Solved: Re: ssh -X (X11 forwarding) not working from 6.1 to 8.1

2011-07-12 Thread perryh
Mark Felder wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:06:33 -0500, Michael Sierchio > wrote: > > > xauth not in your path? > > ssh -Y skips all auth stuff so you don't need xauth; he said that > didn't work either :-( Well, apparently, even -Y needs xauth (which was not installed on the 8.1 system) on th

Re: ssh -X (X11 forwarding) not working from 6.1 to 8.1

2011-07-12 Thread perryh
Frank Shute wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:18:07AM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > > > DISPLAY is not getting set in a remote shell started by "ssh -X". ... > Have you tried putting: > > DISPLAY=:0.0 > > in ~/.ssh/environment on the machine that's not setting DISPLAY > properly? Wou

Re: Transparent load balancing

2011-07-12 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 7/11/11 6:49 PM, Unga wrote: > Hi all > > I need to implement a transparent load balancing daemon in C. > > That is, the daemon accept a TCP connection, get more info from the client, > and forward the communication transparently to another server to handle it. > > How this could be implemen

mutt and slrn

2011-07-12 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
I've been a GUI man for the last couple of years. Recently I wanted to change back to the two programs I used most: mutt (email) and slrn (news) only to find out they were not in ports anymore. Yes I know, there'se japanese versions, but what ever happened to the 'normal' programs? Are they gon

Re: mutt and slrn

2011-07-12 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
Op 12-7-2011 11:39 schreef Dick Hoogendijk: I've been a GUI man for the last couple of years. Recently I wanted to change back to the two programs I used most: mutt (email) and slrn (news) only to find out they were not in ports anymore. Yes I know, there'se japanese versions, but what ever hap

Re: Transparent load balancing

2011-07-12 Thread Unga
--- On Tue, 7/12/11, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > From: Damien Fleuriot > Subject: Re: Transparent load balancing > To: "Unga" > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2011, 4:11 PM > On 7/11/11 6:49 PM, Unga wrote: > > Hi all > > > > I need to implement a transparent load bal

Re: IPFW Firewall NAT inbound port-redirect

2011-07-12 Thread Bill Tillman
From: Dan Nelson To: Michael Sierchio Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Mon, July 11, 2011 1:07:31 PM Subject: Re: IPFW Firewall NAT inbound port-redirect In the last episode (Jul 11), Michael Sierchio said: > Sorry for the naive question, but most of

Re: What is xz ?

2011-07-12 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Robert Bonomi wrote: > > Correct. I'm currently on 7-STABLE where it's "not yet" part of > > the base system, but my new 8.2-STABLE also has it in /usr/bin. > > I believe it has been introduced with version 8... > > It is part of '7.2-RELEASE', It is not. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber

Re: IPFW Firewall NAT inbound port-redirect

2011-07-12 Thread Michael Sierchio
Is there a way of specifying a particular public address if there is more than one bound to the external interface? A la nat 123 config if re0.2 log same_ports redirect_port tcp 10.0.0.3:22 102.10.22.1: ? On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Bill Tillman wrote: > > > _

Re: IPFW Firewall NAT inbound port-redirect

2011-07-12 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jul 12), Michael Sierchio said: > Is there a way of specifying a particular public address if there is > more than one bound to the external interface? A la > > nat 123 config if re0.2 log same_ports redirect_port tcp 10.0.0.3:22 > 102.10.22.1: Yes; the redirect_port sy

Re: mergemaster confusion

2011-07-12 Thread doug
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, d...@safeport.com wrote: I have a mergemaster question. I assume this is my error but do not see what I did. I am testing remote update procedures so I started with a 7.0 IS0 and updated it to 7.4. My mergemaster.rc has the following directives: FREEBSD_ID=yes AUTO_

Re: IPFW Firewall NAT inbound port-redirect

2011-07-12 Thread Michael Sierchio
We're not talking about natd. The question was about the use of ipfirewall nat. On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jul 12), Michael Sierchio said: >> Is there a way of specifying a particular public address if there is >> more than one bound to the external

Re: IPFW Firewall NAT inbound port-redirect

2011-07-12 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jul 12), Michael Sierchio said: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Dan Nelson wrote: > > In the last episode (Jul 12), Michael Sierchio said: > >> Is there a way of specifying a particular public address if there is > >> more than one bound to the external interface?  A la > >

Re: IPFW Firewall NAT inbound port-redirect

2011-07-12 Thread Bill Tillman
From: Michael Sierchio To: Dan Nelson Cc: Bill Tillman ; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Tue, July 12, 2011 6:35:19 PM Subject: Re: IPFW Firewall NAT inbound port-redirect We're not talking about natd.  The question was about the use of ipfirewall nat.

Re: IPFW Firewall NAT inbound port-redirect

2011-07-12 Thread Michael Sierchio
I'm familiar with natd since its appearance. I was unclear on the ipfirewall nat syntax, since there is no syntax definition in the man page. It's true the man page is already too large, but some examples (somewhere) would be nice. Marshaling packets into userland and back into the kernel makes n

Re: IPFW Firewall NAT inbound port-redirect

2011-07-12 Thread Michael Powell
Michael Sierchio wrote: > I'm familiar with natd since its appearance. I was unclear on the > ipfirewall nat syntax, since there is no syntax definition in the man > page. It's true the man page is already too large, but some examples > (somewhere) would be nice. Marshaling packets into userland

Re: IPFW Firewall NAT inbound port-redirect

2011-07-12 Thread Michael Sierchio
Mike - You're confused. natd is still a userland process that works via divert sockets. ipfirewall nat is an extension to ipfirewall (ipfw is the userland control program to modify the rulesets, nat config, tables, etc.). - Michael On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Michael Powell wrote: > Mic