> community and to the users around the world who wants a free OS with
> similar looking and functions
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 01:56:25 -0300, Bruno Comerci wrote:
> Instead of wasting your time and man power, why wont you
> join to the ReactOS project?
Because I like to _act_, instead to just RE-act.
REact to some old-fashioned and spoiled concepts
and incompatible infrastructures without any future...
Hi.
On 09.03.2012 10:56, Bruno Comerci wrote:
Instead of wasting your time and man power, why wont you join to the ReactOS
project?
It would be more beneficial to the internet community and to the users around
the world who wants a free OS with similar looking and functions than Windows,
if y
Troll alert. (just let it die)
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Bruno Comerci
wrote:
>
> Hi guys.
>
>
> Instead of wasting your time and man power, why wont you join to the ReactOS
> project?
> It would be more beneficial to the internet community and to the users around
> the world who wants
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Bruno Comerci
wrote:
>
> Hi guys.
>
>
> Instead of wasting your time and man power, why wont you join to the ReactOS
> project?
> It would be more beneficial to the internet community and to the users around
> the world who wants a free OS with similar looking an
Hi,
On Friday 09 March 2012 11:56:25 Bruno Comerci wrote:
>
> Hi guys.
>
>
> Instead of wasting your time and man power, why wont you join to the ReactOS
> project?
hey, who clean my desk now? I was just eating when I read this crap. Best
trolling ever!
> It would be more beneficial to the
> Who in their right mind would EVER want to run this crap?
You answered your own question. My guess? People who are too cheap to buy
Windows and too stupid to figure out how to find a free copy of XP or Win 7
on the net and do the activation or find a password. That's a pretty small
user space.
On Mar 8, 2012, at 11:56 PM, Bruno Comerci wrote:
>
> Hi guys.
>
>
> Instead of wasting your time and man power, why wont you join to the ReactOS
> project?
> It would be more beneficial to the internet community and to the users around
> the world who wants a free OS with similar looking an
On 3/9/12 4:08 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Well that's exactly what I'm trying to show you.
Link aggregation will *NOT* allow you to get 200mbs between 2 servers by
sending data over the 2 cables.
As per the example I pasted below, link aggregation uses a load
balancing algorithm to share the
2012-03-08 19:46, Chad Perrin skrev:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 08:51:03AM +, Arthur Chance wrote:
On 03/07/12 21:40, Chad Perrin wrote:
If anyone has more information about planned BSD Unix ports to Raspberry
Pi, or comes up with more in the next few weeks, I'd appreciate it if
someone would
On 03/09/12 15:08, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2012-03-08 19:46, Chad Perrin skrev:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 08:51:03AM +, Arthur Chance wrote:
On 03/07/12 21:40, Chad Perrin wrote:
If anyone has more information about planned BSD Unix ports to
Raspberry
Pi, or comes up with more in the next few
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012, Da Rock wrote:
> I'm reconsidering my current setup (postfix/courier) for imap and I was
> doing some research on performance comparisons between imap server
> setups. I stumbled on this article just just about fell of my chair
> laughing when I read the last article on
i'd like to follow up with this question if possible
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:31 PM, alexus wrote:
> ---
> LoadModule fastcgi_module libexec/apache22/mod_fastcgi.so
>
>
> AddHandler php5-fastcgi .php
> FastCgiExternalServer /usr/local/www/apache22/data/php -socket
> /var/run/sp
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Bill Campbell
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 1:46 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: imap server performance benchmarks
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012, Da Rock wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:33:53 -0600, Weldon Godfrey
wrote:
I would highly recommend looking at Dovecot. I have used courier for
several ISPs then switched to Dovecot on my last install. Its ability
for
caching the index per user is of great performance advantage if you
choose
to leverag
On Friday 09 March 2012 01:56:25 Bruno Comerci wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
>
> Instead of wasting your time and man power, why wont you join to the
> ReactOS project? It would be more beneficial to the internet community and
> to the users around the world who wants a free OS with similar looking and
> f
I think you're naming your module incorrectly.
First, try just setting the handler in your vhost w/o the ifmodule stuff.
If that works, you know where you've gone wrong.
On 9 Mar 2012, at 21:12, alexus wrote:
> i'd like to follow up with this question if possible
>
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Bruno Comerci
Sent: 09 March 2012 04:56
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Suggestion
Hi guys.
Instead of wasting your time and man power, why wont you join
Hi,
On Saturday 10 March 2012 07:57:59 Graeme Dargie wrote:
>
>
> I try not to reply to these things, but I have to say this bloke is having a
> proper tin bath (laugh) in development since 1996 their website proudly
> claims, and here we are in 2012 and it is still an alpha!
>
you can see on
On 03/10/12 08:21, Mark Felder wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:33:53 -0600, Weldon Godfrey
wrote:
I would highly recommend looking at Dovecot. I have used courier for
several ISPs then switched to Dovecot on my last install. Its
ability for
caching the index per user is of great performance
On 03/10/12 11:07, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 10 March 2012 07:57:59 Graeme Dargie wrote:
I try not to reply to these things, but I have to say this bloke is having a
proper tin bath (laugh) in development since 1996 their website proudly claims,
and here we are in 2012 and it is
if it would be incorrectly it wouldn't work the first time (default host)
virtualhost has a copy from a default host, the only difference is
local path to directory, that's all
ifmodule is there just in case if for whatever reason module is
missing, site can operate in degraded state vs not operate
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:48:17PM +, Arthur Chance wrote:
> On 03/09/12 15:08, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> >2012-03-08 19:46, Chad Perrin skrev:
> >>
> >>That helps me get sort of a timeline in mind, I think.
> >
> >The production is halted.
> >
> >http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/781
>
> The k
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:56:25AM -0300, Bruno Comerci wrote:
>
> Hi guys.
>
> Instead of wasting your time and man power, why wont you join to the
> ReactOS project? It would be more beneficial to the internet community
> and to the users around the world who wants a free OS with similar
> loo
On 3/9/2012 7:07 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
you can see on this how difficult it is to be 100% compatible with Windows.
Especially the Virus layer of Windows is hard to redo.
It is a masterpiece on its own.
Erich
Wine got some of the security issues to match, and they were found in
wine and
Hi,
On Saturday 10 March 2012 14:28:05 Joshua Isom wrote:
> On 3/9/2012 7:07 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > you can see on this how difficult it is to be 100% compatible with Windows.
> > Especially the Virus layer of Windows is hard to redo.
> >
> > It is a masterpiece on its own.
>
> Wine got
30 matches
Mail list logo
