The fastest solution is probably to install
x11/gtk-theme-switch2 and use "switch2" to change the theme and/or
font.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail t
On 12/10/10, Chris Brennan wrote:
> Umm... what's the dea w/ this? More spam?
Not my spam.
If you still think that I actually really send this to you I can not help you.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
Hey all!
I've got /etc/mail/aliases file like
user: u...@site1.domain.com
user2: us...@site1.domain.com
user3: us...@site2.domain.com
When someone from Internet send email to u...@domain.com with cc: to
us...@domain.com sendmail send mail to user and user3 normaly, they
recieve their mail.
But
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:30:08 -0600
Gary Gatten wrote:
> Could there be a ulimit issue as well?
I think shared memory is unaffected by ulimits ... at least, I've never
had trouble with ulimit preventing PostgreSQL from allocating gigs and
gigs of shared memory, and I don't recall every having to b
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 340, Issue 11, Message: 27
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:54:37 -0500
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
No, he didn't. These mails are FORGED as being from freebsd-questions
participants, and on first glance may appear to be list postings. They
us
On Dec 10, 2010, at 8:40 AM, jw011235 wrote:
It's possible what you're seeing is related to DDOS attacks by
"anonymous" on UltraDNS (and others) in connection with all the
Wikileaks events this week. It's hard to say for certain given how
poorly most mainstream technical news is reported.
Generally reading documentation helps.
then google...
http://www.google.co.uk/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUK294&=&q=sendmail+aliases&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=
first URL...
http://www.feep.net/sendmail/tutorial/intro/aliases.html
t
> Hey all!
>
> I've got /etc/mail/aliases file like
It's possible what you're seeing is related to DDOS attacks by
"anonymous" on UltraDNS (and others) in connection with all the
Wikileaks events this week. It's hard to say for certain given how
poorly most mainstream technical news is reported.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10421577-265
2010/12/10 tomasz dereszynski :
>
> Generally reading documentation helps.
> then google...
>
> http://www.google.co.uk/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUK294&=&q=sendmail+aliases&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=
>
> first URL...
> http://www.feep.net/sendmail/tutorial/intro/aliases.html
>
> t
>
>>
Hi
I have a file server with an zfs system. I have set up nfs shares using
"zfs nfsshare" as it says in the documentation. Then the system use
the file /etc/zfs/exports.
But I find out that I also can share this directories using the standard
/etc/exports. This way I have all administra
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 12/10/10, Chris Brennan wrote:
> > Umm... what's the dea w/ this? More spam?
>
> Not my spam.
>
> If you still think that I actually really send this to you I can not help
> you.
>
Well no Paul, I wasn't blaming you directly, I I just no
No, this list does not.
As I mentioned yesterday, this is an unmonitored, unnannyed list that accepts
emails from addresses without checking authenticity... meaning I can post from
4 emails (and I have) and not be subscribed on each address.
Spoofing email addresses has happened for years, and
On 10 December 2010 13:57, Sven-Åke Svensson wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> I have a file server with an zfs system. I have set up nfs shares using
> "zfs nfsshare" as it says in the documentation. Then the system use the
> file /etc/zfs/exports.
>
> But I find out that I also can share this directories u
On 12/10/10 9:46 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
No, this list does not.
As I mentioned yesterday, this is an unmonitored, unnannyed list that accepts
emails from addresses without checking authenticity... meaning I can post from
4 emails (and I have) and not be subscribed on each address.
Spoofing e
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 09/12/2010 11:31, Laszlo Nagy wrote:
>> Today something happened. Number of http processes went up to 200. As a
>> result, number of connections to database also went up to 200, and the
>> web server is now refusing clients with "Cannot connect to database"
>> messages (
in message <20101209114208.c1...@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz>, wrote
Lars Eighner thusly...
>
> How do I make gtk widgets use larger fonts? I found an old linux
> FAQ on this, but it appears to have nothing to do with the way
> configuration works on FreeBSD.
In ~/.gtkrc-2.0, I have ...
style "
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:12:17 +0300, c0re wrote:
> I do use aliases file and I know what is it.
> But it looks like not this case.
> I want Cc: be rewritten like in aliases file defined in Cc: header,
> not only those one that comes in "RCPT TO:".
> And sendmail does not do it with Cc: field.
> Yes
Hi folks,
I'm trying to build a failover solution using FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE and Heartbeat
from ports (v2.1.4-10).
I've already configured heartbeat in the two peers, but once I start the daemon
using the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/heartbeat script, either CRM and CIB fail to
start.
I've already f
Hi all,
I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it quickly. At
Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src, but for now, I would
like to get the latest version of Proftpd up.
What is the best / quickest method of getting 1 single port updated? (Proftpd
1.3.3c)
-G
_
> Hi all,
>
> I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it quickly. At
> Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src, but for now, I
> would like to get the latest version of Proftpd up.
>
> What is the best / quickest method of getting 1 single port updated?
> (Proftpd 1
Grant Peel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it quickly. At
> Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src, but for now, I
> would like to get the latest version of Proftpd up.
>
> What is the best / quickest method of getting 1 single port u
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:38:29 -0800 Kurt Buff wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 22:50, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:49:41 -0800 Kurt Buff wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >
> >> I have a Lenovo T61 with a 100g HD that I dual boot with FreeBSD
> >> 8.0-STABLE amd64 and Windows XP.
How and to
On 10/12/2010 15:26, Grant Peel wrote:
Proftpd 1.3.3c
portupgrade proftpd 1.3.3c
or delete the port from /usr/ports/distfiles, do a portsnap update,
portsnap fetch index then make deinstall && make install clean
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.or
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Michael Powell wrote:
Grant Peel wrote:
I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it quickly. At
Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src, but for now, I
would like to get the latest version of Proftpd up.
What is the best / quickest method of
Warren Block wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Michael Powell wrote:
>
>> Grant Peel wrote:
>>
>>> I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it quickly. At
>>> Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src, but for now, I
>>> would like to get the latest version of Proftpd up.
Does anyone have any ideas?
On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Has anyone else had experience with ProFTP 1.3.3a running away with
> processes? I installed it about 2 months ago with a new server build and over
> the course of the last three weeks I've had to forc
I have been having this happen a few times per week for the past few
weeks. I believe it is caused by someone attacking proftpd. I noticed
today that there is an updated version - 1.3.3c that fixes a
vulnerability that they may have been trying to exploit.
When I looked at the process list,
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:07:00 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Michael Powell wrote:
>
> > Grant Peel wrote:
> >
> >> I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it
> >> quickly. At Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src,
> >> but for now, I woul
On 11/12/2010 4:47, Jerry Bell wrote:
I have been having this happen a few times per week for the past few
weeks. I believe it is caused by someone attacking proftpd. I
noticed today that there is an updated version - 1.3.3c that fixes a
vulnerability that they may have been trying to exploit
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Bell"
To:
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: Runaway ProFTP?
I have been having this happen a few times per week for the past few weeks.
I believe it is caused by someone attacking proftpd. I noticed today that
there is an updated
I have not been able to get portsnap to work at all today.
On Dec 10, 2010, at 10:53 PM, Grant Peel wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Jerry Bell"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 4:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Runaway ProFTP?
>
>
>> I have been having this happen a few times per we
This may apply to other systems that can use a vi clone, not just
the BSD's. I am looking for an easy way of turning on/off my list of
homonyms that I am trying to set up for my ":abbreviation" list.
So, is there a failsafe way of
(1) including my ~150 :ab list in vim and turning it on
1.
In my system
umask enter
022
I want to know why i do the commander
umask -S
it show Improper mask
not u=rwx,g=.
2. anybody who know how to listen the music like .ape or flac
thank you
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
33 matches
Mail list logo
