Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 05:11:00PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > > But if I remember my legal and ethics course correctly if you can arrive > at a conclusion through your own research then your reasonably clear. > For example, the drivers are closed source but the hardware itself is an > entirely separa

FreeBSD 7.1-RC1 rl0 watchdog timeout with custom kernel

2008-12-15 Thread Gennady Kudryashoff
Hello, all! I have Asus X51RL laptop with FreeBSD 7.1-RC1 installed. There were no troubles with GENERIC kernel, but when I've compiled custom kernel, rl ethernet driver tells to the console a lot of errors: rl0: link state changed to UP rl0: watchdog timeout rl0: watchdog timeout Any mistake?

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I think that can be handled quite easily by community social pressure, and moderation would just set a precedent for "it's someone else's job". moderation is needed. Things like "community social pressure" simply doesn't. Like with democracy - those who are more common and louder will takeove

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
and exactly is needed on that group. it would be enough that moderator's job will be just removing posts that classify to NTG. NOTHING else. As long as neither you, nor anyone that thinks like you, is in charge of moderation, it might not be a *complete* disaster. of course it should be you t

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
There are many constructive ways of improving FreeBSD. You have already submitted 7 bug reports in out bug database. If you think you can help of which at least 2 was completely ignored;) (no even response) by submitting *more* bug reports, testing FreeBSD patches, developing new FreeBSD co

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:49:57PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > > I think the list you're looking for when you talk about only discussing > > the base-system already exists (probably stable or arch). This is > > freebsd questions- and the nature of the list according to the > > all-knowing h

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:06:58 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar wrote: > Now i'm using FreeBSD and it got better each version. Really better, > not "better". > > And i really want to keep it that way, because there is no alternative > now! There are many constructive ways of improving FreeBSD. You ha

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread perryh
> > Unfortunately, anything covered by a patent, as I hinted > > above, is verboten. Er, doesn't it depend on what is patented? If the h/w itself is patented, but its software-visible interface is not, there should be no problem writing a driver for that h/w. OTOH if the algorithms used in the d

Re: install freebsd from inside another operating system

2008-12-15 Thread Robin Becker
After some messing around with various efforts on the depenguinator I came up with this scheme for getting a freebsd boot using an external freebsd machine ie not using the target to create the boot. ##freebsd machine #get the freebsd bootonly location wget [use your local location]/7.1-RC1-i

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
base system: nothing appropriate Maybe what we need isn't for you to keep complaining about 70% of the very helpful list traffic, helpful for whom? thus producing another 5% of the list traffic yourself (directly, and indirectly through annoyed responses to you), but for someone to come up

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Da Rock
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 12:54 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> > >> Most of them don't. > > > > Considering that, the moment someone shows up and says "I'm a Windows > > user, but I'm thinking about trying out FreeBSD," you immediately assume > > the person doesn't want to learn without bothering t

Upgrading 4.x install without doing clean reinstall?

2008-12-15 Thread Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum
I have a server that was running Free BSD 4.7 for a number of years. I DO NOT have easy physical access to it, its in a datacenter and i cant get to it myself or at this point rely on anyone there to put in a new install disk or anything. Ive replaced this server with a new one for production u

Renaming files with strange characters in dired-mode [was: Re: control character file names]

2008-12-15 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:59:02 -0800, Noah wrote: >> If you have customized `dired-listing-switches' try reverting it to a >> simpler set of options, like: >> >> (setq-default dired-listing-switches "-lFa") >> >> The -b and -B options tend to confuse dired about what the *real* >> filename is, a

Re: control character file names

2008-12-15 Thread Polytropon
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:59:02 -0800, Noah wrote: > I am > unable to rename a directory that has nine '?'. Maybe Midnight Commander - PF6: Rename - will do the job? (Workaround) -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...

Re: control character file names

2008-12-15 Thread Noah
Polytropon wrote: On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:59:02 -0800, Noah wrote: I am unable to rename a directory that has nine '?'. Maybe Midnight Commander - PF6: Rename - will do the job? (Workaround) okay I dont quite understand. what is midnight commander - PF6: Rename? Cheers, Noah __

Re: Renaming files with strange characters in dired-mode [was: Re: control character file names]

2008-12-15 Thread Noah
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:59:02 -0800, Noah wrote: If you have customized `dired-listing-switches' try reverting it to a simpler set of options, like: (setq-default dired-listing-switches "-lFa") The -b and -B options tend to confuse dired about what the *real* filen

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread michael
can this thread be closed now? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Jerry
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:49:43 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> >> I think that can be handled quite easily by community social >> pressure, and moderation would just set a precedent for "it's >> someone else's job". > >moderation is needed. Things like "community social pressure" >simply doe

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
freebsd-questions User questions and technical support Exactly. Note, however, that 'user questions' means something very different from what you are pushing to convince everybody else :-) so please start to answer every possible question. for example problems with windows ftp program

Re: control character file names

2008-12-15 Thread Polytropon
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:14:32 -0800, Noah wrote: > Polytropon wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:59:02 -0800, Noah wrote: > >> I am > >> unable to rename a directory that has nine '?'. > > > > Maybe Midnight Commander - PF6: Rename - will do the job? > > (Workaround) > > > > > > okay I dont qu

Re: imagemagick convert: japanese text broken in freebsd

2008-12-15 Thread Glen Barber
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:21 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:17:38 -0800, Charlie Kester > wrote: >> The conversations on ports@ seem to be mostly concerned with the needs >> of port maintainers rather than the users of ports. If you have >> problems getting a port to buil

Re: control character file names

2008-12-15 Thread Noah
Hi there, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:52:01 -0800, Noah wrote: * Use a file manager. I often use `dired-mode' inside an Emacs session to move around, copy, re-organize, rename or delete files. Any file manager that can display several character sets

Re: imagemagick convert: japanese text broken in freebsd

2008-12-15 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:17:38 -0800, Charlie Kester wrote: > The conversations on ports@ seem to be mostly concerned with the needs > of port maintainers rather than the users of ports. If you have > problems getting a port to build or a package added, it feels like the > right place to get help.

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Most of them don't. Considering that, the moment someone shows up and says "I'm a Windows user, but I'm thinking about trying out FreeBSD," you immediately assume the person doesn't want to learn without bothering to read any further, I yes. because if this person would like, he/she would rea

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I.e. "freebsd-quesitions" is for all FreeBSD-related questions, not only questions about the FreeBSD base system. from handbook: freebsd-questions User questions and technical support ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://list

Re: control character file names

2008-12-15 Thread Noah
Sorry for being to briefly. 1. The Midnight Commander is a curses based file manager that might be a workaround for the problem you can't solve using Emacs at the moment. It can be installed via ports or (more simple) from packages using "pkg_add -r mc". The command to run it is "mc". 2. P

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
It's already happening on that group that's why i talk about starting moderation to remove all posts that are not about group topic! Group topic? As far as I can tell, the topic is "user questions" about FreeBSD (according to http://lists.freebsd.org/ and the List-Id header). Where exactly i

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:49:57 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> I think the list you're looking for when you talk about only >> discussing the base-system already exists (probably stable or >> arch). This is freebsd questions- and the nature of the list >> according to the all-knowing handboo

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
moderation is needed. Things like "community social pressure" simply doesn't. Like with democracy - those who are more common and louder will takeover, no matter if it make sense or not. Yes, and you have gone a long way in proving just that point. Your narrow minded, inability to accept anyone

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Da Rock
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 19:21 -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:39:26AM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > > > > Hence why I tend to send really green unix newbies to linux school than > > grind their teeth on FreeBSD straight up. Let em get their skills and > > experience in how *nix in g

Re: GPL version 4

2008-12-15 Thread Richard M Stallman
I don't think it is that bad - the intent is for the software to be freely available for *people* to use. It is actually about our freedom. You have it right. Copyleft licenses defend freedom for all users by stopping middlemen from stripping it away. We have no plans for a version 4 of

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
That's THAT simple, unless you like it to be more complicated. No there isn't. The freebsd-newbies list has been merged with freebsd-questions for several years now. You could have easily verified this by following the link to: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies sor

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
When I say that FreeBSD is *not* a bunch elitist bastards and we do *not* like driving users away, I am aware of how serious it is to 'speak on behalf of the entire FreeBSD team' I speak only for myself. As i already wrote, i don't want FreeBSD to be turned into mainstream crap, because there a

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Why not send them to something like DesktopBSD or PC-BSD, or even FreeSBIE (if that project is still around)? If they go to some chintzy user-obsequious Linux distribution like PCLinuxOS first, they'll just have more stuff to unlearn *if* it ever occurs to them to give some BSD Unix variant a try

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Heh. "The customer is /always/ right, even when they're wrong." The difference is that you give the idiot customers exactly what they ask for, and the good customers what they actually need which cannot be done. you choose idiots or good customers, as it's effectively 2 market niches. _

Re: control character file names

2008-12-15 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:52:01 -0800, Noah wrote: >> >> * Use a file manager. >> >> I often use `dired-mode' inside an Emacs session to move around, >> copy, re-organize, rename or delete files. Any file manager that >> can display several character sets at once will do fine :

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Da Rock
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 02:16 -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > > Unfortunately, anything covered by a patent, as I hinted > > > above, is verboten. > > Er, doesn't it depend on what is patented? If the h/w itself is > patented, but its software-visible interface is not, there should be > no

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I think the list you're looking for when you talk about only discussing the base-system already exists (probably stable or arch). This is freebsd questions- and the nature of the list according to the all-knowing handbook IS for newbies, people who probably won't understand the difference between

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Da Rock
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 12:49 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > > I think that can be handled quite easily by community social pressure, > > and moderation would just set a precedent for "it's someone else's job". > > moderation is needed. Things like "community social pressure" > simply doesn't.

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Da Rock
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 02:11 -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 05:11:00PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > > > > But if I remember my legal and ethics course correctly if you can arrive > > at a conclusion through your own research then your reasonably clear. > > For example, the drivers a

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Benjamin M. A'Lee
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:49:43PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> >> I think that can be handled quite easily by community social pressure, >> and moderation would just set a precedent for "it's someone else's job". > > moderation is needed. Things like "community social pressure" simply > doesn

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
That might be a valid concern if your notion of "off topic" didn't include things that pretty much everyone else seems to think is on topic enough to fit into this list. do we have to start deciding what's "on-topic" by voting? congratulations i don't mean moderation like removing one o

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Actually, Pentium M processors may well be the best x86-compatible CPUs of their generation -- low power consumption relative to the competition, and the best performance per dollar in their class. Pentium 4, though, certainly sucks. as having pentium-M laptop and pentium-4 server i can only sa

Uptime logging with (maybe) ppp's log functionality

2008-12-15 Thread Polytropon
Hi! I'm going to setup a system with a dial-up modem for sporadic Internet access; a provider that charges per second online time is used. Is there a way ppp (which is used for dialing) can log the online time (or at least the connection's start and stop time) so the costs can be calculated? Furt

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:06:52 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> I.e. "freebsd-quesitions" is for all FreeBSD-related questions, not >> only questions about the FreeBSD base system. > > from handbook: > > freebsd-questions User questions and technical support Exactly. Note, however, that

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
i don't think that has to happen at all. personally i think self-moderation is best, followed by moderation (which i haven't found to be a bad thing). here the former seems to be dominant because of the quality of people on the list, so it is quite sufficient. this quality gets down. not becau

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:04:52 -0700 Chad Perrin wrote: >On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 08:57:28PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> >>bad (TM). >> > >> >No -- at *any* level: >> >> you are wrong. >> >> for example you WILL like to control what oficially your employees >> ktalk about your company. > >Th

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
That's not censorship -- it's a nondisclosure agreement. There are users on this list who would love to see users of FBSD bound by an NDA so that they could not say anything these self appointed "CENSORS" consider verboten. you are excellent at messing things up. __

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:12:16 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> freebsd-questions User questions and technical support >> >> Exactly. Note, however, that 'user questions' means something very >> different from what you are pushing to convince everybody else :-) > > so please start to answe

Re: Upgrading 4.x install without doing clean reinstall?

2008-12-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote: | I have a server that was running Free BSD 4.7 for a number of years. I | DO NOT have easy physical access to it, its in a datacenter and i cant get | to it myself or at this point rely on anyone there to put in a ne

Re: Uptime logging with (maybe) ppp's log functionality

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I'm going to setup a system with a dial-up modem for sporadic Internet access; a provider that charges per second online time is used. Is there a way ppp (which is used for dialing) can log the online time (or at least the connection's start and stop time) so the costs can be calculated? option

Re: FreeBSD 7.1-RC1 rl0 watchdog timeout with custom kernel

2008-12-15 Thread Roland Smith
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:31:16AM +0300, Gennady Kudryashoff wrote: > Hello, all! > > I have Asus X51RL laptop with FreeBSD 7.1-RC1 installed. > There were no troubles with GENERIC kernel, but when I've compiled custom > kernel, rl ethernet driver tells to the console a lot of errors: > > rl0:

Running rsnapshot via cron reboots the machine

2008-12-15 Thread David N
Hi, I have a machine AMD Sepron LE-1150 ASUS M2A-VM 1GB RAM ECC 2x SATA 300GB in a RAID 1 (gmirror). 7.0-RELEASE-p2 AMD64 generic kernel it was doing backups via bacula to an external disk USB 2.0 SATA disk, and it was working well. (GLabel) /dev/ufs/BackupDisk I changed to rsnapshot recently,

Re: Disk Errors

2008-12-15 Thread Al Plant
Wojciech Puchar wrote: ad2: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out LBA=0 ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=1 ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (0 retries left) LBA=1 The flash drive is detected with 3940272 sectors. Is there a way to control the LBA= parameter? Does it matter if I try?

Re: Firebird client fails port install

2008-12-15 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Da Rock writes: > I'm trying to install php5-extensions (which includes firebird), but its > failing with an error code 1 on firebird20-client. It does mention > running make to build firebird, but not as root. So I've tried > everything to get this to work: running make as my wheel group user, >

Re: FreeBSD 7.1-RC1 rl0 watchdog timeout with custom kernel

2008-12-15 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Gennady Kudryashoff writes: > Hello, all! > > I have Asus X51RL laptop with FreeBSD 7.1-RC1 installed. > There were no troubles with GENERIC kernel, but when I've compiled custom > kernel, rl ethernet driver tells to the console a lot of errors: > > rl0: link state changed to UP > rl0: watchdog

questions about some archive files, type *.rar

2008-12-15 Thread Gary Kline
guys, last friday i found a public domain "DVD-ROM" of books available for free d/l. turns out there were 13 huge files in rar files. I have all. can these be catted together and the "unrar"d to form the original? Oh: there was another version

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:53:39PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> > >>and exactly is needed on that group. it would be enough that moderator's > >>job will be just removing posts that classify to NTG. NOTHING else. > > > >As long as neither you, nor anyone that thinks like you, is in charge of

Re: questions about some archive files, type *.rar

2008-12-15 Thread Tsu-Fan Cheng
just use "unrar" under archivers in ports collection. dont have to cat all the rar files together, "unrar" can un-compress it in sequence and generate the original files. TFC On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > >guys, > >last friday i found a public domain "DVD-R

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:16:23PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >>It's already happening on that group that's why i talk about starting > >>moderation to remove all posts that are not about group topic! > > > >Group topic? As far as I can tell, the topic is "user questions" > > about FreeBSD A

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:14:10PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 19:21 -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:39:26AM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > > > > > > Hence why I tend to send really green unix newbies to linux school than > > > grind their teeth on FreeBSD strai

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 02:13:03PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >>That's THAT simple, unless you like it to be more complicated. > > > >No there isn't. > > > >The freebsd-newbies list has been merged with freebsd-questions for > >several years now. > > > >You could have easily verified this by f

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:53:01PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > >That might be a valid concern if your notion of "off topic" didn't > >include things that pretty much everyone else seems to think is on topic > >enough to fit into this list. > > do we have to start deciding what's "on-topic"

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Da Rock
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 13:49 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > > I think the list you're looking for when you talk about only discussing > > the base-system already exists (probably stable or arch). This is > > freebsd questions- and the nature of the list according to the > > all-knowing handbook

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:44:41PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> > >>moderation is needed. Things like "community social pressure" > >>simply doesn't. Like with democracy - those who are more common and > >>louder will takeover, no matter if it make sense or not. > > > >Yes, and you have gone

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:06:58PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > base system: nothing appropriate > > > >Maybe what we need isn't for you to keep complaining about 70% of the > >very helpful list traffic, > > helpful for whom? > > >thus producing another 5% of the list traffic > >yourself (

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Monday 15 December 2008 11:14:08 Chad Perrin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:53:39PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > >>and exactly is needed on that group. it would be enough that > > >> moderator's job will be just removing posts that classify to NTG. > > >> NOTHING else. > > > > > >As lo

Re: Firebird client fails port install

2008-12-15 Thread Da Rock
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 14:29 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Da Rock writes: > > > I'm trying to install php5-extensions (which includes firebird), but its > > failing with an error code 1 on firebird20-client. It does mention > > running make to build firebird, but not as root. So I've tried > > e

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 02:16:34AM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > > Unfortunately, anything covered by a patent, as I hinted > > > above, is verboten. > > Er, doesn't it depend on what is patented? If the h/w itself is > patented, but its software-visible interface is not, there should b

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:08:18PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >Actually, Pentium M processors may well be the best x86-compatible CPUs > >of their generation -- low power consumption relative to the competition, > >and the best performance per dollar in their class. Pentium 4, though, > >cert

Re: Firebird client fails port install

2008-12-15 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Da Rock writes: > On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 14:29 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> Da Rock writes: >> >> > I'm trying to install php5-extensions (which includes firebird), but its >> > failing with an error code 1 on firebird20-client. It does mention >> > running make to build firebird, but not as

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:27:30PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > > If you have done your own research then the algorithms wouldn't > necessarily be the same- they'd nearly certainly be different, wouldn't > they? So isn't that the basis for the patent? A patent is a registration > of an idea. Two differ

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Jeff Laine
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:34:20AM -0900, Beech Rintoul wrote: > On Monday 15 December 2008 11:14:08 Chad Perrin wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:53:39PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > >>and exactly is needed on that group. it would be enough that > > > >> moderator's job will be just rem

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread prad
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:25:29 -0500 Jerry wrote: > Actually, I like your reference to 'Democracy'. Coming from a > socialist, the very thought of an open discussion on any matter that > does not fit in your narrow parameters would seem objectionable. > there are some serious problems with some pe

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Da Rock
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 13:43 -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 02:16:34AM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > > > Unfortunately, anything covered by a patent, as I hinted > > > > above, is verboten. > > > > Er, doesn't it depend on what is patented? If the h/w itself is > > p

Re: Firebird client fails port install

2008-12-15 Thread Da Rock
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 15:49 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Da Rock writes: > > > On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 14:29 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> Da Rock writes: > >> > >> > I'm trying to install php5-extensions (which includes firebird), but its > >> > failing with an error code 1 on firebird20-c

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Da Rock
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 13:47 -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:27:30PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > > > > If you have done your own research then the algorithms wouldn't > > necessarily be the same- they'd nearly certainly be different, wouldn't > > they? So isn't that the basis for

Re: GPL version 4

2008-12-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:38:35AM -0500, Richard M Stallman wrote: > I don't think it is that bad - the intent is for the software to be > freely available for *people* to use. It is actually about our freedom. > > You have it right. Copyleft licenses defend freedom for all users by > s

Re: Firebird client fails port install

2008-12-15 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Da Rock writes: > On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 15:49 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> Da Rock writes: >> >> > On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 14:29 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> >> Da Rock writes: >> >> >> >> > I'm trying to install php5-extensions (which includes firebird), but its >> >> > failing with an e

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread prad
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:34:20 -0900 Beech Rintoul wrote: > Guys, enough! This thread is starting to spam the list. > i agree too at this point and apologize for some of my earlier contributions. it is clear there will probably be no resolution between the engaging parties of which a few seem to h

power management

2008-12-15 Thread prad
my son read somewhere that linux does better power management than freebsd. one specific item being that the cpu scaling is more efficiently handled. i don't know much about this stuff so i thought i'd ask here. 1. is there any accuracy to the statement? 2. is cpu scaling a kernel issue? if so,

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:51:03 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> That's not censorship -- it's a nondisclosure agreement. > > > > There are users on this list who would love to see users of FBSD > > bound by an NDA so that they could not say anything these self > > appointed "CENSORS" conside

Re: Canonical way for DHCP->IP->/etc/hosts

2008-12-15 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roger Olofsson wrote: > > > Jeff Laine skrev: >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 02:00:12PM +0100, Roger Olofsson wrote: >>> Dear mailing list, >>> >>> I am sorry if this question has been asked over and over again - >>> however the htdig search interface fo

Re: questions about some archive files, type *.rar

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
for free d/l. turns out there were 13 huge files in rar files. I have all. can these be catted together and the "unrar"d to form the original? don't cat. just unrar x unrar handles split archives ___ freebsd-questions@freebs

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
So, we end up splitting the potential FreeBSD users between Ubuntu and Fedora with more of them going to Ubuntu because not quite as many become very nice. after trying FreeBSD they WILL get back to linux (and then windows) quickly. Those who REALLY know they need something different, like h

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Guys, enough! This thread is starting to spam the list. Please take this to freebsd-chat or off list. OK i wont post on that anymore. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubsc

Startup scipt

2008-12-15 Thread KES
Здравствуйте, Questions. It there feature (option in rc.subr) to run multiple services at once? For example I have 'service' to run service with specific flags I want to do: service_enable="YES" service_instances="instance1 instance2" service_instance1_flags="-flag 1 rl0" service_instance2_flags

Re: power management

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
my son read somewhere that linux does better power management than freebsd. one specific item being that the cpu scaling is more efficiently handled. my friend told me that freebsd does it better ;) anyway it's just "been told", "somewhere" etc. to compare things we first need to set up a metri

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Brian Whalen
Chad Perrin wrote: Tell that to the uncountable hordes of dedicated Linux users who don't know what they're missing and, as such, see no reason to even give FreeBSD a try. Many Linux people I know still think FreeBSD SMP sucks, that combined with a lack of journaling filesystem on BSD gives

Re: Startup scipt

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
instance it has first one already runned. And he add second instance because of it is not enough to have only one instance. So proftpd_enable="YES" will enable all instances proftpd_enable="NO" will disable all instances proftpd_external_enable="NO" will disable some instance For example: user ru

Re: Firebird client fails port install

2008-12-15 Thread Da Rock
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 16:49 -0500, Mark Moellering wrote: > Da Rock wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 15:49 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > > >> Da Rock writes: > >> > >> > >>> On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 14:29 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >>> > Da Rock writes: > >

Re: Firebird client fails port install

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
As a matter of fact I never use true root I ALWAYS use su (believe it or what's a practical difference between logging to root directly or doing su? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ques

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:13:38PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > >So, we end up splitting the potential FreeBSD users between Ubuntu and > >Fedora with more of them going to Ubuntu because not quite as many become > > very nice. after trying FreeBSD they WILL get back to linux (and then > w

Re: Firebird client fails port install

2008-12-15 Thread Da Rock
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 23:46 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > As a matter of fact I never use true root I ALWAYS use su (believe it or > > what's a practical difference between logging to root directly or doing > su? The log files log exactly "who" did what instead of anonymously. At the least t

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 02:22:31PM -0800, Brian Whalen wrote: > Chad Perrin wrote: > > > >Tell that to the uncountable hordes of dedicated Linux users who don't > >know what they're missing and, as such, see no reason to even give > >FreeBSD a try. > > > Many Linux people I know still think FreeB

Re: power management

2008-12-15 Thread prad
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:20:51 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > IMHO it depends on hardware > ya that makes sense at least from reading about different cpu state descriptions here: Everything You Need to Know About the CPU C-States Power Saving Modes http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/611

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 07:07:36AM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 13:43 -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 02:16:34AM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > > > > Unfortunately, anything covered by a patent, as I hinted > > > > > above, is verboten. > > > > > > E

Re: power management

2008-12-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Simply - install linux, then FreeBSD on same machine and check it :) :D ya that's what's important here at least. anyway - just using hlt instruction greatly reduces CPU power usage even at full clock. i don't think the difference is THAT huge by reducing clock multipliers, voltage etc.

Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors

2008-12-15 Thread Da Rock
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 16:23 -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 07:07:36AM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 13:43 -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 02:16:34AM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > > > > > Unfortunately, anything covered by a pa

Re: Startup scipt

2008-12-15 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:56:43 +0200, KES wrote: > It there feature (option in rc.subr) to run multiple services at once? None that I know of. > For example I have 'service' > to run service with specific flags I want to do: > > service_enable="YES" > service_instances="instance1 instance2" > serv

  1   2   >