Hello.
I just upgraded openoffice-3.2.1 to openoffice-org-3.3.0 and found
myself in a serious issue. Opening openoffice works only sporadically,
in most cases I get the error:
XDM authorization key matches an existing
client!/usr/local/openoffice.org-3.3.0/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin
"O. Hartmann" writes:
> Hello.
> I just upgraded openoffice-3.2.1 to openoffice-org-3.3.0 and found
> myself in a serious issue. Opening openoffice works only sporadically,
> in most cases I get the error:
>
> XDM authorization key matches an existing
> client!/usr/local/openoffice.org-3.3.0/open
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:17:43 -0800
Rem P Roberti wrote:
> I installed linux-opera, and I guess I made a mistake by opening it
> the first time as root, when I should have opened as user. At any
> rate, I can now only open the browser as root, and when I do I get
> this message:
>
> opera: $HOME
> "Jarrod" == Jarrod Slick writes:
Jarrod> If you know of any specific problems with postfix that would
Jarrod> substantiate your claim I encourage you to inform the project's
Jarrod> maintainers.
In fact, given the legacy of other security tools created by the author
of Postfix (Wietse Vene
Pleasant Day to you,
I want to place an Art order in your store,and I will like to know if you ship
to ESPANA (Spain) and my method of payment will be credit card. So please let
me know if you can assist me with the order before ending of these month,and
please do not forget to include your w
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote:
> On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>
>> No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and
>> pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
>>
>> But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something
On 02/02/2011 05:52, krad wrote:
Hi All,
A quick question. Im upgrading my filer at home to have 2x 2tb samsung
F4EG drives. I believe these are 4k drives. I'm intending to use the
gnop trick to get zfs ashift to 12. Will this make my pool unbootable.
I have read a few threads aluding to this.
After several months away from FreeBSD I am asking
for advice on versions for general desktop / interest
use [non critical learning platform]
Should I hang on a bit for 8.2 to go current?
Or will I easily be able to update RC3 in any case?
Thanks!
___
version i tried. that turns off certain maintainers, and it would
put me
off
aswell
postfix on the other hand is more in tune with the rest of the
system
>
> thanks in advance
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd
Hi!
My system: FreeBSD 8.1
I like to update perl to higher version and I don't want to screw up...
I red /usr/ports/UPDATING:
"perl-after-upgrade" script supplied with lang/perl5.12
If I update to perl 5.12.3 is it enough that I run above script, please?
In /etc/make.conf I have:
# added by use
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:09:11 -
"Graham Bentley" wrote:
> After several months away from FreeBSD I am asking
> for advice on versions for general desktop / interest
> use [non critical learning platform]
>
> Should I hang on a bit for 8.2 to go current?
>
> Or will I easily be able to update
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:09:11PM -, Graham Bentley wrote:
> After several months away from FreeBSD I am asking
> for advice on versions for general desktop / interest
> use [non critical learning platform]
>
> Should I hang on a bit for 8.2 to go current?
Nah, install now and upgrade when 8
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:03:32 -0600
ajtiM wrote:
> Hi!
>
> My system: FreeBSD 8.1
>
> I like to update perl to higher version and I don't want to screw
> up... I red /usr/ports/UPDATING:
>
> "perl-after-upgrade" script supplied with lang/perl5.12
>
> If I update to perl 5.12.3 is it enough that
On Wednesday February 2 2011 07:20:43 RW wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:03:32 -0600
>
> ajtiM wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > My system: FreeBSD 8.1
> >
> > I like to update perl to higher version and I don't want to screw
> > up... I red /usr/ports/UPDATING:
> >
> > "perl-after-upgrade" script supplie
[1]Cartões Mais Barato
Pensando no Produto mais barato que existe?
Só aqui é mais barato!
[2]Cartões de visita Para você vender mais e lucrar mais.
[3]Varios pontos de distribuição em São paulo
Entregas em todo Brasil
[4]Cartões Mais Barato
A Cartoes Mais Barat
Just wanted to mention that Flash works fine for me with native Opera and the
opera-linuxplugins port.
So did you install linux-Opera from the port? I haven't run linux-Opera on
FreeBSD in a while (I run it in Linux:), so I don't recall - is the binary
called "opera" or "linux-opera"?
Jud
Se
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:47:02 -0600
ajtiM wrote:
> Thank you very much. But I like to know if I need to change entry in
> make.conf:
> # added by use.perl 2010-11-05
> 17:40:46 PERL_VERSION=5.8.9
>
> to PERL_VERSION=5.12.3
>
> or just delete those line.
You don't need to do anything, it'll be
On 2/1/2011 at 8:44 PM Paul Macdonald wrote:
|On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
|>
|> No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix,
and
|> pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
|>
|> But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something I want
it
On 2 February 2011 12:18, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 05:52, krad wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> A quick question. Im upgrading my filer at home to have 2x 2tb samsung
>> F4EG drives. I believe these are 4k drives. I'm intending to use the
>> gnop trick to get zfs ashift to 12. Will this make my
I installed linux-opera, and I guess I made a mistake by opening it
the first time as root, when I should have opened as user. At any
rate, I can now only open the browser as root, and when I do I get
this message:
opera: $HOME set to /root. Use -personaldir if you do not want to use
/root/.op
Just wanted to mention that Flash works fine for me with native Opera and the
opera-linuxplugins port.
So did you install linux-Opera from the port? I haven't run linux-Opera on FreeBSD in a while (I
run it in Linux:), so I don't recall - is the binary called "opera" or
"linux-opera"?
Jud
Dear list,
I have been doing some remote work using ssh and BPF. From time to time I
feel like restarting /etc/rc.d/netif using a static configuration and
noticed that my default route gets delete even when I have everything se as
static under /etc/rc.conf. The only way I can get my default route b
When you run whereis linux-opera as root, what is the result ( other than the
port directory)?
Jud
whereis linux-opera
linux-opera: /usr/local/bin/linux-opera
/usr/local/man/man1/linux-opera.1.gz /usr/ports/www/linux-opera
Rem
___
freebsd-q
I'm currently running 8.1-R without AHCI enabled, with a raidz zpool
based on /dev/ad* disks, plus one system disk that's UFS2, mounted using
partition labels. I need to enable AHCI in order to get hot pluggable
eSata capability, and that's going to rename the disks to /dev/ada*.
Will zfs handl
On 02/02/2011 15:44, Lisandro Grullon wrote:
Dear list,
I have been doing some remote work using ssh and BPF. From time to time I
feel like restarting /etc/rc.d/netif using a static configuration and
noticed that my default route gets delete even when I have everything se as
static under /etc/rc.
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>
> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
>
> thanks in advance
I've used both and both have their advocates/supporters.
I used qmail for about 10 yrs and picked it when basically the choice
was qmail, sendmail and smail.
It
On 2 February 2011 16:29, Arthur Chance wrote:
> I'm currently running 8.1-R without AHCI enabled, with a raidz zpool based
> on /dev/ad* disks, plus one system disk that's UFS2, mounted using partition
> labels. I need to enable AHCI in order to get hot pluggable eSata
> capability, and that's go
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:09:11PM -, Graham Bentley wrote:
> After several months away from FreeBSD I am asking
> for advice on versions for general desktop / interest
> use [non critical learning platform]
>
> Should I hang on a bit for 8.2 to go current?
>
> Or will I easily be able to up
Right place, so all I can figure is when you initially ran it, the .opera or
.linux-opera folder, whichever it is, was put in /root instead of /home/$USER.
Looking as root or super-user, got such a folder in /root?
Jud
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 2, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:09:11PM -, Graham Bentley wrote:
>
> After several months away from FreeBSD I am asking
> for advice on versions for general desktop / interest
> use [non critical learning platform]
>
> Should I hang on a bit for 8.2 to go current?
>
> Or will I easily be able to u
Hello,
I have a HP LaserJet P1102 printer and I managed to get it working
with CUPS and "foo2zjs" filter from foo2zjs.rkkda.com. I am interested
in removing the CUPS and using the native LPD system of FreeBSD. But I
have a question.
What command should I specify as "if" Input Filter or "of" Outpu
Right place, so all I can figure is when you initially ran it, the .opera or
.linux-opera folder, whichever it is, was put in /root instead of /home/$USER.
Looking as root or super-user, got such a folder in /root?
Jud
Nope...that was the weird thing. There was nothing in /root that
ref
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 22:24:42 +0330, Bahman Kahinpour
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a HP LaserJet P1102 printer and I managed to get it working
> with CUPS and "foo2zjs" filter from foo2zjs.rkkda.com. I am interested
> in removing the CUPS and using the native LPD system of FreeBSD. But I
> have a qu
Hi!
Again me with the perl update from 5.8 to 5.12.
I did portmaster -o lang/perl5.12 /lang/perl5.8
and upgrade was without problem.
Than I ran portmaster -r perl-
and there were also for rebuild "arts", "qt33" which I dont have installed and
portmaster --check-depends doesn't shows any problems
On 02-02-2011 16:37, Frank Shute wrote:
What I'd also say is that Postfix is probably easier to install and
configure.
Agreed. Postfix is *really* easy and well documented; so much that I've
seen people claim that it "can't be that good" since it's so easy to
configure, with great defaults an
>When you do decide on your MTA, I'd recommend buying a book which
>documents it.
Oh, definitely. Particularly if you decide on qmail.
R's,
John
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
Hey guys.
Does anyone know what the new "minimal" install size is?
I remember running across a blurb about FBSD-7 and above require more
space and supposedly won't fit on less than 512MB or something like that.
What are these specs?
And I feel like I should still be able to product an 8-20
a recent 9-HEAD build shows mfsbsd does a build in about 27M Jan 30 19:37
mfsboot.img, so depending on your needs
I do know with the bsdbox patch set and some tweaks you can get a working
system in 11MB cutting out alot of what a
firewall doesnt need :)
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Martes G
Hi,
I consider buying a so called "surf stick" for mobile internet access
when travelling with my laptop. Has anyone experience with the o2 surf
stick (germany) hsdpa & hsupa using freebsd 8?
Regards,
Jens
--
03. Hornung 2011, 07:15
Homepage : http://www.jan0sch.de
In Mexico we have a word fo
El día Thursday, February 03, 2011 a las 07:19:10AM +0100, Jens Jahnke escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I consider buying a so called "surf stick" for mobile internet access
> when travelling with my laptop. Has anyone experience with the o2 surf
> stick (germany) hsdpa & hsupa using freebsd 8?
>
> Regards,
40 matches
Mail list logo
