Hi Allen,
I've forwarded your request to freebsd-questions, since they're more
likely in a position to help you out -- you'll need to subscribe to
receive the replies!
Chris
[Top posted because I feel that it makes more sense here, please cut
my chunk out of replies]
On 21 June 2011 04:44, Alle
On 6/21/11 12:30 AM, Gary Gatten wrote:
> On 6/20/11 5:07 PM, Martin McCormick wrote:
>
> I was kinda going this route as well - policy based routing type thing, but,
> is there an "easier" way?
>
> 1.) Temporarily enable ipforwarding - not my favorite
> 2.) Instead of a second NIC, bind the n
On 6/21/11 2:32 AM, Jerome Herman wrote:
> On 21/06/2011 00:13, Jon Radel wrote:
> So depending on the client route, packets from a given IP address can
> land on either interface. Actually two clients nated behind the same
> public address might end up on both interfaces at the same time.
> Eve
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Martin McCormick wrote:
I would like to say that I got it working, but after
looking at the duel-homed host section of the Handbook, I am
still stuck. A Google search turned up a thread from a couple of
years ago that almost echoed my exact words. We've got a syste
Here is what the issue is right now. The remote campus
in question has been on number space that was part of our Class
B network. They got a block of subnets for their DNS's and
campus enterprises and work stations. We secured them their own
number space and they are migrating from their po
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 23:52:23 -0400
Robert Simmons articulated:
> Who is the admin for freebsd-quesitons and freebsd-security? There
> seems to be a few email addresses that are subscribed to these lists
> that keep spamming it periodically, or in the case of
> freebsd-security actually don't exis
On 21 June 2011 04:44, Allen wrote:
Been on Linux maybe 10-12 distributions for 10 years, am 80 and always been
curious about BSD so finally getting around to it.
Presently sadly my new Toshiba L675D seems to have some Linux incompatibilities
so I have win 7 with Ubuntu 10.04.2 wubi.
I do have
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:50:42 -0400
Fbsd8 articulated:
> > On 21 June 2011 04:44, Allen wrote:
> > Been on Linux maybe 10-12 distributions for 10 years, am 80 and
> > always been curious about BSD so finally getting around to it.
> > Presently sadly my new Toshiba L675D seems to have some Linux
>
On 6/21/11 6:41 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 6/21/11 2:32 AM, Jerome Herman wrote:
On 21/06/2011 00:13, Jon Radel wrote:
So depending on the client route, packets from a given IP address can
land on either interface. Actually two clients nated behind the same
public address might end up
Hi, Allen wrote:
> Been on Linux maybe 10-12 distributions for 10 years, am 80 and always been
> curious about BSD so finally getting around to it.
> Presently sadly my new Toshiba L675D seems to have some Linux
> incompatibilities so I have win 7 with Ubuntu 10.04.2 wubi.
> I do have a huge dat
On 6/21/11 7:28 AM, Martin McCormick wrote:
The problem I have, probably due to a misunderstanding
of what I need to do, is easy to describe.
The defaultrouter statement in rc.conf or
route add default x.x.x.x
from the command line sets an interface to know that packets
whose
> This, in of itself, doesn't follow. In the absence of stateful firewalls
> and anti-spoofing filtering (blocking packets that don't have a source IP
> address on the "expected" list),
While I can't comment on anyone else's environment, it is in my
experience very common in most corporate and ed
> When I set up the secondary interface, I have not been
> able to come up with a statement or statements that tell fxp1
> that it's default router is y.y.y.y so you can't ever reach it
> from outside the new subnet.
What you want to do is called "policy routing" or "source routing",
since
On 6/21/11 1:28 PM, Martin McCormick wrote:
> Here is what the issue is right now. The remote campus
> in question has been on number space that was part of our Class
> B network. They got a block of subnets for their DNS's and
> campus enterprises and work stations. We secured them their o
I'm running into a weird problem with sed. I believe what I'm trying to do
should work fine, but seem to be stymied by weirdness in sed's argument
processing. This is on 8.2-RELEASE-p2.
> which sed
/usr/bin/sed
According to years of experience and re-reading the man page five times today
th
>> sed -i'' -e 's/^\(REVOKE ALL ON SCHEMA public FROM \)postgres/\1pgsql/' \
> ? -e 's/^\(GRANT ALL ON SCHEMA public TO \)postgres/\1pgsql/' \
> ? /tmp/pgdump
> sed: -e: No such file or directory
If you put a space after -i:
sed -i '' ...
It will work. The '-i' option tak
On 2011/06/21, at 11:24, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
>>> sed -i'' -e 's/^\(REVOKE ALL ON SCHEMA public FROM \)postgres/\1pgsql/' \
>> ? -e 's/^\(GRANT ALL ON SCHEMA public TO \)postgres/\1pgsql/'\
>> ? /tmp/pgdump
>> sed: -e: No such file or directory
>
> If you put a space
> Aha... I knew it had to be something. I couldn't quite wrap my head around
> the idea that sed is misbehaving.. it seems way too old and set in its ways
> for that. However, I did get the -i'' syntax from somewhere.. perhaps it's
> a GNUism and I just forgot where I picked it up.
In GNU se
Folks
I have a FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE system that I'm connecting via iSCSI to a
Compellent SAN. The iscsi-initiator works fine but is very slow and given
to periodic (very short) hangs. The issue is that we have subversion on
it and it takes a long time to checkout some of our repos. Any pointer
> and the Freebsd installer guide
> http://www.a1poweruser.com/
>
Hmmm... Wish I'd known about that a while back. It's more or less
exactly what I've been looking for, a realy good "how to" guide for
F'BSD.
The only thing missing (had a quick look!) is details on Jails (they are
mentioned,
Damien Fleuriot writes:
> SOLUTION:
> You need a way to reply using a specific route depending on which IP was
> requested by the internet user at 50.50.50.50
>
> If they queried 100.100.100.53, you need to route through 100.100.100.1.
> If they queried 200.200.200.53, you need to route through 20
On 06/21/11 12:41, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 6/21/11 2:32 AM, Jerome Herman wrote:
So depending on the client route, packets from a given IP address can
land on either interface. Actually two clients nated behind the same
public address might end up on both interfaces at the same time.
Even th
On 6/21/11 6:30 PM, Jerome Herman wrote:
> On 06/21/11 12:41, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>
>> This does not depend on the route the client takes, but rather on the IP
>> the client tries to reach, wouldn't you agree ?
>
> Most of the problems I was afraid of were lifted when further
> explanations
On 06/21/11 18:45, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 6/21/11 6:30 PM, Jerome Herman wrote:
On 06/21/11 12:41, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
This does not depend on the route the client takes, but rather on the IP
the client tries to reach, wouldn't you agree ?
Most of the problems I was afraid of were lifte
i think there are only two mindmap programs in ports, vym and
freemind. i must have spend a month trying to figure out freemind.
last night i installed vym, and got pratically nowhere. if there is
any tutorial on these two i can't find them.
can any listmember give me a pointer to anything tu
Your folder tmp is an own partition with just 1GB size.
This partition is running full.
Mon Jun 20 11:41:58 2011 849M /tmp
Mon Jun 20 11:42:01 2011 Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/amrd0s1a 989M 987M -76M 108% /
When a partition is over 100% its use backup place for defect se
On Jun 21, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Lokadamus wrote:
> Mon Jun 20 11:41:58 2011 849M /tmp
> Mon Jun 20 11:42:01 2011 Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/amrd0s1a 989M 987M -76M 108% /
>
> When a partition is over 100% its use backup place for defect sektors. A
> partition is/ was cre
Hi, I'm an ipfw user that finally got the opportunity to set up NAT on
an interface with a public IP. I was doing some multi-homing experiments
using ipfw fwd combined with outbound ipfw nat - and since I needed to
run both, and both immediately ended ipfw ruleset execution, I had to
turn off net.i
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 07:44:16 AM Jerry wrote:
> You have voiced a concern that has been voiced here several times in
> the past. Unfortunately, this is an "open" list; ie, anyone subscribed
> or not can post. This leads to the inevitable problems that plague this
> forum. I have tried contacti
OK, it works very well. Installing a ZFS FreeBSD system with an ufs
/boot is very very easy using the PC-BSD DVD.
However, I have one question:
I'd like to install FreeBSD (pcbsd) on a (zfs) mirror
In OpenSolaris you can install directly to the zfs mirror, but how's
this in this situation> Afte
OK, So I got ZFS installed on this new box, I had to loose two disks due
to them being faulty, so I removed the IDE expansion card and booted
from an SD card, all went well (according to this guide ->
http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/Mirror). I adjusted the
instructions there for on
On 21/06/2011 20:01, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> I'd like to install FreeBSD (pcbsd) on a (zfs) mirror
> In OpenSolaris you can install directly to the zfs mirror, but how's
> this in this situation> After all, an UFS partitin is also created. How
> can I get the equivalent of an OpenSolaris mirrored
Machine has been running FreeBSD/amd64 with 2 GiB of memory.
I just installed a 2nd 2 GiB of memory for 4 GiB total.
FreeBSD thinks it now has 32 GiB ???
FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #22: Tue Jun 7 12:37:21 PDT 2011
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ (1808.34-MHz K8-class CPU)
real memory = 343597383
trying to use memory that isn't there? How do I debug/fix this?
Just curious, what was memtest86+ report?
Can you install dmidecode(8) from /usr/ports/sysutils/dmidecode
I'd be very suprised if GCC started misbehaving during compile
~BAS
Didn't find anything with google.
___
Hi questions@
> Robert Simmons articulated:
> > There
> > seems to be a few email addresses that are subscribed to these lists
> > that keep spamming it periodically,
je...@seibercom.net wrote:
> Now, if this forum were conducted under the same restraints that the
> Postfix forums(2) adhere to, t
"Daniel Staal" wrote:
>
> On Mon, June 20, 2011 3:35 am, Dennis Perisa wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Are there paid support services available for FreeBSD? If provided by a
> > 3rd party, can you name or even recommend a few?
>
> I haven't tried any, so I can't make recommendations, but the FreeBSD
I can't really say I understand the exact problem the OP has, but if
it's anything similar to asymmetrical/source-based routing problems I
was having some time ago, pf and reply-to is probably the best way to
do it. However, I'd also like to point out setfib(1), as it seems
no-one has brought it up
Hi,
Reference:
> From: Warren Block
> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:51:14 -0600 (MDT)
> Message-id:
Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:32:55 -0700 (PDT), Unga wrote:
> >>
> >> Could somebody please highlight to me how to su
"Those who think they know it all are really annoying to those of us who do."
> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:04:52 +0200
> From: Lokadamus
>
> Your folder tmp is an own partition with just 1GB size.
FALSE TO FACT.
You can run df(1), giving it _any_ fileneme -- whether OR NOT it is
a directory -
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Tue Jun 21 17:34:22 2011
> From: n j
> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:02:53 +0200
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Two Networks on one System
>
> I can't really say I understand the exact problem the OP has,
As _I_ understand it, one of tw
On 06/22/11 08:15, Chris Brennan wrote:
> OK, So I got ZFS installed on this new box, I had to loose two disks due
> to them being faulty, so I removed the IDE expansion card and booted
> from an SD card, all went well (according to this guide ->
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/Mi
* Peter Toth [2011-06-22 12:16:11 +1200]:
> Did you set the "bootfs" property on your root pool? Example: "zpool set
> bootfs=tank/root tank"
Well, the wiki I linked has the following:
Fixit# mkdir /boot/zfs
Fixit# zpool create zroot mirror /dev/gpt/disk0 /dev/gpt/disk1
Fixit# zpool
* Peter Toth [2011-06-22 12:16:11 +1200]:
> Did you set the "bootfs" property on your root pool? Example: "zpool set
> bootfs=tank/root tank"
OK, I booted back to the livefs memostick, imported my zpool (tank) and
zpool promptly tells me the following
Fixit# zpool set bootfs=tank/root tank
# dmidecode 2.11
SMBIOS 2.2 present.
Handle 0x0005, DMI type 5, 24 bytes
Memory Controller Information
Error Detecting Method: 64-bit ECC
Error Correcting Capabilities:
None
Supported Interleave: One-way Interleave
Current Interleave: One-way Interle
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> I'm against merging chat@ & questions@, & don't believe it will happen
> Lists for different purposes, but even if questions@ people
> might come to a consensus in favour of merging, lots of
> people on other lists hav
"Dieter BSD" wrote:
> Machine has been running FreeBSD/amd64 with 2 GiB of memory.
> I just installed a 2nd 2 GiB of memory for 4 GiB total.
> FreeBSD thinks it now has 32 GiB ???
>
> FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #22: Tue Jun ??7 12:37:21 PDT 2011
> CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ (1808.34-MHz K8-c
I have kernel configuration files (e.g., a custom GENERIC) under RCS. For
example:
==
# $Revision: 1.1$
cpu HAMMER
ident GENERIC
==
I want to add that "1.1" to the end of GENERIC such that it becomes:
==
# $Revision: 1.1$
cpu
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 06:03:23 PM Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> The traffic on questions@ has now become very heavy.
>
> Traffic too heavy in fact, & a mess of themes,
>Some traffic would be better posted to hackers@ or
>current@ or other more specialist lists
Also, one place
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Robert Simmons wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 06:03:23 PM Julian H. Stacey wrote:
The traffic on questions@ has now become very heavy.
Traffic too heavy in fact, & a mess of themes,
Some traffic would be better posted to hackers@ or
current@ or othe
49 matches
Mail list logo
