freebsd 6.4 -> 7.3 upgrade failure, ports openssl, and libz.so.3 versus libz.so.4

2010-09-14 Thread Benno Overeinder
Hi, I am upgrading a system from freebsd 6.4 to freebsd 7.3 from source. On this system, the ports openssl package has been installed. With the make buildworld, the compilation of sendmail fails with the message: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: warning: libz.so.3, needed by /usr/local/lib/libssl

sendmail && resolv.conf changes

2010-09-14 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, When using a laptop it is normal that there are some changes in resolv.conf during the live, for example: boot time: no network available start of PPP over UMTS: resolv.conf from provider start VPN to connect to company: resolv.conf from company ... it seems that sendmail is not aware of

Re: sendmail && resolv.conf changes

2010-09-14 Thread tomasz dereszynski
> > Hello, > > When using a laptop it is normal that there are some changes in > resolv.conf during the live, for example: > > boot time: no network available > start of PPP over UMTS: resolv.conf from provider > start VPN to connect to company: resolv.conf from company > ... > > it seems that sen

Re: sendmail && resolv.conf changes

2010-09-14 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Tuesday, September 14, 2010 a las 09:15:49AM +0100, tomasz dereszynski escribió: > > > > > Hello, > > > > When using a laptop it is normal that there are some changes in > > resolv.conf during the live, for example: > > > > boot time: no network available > > start of PPP over UMTS: resol

Re: sendmail && resolv.conf changes

2010-09-14 Thread tomasz dereszynski
> El día Tuesday, September 14, 2010 a las 09:15:49AM +0100, tomasz > dereszynski escribió: > >> >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > When using a laptop it is normal that there are some changes in >> > resolv.conf during the live, for example: >> > >> > boot time: no network available >> > start of PPP ove

i386 jail on AMD64 system not seeing network. AMD64 jails working fine.

2010-09-14 Thread Jim
I am trying to run a teamspeak server, so I need an i386 jail. However, the jail seems to have issues with connecting to the network. * I set up the jail (make clean buildworld install distribution TARGET=i386 DESTDIR=/data/jail/speak/), and get no errors. * I mount /data/jail/speak/dev and /data/

Re: this is probably a little touchy to ask...

2010-09-14 Thread Jules Gilbert
I'm the guy who started this thread. First, I'm not unhappy with any of you. Each of you, every single person who has, at any time, been a member of the team working on *any* FBSD sub-system, has contributed more than me. I don't criticize you, I salute you, thank you. And stop throwing bricks

RE: sendmail && resolv.conf changes

2010-09-14 Thread Terrence Koeman
> -Original Message- > From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of tomasz dereszynski > Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 11:28 AM > To: Matthias Apitz; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: sendmail && resolv.conf changes >

Re: this is probably a little touchy to ask...

2010-09-14 Thread David Brodbeck
(Trimming the CC list a bit.) On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Jules Gilbert wrote: > I understand that Sun declined to allow pre-built configurations to be > shipped.  Okay. > > Now, (here I am not asking for a public response, nor am I suggesting > that anyone email me privately about this,) do

Re: apropos returning same item twice

2010-09-14 Thread Steven Friedrich
On Monday 13 September 2010 8:37:26 pm Alexander Best wrote: > On Sat Sep 11 10, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > Why does apropos list mysql(1) twice? > > > > It doesn't return duplicates with apropos kde... > > maybe you have a gzip'ed and plain version in /usr ? > > see PR #4419. > > cheers. > al

unix permissions questions

2010-09-14 Thread doug
I found several directories whose permissions where set to dr-s--S--T 2 user group 512 Feb 22 2010 .procmail/ All were .procmail which is what we set for procmail logging and supporting recipes. In reading 'man ls' it seems (to me) this might result from losing the execute bit on the di

Re: sendmail && resolv.conf changes

2010-09-14 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Tuesday, September 14, 2010 a las 05:49:07PM +0200, Terrence Koeman escribió: > > > What I wanted to say: sendmail runs and DHCP changes in certain > > > situations the IP, routing and DNS, and sendmail does not adopt on > > these > > > changes. > > > > > It might be an idea to (mis)use th

Re: unix permissions questions

2010-09-14 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:32:40 -0400 (EDT), d...@safeport.com wrote: > I found several directories whose permissions where set to > >dr-s--S--T 2 user group 512 Feb 22 2010 .procmail/ > > All were .procmail which is what we set for procmail logging and supporting > recipes. In reading 'ma

Re: unix permissions questions

2010-09-14 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Sep 14, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:32:40 -0400 (EDT), d...@safeport.com wrote: >> I found several directories whose permissions where set to >> >> dr-s--S--T 2 user group 512 Feb 22 2010 .procmail/ >> >> All were .procmail which is what we set for proc

Re: unix permissions questions

2010-09-14 Thread doug
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Polytropon wrote: On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:32:40 -0400 (EDT), d...@safeport.com wrote: I found several directories whose permissions where set to dr-s--S--T 2 user group 512 Feb 22 2010 .procmail/ All were .procmail which is what we set for procmail logging and supp

Re: unix permissions questions

2010-09-14 Thread doug
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Chuck Swiger wrote: On Sep 14, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Polytropon wrote: On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:32:40 -0400 (EDT), d...@safeport.com wrote: I found several directories whose permissions where set to dr-s--S--T 2 user group 512 Feb 22 2010 .procmail/ All were .procmail

Re: unix permissions questions

2010-09-14 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:04:58 -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Sep 14, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Polytropon wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:32:40 -0400 (EDT), d...@safeport.com wrote: > >> I found several directories whose permissions where set to > >> > >> dr-s--S--T 2 user group 512 Feb 22 2010

Re: unix permissions questions

2010-09-14 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Sep 14, 2010, at 11:16 AM, d...@safeport.com wrote: >> A bit of experimentation suggests that "chmod 7500 .procmail" are the >> permissions involved, which are silly. No group permissions enabled means >> setgid is meaningless, and I don't see any value for using the sticky bit >> here, eith

Is it safe to run gjournal on aac-based system (BIO_FLUSH)?

2010-09-14 Thread Toomas Aas
Hello! I'm planning to install FreeBSD 8.1 on a system which has Adaptec 4805SAS RAID controller (using aac driver). I'd like to use gjournal for the data partition, but I have some doubts regarding the (lack of) BIO_FLUSH feature. I have another system with FreeBSD 7.3 and a different aa

Re: apropos returning same item twice

2010-09-14 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Sep 14 10, Steven Friedrich wrote: > On Monday 13 September 2010 8:37:26 pm Alexander Best wrote: > > On Sat Sep 11 10, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > > Why does apropos list mysql(1) twice? > > > > > > It doesn't return duplicates with apropos kde... > > > > maybe you have a gzip'ed and plai

Re: this is probably a little touchy to ask...

2010-09-14 Thread RW
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:11:10 -0400 Jules Gilbert wrote: > A typical FBSD user wants to be able to do a ports-based install, or > perhaps a pkg_add and, presto, out of the box, have a browser. > > And, here it comes... Wait for it. > > Without too much trouble, have a running Java, connect to t

Re: this is probably a little touchy to ask...

2010-09-14 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Jules" == Jules Gilbert writes: Jules> Now, if Oracle won't adjust their thinking, I intend to look at Java Jules> sub-systems that are supplied and built by other people than Oracle. Jules> (It's called Open Source.) And that's what I tried to say in my last few posts. Given Oracle's ap

Re: this is probably a little touchy to ask...

2010-09-14 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Randal L. Schwartz on Tuesday, 14 September 2010: > > "Jules" == Jules Gilbert writes: > > Jules> Now, if Oracle won't adjust their thinking, I intend to look at Java > Jules> sub-systems that are supplied and built by other people than Oracle. > Jules> (It's called Open Source.) > > A

jumbo frame support in bge(4) for BCM5704

2010-09-14 Thread David Newman
8.0-RELEASE amd64, Tyan S2882-D motherboard, Broadcom BCM5704C gigabit Ethernet transceivers Looking for clues on enabling jumbo support on BCM5704 chips. The bge(4) manpage claims this interface supports jumbo frames, as does Broadcom's data sheet. However, 'ifconfig bge0 mtu 9000' returns an e

Re: jumbo frame support in bge(4) for BCM5704

2010-09-14 Thread Adam Vande More
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:19 PM, David Newman wrote: > 8.0-RELEASE amd64, Tyan S2882-D motherboard, Broadcom BCM5704C gigabit > Ethernet transceivers > > Thanks in advance for any clues on enabling jumbos on this system. > What happens if you boot from a linux live cd and try to enable frames the

How to prevent system to launch interactive fsck after improper shutdown and reboot?

2010-09-14 Thread Yuri
Almost every time after improper shutdown (poweroff) and reboot I get into interactive fsck. I am being asked whole bunch of questions to which I just have to answer Y (what are my other options?) Why drop user into interactive fsck if there is not much choice anyways? Is there a way to set

Re: How to prevent system to launch interactive fsck after improper shutdown and reboot?

2010-09-14 Thread Remko Lodder
>> Almost every time after improper shutdown (poweroff) and reboot I get >> into interactive fsck. >> >> I am being asked whole bunch of questions to which I just have to answer >> Y (what are my other options?) >> >> Why drop user into interactive fsck if there is not much choice anyways? >> Is t

Re: this is probably a little touchy to ask...

2010-09-14 Thread Joshua Isom
On 9/14/2010 4:21 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: "Jules" == Jules Gilbert writes: Jules> Now, if Oracle won't adjust their thinking, I intend to look at Java Jules> sub-systems that are supplied and built by other people than Oracle. Jules> (It's called Open Source.) And that's what I tried

Re: How to prevent system to launch interactive fsck after improper shutdown and reboot?

2010-09-14 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Wednesday, September 15, 2010 a las 09:41:54AM +0300, Yuri escribió: > Almost every time after improper shutdown (poweroff) and reboot I get > into interactive fsck. > > I am being asked whole bunch of questions to which I just have to answer > Y (what are my other options?) > > Why dro