Re: openssl version - how to verify

2010-11-16 Thread Adam Vande More
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:28 AM, c0re wrote: > Jerry, I'm not about that :) base openssl are OK. But I need proves > that it has got no security problems - it's external IT auditors > request. > And I'm interested how I can know what patchlevel there on base > openssl version and prove them (audi

Re: openssl version - how to verify

2010-11-16 Thread c0re
2010/11/16 Adam Vande More : > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:28 AM, c0re wrote: >> >> Jerry, I'm not about that :) base openssl are OK. But I need proves >> that it has got no security problems - it's external IT auditors >> request. >> And I'm interested how I can know what patchlevel there on base >

Re: openssl version - how to verify

2010-11-16 Thread Christer Solskogen
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:49 AM, c0re wrote: > 2010/11/16 Adam Vande More : >> Please don't top-post, thanks. > > Sorry. Wont will in future. But why? > Because it messes up the flow of reading. I prefer to bottom-post. > How come? > What do you do instead? > > No. > > > Do you like top-posting?

Re: History of C (Re: Why do you use a devil as a mascot?)

2010-11-16 Thread perryh
Wojciech Puchar wrote: > there will no no next language. there is no need to have C follower. > C is perfect Which C are you referring to here? The original K&R, ANSI, or some other variant? ANSI C is different enough from K&R C -- in strength of typing if nothing else -- that some would say A

Re: History of C (Re: Why do you use a devil as a mascot?)

2010-11-16 Thread Julian H. Stacey
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > there will no no next language. there is no need to have C follower. > > C is perfect > > Which C are you referring to here? The original K&R, ANSI, or some > other variant? ANSI C is different enough from K&R C -- in strength > of ty

Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)'

2010-11-16 Thread Dmitry Krivenok
I have the following card: siba_b...@pci0:12:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x000c1028 chip=0x431514e4 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)' class = network And it doesn't work with bwn driver (perhaps that's a confi

Re: [freebsd] pecl-imagick -> Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped) on php -i under freebsd 7.3

2010-11-16 Thread endzed
Le 12 nov. 2010 à 01:04, Olivier Mueller a écrit : > Good evening, > > On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 10:45 +0200, Olivier Mueller wrote: >> Problem: >> >> [...@pandora ~]$ php -v -c /usr/local/etc/php.ini-production >> PHP 5.3.2 with Suhosin-Patch (cli) (built: Jun 14 2010 18:11:48) >> Copyright (c)

Re: [solved] Re: [freebsd] pecl-imagick -> Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped) on php -i under freebsd 7.3

2010-11-16 Thread Alex Dupre
Olivier Mueller ha scritto: Brillant! It fixed the issue, many thanks. This is not the correct fix, the correct "fix" is to enable threads in php, using the appropriate OPTION. -- Alex Dupre ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lis

Re: ZFS and 4k sector drives

2010-11-16 Thread Ivan Voras
On 11/15/10 20:24, Wojciech Puchar wrote: work with ZFS raidz2 pools. It seems that most of the 4k sector drives are using emulation, and reporting 512 byte sectors to the OS instead of their native 4k size. I know someone who had an issue trying to insert one of these drives into a running ZFS p

*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 in both standard-supfile and stable-supfile

2010-11-16 Thread pigskinwhitehat
I was wondering why both the stable & standard supfiles on FreeBSD-8.1 / amd64 both have the exact release tag: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 Shouldn't they be different? What would be the correct tab for each supfile respectively? ___ freebsd-q

Re: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 in both standard-supfile and stable-supfile

2010-11-16 Thread Jason Helfman
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:09:30PM -0500, pigskinwhite...@icqmail.com thus spake: I was wondering why both the stable & standard supfiles on FreeBSD-8.1 / amd64 both have the exact release tag: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 From: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/cvs-tags.html RELENG_8

Re: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 in both standard-supfile and stable-supfile

2010-11-16 Thread Chris Brennan
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:09 PM, wrote: > I was wondering why both the stable & standard supfiles on FreeBSD-8.1 / > amd64 both have the exact release tag: > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 > > Shouldn't they be different? What would be the correct tab for each supfile > respectively? > _

Re: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 in both standard-supfile and stable-supfile

2010-11-16 Thread Chris Rees
On 16 November 2010 18:09, wrote: > I was wondering why both the stable & standard supfiles on FreeBSD-8.1 / > amd64 both have the exact release tag: > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 > > Shouldn't they be different? What would be the correct tab for each supfile > respectively? On my machin

Does MAC version of iTunes work on FreeBSD?

2010-11-16 Thread Steven Friedrich
-- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version:FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 i386 (6.4 MB kernel) manager(s):kde4-4.5.3 X windows: xorg-7.5X.Org X Server 1.7.5 ___ freebsd

Re: Is ZFS ready for prime time?

2010-11-16 Thread Adam Vande More
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: > Actually, I don't see anything incorrect in the above archive post. > I do. Cherry picking ZFS deficiencies without addressing the proper documented way to work around them or at even acknowledging it's possible to do so is FUD. It's not lik

Re: Does MAC version of iTunes work on FreeBSD?

2010-11-16 Thread Nathan Vidican
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > -- > System Name:   laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org > Hardware:      2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory > OS version:    FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 i386 (6.4 MB kernel) > manager(s):    kde4-4.5.3 > X windows:     xorg-7.5    X.Org X

Re: Does MAC version of iTunes work on FreeBSD?

2010-11-16 Thread Chris Rees
On 16 November 2010 19:26, Nathan Vidican wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Steven Friedrich > wrote: >> >> -- >> System Name:   laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org >> Hardware:      2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory >> OS version:    FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 i386 (6.4 MB kernel) >> m

Re: ZFS and 4k sector drives

2010-11-16 Thread Wojciech Puchar
i was sure it have variable sizes but multiplies of 4k, anyway i dont care ;) using 32 or 64K blocks (means 4 or 8K fragments) with UFS and full disks, or partitions aligned to 4K solves all problems ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list htt

Re: Is ZFS ready for prime time?

2010-11-16 Thread App Deb
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > no. ZFS is not usable and will never be usable for anything more than a toy. > This is a result of that design. Actually I find the basics of its design pretty simple (cow/txg/zil) and for that reason I think it is going to become very r

Rebuilding perl with threads

2010-11-16 Thread Toomas Aas
Hello! I'm in a process of installing a new server. I have already built and installed a lot of ports over the past weeks, and now that I'm almost done I discovered that one of the last things I need to install (misc/amanda-server) needs Perl installed with threads support, whereas I have

RE: Is ZFS ready for prime time?

2010-11-16 Thread Gary Gatten
... Actually I find the basics of its design pretty simple (cow/txg/zil) and for that reason I think it is going to become very robust in the near future, if it isn't already. What is complex is the various journal and soft-updates code that traditional file systems use. But yes it has performa

Re: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 in both standard-supfile and stable-supfile

2010-11-16 Thread krad
On 16 November 2010 18:45, Chris Rees wrote: > On 16 November 2010 18:09, wrote: > > I was wondering why both the stable & standard supfiles on FreeBSD-8.1 / > > amd64 both have the exact release tag: > > > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 > > > > Shouldn't they be different? What would be t

X resolution

2010-11-16 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Hello. I've configured my X to use a 1600x1200 resolution (or so I thought...). It used to work until the last X.Org upgrade; after that it *usually* worked: very rarely it would start at 2048x1536, but a couple of Ctrl-Alt-Backspace was normally enough. Since a couple of day, it always start

Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)'

2010-11-16 Thread Erik Gustafson
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:17 AM, b. f. wrote: > Chris Brennan wrote: > ... >>My Hiccup as the subject suggests is about my Wireless Card. >>I have been following the handbook ( >>http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/config-network-setup.html) on how to use >>64-bit Windows drivers coupled w/ ndisge

Re: Is ZFS ready for prime time?

2010-11-16 Thread Ivan Voras
On 11/16/10 20:23, Adam Vande More wrote: On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: Actually, I don't see anything incorrect in the above archive post. I do. Cherry picking ZFS deficiencies without addressing the proper documented way to work around them or at even acknowledging i

Re: X resolution

2010-11-16 Thread Warren Block
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Andrea Venturoli wrote: Hello. I've configured my X to use a 1600x1200 resolution (or so I thought...). It used to work until the last X.Org upgrade; after that it *usually* worked: very rarely it would start at 2048x1536, but a couple of Ctrl-Alt-Backspace was normally e

ejabberd won't startup

2010-11-16 Thread t...@diogunix.com
Hi everybody dealing with ejabberd and/or erlang in a FreeBSD8-Jail ! I've built the ejabberd port (with ODBC support / the Erlang MySQL driver) two days ago but can't get it to run. # ejabberdctl start spits out a huge bunch of Erlang error messages (unreadable for most humans), obviously sa

Re: FreeBSD on Rackspace Could

2010-11-16 Thread Matthew Faircliff
Try www.rootbsd.net - FreeBSD VM's backed by great service. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Building kdiff3 for kde 3.5

2010-11-16 Thread doug
Apparently only the version for kde4 is on the ports and I could not find a package for 3.5. Building the available source had some interesting results but ultimate did not work. What I finally did was google the 3.5 package name I had installed and found a copy at the University of Kent. Ther