1) Is ZFS as of 8.1 Release considered to be ready for mission critical?
no. ZFS is not usable and will never be usable for anything more than a
toy. This is a result of that design.
use UFS if you want something you can trust
___
freebsd-questions
The thing is - and was then, too - that this list is widely advertised
(in the handbook, even the installed /etc/motd) as the primary contact
point for new people with questions about FreeBSD, and as such can't be
moderated by 'some poor bastard .. 24/7/365' as I put it then, nor can
it require pr
simply edit /etc/rc.d/ipfw and make it doing only what you want.
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010, Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
I seem to have one server that does not flush the /etc/rc.firewall rules when
the script taken from "firewall_type" starts up. That is to say when I boot
the machine, 3 rules seem
implemented at all -- but BCPL developed a following. Someone
(at Bell Labs?) produced a derivative called B, from which a few
researchers at Murray Hill derived C. Thus the question: should
the next language in the series be named D (next alphabetically)
or P (next letter of BCPL)?
there will
Hello,
> > I want to start using ZFS v13 and I have FreeBSD 7.2 world with 7.3
> kernel.
> >
> > And if I need to upgrade something in the world - what should it be?
>
> Why do you not update FreeBSD properly? If you want to use 7.3, install
> kernel _and_ world. (I would suggest using 8.1 though
On 11/14/10 20:44, Gary Kline wrote:
TWo questions: didn't IBM create CPL? And doesn't BCPL
Stand for "British Computer Programming Language"? (I did have
both editions of the C book by Brian and DEnnis; then loaned the
2nd edition and never got ti back.) I think
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:32:37 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar articulated:
> the only way to make ANY discussion forum usable is to have
> moderation and clear rules of posting.
>
> Otherwise it will be destroyed. Buy random people or actually by
^^^
Maybe if we didn
On 15 November 2010 08:28, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
>> 1) Is ZFS as of 8.1 Release considered to be ready for mission critical?
>>
>
> no. ZFS is not usable and will never be usable for anything more than a
> toy. This is a result of that design.
>
> use UFS if you want something you can trust
>
On Mon 15 Nov 2010 at 00:32:37 PST Wojciech Puchar wrote:
the only way to make ANY discussion forum usable is to have
moderation and clear rules of posting.
Otherwise it will be destroyed. Buy random people or actually by
someone spreading nonsense willingfully. Or both
I notice that you
Hello!
I have the following wi-fi card on my Dell Latitude E6400:
siba_b...@pci0:12:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x000c1028 chip=0x431514e4
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation'
device = 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)'
class = network
Grepping for 0x4
Hello.
My name is mohsen,I'm a student in software engineering.I'm from Iran.
I see Non-English Mailing lists in FreeBSD web site,and i understand FreeBSD
not have mailing list for my countery.
FrreBSD is popular distro in my country,I want know for create new mailing
list for my country what shoul
It's not a great idea to hack the rc.d scripts, they can be clobbered when
updating.
Chris
Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote, but K-9 can't yet do
threading.
On 15 Nov 2010 08:45, "Wojciech Puchar" wrote:
simply edit /etc/rc.d/ipfw and make it doing only what you want
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 337, Issue 1, Message: 15
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:50:47 -0500 "Grant Peel" wrote:
>
> I seem to have one server that does not flush the /etc/rc.firewall rules
> when the script taken from "firewall_type" starts up. That is to say when I
> boot the machine, 3
Hey all!
If I look at base openssl in 7.3-RELEASE-p3
sys# openssl version -a
OpenSSL 0.9.8e 23 Feb 2007
built on: Mon Sep 27 11:54:36 MSD 2010
platform: FreeBSD-i386
options: bn(64,32) md2(int) rc4(idx,int) des(ptr,risc1,16,long) blowfish(idx)
compiler: cc
OPENSSLDIR: "/etc/ssl"
but at www.ope
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:17:10 +0300
c0re articulated:
> If I look at base openssl in 7.3-RELEASE-p3
>
> sys# openssl version -a
> OpenSSL 0.9.8e 23 Feb 2007
> built on: Mon Sep 27 11:54:36 MSD 2010
> platform: FreeBSD-i386
> options: bn(64,32) md2(int) rc4(idx,int) des(ptr,risc1,16,long)
> blowf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/11/2010, at 00:38, Jerry wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:17:10 +0300
> c0re articulated:
>
>> If I look at base openssl in 7.3-RELEASE-p3
>>
>> sys# openssl version -a
>> OpenSSL 0.9.8e 23 Feb 2007
>> built on: Mon Sep 27 11:54:36 MSD 2010
>
Hi ALL,
surprisingly, the port for /usr/ports/net-im/ejabberd too tries to build a
bunch of software usually not associated with ejabberd (such as a lot of
Java, X11, OpenMotif, GTK and don't know what else).
After hours, the build of ejabberd then failed with:
/local/include -rpath=/usr/loca
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 337, Issue 1, Message: 19
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:29:10 -0700 Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 02:39:32PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> >
> >About 2000, 2001 was when I shucked my "muuz" game/mind-machine
> >effort. It was over 10K line of C-i
On 11/13/10 6:32 PM, "dalesc...@shaw.ca" wrote:
>> but dedicated/vps does not offer what cloud computing does.
>
>What do feel are the advantages of the cloud?
i haven't used one yet but, as far as i can tell, the interesting
differences derive from how the could platform implements network, sto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:41:32 +1030
Indexer articulated:
> It breaks alot, and causes you to need to rebuild some parts of the
> base system. The most notable, is SSHD, which whenever I install the
> openssl from ports, will not work unless i rebuild
For us it is mostly cost but the other advantage (with RS at least) is
you can size the "hardware" to fit your needs and not get any more
then you need... for example when we first started our consulting firm
back in July we bought 256MB of RAM (RS sizes the Disk, CPU,
Bandwidth, etc. as a multiple
oops should of said the main disadvantage is it is not FreeBSD
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Aryeh Friedman
wrote:
> For us it is mostly cost but the other advantage (with RS at least) is
> you can size the "hardware" to fit your needs and not get any more
> then you need... for example when w
I'm trying to figure out how, if it's possible, to make the 4k sector
drives work with ZFS raidz2 pools. It seems that most of the 4k sector
drives are using emulation, and reporting 512 byte sectors to the OS
instead of their native 4k size. I know someone who had an issue trying
to insert o
On 15 November 2010 08:56, cronfy wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> > > I want to start using ZFS v13 and I have FreeBSD 7.2 world with 7.3
> > kernel.
> > >
> > > And if I need to upgrade something in the world - what should it be?
> >
> > Why do you not update FreeBSD properly? If you want to use 7.3, inst
2010/11/15 Jerry :
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:17:10 +0300
> c0re articulated:
>
>> If I look at base openssl in 7.3-RELEASE-p3
>>
>> sys# openssl version -a
>> OpenSSL 0.9.8e 23 Feb 2007
>> built on: Mon Sep 27 11:54:36 MSD 2010
>> platform: FreeBSD-i386
>> options: bn(64,32) md2(int) rc4(idx,int)
On Sat Nov 13 10, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Nov 13):
> > Hi, Freebsd-questions.
> > *pls. redirect to right developers thread
> >
> > in 7.2FreeBSD top show as:
> > 32 root -68- 0K16K WAIT72:24 10.25% irq16: rl0
> >
> > in 9.0FreeBSD top show as:
> > 12 root
Quoth Jerry on Monday, 15 November 2010:
>
> Since it has now become apparent that the "SUBJECT" of the post loses
> its relationship to the actual content of the post after "X" replies on
> this forum, I propose that we start a study on how many replies does it
> take for that phenomena to occur.
Hello,
I'd like to ask when can we expect a driver for the LSI 9211 hardware?
That is, the following device:
non...@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x010700 card=0x30501000 chip=0x00721000
rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'LSI Logic (Was: Symbios Logic, NCR)'
class = mass storage
subclass = SA
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:40:27 +0300
c0re articulated:
> There are still too many broken ports with openssl from ports, I do
> not like debug it and really like to use base openssl, almost no
> difference.
Might I suggest that if you are aware of ports that don't work
correctly with the port's ver
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Mohsen Mostafa Jokar
wrote:
> Hello.
> My name is mohsen,I'm a student in software engineering.I'm from Iran.
> I see Non-English Mailing lists in FreeBSD web site,and i understand FreeBSD
> not have mailing list for my countery.
> FrreBSD is popular distro in my c
On Monday, November 15, 2010 12:03:35 pm Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to ask when can we expect a driver for the LSI 9211 hardware?
> That is, the following device:
> non...@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x010700 card=0x30501000 chip=0x00721000
> rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'LSI Logic (
Здравствуйте, Grant.
Вы писали 15 ноября 2010 г., 0:50:47:
GP> Hi all,
GP> I seem to have one server that does not flush the /etc/rc.firewall rules
GP> when the script taken from "firewall_type" starts up. That is to say when I
GP> boot the machine, 3 rules seem to be still in the list when I d
Hello,
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:06:10 -0500
John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, November 15, 2010 12:03:35 pm Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd like to ask when can we expect a driver for the LSI 9211
> > hardware? That is, the following device:
> > non...@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x010700
Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if anyone has considered the creation of a kernel
> newbies mail list for FreeBSD.
> I am aware of two places where someone can ask questions about that:
> either freebsd-hackers@ or the "FreeBSD Development" forum
> at http://forums.freeb
I haven't seen someone use "firewall_type" as a path to the config file.
If you check the default rc.firewall file, you will see several types of
default firewall settings, such as "open" and "closed". You want to set
"firewall_type" in rc.conf to be "open" or whatever your firewall type
is in
A driver called "mps" exists in FreeBSD 9-CURRENT. We're working to move it to
FreeBSD 8 in time for the 8.2 release.
Scott
On Nov 15, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Gergely CZUCZY (by way of Gergely CZUCZY
) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to ask when can we expect a driver for the LSI 9211 hardware?
> Th
Hi--
On Nov 15, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Dave Robison wrote:
> I haven't seen someone use "firewall_type" as a path to the config file. If
> you check the default rc.firewall file, you will see several types of default
> firewall settings, such as "open" and "closed". You want to set
> "firewall_type
Dear Scott and John,
Thank you very much for your quick and helpful reply.
mps(4) does seem to recognize the card, and the disks showed up
properly, so far. Currently i'm loading it from loader.conf, and
putting it inside the kernel config doesn't work, though i think i
just have to insert that s
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 12:13 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
> There is nothing which prevents mirror sites from providing access to
> the CVS repo via rsync, even if they get it via CVSup...
I went ahead with adding this to ftp2.freebsd.org:
% rsync ftp2.freebsd.org::FreeBSD-CVS/
drwxr-xr-x
I propose that we spend our energies working on something that FreeBSD
users would give a damn about, like enabling GEM support so the latest
Intel drivers can be ported to support Ironlake graphics.
and fixing remaining problems with network after big change of
routing/ipfw in 8.*
most are f
work with ZFS raidz2 pools. It seems that most of the 4k sector drives are
using emulation, and reporting 512 byte sectors to the OS instead of their
native 4k size. I know someone who had an issue trying to insert one of
these drives into a running ZFS pool with other 512 byte sector drives w
I notice that you never got an answer to your question about that PCIe
controller. I wish I had an answer for you, and that people finding
now i don't expect it.
seems the problem is that FreeBSD can't by itself set SATA controller
mode. i can't find such option.
This crappy controllers
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
please elaborate
look at archives. i really don't want to repea
On 15 November 2010 19:33, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>>
>>> ___
>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>>> freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.
On 11 November 2010 12:06, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
>> Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code?
>
> atanl(1)
Er, arc tan of 1 is pi/4.
Try atanl(1)*4, or for a less wasteful instruction try using the constant M_PI
Also, forgive me if I'm wrong, but this looks like a homework question.
Ch
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:52:41AM -0800, Dave Robison wrote:
> I haven't seen someone use "firewall_type" as a path to the config
> file. If you check the default rc.firewall file, you will see several
> types of default firewall settings, such as "open" and "closed". You
> want to set "firewall_t
On 15 November 2010 19:59, Peter Boosten wrote:
> He's consistent in any case (a quick google search reveals this 2008
> message):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/msg192926.html
Consistent, but still just spouting uninformed FUD.
Chris
___
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 20:33 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>
> >> ___
> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> >> freebsd-questions-unsubsc
On 15 November 2010 20:10, Devin Teske wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 20:33 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> >> To unsubscr
On 15 November 2010 19:59, Peter Boosten wrote:
>
> On 15 nov 2010, at 20:37, Chris Rees wrote:
>
> On 15 November 2010 19:33, Wojciech Puchar
> wrote:
>
>
> ___
>
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
Hello, Freebsd-questions.
I have commented out 'device bce' but still have error:
ld -d -warn-common -r -d -o if_ath.kld if_ath.o if_ath_pci.o ah_osdep.o ah.o
ah_regdomain.o ah_eeprom_v3.o ah_eeprom_v1.o ar5210_attach.o
ar5210_beacon.o ar5210_interrupts.o ar5210_keycache.o ar5210_misc.o
On 15 nov 2010, at 20:37, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 15 November 2010 19:33, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send an
On 15 November 2010 20:10, Devin Teske wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 20:33 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > >>
> > >> ___
> > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> > >> To un
Здравствуйте, Коньков.
Вы писали 15 ноября 2010 г., 22:25:49:
КЕ> Hello, Freebsd-questions.
КЕ> I have commented out 'device bce' but still have error:
КЕ> ld -d -warn-common -r -d -o if_ath.kld if_ath.o if_ath_pci.o
КЕ> ah_osdep.o ah.o ah_regdomain.o ah_eeprom_v3.o ah_eeprom_v1.o
КЕ> ar521
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
> Sounds like FUD.
>
> Like the OP, I too am interested in the current state of ZFS. We've been
> following the threads as far as build 28, and I do indeed see positive
> improvement and continued development. However, is anyone that is
> active
On 15 November 2010 20:42, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>
>> Sounds like FUD.
>>
>> Like the OP, I too am interested in the current state of ZFS. We've been
>> following the threads as far as build 28, and I do indeed see positive
>> improvement an
Hi
Intel(C) driver v1.8.4
igb0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=53b
capabilities=53b
standart driver
igb0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=1bb
capabilities=101bb
Does igb intel driver can not do VLAN_HWCSUM?
What is HWFILTER?
Is this better to isntall
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Michael Powell wrote:
> Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was wondering if anyone has considered the creation of a kernel
>> newbies mail list for FreeBSD.
>> I am aware of two places where someone can ask questions about that:
>> either freebsd-hack
On 15/11/2010 20:33, krad wrote:
> My gut feeling is no. I wouldn't put it on mission critical stuff yet. Its
> not that I have had any major bad experiences (x fingers) but im not aware
> of any major deployments of it in the wild. As a result I wouldnt feel safe
> being the 1st 8)
>
> What I wou
One problem I ran into is that the file sharing technologies in
FreeBSD have not kept up; I consider NFSv4 a requirement for sanely
sharing ZFS over a network, and FreeBSD's NFSv4 server is still under
heavy development and not yet production-ready. That may not matter
for a backup server, though.
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 337, Issue 2, Message: 26
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:52:41 -0800 Dave Robison wrote:
> I haven't seen someone use "firewall_type" as a path to the config file.
It's not so uncommon. Anyone who's based their ruleset on the handbook
section on IPFW will likely be u
Chris Brennan wrote:
...
>My Hiccup as the subject suggests is about my Wireless Card.
>I have been following the handbook (
>http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/config-network-setup.html) on how to use
>64-bit Windows drivers coupled w/ ndisgen to get my wireless card working. I
>got ndisgen to ge
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:17 PM, b. f. wrote:
> Chris Brennan wrote:
> ...
> >My Hiccup as the subject suggests is about my Wireless Card.
> >I have been following the handbook (
> >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/config-network-setup.html) on how to
> use
> >64-bit Windows drivers coupled w
On 11/16/10, Chris Brennan wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:17 PM, b. f. wrote:
>
>> Chris Brennan wrote:
>> ...
>> >My Hiccup as the subject suggests is about my Wireless Card.
>> >I have been following the handbook (
>> >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/config-network-setup.html) on how t
On 11/16/10, b. f. wrote:
...
>
> ttp://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/144724
The above should be http://... , of course.
b.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubs
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:02 AM, b. f. wrote:
> On 11/16/10, b. f. wrote:
> ...
> >
> > ttp://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/144724
>
> The above should be http://... , of course.
>
> b.
>
I've seen him elsewhere on the list so I will shoot him an e-mail then
(unless he responds to
Bill Tillman wrote:
>
> I just purchased a setup which will allow me to access IDE and/or SATA
> drives through a USB port. Of course I was hoping for it to work with
> FreeBSD and in spite of the reviews which said it needed no Windows
> drivers as soon as I opened it up there was a CD with th
Jerry, I'm not about that :) base openssl are OK. But I need proves
that it has got no security problems - it's external IT auditors
request.
And I'm interested how I can know what patchlevel there on base
openssl version and prove them (auditors) that freebsd base openssl
are not vulnerable.
2010
68 matches
Mail list logo
