On Thursday 10 June 2010 03:30:14 Pieter de Goeje wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 June 2010 09:34:40 Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > On 09/06/2010 08:15:23, Eitan Adler wrote:
> > > Why do I sometimes see the grep in ps's output and sometimes not see
> > > it?
> >
> > When you run that pipeline the OS doesn't s
So, it would appear that Midphase hosting are still incapable of working out
why their ticketing system is sending replies with forged From: address to
posters to the freebsd-questions mailing list. (Their support queue is at
mpcustomer.com).
I'm assuming the list admins already have examples t
Hi,
Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
Subject: [#24548754] Re: why does ps |grep sometimes not return itself?
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:46:31 -0500
From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Reply-To: supp...@mpcustomer.com
Message-ID:
I suggest to block on the freebsd server the compl
Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
I'm assuming the list admins already have examples to work with, but here is a
set of headers from the reply I got to my last list post, in case it's any
help.
for everyone how does not want this mails anymore but into your
/etc/mail/access the
Hi,
On my system (FreeBSD 7.3 AMD64, system & kernel current as per today)
it takes awully long to start up gnome (2.30) - "awfully long" meaning
2-3 minutes (this is on a Intel quadcore-CPU with 4GB RAM!)
In my /etc/rc.conf I've got
gnome_enable="YES"
I've already ruled out the usual suspect b
Thanks for the recommendation. I'm pretty much settled on thttpd now
though - small, does cgi, no dependencies.
Thanks,
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Peet Maier
Sent: 09 June 2010 23:38
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Small webserver recommendations
There is a
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
>>
>> Subject: [#24548754] Re: why does ps |grep sometimes not return itself?
>> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:46:31 -0500
>> From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>> Reply-To: supp...@mpcusto
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On my system (FreeBSD 7.3 AMD64, system & kernel current as per today)
> it takes awully long to start up gnome (2.30) - "awfully long" meaning
> 2-3 minutes (this is on a Intel quadcore-CPU with 4GB RAM!)
>
> In my /etc/rc.conf I've
On Thursday 10 June 2010 14:06:46 Rob Farmer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Matthias Fechner
wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
> >> Subject: [#24548754] Re: why does ps |grep sometimes not return itself?
> >> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:46:31 -0500
> >>
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
> On Thursday 10 June 2010 14:06:46 Rob Farmer wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Matthias Fechner
> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
>> >> Subject: [#24548754] Re: why does ps |grep sometimes n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 13:32:23, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
> I know it creates work for the admins, but couldn't their address be
> unsubscribed and banned, given that they have been creating a nuisance for at
> least the last several weeks now?
Sure. Just te
On Thursday 10 June 2010 14:51:42 Rob Farmer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan McKeown
wrote:
[rant about midphase hosting and mpcustomer.com]
>
> They posted in a previous thread about this, saying they couldn't
> unsubscribe under their address, ie. somebody is relaying mail to
In response to Rob Farmer :
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 June 2010 14:06:46 Rob Farmer wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Matthias Fechner
> > wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
> >> >> Subject:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 15:04:53 Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> The only other mechanism might be to tag each list e-mail with a unique
> value for each recipient in such a way that it is preserved in the
> message that mpcustomer.com's help system sends out. That has severe
> problems of scale and lo
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
> On Thursday 10 June 2010 14:51:42 Rob Farmer wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan McKeown
> wrote:
> [rant about midphase hosting and mpcustomer.com]
>>
>> They posted in a previous thread about this, saying they couldn't
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 14:12:48, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
> Isn't that called VERP (variable envelope return path)? I agree - the load it
Dat's der bunny.
> would impose isn't worth it. I'm just shocked that midphase care so little
> about their reputation o
I also have a similar problem (slow start-up) with gnome 2.30. In my case
gnome-panel stops for some time (30 secs ?) then outputs a message to the
console and then everything is ready to accept input. I can't attach the output
message now.
In my /etc/rc.conf I just added
hald_enable="YES"
db
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Vinay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am new to FreeBSD. I have installed FreeBSD 6.3 and was playing with
> gvinum.
>
>
> Can you let me know what am i missing?
>
You should use a current release of FreeBSD, if 6.3 is still supported it
won't be for much longer.
Use the 8.
Am 10.06.10 15:30, schrieb Matthew Seaman:
Until then, as someone upthread said, block them using your access DB if
you run your own sendmail based mail system. The equivalents for people
running other MTAs are left as exercises for interested students. If
you don't have your own mail system, t
Hi all,
I can't find an answer to this question, so I decided to post here.
Since I'm not very good at english let me ask this with an example.
I assume that packages and ports may have different versions of the
same software (am I right?) so, for instance, if you install gnome
with packages you
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 04:58:56PM +0200, Antonio Vieiro wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I can't find an answer to this question, so I decided to post here.
> Since I'm not very good at english let me ask this with an example.
>
> I assume that packages and ports may have different versions of the
> same so
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 10 06:25:02 2010
> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:24:55 +0200
> From: Matthias Fechner
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Midphase Hosting
>
> Hi,
>
> Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
> > Subject: [#24548754] Re: why does p
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:12:48 +0200
Jonathan McKeown articulated:
> On Thursday 10 June 2010 15:04:53 Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >
> > The only other mechanism might be to tag each list e-mail with a
> > unique value for each recipient in such a way that it is preserved
> > in the message that mpcust
FreeBSD's sh (in 8.0) doesn't seem to support the ++ or -- arithmetic
operators
$ echo "$((n++))"
arithmetic expression: syntax error: "n++"
Am I wrong in thinking these are POSIX operators? It seems odd if they
were simply left-out..
___
freebsd-q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 15:13:39, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> Am 10.06.10 15:30, schrieb Matthew Seaman:
>> Until then, as someone upthread said, block them using your access DB if
>> you run your own sendmail based mail system. The equivalents for people
>> runn
Hi all,
Its been a while since I have used CVSup.
I have a server with FreeBSD 8 RELEASE on it. It was built very shortly
after 8.0 was released.
I want to run CVSup on the source and ports before deploying it
TO make sure that just ports and source are updated, what tag do I use in
the sup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 17:12:50, Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:12:48 +0200
> Jonathan McKeown articulated:
>
>> On Thursday 10 June 2010 15:04:53 Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>>
>>> The only other mechanism might be to tag each list e-mail with a
>>> unique
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:26:22PM -0400, Grant Peel thus spake:
Hi all,
Its been a while since I have used CVSup.
I have a server with FreeBSD 8 RELEASE on it. It was built very shortly
after 8.0 was released.
I want to run CVSup on the source and ports before deploying it
TO make sure that
RELENG_8_0
Yes. This will give you the latest 8.0 release + desired patch level
(critical security patches). This is almost certain what you want to be
running before going to production status. I mean, you could use
RELENG_8_0_RELEASE I suppose, but then the cvsup would be without merit.
On 10.06.2010 18:12, Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:12:48 +0200
> Jonathan McKeown articulated:
>
>> On Thursday 10 June 2010 15:04:53 Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>>
>>> The only other mechanism might be to tag each list e-mail with a
>>> unique value for each recipient in such a way that it is
I have an approach that will get MidPhase's attention, but I need the help
of as many of the other victims of their borked support system as I can
round up.
Anybody who gets one of their misbeggotten trouble-ticket acks, please
forward (or copy, or whatever) the message, with *COMPLETE* headers, t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 17:26:22, Grant Peel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Its been a while since I have used CVSup.
>
> I have a server with FreeBSD 8 RELEASE on it. It was built very shortly
> after 8.0 was released.
>
> I want to run CVSup on the source and ports b
In the last episode (Jun 10), RW said:
> FreeBSD's sh (in 8.0) doesn't seem to support the ++ or -- arithmetic
> operators
>
> $ echo "$((n++))"
> arithmetic expression: syntax error: "n++"
>
> Am I wrong in thinking these are POSIX operators? It seems odd if they
> were simply left-out..
Ea
I had been using csh/tcsh for 20 years and I just switched to bash. The
recent discussion about the differences between the shells prompted me
to take another look at bash. I thought I'd share my perception of the
differences between tcsh and bash.
The big thing tcsh is lacking, and the reason
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jun 9 06:09:36 2010
> From: Eitan Adler
> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:08:58 +0300
> To: questi...@freebsd.org
> Cc:
> Subject: Too many defunct processes; kill -9 not working
>
> Lately I've been getting a considerable number of defunct processes. I
>
Dan D Niles writes:
> The which command functions differently between bash and tcsh. For
> example, I have ls aliased to do color output and add some other options
> that I like. With tcsh, 'which ls' returns
> "ls: aliased to \ls -GFB"; with bash it returns
> "/bin/ls". The tcsh behavior
In the last episode (Jun 10), Lowell Gilbert said:
> Dan D Niles writes:
>
> > The which command functions differently between bash and tcsh. For
> > example, I have ls aliased to do color output and add some other options
> > that I like. With tcsh, 'which ls' returns
> > "ls: aliased
On Jun 10 2010 11:36, Robert Bonomi wrote:
> I have an approach that will get MidPhase's attention, but I need the help
> of as many of the other victims of their borked support system as I can
> round up.
>
> Anybody who gets one of their misbeggotten trouble-ticket acks, please
> forward (or cop
I emailed the maintainer but got no response.
Fresh install of FreeBSD 8.0-Release and a port collection from around
6/5/10. Did a make on the dahdi-2.3.0rc2 port, but it fails.
I can provide details, but was wondering if it was something on my machine
or if others have noticed this and are awa
Douglas Thrift wrote on Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:27:25PM -0700:
> Hello,
>
> I've run into this before and it seems to me like the port should
> actually depend on misc/compat6x. I emailed Martin about this a while
> back, but never received any reply. Apparently there is even an open bug
> for th
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:41:32 -0400
Lowell Gilbert articulated:
> bash (like most other sh-style shells) has no "which" builtin. You
> end up running /usr/bin/which. bash (like most other sh-style
> shells) does have a (rough) equivalent, which is "type"
Personally, I have found the "command" e
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Douglas Thrift wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've run into this before and it seems to me like the port should
> actually depend on misc/compat6x. I emailed Martin about this a while
> back, but never received any reply. Apparently there is even an open bug
> for this: http
Hello,
I've run into this before and it seems to me like the port should
actually depend on misc/compat6x. I emailed Martin about this a while
back, but never received any reply. Apparently there is even an open bug
for this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/146680
Hope this helps
I should have spent just a few more minutes googling. Found this:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.telephony.pbx.asterisk.bsd/3083
Looks like exactly the issue I ran in to.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
I Had a terrible week with freebsd. In monday I did an upgrade from 7.3
to 8.1-prerelease in 3 machines, 2 of them worked normaly and one stop
functioning, and without user (ldap) e cron is not sending emails. The
log for cron is:
Jun 10 19:45:00 sol /usr/sbin/cron[80892]: (root) CMD (/usr/lib
Hello Martin, *,
the port lang/cmucl has a dependency on a very old libutil,
libc and libm:
% lisp
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libutil.so.5" not found, required by "lisp"
% which lisp
/usr/local/bin/lisp
% ldd `which lisp`
/usr/local/bin/lisp:
libutil.so.5 => not found (0x0)
hi all...
reading
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sendmail.html
i did get an access file set up. it doesn't do anything thought...
i have only entry like this:
some.domain.comOK
and did make. then changed /etc/defaults/rc.conf to
sendmail_enable=
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:40 PM, kalin m wrote:
>
>
>
> hi all...
> reading
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sendmail.html
>
> i did get an access file set up. it doesn't do anything thought...
> i have only entry like this:
>
> some.domain.com OK
>
> and did
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 02:49 am, Dan D Niles wrote:
> I had been using csh/tcsh for 20 years and I just switched to
> bash. The recent discussion about the differences between the
> shells prompted me to take another look at bash. I thought
> I'd share my perception of the differences between tcsh a
Disclaimer: If this mail has been sent to you by mistake or if you prefer not
to receive any future emails on Training Program from us, please reply this
e-mail with "REMOVE" in the subject line. We apologize for any inconveniences
caused. Thank you for your time.
Please forward this e-mail to y
Hello
While I'm on the upgradeing path to KDE 4.4.4 I get the follwoing error in
x11/kdebase4-workspace. Any ideas?
Kind regards,
===> Building for kdebase-workspace-4.4.4
[ 0%] [ 0%] Built target kgreet_generic_automoc
Built target kgreet_classic_automoc
[ 0%] Built target kgreet_winbind_
Hi,
Ah, I see.
So if I need a more advanced version of some software, that has been
installed as a package, I can use portupgrade (or other port
management tools) to upgrade the package to a port. Am I right?
Thanks,
Antonio
(As a newbie I'm somewhat concerned about keeping consistency between
52 matches
Mail list logo
