Mark Willson wrote:
Phusion wrote:
I need some help configuring sendmail to send only using authorization
to a smart host being the ISP's mail server. I'm running 7.2-RELEASE.
Use /usr/share/sendmail/cf/cf/clientproto.mc
(Instructions in the README files)
--
Mauro Rezzonico , Como, Italia
"Ma
Hi,
I am running a server that is acting as the mail server for only internal users
(about 50 users). Currently we are running Sendmail, but reading on other
discussions I noticed that qmail and other programs are suggested.
I am wondering if qmail is thought to be better than sendmail. Is there
Matthias Fechner wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael Powell schrieb:
>> patch I got. I use cvsup11 because it closest to me (in the Verizon
>> datacenter in Ashland, Va.) but I have had that server go stale before.
>> Might try csupping ports again from something a little higher up in the
>> hierarc
Michael Powell wrote:
> Jerry wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> No problems on my machines.
>>
>> PHP 5.2.11 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.7 (cli) (built: Sep 24 2009 19:08:59)
>> Copyright (c) 1997-2009 The PHP Group
>> Zend Engine v2.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2009 Zend Technologies
>>
[snip]
>
> Will look into it
Aflatoon Aflatooni wrote:
> Hi,
> I am running a server that is acting as the mail server for only internal
> users (about 50 users). Currently we are running Sendmail, but reading on
> other discussions I noticed that qmail and other programs are suggested. I
> am wondering if qmail is thought to
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Aflatoon Aflatooni wrote:
> Hi,
> I am running a server that is acting as the mail server for only
> internal users (about 50 users). Currently we are running Sendmail,
> but reading on other discussions I noticed that qmail and other
> programs are sugges
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:03:37 -0400
Michael Powell wrote:
> Found the problem. The mailheader patch for 5.2.10 clashes with the
> Suhosin patch for 5.2.11. I rebuilt PHP with Suhosin and without
> mailheader patch and now it's all happy again. Now my php -v reads
> like Jerry's.
Did you file a PR
Aflatoon Aflatooni wrote:
Hi,
I am running a server that is acting as the mail server for only internal users
(about 50 users). Currently we are running Sendmail, but reading on other
discussions I noticed that qmail and other programs are suggested.
I am wondering if qmail is thought to be bet
Aflatoon Aflatooni writes:
> I am running a server that is acting as the mail server for only internal
> users (about 50 users). Currently we are running Sendmail, but reading on
> other discussions I noticed that qmail and other programs are suggested.
> I am wondering if qmail is thought to b
Jerry wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:03:37 -0400
> Michael Powell wrote:
>
>> Found the problem. The mailheader patch for 5.2.10 clashes with the
>> Suhosin patch for 5.2.11. I rebuilt PHP with Suhosin and without
>> mailheader patch and now it's all happy again. Now my php -v reads
>> like Jer
Jerry wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:03:37 -0400
> Michael Powell wrote:
>
>> Found the problem. The mailheader patch for 5.2.10 clashes with the
>> Suhosin patch for 5.2.11. I rebuilt PHP with Suhosin and without
>> mailheader patch and now it's all happy again. Now my php -v reads
>> like Jer
Aflatoon Aflatooni writes:
> Hi,
> I am running a server that is acting as the mail server for only internal
> users (about 50 users). Currently we are running Sendmail, but reading on
> other discussions I noticed that qmail and other programs are suggested.
> I am wondering if qmail is though
I personally prefer postfix too. It seems to be a relieable program, setting it
up is easier then sendmail. It also integrates well with mailman (for the case
you want to host mailing lists).
Some basic comparison:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_mail_servers
Cheers
herb langhans
On
Yes. What about bogofilter. This port is smart, I always wonder how intelligent
it dedects spam, just by the content. Even works with Chinese messages..
Setting it up requires some time and patience (its a filter what plugs in at
procmail). But its small and efficient, ideal for mailservers.
h
My Atheros PCMCIA-card went crazy with the HAL-port enabled. For the case you
use HAL..
Cheers
herb langhans
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:26:23AM -0400, Kenneth wrote:
> Anyone been able to use the ath driver on an atheros 5424/2424? I have a
> Compaq Presario CQ60 and can not get the wireless l
Hello, I hope somebody here known well tap interfaces on freebsd :).
I try to configure virtualbox with bridge interface. Everything seams ok:
# ifconfig tap0
tap0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu
1500
ether 00:bd:4f:0a:00:00
inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
#
On 9/27/2009 10:06 AM, herbert langhans wrote:
Yes. What about bogofilter. This port is smart, I always wonder how intelligent
it dedects spam, just by the content. Even works with Chinese messages..
Setting it up requires some time and patience (its a filter what plugs in at
procmail). But it
On Sunday 27 September 2009 18:17:22 Sébastien Serre wrote:
> Hello, I hope somebody here known well tap interfaces on freebsd :).
>
> I try to configure virtualbox with bridge interface. Everything seams ok:
> # ifconfig tap0
>
> tap0: flags=8943 metric 0
> mtu 1500
> ether 00:bd:4f:0a:
2009/9/25 Saifi Khan :
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>
>> > > > i noticed that there is no Oracle available for FreeBSD
>> > > > http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/index.html
>> > > >
>> > > > What could be the reason for that ?
>> > >
>> > > Best ask direc
On Sunday 27 September 2009 16:13:38 Sébastien Serre wrote:
> On Sunday 27 September 2009 18:17:22 Sébastien Serre wrote:
> > Hello, I hope somebody here known well tap interfaces on freebsd :).
> >
> > I try to configure virtualbox with bridge interface. Everything seams ok:
> > # ifconfig tap0
>
On Sun 27 Sep 2009 at 12:25:50 PDT Chris Rees wrote:
This guy replying to your post was a troll, basically. Ignore him, and
Yep. It shows that some Linux fans are just as prone to creating FUD as
their adversaries in the Windows world.
I'd like to think the BSD community is better than that.
On Sunday 27 September 2009 22:51:02 Mario Lobo wrote:
> On Sunday 27 September 2009 16:13:38 Sébastien Serre wrote:
> > On Sunday 27 September 2009 18:17:22 Sébastien Serre wrote:
> > > Hello, I hope somebody here known well tap interfaces on freebsd :).
> > >
> > > I try to configure virtualbox w
>> On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:01:22 -0700 (PDT),
>> Aflatoon Aflatooni said:
A> I am running a server that is acting as the mail server for only
A> internal users (about 50 users). Currently we are running Sendmail...
First things first: if you're happy with Sendmail and your system works
to
In the last episode (Sep 26), Chris Whitehouse said:
> Hi all
>
> Does anyone have experience of a LaCie Hard Disk, Design by Neil Poulton
> eSATA, FireWire 400 & Hi-Speed USB 2.0 1TB ?
>
> http://www.lacie.com/uk/products/product.htm?pid=11064
>
> Are all the interfaces supported? The data shee
On 25/09/2009 10:28 PM, Saifi Khan wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
i noticed that there is no Oracle available for FreeBSD
http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/index.html
What could be the reason for that ?
Best ask direct of commerci
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009, Dan Nelson wrote:
>In the last episode (Sep 26), Chris Whitehouse said:
>> Hi all
>>
>> Does anyone have experience of a LaCie Hard Disk, Design by Neil Poulton
>> eSATA, FireWire 400 & Hi-Speed USB 2.0 1TB ?
>>
>> http://www.lacie.com/uk/products/product.htm?pid=11064
>>
>
Greetings,
Please suggest a cloning method comparable to Clonezilla.
Preferably fast, no need to install a base OS, easy to clone and
restore. Of course, the key is fast.
Clonezilla does a nice job with OS's other than *BSD (It uses dd (iirc))
and that takes forever (at least when cloning - have
27 matches
Mail list logo
