I recently upgraded from FreeBSD 7.2 to 8.0. This resulted in a strange
error with authdaemond (part of the Courier imap package, used to
authenticate users) when used in conjunction with postfix; I've rebuilt
all of the packages, but the config they're using has worked since the
6.0 days.
I
On Sunday 29 November 2009 22:47:56 Kurt Buff wrote:
> I've gotten Flash and Java going with Firefox, as root, using the
> directions here:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/desktop-browsers.html
>
> However, I can't get it going as a standard user. When I run
>
>
Le Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:15:11 -0800,
Gary Kline a écrit :
> it is better to pkg_delete OOo-301 or just cd to /usr/local and
> /bin/rm -r it from there? this time i'll make a not of the preferred
> way of cleaning out the old stuff..
You should use pkg_delete to remove an installed port.
It remov
Hi!
I am trying to upgrade a 6.2-RELEASE to 6.4-RELEASE, but `freebsd-update -r
6.4-RELEASE upgrade` is not available in this version. Can i upgrade this or
do i have to go the old way? Unfortunately the `pkg_add -r cvsup` does not
find the package for it.
Thx
Alex
_
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:38:23 -0800
Corey Chandler replied:
>I recently upgraded from FreeBSD 7.2 to 8.0. This resulted in a
>strange error with authdaemond (part of the Courier imap package, used
>to authenticate users) when used in conjunction with postfix; I've
>rebuilt all of the packages, bu
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:01:50 +0100, Patrick Lamaiziere
wrote:
> Le Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:15:11 -0800,
> Gary Kline a écrit :
>
> > it is better to pkg_delete OOo-301 or just cd to /usr/local and
> > /bin/rm -r it from there? this time i'll make a not of the preferred
> > way of cleaning out the o
Allow me an addition, primarily involving your item #1,
licensing restriction, extended to possible legal
restrictions:
Some ports, especially from the multimedia category,
allow many build-time options that determine what to
include in the final program, mostly used for codecs
and file formats. T
Alex Huth wrote:
>I am trying to upgrade a 6.2-RELEASE to 6.4-RELEASE, but `freebsd-update -r
>6.4-RELEASE upgrade` is not available in this version. Can i upgrade this or
>do i have to go the old way? Unfortunately the `pkg_add -r cvsup` does not
>find the package for it.
Might it be possible to
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Randi Harper wrote:
> I'm going to just reply to all of these at once.
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 07:59:42AM -0500, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Peggy Wilkins wrote:
>>>
* David Rawling schrieb:
> Alex Huth wrote:
>
>
> Might it be possible to install the csup port from /usr/ports/net and use that
> instead of cvsup? IIRC it's compatible with cvsup and uses the same config,
> but
> does not require M3 etc.
>
Thx csup was the solution. I should remember it, but
Alex Huth wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am trying to upgrade a 6.2-RELEASE to 6.4-RELEASE, but `freebsd-update -r
> 6.4-RELEASE upgrade` is not available in this version. Can i upgrade this or
> do i have to go the old way? Unfortunately the `pkg_add -r cvsup` does not
> find the package for it.
>
> Thx
>
> A
Hi Guys,
I can't seem to get OpenBGPD to compile properly on 7.0. I updated the
ports to the latest version using portsnap and when I do a make install I
get the following:
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall
-I/usr/ports/net/openbgpd/work/bgpd
-I/usr/ports/net/openbgpd/work/bgpd/../op
I have configured IPF based firewall on solaris 10, however for some reason
which i do not understand the machine block all TCP connections after few
hours of deploying the firewall rules.
while blocked machine is not ping able nor I can SSH it, consequently i have
to access it via console and hav
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 01:16, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Sunday 29 November 2009 22:47:56 Kurt Buff wrote:
>> I've gotten Flash and Java going with Firefox, as root, using the
>> directions here:
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/desktop-browsers.html
>>
>> However, I
I had this problem too.
I didn't have browser_plugins/ into /usr/local/lib, so I linked it to
/usr/local/lib/firefox3/plugins/
I don't remember exactly, but I think this would work
Also, my user is not a member of wheel.
But plugins are owned by root:wheel, 755 chmoded, and it works.
(other subj
Yuri writes:
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> Yuri wrote:
>>> I am seeing this for a long time. If I use 'portupgrade -aPP'
>>> (packages only) there is a very large percentage of packages
>>> missing.
>>> Upgrading becomes many times faster when binary packages available
>>> are available.
>>
>> Missi
Hmm...
# ll /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
total 128
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 68 Sep 13 09:44 libjavaplugin_oji.so ->
/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/plugin/amd64/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 130658 Sep 13 13:12 npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
# ll /usr/local/lib/firefox3/
In the last episode (Dec 01), Gary Kline said:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 10:39:03PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > In the last episode (Dec 01), Gary Kline said:
> > > Be nice to suggest to the mutt folks to let this be turned on only for
> > > certain email. I *have* tried to sub to the mutt mailin
I think you should move browser_plugins content to firefox3/plugins, remove
browser_plugins, and then link it to firefox3/plugins.
Samuel Martín Moro
CamTrace
{EPITECH.} tek4
"Nobody wants to say how this works.
Maybe nobody knows ..."
Xorg.conf(5)
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:
On 11/28/09, Peggy Wilkins wrote:
> Can someone elaborate on what exactly this statement in the 8.0
> detailed release notes means?
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.0R/relnotes-detailed.html#FS
>
>> 2.2.5 File Systems
>>
>> “dangerously dedicated” mode for the UFS file system is no longer
>>
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Gary Kline wrote:
>
> it is better to pkg_delete OOo-301 or just cd to /usr/local and
> /bin/rm -r it from there? this time i'll make a not of the preferred
> way of cleaning out the old stuff..
>
>
Early this century I started removing packages by issuing "sudo r
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 08:34:05PM -0800, Randi Harper wrote:
> I'm going to just reply to all of these at once.
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 07:59:42AM -0500, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Peggy Wilkins
2009/12/2 :
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Gary Kline wrote:
>
>>
>> it is better to pkg_delete OOo-301 or just cd to /usr/local and
>> /bin/rm -r it from there? this time i'll make a not of the preferred
>> way of cleaning out the old stuff..
>>
>>
> Early this century I started removing pac
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
> 2009/12/2 :
> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Gary Kline wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> it is better to pkg_delete OOo-301 or just cd to /usr/local and
> >> /bin/rm -r it from there? this time i'll make a not of the preferred
> >> way of cleaning out
Hello,
I just spent some time with an issue: after a "standard" upgrade (by
luck on a test server), the image generation/conversion part of a
webpage is not working correctly anymore: pictures (which are
dynamically re-sized with pecl-imagick) are simply inverted (but only
TIFF's).
Before:
Image
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 09:19:38AM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Dec 01), Gary Kline said:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 10:39:03PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > > In the last episode (Dec 01), Gary Kline said:
> > > > Be nice to suggest to the mutt folks to let this be turned on onl
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 04:38:18PM +0100, usleepl...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Gary Kline wrote:
>
> >
> > it is better to pkg_delete OOo-301 or just cd to /usr/local and
> > /bin/rm -r it from there? this time i'll make a not of the preferred
> > way of cleaning out the
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> Some of the responses have said that UFS handling of 'Dangerously
> dedicated' has not gone away, just sysinstall handling of it.
> That may be true and if that is true, then you can probably still
> access dangerously dedicated drives. B
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 09:48:05AM -0800, Randi Harper wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > Some of the responses have said that UFS handling of 'Dangerously
> > dedicated' has not gone away, just sysinstall handling of it.
> > That may be true and if that is true,
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:30:10AM -0500, Bob Johnson wrote:
> On 11/28/09, Peggy Wilkins wrote:
> > Can someone elaborate on what exactly this statement in the 8.0
> > detailed release notes means?
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.0R/relnotes-detailed.html#FS
> >
> >> 2.2.5 File Systems
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:09:22 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> Good. Except that in FreeBSD land you are talking about a slice table.
> To carry things forward consistently, the partition table is within
> a slice and describes FreeBSD partitions a..h (and more now I guess).
> Only in MS or Lunix
# cd /var/db/pkg
# pkg_delete <> # Use Tab key for completion.
# pkgdb -vFa
is in my ~/.HowTo file.
thanks for the datapoints and the chuckles,
gary
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org http://trans
Hi
Can I change dst IP in packet with IPFW?
--
С уважением,
Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
On Dec 2, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Коньков Евгений wrote:
> Can I change dst IP in packet with IPFW?
Normally this was done using natd's redirect_address capability. In newer
versions of FreeBSD, IPFW has grown internal support for doing nat redirects
without using the userland natd; for example, see
I am running (under bash):
LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8 opera
and all menu items are still in English. Same with firefox3.
Why LANG isn't switched by LANG variable?
Yuri
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 08:34:05PM -0800, Randi Harper wrote:
> I'm going to just reply to all of these at once.
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 07:59:42AM -0500, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Peggy Wilkins wrote
Здравствуйте, Chuck.
Вы писали 2 декабря 2009 г., 22:28:23:
CS> On Dec 2, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Коньков Евгений wrote:
>> Can I change dst IP in packet with IPFW?
CS> Normally this was done using natd's redirect_address capability.
CS> In newer versions of FreeBSD, IPFW has grown internal support
Hi !
I think that firefox needs its language pack to be installed the usual way:
THis is the __language pack package description__ for firefox3
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/www/firefox3-i18n/pkg-descr
And this is for firefox35
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/www/firefox35
Hi, I'm running nfsd on FreeBSD (7.2 and 8.0) but it seem don't listen
on udp.
$ tail /etc/rc.conf
rpcbind_enable="YES"
rpc_lockd_enable="YES"
rpc_statd_enable="YES"
nfs_server_enable="YES"
nfs_server_flags="-t -u -n 4"
mountd_flags="-p 962 -r"
$ netstat -a -f inet | grep nfsd
tcp4 0
daniele wrote:
Hi !
I think that firefox needs its language pack to be installed the usual
way:
THis is the __language pack package description__ for firefox3
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/www/firefox3-i18n/pkg-descr
And this is for firefox35
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?p
daniele wrote:
Hi !
I think that firefox needs its language pack to be installed the usual
way:
THis is the __language pack package description__ for firefox3
Language pack (firefox3-i18n-3.0.15) for firefox didn't translate menus
at all. Tools item got "Quick Locale Switcher" menu which
Hi--
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Коньков Евгений wrote:
> Actually I have google clue: http://gara.opennet.ru/http_redirect.html
> but it is impossible to implement that with IPFW NAT.
> And now -a and -proxy_only are exclusive but in article as you can sen
> in examples they are not. article is d
I just finished a forced rebuild of all my ports, but the crashes
persist.
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 23:29 +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:44:00AM -0500, Curly Brace wrote:
> > Hi all, I'm on 8.0/amd64, and my GNOME 2.28 update went off with no
> > problems, but now Firefox 3
Okay, so I've seen this error many times and its cause has always been clear.
In this case I'm stumped. I've got a 3U SuperMicro server with 16 drives hooked
up to two 3Ware controllers. The drives are configured into two logical drives
da0 and da1. I've installed a FreeBSD 8.0 OS on da0 but whe
I had meant to include my partition table in the last email:
# fdisk -p da0
# /dev/da0
g c1458908 h255 s63
p 1 0xa5 63 35664237
a 1
p 2 0xa5 35664300 62862345
p 3 0xa5 98526645 1863989820
This is what I'd expect it to be. If I use the -u option I get this:
# fdisk -u da0
*** Working on devic
U can safely use the sysinstall to go to fdisk to view the partition table.
There set bootable yes
press 'w' to write
answer if u want boot mgr or not
should help.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Peter Steele wrote:
> Okay, so I've seen this error many times and its cause has always been
> clear
I have successfully installed freebsd on my macbook (yay!), but I
can't figure out how to make the wifi work. Wired networking works
great.
I am following the directions here :
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/network-wireless.html,
but I have only got up to section 31.3.3.1, since I
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:42:13 -0800 Yuri wrote:
> daniele wrote:
> > I think that firefox needs its language pack to be installed the
> > usual way:
> > THis is the __language pack package description__ for firefox3
> Language pack (firefox3-i18n-3.0.15) for firefox didn't translate
> menus at all
48 matches
Mail list logo
