On 16 March 2011 19:47, Carmel wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:32:48 -0700
> Chuck Swiger articulated:
>
> > On Mar 16, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Carmel wrote:
> > > OK, then does that mean that the latest version will be used in the
> > > still not released 9 version of FreeBSD?
> >
> > Currently, no-
On Wednesday March 16 2011 19:58:13 Da Rock wrote:
> On 03/17/11 07:04, ajtiM wrote:
> > On Wednesday March 16 2011 09:39:11 Mark Felder wrote:
> >> On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:48:45 -0500, Da Rock
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>> IF I understand you correctly here, you need to configure the wifi
> >>> connect
On 03/17/11 20:51, ajtiM wrote:
On Wednesday March 16 2011 19:58:13 Da Rock wrote:
On 03/17/11 07:04, ajtiM wrote:
On Wednesday March 16 2011 09:39:11 Mark Felder wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:48:45 -0500, Da Rock
wrote:
IF I understand you correctly here, you
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:46:44 +
krad articulated:
[snip]
> a combination of time and limited resources I guess. If it bugs you
> that much why dont you volunteer yourself to maintain it, i'm sure
> that if you dont feel competent enough at present, people will help
> and mentor you
It is par
Carmel writes:
> It is part of the base system. I don't know if it has a true
> maintainer. In any case, I would need commit privileges which I
> don't and never expect to have and have no desire to acquire..
I do not believe that is correct; a fair number of people
contribute product
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:32:59PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 19:56, Lars Eighner wrote:
> >Using the -C switch with portupgrade, I am managing to turn WITH_HAL off in
> >ports that I install or upgrade. Is there a way to make this a global
> >default?
> >
> >Is there a (convenient) w
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Krutov Mikle wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:32:59PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 06/03/2011 19:56, Lars Eighner wrote:
Using the -C switch with portupgrade, I am managing to turn WITH_HAL off in
ports that I install or upgrade. Is there a way to make this a global
defaul
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:42:00 +0300, Krutov Mikle
wrote:
> As for me, it is like a habit:
> I've installed Xorg + HAL for the first time;
> I've seen that my config is ignored;
> I disabled HAL by-default in make.conf
> :)
Similar situation here. The thing that annoys me most
regarding HAL is tha
On 17 March 2011 16:10, Lars Eighner wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Krutov Mikle wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:32:59PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/03/2011 19:56, Lars Eighner wrote:
Using the -C switch with portupgrade, I am managing to turn WITH_HAL off
in
p
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Da Rock
wrote:
>> The problem is it'd have to be someone who's unemployed. ;) Any
>> software company is going to want to patent something that valuable;
>> they'd be failing their shareholders if they didn't.
>>
>
> Except a private company.
Yeah, but most priv
Quoth David Brodbeck on Thursday, 17 March 2011:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Da Rock
> wrote:
> >> The problem is it'd have to be someone who's unemployed. ;) Any
> >> software company is going to want to patent something that valuable;
> >> they'd be failing their shareholders if they did
I have a question regarding the installation and startup of sguil-client on a
8.2 Generic OS.
It seems that my installation requires an iwidget extension when run with
tclsh8.4 and receives an error when running wish8.4:
Error in startup script: can't read "0": no such variable while executing
E
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 05:35:04PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> Well yes, that's one thing: if you use HAL, everything must use HAL
> and you can't pick and match incompatible applications and force half
> of the things in xorg.conf.
There should be a way to override it on a piecemeal basis. Ser
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:46:50AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
> Quoth David Brodbeck on Thursday, 17 March 2011:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Da Rock
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Except a private company.
> >
> > Yeah, but most private software companies are trying to get bought
> > out by one
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Chad Perrin wrote:
In my experience, about one third of the time HAL makes X work great, and
the other two thirds of the time it fails in some way that requires me to
create a complete xorg.conf file just for one or two options.
hal just provides input device hotplug abili
Hi there,
Thanks so much for placing this contact information in your header! I am
trying to add SRV records to my name server, which is a FreeBSD box.
(Output from uname -a):
ns1# uname -a
FreeBSD ns1.partnershiphp.org 4.11-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 21
17:21:22 GMT 2005 r.
I have a remote server, and I'd like to know if it will support
64-bit instructions. Is there some way I can tell? It's running 32-bit
FreeBSD right now.
>From dmesg.boot:
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2387.76-MHz 686-class C
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:48:52 -0600
Chad Perrin articulated:
> I blame Microsoft, GNU, and Canonical for this trend, mostly.
Chad, I believe I stand on firm ground when I state that you would
blame Microsoft if the sun didn't come up tomorrow. You obviously must
have a life time membership to "Sl
Hi:
FreeBSD 4.11 is juts too old you should Upgrade that machine.
Anyway check the named(bind) version to see if it supports srv records.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Ola Peters wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Thanks so much for placing this contact information in your header! I am
> trying to add
Afaik there should be "LM" in "AMD features" output. Even for Intel. Grep
your dmesg.boot for LM.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Tait wrote:
> I have a remote server, and I'd like to know if it will support
> 64-bit instructions. Is there some way I can tell? It's running 32-bit
> FreeBSD
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:33 -0700, Tait wrote:
> I have a remote server, and I'd like to know if it will support
> 64-bit instructions.
I wrote this for the job (please, suggestions/comments very welcome):
BEGIN FILE
/* -*- tab-width
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Diego Arias wrote:
> Its actually a little bit harder than that, not impossible but you have to
> upgrade the base OS and then the ports (Packages). As we have now 8.2 i
> suggest to do a clean-installation
>
> From version 6 and newer you could do a Binary upgra
Ola,
You have BIND 8.3 as you wrote to me. Check manual if it supports SRV
records. If so -- you do not have to upgrade your OS now.
FreeBSD 4 is REALLY OLD but I do not think upgrading freebsd is what you
want to do now: your issue is to update SRV record, right?
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:48 A
Hello,
What name server do you use? I am almost sure you have BIND.
You must open your zonefile, add SRV record and reload zone.
I think your zonefile is somewhere in /etc/namedb/
read bind manual, man named and man ndc (or rndc) to solve your problem.
Your question is not about freebsd but abou
>I have a remote server, and I'd like to know if it will support
>64-bit instructions. Is there some way I can tell? It's running 32-bit
>FreeBSD right now.
>
>>From dmesg.boot:
> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2387.76-MHz 686-cl
Tait wrote:
> I have a remote server, and I'd like to know if it will support
> 64-bit instructions. Is there some way I can tell? It's running 32-bit
> FreeBSD right now.
>
>>From dmesg.boot:
> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2387.76-MHz 6
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:33 -0700, Tait wrote:
> I have a remote server, and I'd like to know if it will support
> 64-bit instructions. Is there some way I can tell? It's running 32-bit
> FreeBSD right now.
>
> >From dmesg.boot:
> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
> C
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 05:35:57PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:48:52 -0600
> Chad Perrin articulated:
>
> > I blame Microsoft, GNU, and Canonical for this trend, mostly.
>
> Chad, I believe I stand on firm ground when I state that you would
> blame Microsoft if the sun didn't co
Using the standard version query syntax below..
dig +short @ns1.partnershiphp.org version.bind txt chaos
"DNS Server v2090"
She seems to have a DNS server that I'm both unfamiliar with
and unable to find with a search engine.
So, as you say, this is a DNS server question not an OS
question.
O
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Ilya Kazakevich
wrote:
> Afaik there should be "LM" in "AMD features" output. Even for Intel. Grep
> your dmesg.boot for LM.
>
Please don't top-post.
yes that is correct, LM stands for Long Mode which indicates amd64 support.
If your CPU doesn't list it, it's eit
Hi,
Does any of you met the following problem using phpmp with musicpd:
When I try to change the volume on the web interface I always get the following
error: "ACK [5@0] {} unknown command "volume"", everything else is working
great.
Thank you!
Laszlo
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:36:37 -0600
Chad Perrin articulated:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 05:35:57PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:48:52 -0600
> > Chad Perrin articulated:
> >
> > > I blame Microsoft, GNU, and Canonical for this trend, mostly.
> >
> > Chad, I believe I stand on fi
On 03/18/11 03:35, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Da Rock
wrote:
The problem is it'd have to be someone who's unemployed. ;) Any
software company is going to want to patent something that valuable;
they'd be failing their shareholders if they didn't.
Exce
--As of March 17, 2011 7:48:58 PM -0400, Jerry is alleged to have said:
>
> I have two Linksys Wireless-N PCI cards in front of me that work
> fine on a Windows platform. FreeBSD doesn't even have a driver for
> them, thereby rendering them useless. I suppose that is Microsoft's
> fault too.
No
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 07:48:58PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:36:37 -0600
> Chad Perrin articulated:
> >
> > No, not really. It's more the fault of the hardware manufacturer.
>
> Chad, up until this point I had taken your response seriously. In fact,
> I thought it was well pr
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 06:27:13PM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
>
> yes that is correct, LM stands for Long Mode which indicates amd64 support.
> If your CPU doesn't list it, it's either a 32 bit only CPU, or it's a bug.
. . . or maybe it is a 64 bit CPU that is not x86_64/amd64 compatible.
Do I
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 08:27:32PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
>
> The additional knowledge that Linux supports them means the manufacturer
> isn't totally closed to supporting Open-source software, but tells us
> nothing beyond that. Linux's support may be by way of a binary blob from
> Linksy
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> . . . or maybe it is a 64 bit CPU that is not x86_64/amd64 compatible.
> Do IA-64 (Itanium), IBM POWER, and SPARC 64 bit processors use the same
> Long Mode functionality?
>
No, it is a function of it's ancestry, real mode, protected mode(16
--As of March 16, 2011 10:17:12 PM +, Matthew Seaman is alleged to have
said:
I suggest you try out your update in a VM then, because I doubt anyone
will produce an answer definitive enough for you.
--As for the rest, it is mine.
In case anyone still cares, and if a VM running in Paralle
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 07:54:13PM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> > . . . or maybe it is a 64 bit CPU that is not x86_64/amd64 compatible.
> > Do IA-64 (Itanium), IBM POWER, and SPARC 64 bit processors use the same
> > Long Mode functionali
Some time ago, emacs started doing this on startup under X:
(emacs:65141): GLib-WARNING **: In call to g_spawn_sync(), exit status
of a child process was requested but SIGCHLD action was set to SIG_IGN
and ECHILD was received by waitpid(), so exit status can't be
returned. This is a bug in the p
Hope someone can see what I missed here, as the topic says, webcamd
doesn't start at boot.
Logitec USB cameram product 0x08b2 vendor 0x046d, is plugged in, works
wonderfully in skype-2.0.0.72,1, emesene-1.6.3, pwcview, etc..
grep webc /etc/rc.conf
webcamd_enable="YES"
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wh
Hello all, including the guys who responded.
Thanks for the comments and tips/ links. I'd see what I can do to move
fwd on the issue.
Appreciate your feedback!
On 3/10/2011 11:33 AM, Juan C. Valido wrote:
I'm an old "foggie" also and a lifetime Windows guy and I did a lot of
research and a l
>> yes that is correct, LM stands for Long Mode which indicates amd64 support.
>> If your CPU doesn't list it, it's either a 32 bit only CPU, or it's a bug.
>
>. . . or maybe it is a 64 bit CPU that is not x86_64/amd64 compatible.
>Do IA-64 (Itanium), IBM POWER, and SPARC 64 bit processors use the
On Wed,16-03-2011 [16:25:54], Ilya Kazakevich wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> I configured boot0 to my ar0 and tried to boot from it. It freezes.
> I use RAID10 and Intel-ICH7.
>
> Looks like I've faced with some other troubles..
>
> Ilya.
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:05 PM, mcoyles
> wrote:
>
> > >T
45 matches
Mail list logo
