On 22 July 2010 02:16, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Aiza wrote:
>
> >
> > Not yet, when I have a spare box I might, although I quite like using
> >> zfs for jails as you can limit the disk usage dynamically per zfs
> >> filesystem and I didnt see any support there y
Rich, if you can't get either the installation CD or live-file-system CD to
boot (FreeBSD), maybe your computer is allergic to FreeBSD? I've had that
problem with both FreeBSD and NetBSD on the older computer (Cx486DX-2 at
66 MHz; 1.2 GB hard drive). One thing that could possibly help is if you
Hi,
I am interested in having a production grade BIND9 implementation on FreeBSD.
My hardware is as below
Intel(r) Xeon(r) Processor X5560
I learned from the site that FreeBSD for ia64 is still in TIER2. Can you please
advise me on the below.
1. When it will be moved to TIER1.
2. I
Hi,
> Intel(r) Xeon(r) Processor X5560
> I learned from the site that FreeBSD for ia64 is still in TIER2. Can
> you please advise me on the below.
For Intel Xeon, I think you want the amd64 branch. ia64 would be for
Ithanium.
Bests,
Olivier
___
free
On 22 July 2010 10:17, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Intel(r) Xeon(r) Processor X5560
>
> > I learned from the site that FreeBSD for ia64 is still in TIER2. Can
> > you please advise me on the below.
>
> For Intel Xeon, I think you want the amd64 branch. ia64 would be for
> Ithanium.
>
> Best
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:35:48PM +0100, krad typed:
>
> while we are on the topic of debugging I would recomend exim as an MTA. I
> manage a few large enterprise mail systems with 10M + active accounts. A lot
> of them are legacy systems that we gained through acquisitions. I generally
> have to
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:58:39AM +0200, Peter Boosten typed:
> On 22-7-2010 2:10, Aiza wrote:
> >
> > If this apache jail is going to use the standard port 80 to listen on,
> > then the host and any other jails can not use that port number.
>
> Nonsense!
Indeed
> Since the IP address assigned
On 22 July 2010 12:26, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:35:48PM +0100, krad typed:
> >
> > while we are on the topic of debugging I would recomend exim as an MTA. I
> > manage a few large enterprise mail systems with 10M + active accounts. A
> lot
> > of them are legacy systems
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:32:36 +0100
krad articulated:
> yep I know exim is sendmail cli compatible, but the output from sendmail is
> not the same on exim (interactive prompt). You can probably get similar
> output from sendmail, but with most things sendmail it is archaic and
> obfuscated.
With
Gentlemen,
Since the ONLY instance of Apache on this box will BE the one I'm
installing in the jail, I should just be able to connect to it by its
IP address...just like any other web server.
Yes? No? Am I missing something?
Ed
___
freebsd-questions@fre
In response to Ed Flecko :
> Gentlemen,
> Since the ONLY instance of Apache on this box will BE the one I'm
> installing in the jail, I should just be able to connect to it by its
> IP address...just like any other web server.
>
> Yes? No? Am I missing something?
Yes.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.
I agree, but I might start pulling parts and see if it works then. swap video
cards if you can, etc.
On Jul 22, 2010, at 3:28 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Rich, if you can't get either the installation CD or live-file-system CD to
> boot (FreeBSD), maybe your computer is allergic to FreeBSD? I'
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:32:36 +0100
> krad articulated:
>
>
> > yep I know exim is sendmail cli compatible, but the output from sendmail
> is
> > not the same on exim (interactive prompt). You can probably get similar
> > output from sendmail, but w
Hello,
Is 'pfm2afm' part of some port in /usr/ports? Thanks in advance
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e - w http://www.unixarea.de/
Solidarity with the zionistic pirates of Israel? Not in my name!
¿Solidaridad con los piratas
It converts Postscript Font files into Adobe Font Manager files.
I've have not a use for it (yet).
On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Is 'pfm2afm' part of some port in /usr/ports? Thanks in advance
>
> matthias
> --
> Matthias Apitz
> t +49-89-61308 3
El día Thursday, July 22, 2010 a las 09:47:52AM -0500, Ryan Coleman escribió:
> It converts Postscript Font files into Adobe Font Manager files.
>
> I've have not a use for it (yet).
Background of my question is the need of Type 1 font files which cover
most of the European Unicode scripts for t
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:57:10PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Thursday, July 22, 2010 a las 09:47:52AM -0500, Ryan Coleman escribió:
>
> > It converts Postscript Font files into Adobe Font Manager files.
> >
> > I've have not a use for it (yet).
>
> Background of my question is the ne
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:28:00 +0300
Odhiambo Washington articulated:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Jerry wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:32:36 +0100
> > krad articulated:
> >
> >
> > > yep I know exim is sendmail cli compatible, but the output from sendmail
> > is
> > > not the same on
--On Thursday, July 22, 2010 02:21:59 +0200 claudiu vasadi
wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the "rmconfig-recursive". I did not know about it.
Nor did I. And it begs the question - is there a way to find out what all the
make targets are in /usr/ports? Is this documented anywhere?
--
Paul Sc
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:15:10 -0500, Paul Schmehl
wrote:
> And it begs the question - is there a way to find out what all the
> make targets are in /usr/ports? Is this documented anywhere?
Yes, "man 7 ports", section TARGETS.
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra
On 7/22/10 1:15 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Thursday, July 22, 2010 02:21:59 +0200 claudiu vasadi
wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the "rmconfig-recursive". I did not know about it.
Nor did I. And it begs the question - is there a way to find out what
all the make targets are in /usr/ports? Is t
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:28:54 -0400
Jerry wrote:
> For starters, you are using the wrong sendmail. You need to use the
> Postfix 'sendmail' version.
>
> $ which sendmail
> /usr/sbin/sendmail
>
> I have Postfix installed and running. Sorry, I thought that was
> obvious.
>
> Typing: "man sendmai
No I'm not going to start ripping my computer apart because FreeBSD can't deal
with my hard drive. I think the problem is a shortcoming in FreeBSD where it
can't deal with drives that have old stale RAID metadata on them. I'm just
going
to have to wait until they can. Until then no FreeBSD for
Then you can suffer through "crappy windows" or spend $50 on a hard drive...
On Jul 22, 2010, at 1:15 PM, Rich wrote:
> No I'm not going to start ripping my computer apart because FreeBSD can't
> deal
> with my hard drive. I think the problem is a shortcoming in FreeBSD where it
> can't deal
Lol, true.
From: Ryan Coleman
To: Rich
Cc: User Questions
Sent: Thu, July 22, 2010 11:50:58 AM
Subject: Re: system hangs on; "Probing devices, please wait (this can take a
while)... "
Then you can suffer through "crappy windows" or spend $50 on a hard drive
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
Rich articulated:
> Lol, true.
Two top posters in succession. My lucky day. In any case, the OP should
NOT have to suffer the agita of being forced to due either. While the
ability do accomplish what the OP desires does not exist ab initio in
FreeBSD, it
Caleb Stein writes:
> the last lines of the output can be found here:
> http://pastebin.com/8VAdvEjH
>
> How should I fix this?
That's pretty weird; I can't make any sense out of it.
If it were me, I would start by making sure that the dependencies are
all up to date, and start over the eclipse
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 04:03:46PM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>
> > Already use procmail so adding an automatic filter should not be
> > difficult if only I can come up with on.
> >
> > Tried "tr \240 ' ' < testfile | hd" and was not able to change the 0xa0
> > into anything. Have already spent m
Jeff Molofee writes:
> I've noticed software update pop up on the screen quite a bit lately.
> Initially it popped up and did nothing. Now in 8.1-RC2 it pops up and
> shows me that I actually have updates. When I click update, it seems
> like it's actually attempting to upgrade the listed packa
Hi,
My name is Subburaj from India, I bought a broadband internet connection and
tried to connect with Freebsd system, I edited the /etc/ppp/ppp.conf with my
username, password and i.p address that my ISP gave me but its not going
through. I tried to troubleshoot with freebsd handbook and als
Hi, Subburaj--
On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:36 AM, subbu 4u wrote:
> My name is Subburaj from India, I bought a broadband internet connection and
> tried to connect with Freebsd system, I edited the /etc/ppp/ppp.conf with my
> username, password and i.p address that my ISP gave me but its not going
Hi folks,
I have Apache installed in a "qjail" named "webserver" (I.P. address
192.168.225.130) using the "pkg_add -r apache22" command, but how do
you get Apache (or Bind, etc.) to automatically start upon boot?
I got the jail to start by adding qjail_enable="YES" to hosts'
/etc/rc.conf and I als
I have this interesting behavior in the top utility on _both_ my 7.1
and 8.0 FreeBSD servers (updated to latest patches). The interesting
behavior happens only when my kernel is compiled with the ULE
scheduler. It does not happen when the kernel uses the old BSD
scheduler.
Here is a link of a sc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/22/10 6:20 PM, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I have Apache installed in a "qjail" named "webserver" (I.P. address
> 192.168.225.130) using the "pkg_add -r apache22" command, but how do
> you get Apache (or Bind, etc.) to automatically start upon
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:36:27AM -0700, subbu 4u wrote:
> Hi,
> My name is Subburaj from India, I bought a broadband internet connection
> and
> tried to connect with Freebsd system, I edited the /etc/ppp/ppp.conf with my
> username, password and i.p address that my ISP gave me but its not g
Thanks Glen.
:-)
I'm not clear how I get the 'make config' to show the configuration
screen or the 'make install' to compile and install???
That might allow me to install Apache (with a limited number of
modules) like I want, but I don't understand what you're suggesting.
Also, do you know fo
On 7/22/10 6:51 PM, Ed Flecko wrote:
Thanks Glen.
:-)
I'm not clear how I get the 'make config' to show the configuration
screen or the 'make install' to compile and install???
Depending on what you've previously done in the www/apache22 directory,
a configuration may already exist. 'make
On 7/22/10 7:07 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
Also, do you know for sure that compiling from source and specifying
the install target (i.e., ./configure --prefix=/PathToJail
--enable-ssl...etc., etc., etc???) won't work?
It will work, sure, but make(1) and the port Makefile does this for you.
To b
Oh, O.K., so I CAN just download the tarball (from
http://httpd.apache.org/), unpack and install it (just like any other
source install) and specify the jail as the target or did I
misinterpret you?
Sorry if I've missed your point!
:-)
Ed
___
freebsd-q
On 7/22/10 7:19 PM, Ed Flecko wrote:
Oh, O.K., so I CAN just download the tarball (from
http://httpd.apache.org/), unpack and install it (just like any other
source install) and specify the jail as the target or did I
misinterpret you?
Do it from _inside_ the jail, not from the host.
Regards,
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Problem is in both cases the above ports require an existing INDEX file
to process and since I
On 7/22/2010 8:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> I have a pristine install of 8.0.
> There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
> I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
> just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
>
> Problem is in both cases the above ports require an
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 7/22/2010 8:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Problem is in both cases the above ports
On 07/22/2010 06:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> I have a pristine install of 8.0.
> There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
> I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
> just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
>
> Problem is in both cases the above ports require a
Is this port broken?
I can not get it to work.
It gives this message
cvs checkout: No CVSROOT specified! Please use the -d option
Cannot read the INDEX file. Give up
The manpage has no information about any options at all, so have no idea
how the -d option is to be coded. I do have a /usr/por
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Is this port broken?
>
> I can not get it to work.
>
> It gives this message
>
> cvs checkout: No CVSROOT specified! Please use the -d option
> Cannot read the INDEX file. Give up
>
I am not familiar with that port, but it looks to be a wrapper for
For some reason I can not connect to *any* wireless network regardless
of the connection type unless I have "WPA" in /etc/rc.conf right
before "DHCP". Why would I require this to connect to open networks?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Benjamin Lee wrote:
On 07/22/2010 06:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Problem is in both cases the above port
packagekit... moreso gnome-packagekit
On 7/22/2010 1:23 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Jeff Molofee writes:
I've noticed software update pop up on the screen quite a bit lately.
Initially it popped up and did nothing. Now in 8.1-RC2 it pops up and
shows me that I actually have updates. When I c
On 23/07/2010 02:20:02, Fbsd8 wrote:
> I have a pristine install of 8.0.
> There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
> I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
> just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
I've heard of a few people trying to do things like th
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:14:12AM +0100, Matthew Seaman thus spake:
On 23/07/2010 02:20:02, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
just populate the ports tree with only the port
Strange freecolor behavior on fresh 8.0-RELEASE system.
# uname -a
FreeBSD alternate-1.net 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21
15:02:08 UTC 2009 r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
# freecolor -V
freecolor version 0.8.8
# freecolor
Bus error
I have rein
Have you updated your ports? This was an issue on the amd64 distribution,
but it was fixed.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Antonio Kless wrote:
> Strange freecolor behavior on fresh 8.0-RELEASE system.
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD alternate-1.net 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21
> 15:
2010/7/23 Randy Belk
> Have you updated your ports? This was an issue on the amd64 distribution,
> but it was fixed.
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Antonio Kless wrote:
>
>> Strange freecolor behavior on fresh 8.0-RELEASE system.
>>
>> # uname -a
>> FreeBSD alternate-1.net 8.0-RELEASE FreeB
2010/7/23 Antonio Kless
>
>
> 2010/7/23 Randy Belk
>
> Have you updated your ports? This was an issue on the amd64 distribution,
>> but it was fixed.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Antonio Kless wrote:
>>
>>> Strange freecolor behavior on fresh 8.0-RELEASE system.
>>>
>>> # uname -a
>>>
>Benjamin Lee wrote:
>> On 07/22/2010 06:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
>>> I have a pristine install of 8.0.
>>> There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
>>> I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
>>> just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
>>>
>>> Problem is in b
56 matches
Mail list logo
