I am trying to install 9.0 on a small notebook on which I have
previously successfully installed 8.2.
I don't get very far. When defining partitions I have opted for Guided
and chosen a drive with enough space (3.5GB), Entire disk. I am then
asked if I'm sure I want to proceed, to which I answ
El día Monday, January 16, 2012 a las 09:45:23AM +0100, Bernard Higonnet
escribió:
> I am trying to install 9.0 on a small notebook on which I have
> previously successfully installed 8.2.
>
> I don't get very far. When defining partitions I have opted for Guided
> and chosen a drive with enou
2012-01-14 10:34, Polytropon skrev:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:12:48 +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2012-01-14 09:22, Polytropon skrev:
How many subdirectories are there?
ls | wc -l
32765
Seems that you have reached LINK_MAX of 32767
(according to /usr/src/sys/sys/syslimits.h).
The differen
On Sunday 15 January 2012 23:54:52 Chip Camden wrote:
> Quoth Polytropon on Monday, 16 January 2012:
> > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:40:20 -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> > > Is it permissible to delete the dot snap folder which is created
> > > in a filesystem?
> >
> > First of all, it's called a directo
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 05:32:11 -0600, ajtiM wrote:
> On Sunday 15 January 2012 23:54:52 Chip Camden wrote:
> > Quoth Polytropon on Monday, 16 January 2012:
> > > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:40:20 -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> > > > Is it permissible to delete the dot snap folder which is created
> > > > in
Hey I install apache on free bsd 8.2 but accidentially didnt include
the perl threads. Now when I try to re-install it says perl file
required for apache..How do i fix this problem?
Thanks,
Daniel Lewis
561-676-1073
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.or
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:59:59 +0100
Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 05:32:11 -0600, ajtiM wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 January 2012 23:54:52 Chip Camden wrote:
> > > Quoth Polytropon on Monday, 16 January 2012:
> > > > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:40:20 -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> > > > > Is it permi
On 15 January 2012 14:23, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> Does anybody already did a *binary* update (w/ freebsd-update) from a zfs on
> root freebsd-8.2-RELEASE to a new freebsd-9.0-RELEASE zfs on root system?
> Did all went well? I know the procedure (freebsd-update, recompile all
> ports, finish freeb
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:21:27 +, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:59:59 +0100
> Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 05:32:11 -0600, ajtiM wrote:
> > > On Sunday 15 January 2012 23:54:52 Chip Camden wrote:
> > > > Quoth Polytropon on Monday, 16 January 2012:
> > > > > On Sun, 15 Jan 20
On 1/16/12 1:03 PM, Daniel Lewis wrote:
> Hey I install apache on free bsd 8.2 but accidentially didnt include
> the perl threads. Now when I try to re-install it says perl file
> required for apache..How do i fix this problem?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel Lewis
> 561-676-1073
Hi,
Sadly, "p
Op 16-1-2012 13:17, Magnus Strahlert schreef:
On 15 January 2012 14:23, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Does anybody already did a *binary* update (w/ freebsd-update) from a zfs on
root freebsd-8.2-RELEASE to a new freebsd-9.0-RELEASE zfs on root system?
Did all went well? I know the procedure (freebsd-
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Daniel Lewis
wrote:
> Hey I install apache on free bsd 8.2 but accidentially didnt include
> the perl threads. Now when I try to re-install it says perl file
> required for apache..How do i fix this problem?
>
I am assuming you want to run mod_perl on mod_work
I've got a weird problem... I was working on installing 9.0 w/zfs on my
laptop, messed up, rebooted, *formatted the drives* and restarted. Got
much further the next time, however...
There is a zombie copy of the old zpool sitting around interfering with
things. 'zpool import' lists it, bu
most likely a ifs "label" on the disk from before that you need to get rid of
before doing the install.
RB
On Jan 16, 2012, at 11:37 AM, Daniel Staal wrote:
>
> I've got a weird problem... I was working on installing 9.0 w/zfs on my
> laptop, messed up, rebooted, *formatted the drives* and r
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Daniel Staal wrote:
> There is a zombie copy of the old zpool sitting around interfering with
> things. 'zpool import' lists it, but it can't import it because the disks
> don't actually exist. 'zpool destroy' can't delete it, because it's not
> imported. ('No s
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
> The link-local addresses don't really harm, but I found them confusing,
> as the host is running as a router, and rtadv announces the link-local
> address by default.
IPv6-standards-wise, this is the correct thing to do. Router
advertiseme
On 16/01/2012 09:55, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Monday, January 16, 2012 a las 09:45:23AM +0100, Bernard Higonnet
escribió:
I am trying to install 9.0 on a small notebook on which I have
previously successfully installed 8.2.
I don't get very far. When defining partitions I have opted for G
Approximate 'zpool status' on 8.2:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
data.zfs DEGRADED 0 0 0
mirror-0DEGRADED 0 0 0
gpt/mid.zfs.sg1tb ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/sam1tbONLINE 0 0
I installed mdbtools from source on github and it put its man pages in
"/usr/local/share/man/man1", where the default man command doesn't find them
(although "man -M /usr/local/share/man mdb-export" works).
>From "man hier", it looks like the man pages should have been put into
>"/usr/local/man
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 01:27:31PM -0700, Dale Scott wrote:
> I installed mdbtools from source on github and it put its man pages in
> "/usr/local/share/man/man1", where the default man command doesn't find
> them (although "man -M /usr/local/share/man mdb-export" works).
Just use `man /full/path/
Dear folks,
I had a FreeBSD 9.0 BETA 2 Machine I was happily running since the
release and only updated ports via portmaster -a, and now since Fedora
9 has officially been released, I ran make buildworld, make
buildkernel, make installkernel and mergemaster -i, and make
installworld and now X does
- Original Message -
From: Yuri Pankov
Date: Monday, January 16, 2012 13:49
> Just use `man /full/path/to/the/manpage`. Also check man(1) and
> man.conf(5) on how to specify additional MANPATHs.
Thanks Yuri! As per man.conf(5), I created /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mdbtools.conf to
add /usr/loc
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 03:30:29PM -0700, Dale Scott wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Yuri Pankov
> Date: Monday, January 16, 2012 13:49
>
> > Just use `man /full/path/to/the/manpage`. Also check man(1) and
> > man.conf(5) on how to specify additional MANPATHs.
>
> Thanks Yuri! As p
Hi,
is anyone running a Common Lisp port on FreeBSD/sparc64?
I'm asking because none of our Common Lisp ports lang/clisp,
lang/ccl, lang/cmucl, lang/sbcl compile on sparc64.
On Debian Linux 6.0.1a for SPARC, at least sbcl is available.
Maybe clisp as well, IIRC.
Any suggestions for running Commo
Matt Mullins wrote:
>> The link-local addresses don't really harm, but I found them confusing,
>> as the host is running as a router, and rtadv announces the link-local
>> address by default.
>
> IPv6-standards-wise, this is the correct thing to do. Router
> advertisements should contain link-lo
Dear folks,
I am trying to update all ports and have encountered xfce4-wm failing
to compile. I used
# portmaster -a -x xfce4-wm
to bypass the failure.
===>>> Launching child to install x11-wm/xfce4-wm
===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm
===>>> Starting check for build dependenci
Dear folks,
Running FreeBSD-8.2 amd64 on three machines, on all three the poppler
message appears everytime I issue
# portmaster -a
command to update ports. Message says
===>>> The following actions were performed:
Re-installation of poppler-glib-0.18.0
It has done this for quite a whil
update
>
> Terminated
> ===>>> The following actions were performed:
> Re-installation of poppler-glib-0.18.0
>
>
> ===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command line:
> portmaster x11-wm/xfce4-wm
>
>
> Any id
> I've got a weird problem... I was working on installing 9.0 w/zfs on my
> laptop, messed up, rebooted, *formatted the drives* and restarted. Got
> much further the next time, however...
>
> There is a zombie copy of the old zpool sitting around interfering with
> things. 'zpool import' lis
I agree if you move drives and a particular zfs has not seen them before - and
there is a zfs label at the end things can go pear shaped - however…
if you blast just the end of the drive it should be fine.
RB
Ps. Maybe I;ll title a book fun with zfs and glabel or cheap thrills with zfs,
glabe
*Hi,
I want to configure CVS in eclipse so can you please help me in this
configuration?
*
--
Thanks & Regards,**
*N V R Gupta Nallajalla
**P **Please do not print this e-mail unless you really need to. This will
preserve trees on our planet.*
___
f
31 matches
Mail list logo
