On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:13:06PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:21:12 -0500, Gary Gatten wrote:
> > Rename them, copy, then rename them back?
>
> Not good for a whole bunch of files; in this case: tar them together,
> transfer the archive, untar it; rename afterwards if neede
On 27.08.2010 20:52, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:02:18PM +0200, Matias wrote:
>> Thanks for replying!
>>
>> I've tried everything you mention here with no success:
>>
>> The BIOS is pretty basic, just allows to select boot order, set the
>> date, and not much more than that. N
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 325, Issue 5, Message: 4
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:06:33 +0100 Paul Macdonald wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for posting on a bsd list but i figure there's more than a few
> sendmail experts here.
>
> I would like to run reverse dns checks on one of my boxes but the
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 09:10:10AM +0200, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) wrote:
> On 27.08.2010 20:52, Roland Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:02:18PM +0200, Matias wrote:
> >> Thanks for replying!
> >>
> >> I've tried everything you mention here with no success:
> >>
> >> The BIOS is p
El 28/08/10 09:40, Roland Smith escribió:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 09:10:10AM +0200, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) wrote:
On 27.08.2010 20:52, Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:02:18PM +0200, Matias wrote:
Thanks for replying!
I've tried everything you mention here with no succe
I see two more possibilities for such a lingua franca file system: xfs and zfs.
I noticed, on http://distrowatch.com/ , that there was an update to xfsprogs
package.
xfsprogs is included in Linux (Slackware 13.0), and I see xfsprogs packages in
NetBSD pkgsrc and freebsd ports.
I saw an article
On 28 August 2010 08:02, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:13:06PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:21:12 -0500, Gary Gatten wrote:
>> > Rename them, copy, then rename them back?
>>
>> Not good for a whole bunch of files; in this case: tar them together,
>> transfer
On 28/08/2010 08:02:31, 'Gary Kline' wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:13:06PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:21:12 -0500, Gary Gatten wrote:
>>> Rename them, copy, then rename them back?
>>
>> Not good for a whole bunch of files; in this case: tar them together,
>> transfer
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 01:49:18PM +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hell Bernt,
> I'm having problems with lines like this in cron, works on the command
> line, but not in cron.
>
> /sbin/dump -0uan -f - /usr | gzip -2 | ssh -c blowfish \
> targetu...@targetmachine.example.com dd
> of=/mybigfiles/
Hello fellas,
I have a 8.0-RELEASE (i386) with the following make.conf:
PERL_VERSION=5.8.9
WRKDIRPREFIX=/wrkdir
NO_BIND = YES
WITH_CUPS=YES
CUPS_OVERWRITE_BASE=YES
WITHOUT_LPR=YES
and a custom kernel that has all the features of GENERIC + all required
stuff for pf. Nothig special up to this poi
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:53:46PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>
> At least you need one machine with Internet connection to get
> the ports update, e. g. using "portsnap fetch extract" or
> "make update" (using csup). Once done, tar cf ports.tar /usr/ports
> and transfer the file to the server witho
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:07:45 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:53:46PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> >
> > At least you need one machine with Internet connection to get
> > the ports update, e. g. using "portsnap fetch extract" or
> > "make update" (using csup). Once done, tar c
Right now I've got an installation of squid 3.0.24, and want to move
to the 3.1 branch.
I could just do a 'make deinstall' on the current version, then do
'make install' in the 3.1 port, but I'm wondering if there's a smarter
way to do this.
Kurt
___
fr
portupgrade, perhaps?
On Aug 28, 2010, at 3:56 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
> Right now I've got an installation of squid 3.0.24, and want to move
> to the 3.1 branch.
>
> I could just do a 'make deinstall' on the current version, then do
> 'make install' in the 3.1 port, but I'm wondering if there's
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:56:09 -0700
Kurt Buff wrote:
> Right now I've got an installation of squid 3.0.24, and want to move
> to the 3.1 branch.
>
> I could just do a 'make deinstall' on the current version, then do
> 'make install' in the 3.1 port, but I'm wondering if there's a smarter
> way to
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
> Right now I've got an installation of squid 3.0.24, and want to move
> to the 3.1 branch.
>
> I could just do a 'make deinstall' on the current version, then do
> 'make install' in the 3.1 port, but I'm wondering if there's a smarter
> way to do
Polytropon wrote:
> > tar -cf ports.tar /usr/port
>
> It should be, better suited:
>
> # cd /usr
> # tar cf ports.tar ports
>
> So one could do "tar xf ports.tar" in the target machine's /usr
> ...
Better put the created tarfile somewhere other than in the directory
that is being
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending
it to.
For more information on our business please click on the following
link:
[1]Click here for our website
We look forward to your continued business in the future.
Regards,
Webmaste
Hi, while trying to compile Firebird 2.1.x from sources I got this error:
**Error**: You must have autoconf 2.63 or later installed.
My first reaction was looking at /usr/ports/devel, but found that the highest
version of autoconf available is 2.62. How can I get 2.63?
Thanks, in advance.
Leon
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:29:29AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 28/08/2010 08:02:31, 'Gary Kline' wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:13:06PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> >> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:21:12 -0500, Gary Gatten
> >> wrote:
> >>> Rename them, copy, then rename them back?
> >>
> >>
Portupgrade won't, AFAIK, cross branches, though I could be wrong about that.
There's a 3.0 branch in /usr/ports/www/squid30 and a 3.1 branch in
/usr/ports/www/squid31, and I want to make the switch to pick up a
feature.
Kurt
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 14:06, Ryan Coleman wrote:
>
>
> portupgrade,
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 14:33, RW wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:56:09 -0700
> Kurt Buff wrote:
>
>> Right now I've got an installation of squid 3.0.24, and want to move
>> to the 3.1 branch.
>>
>> I could just do a 'make deinstall' on the current version, then do
>> 'make install' in the 3.1 po
Leonardo M. Ramé writes:
> Hi, while trying to compile Firebird 2.1.x from sources I got this error:
>
> **Error**: You must have autoconf 2.63 or later installed.
>
> My first reaction was looking at /usr/ports/devel, but found that the
> highest version of autoconf available is 2.62. How can I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have been trying to setup DHCPV6 between two systems. I have my gateway, with
a correctly assigned prefix from my ISP, and a client who has ipv6 enabled, and
dhcp6c installed.
When i activate the dhcpd, it starts correctly but when i try to g
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
> Portupgrade won't, AFAIK, cross branches, though I could be wrong about that.
>
> There's a 3.0 branch in /usr/ports/www/squid30 and a 3.1 branch in
> /usr/ports/www/squid31, and I want to make the switch to pick up a
> feature.
>
> Kurt
portma
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 21:51, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
>> Portupgrade won't, AFAIK, cross branches, though I could be wrong about that.
>>
>> There's a 3.0 branch in /usr/ports/www/squid30 and a 3.1 branch in
>> /usr/ports/www/squid31, and I want to
On 29/08/2010 04:10:24, Indexer wrote:
> subnet6 fe80:1::216:e6ff:fe7f:972e/128 {
That's your problem.
That's a link-local address. It should be your network address -- which
I think is probably 2001:44b8:7988:c60::/64
For testing purposes, I'd also take out the host {} block giving
mai a fixed
27 matches
Mail list logo
