On 10/02/2012 05:20, Fbsd8 wrote:
> I maintain a port that accesses the release distribution files. Now with
> 9.0 having a different path /i386/i386 and the files being compressed
> first with tar and then again with xz I need to change the port to
> access the new layout and file format.
>
> I w
Antonio Olivares writes:
> Dear folks,
>
> I have a question regarding portshaker. I have successfully used
> Warren Block's script to make updates.
>
> http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/portupgrade.html
>
> #!/bin/sh
> /usr/sbin/portsnap fetch update && \
> /usr/local/sbin/portmaster -L
Hello questions!
In late january I updated all ports (portmaster --no-confirm -d -G -a) and
after the update I lost UTF-8, wide character compatibility in irssi, vim
and mutt and such-like.
In fact, I can write åäö in terminal (echo manages to print them for
instance) but I am unable to read the
I have a FreeBSD 9.0 server with an Intel RAID card that has two array
mirrors of which one has failed. The remote host was not responding and
had it reset to find in the RAID utility one of the drives had failed
one of the RAID 1 arrays. Perhaps I shouldn't have, but I told the
utility to use the
So what do I change if I want to increase the shell's file limit?
I use bash 4.
And by the way, for me, part of the normal installation of a new FBSD box
is to make certain changes. For example, for "uniq -c" I use "%06" instead
of "%d" because this way I can sort the output. Things like that.
On 02/11/12 01:34, Henry Olyer wrote:
So what do I change if I want to increase the shell's file limit?
I don't think you can. It's not a shell limit. It's a limit to the
number of arguments the command itself will take. As said, the shell
expands '*' to a list of files as the argument, and rm
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Da Rock <
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
> On 02/11/12 01:34, Henry Olyer wrote:
>
>> So what do I change if I want to increase the shell's file limit?
>>
> I don't think you can. It's not a shell limit. It's a limit to the number
> of argumen
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Matthew Story wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Da Rock <
> freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
>
>> On 02/11/12 01:34, Henry Olyer wrote:
>>
>>> So what do I change if I want to increase the shell's file limit?
>>>
>> I don't think you ca
>>> ls -1 | xargs rm
>> but be aware that that wont work for filenames with spaces.
True. Can't do that using ls to generate the list of filenames as there
is no option to generate a null-separated list amongst ls's
multitudinous collection.
> In addition, I don't believe it solves the OP's in
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:34:20AM -0500, Henry Olyer wrote:
> So what do I change if I want to increase the shell's file limit?
You don't want to diddle the shell.
Use the correct UNIX utilities such as - for, xargs or find - in this
case as have been suggested by other responders. That is t
On 10/02/2012 16:04, Matthew Story wrote:
> find . -type f -depth 1 -print0 | xargs -n99 -0 -s8192 -c5 rm --
>
> or some such, depending on your needs, I believe in most situations this
> particular invocation will also out-perform find ... -delete.
Why would you believe that? find ... -delete ca
On 2/10/2012 7:15 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
I have a FreeBSD 9.0 server with an Intel RAID card that has two array
mirrors of which one has failed. The remote host was not responding and
had it reset to find in the RAID utility one of the drives had failed
one of the RAID 1 arrays. Perhaps I
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:02:29 -0800
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Janos Dohanics wrote:
>
> > 1. The Guided partitioning doesn't suggest any more to
> > create /var, /tmp, /usr, etc. file systems. Is it really
> > the recommendation to go with just / ?
>
> Depends on who you ask :) and on your
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:20:03 +0100
Michael Cardell Widerkrantz wrote:
> Janos Dohanics , 2012-02-08 19:42 (+0100):
>
> > 4. Also, with GPT, one has to be in single user mode to synchronize
> > disks - correct?
>
> I think the guide you linked to:
>
> http://blather.michaelwlucas.com/archives
Can anyone here explain the MaxSessions and MaxConnections setting for
istgt?
Let's say I have the following:
6 servers
8 LUNs
2 Paths to each LUN
Is that... 96 sessions? 96 connections?
It's very unclear what is meant by session and connection.
Thanks,
Mark
We have a ZFS file system under FreeBSD9.0 running on a
virtual machine which had been running flawlessly for a bit over
a month when I discovered that I had copied our home directory
into /usr/home such that we had /usr/home/home. As root, I cd'd
to /usr/home and then typed
rm -r home
at
On Fri, February 10, 2012 11:43 am, Martin McCormick wrote:
> Does this sound familiar to anybody? This is the first
> zfs installation I have used and I am not real wild about trying
> it again if we can't solve this mystery. We can't seem to
> duplicate the problem. Any ideas are apprecia
You will see a message on this group from Ryan Frederick
who is a coworker of mine and who also posted a question about
this same issue. There was a little confusion about which
FreeBSD support group had been asked so my question and his are
about the same machine. He submitted the stack tr
I'm attempting to remove a number of old files within a directory that
was rsynced over from another box. However a number of files (old
symlinks and regular files in this instance) cause a kernel panic when
attempting to remove them using rm or unlink.
This is the panic message output:
Fatal t
In response to the related thread started by Martin McCormick we did run
a `zpool scrub` on the zpool, and the scrub completed successfully with
no repairs performed.
I successfully tried importing the zpool in Linux using the native Linux
ZFS module. However attempting to remove the files via
Здравствуйте, Da.
Вы писали 10 февраля 2012 г., 17:51:59:
DR> On 02/11/12 01:34, Henry Olyer wrote:
>> So what do I change if I want to increase the shell's file limit?
DR> I don't think you can. It's not a shell limit. It's a limit to the
DR> number of arguments the command itself will take. As
> "Matthew" == Matthew Seaman writes:
Matthew>find . -type f -depth 1 -exec rm -f '{}' ';'
Matthew> but let's not leave people in any doubt that this is not the
Matthew> best option.
However...
find . -type f -depth 1 -exec rm -f {} +
Might very well be a great option. Well, not fo
Who should I talk to about removing a thread from the mailing list?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:03:46AM +0800, yt wrote:
> Who should I talk to about removing a thread from the mailing list?
As has been mentioned many times in the lists - it's a lost cause.
These lists are archived, mirrored and otherwise duplicated hundreds
or even thousands of times around the
On 2/9/12, yt wrote:
> Who should I talk to about removing a thread from the mailing list?
With the countless number of mirrors this list has, it's pretty much
impossible.
-Modulok-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
Hi,
I'm struggling with my wireless cards couple days and I can't figure out what's
wrong. Following
I'm under FreeBSD 9.0 RELEASE and ever since I've used it I can't connect to
any wireless network. I've got Atheros NIC and under every other OS it works
fine, even earlier when I were under Free
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:58 PM, zaklinaczcipek128
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm struggling with my wireless cards couple days and I can't figure out
> what's wrong. Following
> I'm under FreeBSD 9.0 RELEASE and ever since I've used it I can't connect
> to any wireless network. I've got Atheros NIC and under
On Fri 2012-02-10 16:12:06 UTC+, Matthew Seaman
(m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk) wrote:
> > In addition, I don't believe it solves the OP's initial problem of the
> > argument list being too long! You'd probably need to use the xargs -n
> > switch here.
>
> Go and read the xargs(1) man pag
Hi,
I have the following config:
1. DG43GT motherboard with 4GB memory
2. br10i SAS adapter
3. 16x Toshiba SAS drives connected to expander backplane.
I am able to create a zfs pool ok without any errors but as soon as I
do a scrub on that pool I get tons of scsi errors.
Here is my dmesg output
29 matches
Mail list logo
