Hello,
I got strange errors from ahci this morning (on a 8.2-RELEASE box):
+ahcich3: Error while READ LOG EXT
+ahcich3: Error while READ LOG EXT
+GEOM_MIRROR: Request failed (error=5). ada1[READ(offset=457644130304,
length=16384)]
+GEOM_MIRROR: Device backup: provider ada1 disconnected.
+(ada1
My FreeBSD Machine sometimes appear these messages:
swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed; blkno 2097158,size 4096, error
6 (or error 11)
swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed; blkno 1048581,size 4096, error 6
swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed; blkno 2097167,size 8192, error 6
...
This erro
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:57:04 +0700
Victor Sudakov wrote:
> > You can use videolan / vlc. It allows you to multicast video too.
> > In September 2011 BSD Magazine you have some examples about that.
>
> I like vlc on Linux/Windows machines. But installing it to a streaming
> server is a pain. Even
I have a new server that I would like to use as a back-end Maildir
storage shared through NFS. The specs are:
FreeBSD 9.0 Beta 2
Xeon x3470 @ 2.93 quad-core CPU
4 GB Ram @ 1333mhz ( upgrading to 12GB tomorrow )
3WARE 9650SE-16LP card with write cache enabled ( battery is installed )
16 x WD RE3
free...@top-consulting.net schreef:
I have a new server that I would like to use as a back-end Maildir
storage shared through NFS. The specs are:
FreeBSD 9.0 Beta 2
Xeon x3470 @ 2.93 quad-core CPU
4 GB Ram @ 1333mhz ( upgrading to 12GB tomorrow )
3WARE 9650SE-16LP card with write cache enabled
Quoting Johan Hendriks :
free...@top-consulting.net schreef:
I have a new server that I would like to use as a back-end Maildir
storage shared through NFS. The specs are:
FreeBSD 9.0 Beta 2
Xeon x3470 @ 2.93 quad-core CPU
4 GB Ram @ 1333mhz ( upgrading to 12GB tomorrow )
3WARE 9650SE-16LP ca
On 16/09/2011 12:31, free...@top-consulting.net wrote:
> A. TEST1: dd bs=1024 if=/dev/zero of=/data/t1 count=1M
>
> 1. ZFS performed the worst, averaging 67MB/sec
> 2. UFS + gjournal did around 130MB/sec
> 3. UFS did around 190MB/sec
>
> B. TEST2 ( random file creation ): bonnie++ -d /data -c 10
On 16/09/2011 13:30, free...@top-consulting.net wrote:
> Is zfs supposed to be faster if you let it manage the disks directly ?
>
Not necessarily faster (in fact, RAID-Z variants have known limitations
which are not so pronounced in RAID5/6), but definitely more convenient
and in some respects s
On 16. sep. 2011, at 12:31, free...@top-consulting.net wrote:
> Right now I defined an entire array of 8TB ( all 16 disks ) separated in two
> pieces. 50 GB for FreeBSD to boot and the rest available to configure as
> storage.
ZFS will want to write to it's ZIL (zfs intent log) before writing to
Hi folks, I have the following pf.conf on FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE *and* 8.2-RELEASE
===
set block-policy return
set skip on lo
int_if=bge1
ext_if=bge0
dup_if=dc0
# NAT rule
nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any -> ($ext_if) sticky-address
#
# Windows RDP redirectio
Quoting Terje Elde :
On 16. sep. 2011, at 12:31, free...@top-consulting.net wrote:
Right now I defined an entire array of 8TB ( all 16 disks )
separated in two pieces. 50 GB for FreeBSD to boot and the rest
available to configure as storage.
ZFS will want to write to it's ZIL (zfs intent l
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:57:45 -0500, wrote:
I know it's usually a big no-no but since I have the battery backed-up
write cache from the raid card, can't I just disable the ZIL entirely ?
No. ZFS doesn't work the way traditional filesystems do.
___
Quoting Terje Elde :
On 16. sep. 2011, at 12:31, free...@top-consulting.net wrote:
Right now I defined an entire array of 8TB ( all 16 disks )
separated in two pieces. 50 GB for FreeBSD to boot and the rest
available to configure as storage.
ZFS will want to write to it's ZIL (zfs intent l
On 16.09.2011 15:57, free...@top-consulting.net wrote:
> Quoting Terje Elde :
>
>> On 16. sep. 2011, at 12:31, free...@top-consulting.net wrote:
>>> Right now I defined an entire array of 8TB ( all 16 disks ) separated
>>> in two pieces. 50 GB for FreeBSD to boot and the rest available to
>>> conf
On Thursday 15 September 2011 13:46:35 Allen wrote:
> Sorry for top posting but can anyone send this to "Computer Stupidities"
> ? It seems to good to waste like this. Anyone who thinks they're a
> Hacker yet doesn't know how FTP works is not only funny, it's
> entertainment. And also, the web sit
On 15/09/2011 23:46, Allen wrote:
Sorry for top posting
I have never understood why people apologise when they top post. Is your
client mail so bad that you can't move your cursor selector under the
last message?
For me, I have tested a lot of client mails and I was always able to
write te
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of David Demelier
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 10:38 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Please secure your FTP access
>
> On 15/09/2011 23:4
On 9/16/11 1:37 PM, David Demelier wrote:
For me, I have tested a lot of client mails and I was always able to
write text under the last message. And even microsoft outlook.
Though your current client does appear to keep you from trimming.
--
--Jon Radel
j...@radel.com
On Fri, September 16, 2011 2:03 pm, Devin Teske wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
>> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of David Demelier
>> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 10:38 AM
>> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>> Su
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:03:40 -0700
Devin Teske articulated:
Between Top/Bottom and in-line posting, this thread is getting harder
to read by the minute.
I am not at my Windows machine at the moment; however, I know from past
experience that I CAN enter text, plain or HTML, after the last entry
in
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Allen wrote:
> Sorry for top posting but can anyone send this to "Computer Stupidities"
> ? It seems to good to waste like this. Anyone who thinks they're a
> Hacker yet doesn't know how FTP works is not only funny, it's
> entertainment. And also, the web site I'
On 16. sep. 2011, at 16:18, free...@top-consulting.net wrote:
> Got a measly 74MB/sec.
You can't ask for advice, get it, do something completely different, and then
complain that it didn't work.
Neither can you ask people to donate their time, if you won't spend yours.
In other words: if yo
Quoting Terje Elde :
On 16. sep. 2011, at 16:18, free...@top-consulting.net wrote:
Got a measly 74MB/sec.
You can't ask for advice, get it, do something completely different,
and then complain that it didn't work.
Neither can you ask people to donate their time, if you won't spend yours
On 16. sep. 2011, at 16:18, free...@top-consulting.net wrote:
> zpool create data da1
> zfs create data/maildomains
> zfs set sync=disabled data/maildomains
Just for the archives... sync=disabled won't disable disable the zil, it'll
disable waiting for a disk-flush on fsync etc. With a battery ba
On 9/16/2011 1:37 PM, David Demelier wrote:
> On 15/09/2011 23:46, Allen wrote:
>> Sorry for top posting
>
> I have never understood why people apologise when they top post. Is your
> client mail so bad that you can't move your cursor selector under the
> last message?
I top posted on purpose. Of
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:14:42PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
>
> Also many smartphone and tablet mailers automatically top-post, and make
> it significantly harder to move the cursor around inside the text with any
> accuracy.
This is why I don't deal with email on my Android smartphone. The ma
On Sep 16, 2011, at 17:27, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:14:42PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
>>
>> Also many smartphone and tablet mailers automatically top-post, and make
>> it significantly harder to move the cursor around inside the text with any
>> accuracy.
>
> This is why
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 06:55:05PM -0500, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2011, at 17:27, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:14:42PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
> >>
> >> Also many smartphone and tablet mailers automatically top-post, and make
> >> it significantly harder to mov
28 matches
Mail list logo
