The CPU is a Xeon 3xxx dual core 2.4 GHz. The machine has no case fans, by
design.
no fans by design?! looks like bad design, intel xeon draw a lot of power.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
As with so many other things in the computer world, it depends. With no case
fans, it's weird that the computer gets colder if it has something above and
no it's not. the machines above and below has proper cooling, and
transfers this machine heat by conduction - rack cases are mostly metal
an
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Wojciech Puchar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As with so many other things in the computer world, it depends. With no
>> case
>> fans, it's weird that the computer gets colder if it has something above
>> and
>>
>
> no it's not. the machines above and below has prop
Hello,
I was wondering if we have any South Africa's living in JHB that would
be interested in starting up a BSD user group?
Regards
Rudi
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
T
Hi,
I have read some tutor and spent hours on configuring ipv6 on my
desktop with FreeBSD, but still can't get it work.
The network administrator only suggested the configuration on windows
xp platform(come as follows), so would any one tell me what should I
do to get it work on FreeBSD.
Many thank
hi,
is there a hdparm equivalent tool, to set the power-save or spin-down
behavior of sata-disk?
or can i to it via sysctl or so?
thanks
Thomas
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
Thomas Herzog wrote:
> hi,
>
> is there a hdparm equivalent tool, to set the power-save or spin-down
> behavior of sata-disk?
> or can i to it via sysctl or so?
sysutils/ataidle in ports at the moment. I believe atacontrol has grown
some support for this in current.
vince
>
> thanks
> Thomas
>
many thanks for this fast answer.
thomas
Vince Hoffman wrote:
Thomas Herzog wrote:
hi,
is there a hdparm equivalent tool, to set the power-save or spin-down
behavior of sata-disk?
or can i to it via sysctl or so?
sysutils/ataidle in ports at the moment. I believe atacontrol has grown
some su
On Friday 09 May 2008 02:03:01 n j wrote:
> Hello,
>
> did anyone experience any problems trying to install mod_authnz_ldap
> with Apache 2.2.8 on FreeBSD 6.3?
>
> I ran into the following trouble:
>
> mod_authnz_ldap.c:41:2: #error mod_authnz_ldap requires APR-util to
> have LDAP support built in.
On a FreeBSD 6.1 with openldap-server-2.3.39, I have setup nss_ldap and
pam_ldap, but cannot get slapd to start as long as I have nss_ldap.conf
present, it just hangs and nothing in the messages or debug logs. I just
copied ldap.conf to nss_ldap.conf, see contents below. As soon as I rm
the nss_lda
> What are you using for apr? The one that comes with apache itself, or the
> devel/apr port?
AFAICT, the one that comes with Apache itself.
It would seem that mod_authnz_ldap required mod_ldap to be compiled in
Apache to work. Having little or no experience at all with Apache +
LDAP combination
I cannot find the version anymore because of Xorg being broken and
complains about libxau.so.0 on startup
But I think it must be at the latest version of FreeBSD 6.0.
Greetings,
Geert
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 13:33 +0100, RW wrote:
> On Wed, 07 May 2008 13:42:00 +0200
> Geert Geurts <[EMAIL PROTECT
I just found out that I will need to copy some files
from a FreeBSD system to a Windows shared drive on our network so that
Windows users can have access to the files.
After reading a little documentation and talking to a
cowworker, I was under the impression that this would allow
On Friday 09 May 2008 15:15:05 n j wrote:
> > What are you using for apr? The one that comes with apache itself, or the
> > devel/apr port?
>
> AFAICT, the one that comes with Apache itself.
>
> It would seem that mod_authnz_ldap required mod_ldap to be compiled in
> Apache to work. Having little
Martin McCormick wrote:
> I just found out that I will need to copy some files
> from a FreeBSD system to a Windows shared drive on our network so that
> Windows users can have access to the files.
>
> After reading a little documentation and talking to a
> cowworker, I was under the i
On Friday 09 May 2008 9:49 am, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Martin McCormick wrote:
> > I just found out that I will need to copy some files
> > from a FreeBSD system to a Windows shared drive on our network so that
> > Windows users can have access to the files.
> >
> > After reading a little docum
smbclient(1)
The smbclient program implements a simple ftp-like client. This is
useful for accessing SMB shares on other compatible servers (such as
Windows NT), and can also be used to allow a UNIX box to print to a
printer attached to any SMB
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 23:35 +0300, Indiana Jones wrote:
> If anybody could provide a solid solution, I'd be most grateful.
>
> I have this box that works as an Internet router and I have two NICs
> in it, 3com 3C996-SX and 3C996-T, the later is bge1 on which I get
> this persistent ERROR below
atacontrol
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Thomas Herzog wrote:
hi,
is there a hdparm equivalent tool, to set the power-save or spin-down
behavior of sata-disk?
or can i to it via sysctl or so?
thanks
Thomas
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
(forgot to send to list the first time)
Hi Martin,
You don't need samba if all you want to do is copy files from FreeBSD to
a Windows system. The easiest way to do it is to mount an existing
Windows share, on FreeBSD. This will give you access to the Windows
share, but nothing is shared o
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Martin McCormick wrote:
I just found out that I will need to copy some files
from a FreeBSD system to a Windows shared drive on our network so that
Windows users can have access to the files.
Some alternatives have been mentioned, but you might also consider
mount_
On Fri, 9 May 2008 16:40:01 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> smbclient connects to any SMB server (be it Windows or unix or
> whatever) and perform fetch, upload and other operations from command
> line.
>
> it's good to:
>
> testing your samba setup (if you need)
> fetc
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 08:10:40AM +0200, Christian Zachariasen wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Nerius Landys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Howdy. I purchased a 1U 10 inch deep server machine a few months ago:
> >
> > http://www.abmx.com/1u-10inch-deep-supermicro-mini-server-p-366.ht
Good morning.
I recently upgraded our two email gateways from 4.8 to 6.2. The required
software was upgraded as well which consists of MailScanner and
Sendmail. Both had been keep up to date so it was not a jump in required
resources.
The issue I am seeing is that my server load, under the s
> If this is a fixed dependency, then it's a bug in the port's Makefile. If it's
> not set in stone (i.e.: mod_authnz_ldap could also work with
> mod_fictional_3rdparty_ldap), then applying the logic you suggest, would kill
> the option to use mod_fictional_3rdparty_ldap.
>
> Set in stone would
Warren Block writes:
>Some alternatives have been mentioned, but you might also consider
>mount_smbfs(8).
I hope I managed to thank each of you who responded as I
feel like I know where I need to go next thanks to all the great
suggestions.
I would have had to enabled nfs client
Hi Martin,
I would have had to enabled nfs client if using
mount_smbfs, correct?
Nopes - stick to using the mount command. Depending on the filesystem
you specify (with the -t option), it will call the relevant mount
command itself (eg. mount_smbfs, mount_nfs).
When I bui
How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions.
===
Last update $Date: 2005/08/10 02:21:44 $
This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If
you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender
thinks that a
The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page
or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge
computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately,
The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inev
DAve wrote:
Good morning.
I recently upgraded our two email gateways from 4.8 to 6.2. The required
software was upgraded as well which consists of MailScanner and
Sendmail. Both had been keep up to date so it was not a jump in required
resources.
The issue I am seeing is that my server load
On May 9, 2008, at 8:54 AM, DAve wrote:
The issue I am seeing is that my server load, under the same traffic
load, has increased 4 times or more. Where previously we saw a high
load on the servers of 5 to 8, we are now seeing 14 to 17. Since the
upgrade Sendmail has begun to timeout connecti
On and on I charge porting linux engineering tools. Major pita. I
see a bunch of #ifdef __APPLE__ lines to pull in alternate headers;
what's the equiv for FreeBSD?
Thanks,
Steve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
On May 9, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Steve Franks wrote:
On and on I charge porting linux engineering tools. Major pita. I
see a bunch of #ifdef __APPLE__ lines to pull in alternate headers;
what's the equiv for FreeBSD?
__FreeBSD__
You might find the output of "touch foo.h ; cpp -dM fooo.h"
inter
I have installed a linux distro on a partition of my machine (latest
Mandriva i686, default installation). I only need it to use a piece of
software for Nikon Coolscan IV film scanner (yes, sane works, but a cheap
commercial package called vuescan has better interface and uses some
hardware feature
software was upgraded as well which consists of MailScanner and Sendmail.
Both had been keep up to date so it was not a jump in required resources.
The issue I am seeing is that my server load, under the same traffic load,
has increased 4 times or more. Where previously we saw a high load on th
FreeBSD 6.2 is I believe slower than 4.11 for single processor systems
and processes which pretty much run single threaded -- ie. exactly what
you're trying to run. This would cause exactly the sort of symptoms you're
seeing.
and what most unix users do.
Try 7.0 instead -- it has all of the s
On May 9, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Try 7.0 instead -- it has all of the speed at multi-threaded, multi-
core
type stuff but has also regained the sort of performance levels you
could
so 4.11 is fastest?
For single-processor systems, FreeBSD 4.11 does very well at a lot of
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
software was upgraded as well which consists of MailScanner and
Sendmail. Both had been keep up to date so it was not a jump in
required resources.
The issue I am seeing is that my server load, under the same traffic
load, has increased 4 times or more. Where previously
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
FreeBSD 6.2 is I believe slower than 4.11 for single processor systems
and processes which pretty much run single threaded -- ie. exactly what
you're trying to run. This would cause exactly the sort of symptoms
you're
seeing.
and what most unix users do.
Try 7.0 inst
Peter Boosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, I was more thinking of:
>
> ssh -L :your.own.host:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> and then open a new shell:
>
> scp -P the-file-you-want-to-copy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> This works easiest with agent forwarding, but I guess any
> authentication will
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On May 9, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Try 7.0 instead -- it has all of the speed at multi-threaded, multi-core
type stuff but has also regained the sort of performance levels you
could
so 4.11 is fastest?
For single-processor systems, FreeBSD 4.11 does very
On Fri, 09 May 2008 15:24:03 +0200
Geert Geurts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cannot find the version anymore because of Xorg being broken and
> complains about libxau.so.0 on startup
> But I think it must be at the latest version of FreeBSD 6.0.
In that case you should read the 20070519 entry
I get the following from growisofs -Z/dev/acd0=image.iso:
:-( unable to CAMGETPASSTHRU for /dev/acd0: Inappropriate ioctl for device
My burner was previously installed in my 6.3 amd64 system without issues.
dmesg reports (after growisofs fails):
...
acd0: DVDR at ata0-master UDMA33
...
acd
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Steve Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get the following from growisofs -Z/dev/acd0=image.iso:
>
>:-( unable to CAMGETPASSTHRU for /dev/acd0: Inappropriate ioctl for device
>
Use /dev/cd0, not /dev/acd0.
Josh
___
i can't seem to boot the cdrom on older hardware (500MHz and down).
i read somewhere that the older drives aren't supported by the
installation cdrom.
i want to create a series of 'dumb terminals' which can ssh -Y into a
faster machine. if necessary i suppose i can floppy in and then install
via n
On Friday 09 May 2008 14:36, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On a FreeBSD 6.1 with openldap-server-2.3.39, I have setup nss_ldap and
> pam_ldap, but cannot get slapd to start as long as I have nss_ldap.conf
> present, it just hangs and nothing in the messages or debug logs. I just
> copied ldap.conf to
On May 9, 2008, at 11:55 AM, DAve wrote:
For single-processor systems, FreeBSD 4.11 does very well at a lot
of tasks. However, Dave apparently has a 4-CPU system (~8 threads
if he enabled hyperthreading), and for real SMP hardware, more
recent versions of FreeBSD generally perform better th
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 22:44 +0200, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
> On Friday 09 May 2008 14:36, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > On a FreeBSD 6.1 with openldap-server-2.3.39, I have setup nss_ldap and
> > pam_ldap, but cannot get slapd to start as long as I have nss_ldap.conf
> > present, it just hangs and
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On May 9, 2008, at 11:55 AM, DAve wrote:
For single-processor systems, FreeBSD 4.11 does very well at a lot of
tasks. However, Dave apparently has a 4-CPU system (~8 threads if he
enabled hyperthreading), and for real SMP hardware, more recent
versions of FreeBSD generally
On Friday 09 May 2008 23:09, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 22:44 +0200, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
> > On Friday 09 May 2008 14:36, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > > On a FreeBSD 6.1 with openldap-server-2.3.39, I have setup nss_ldap and
> > > pam_ldap, but cannot get slapd to start
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On May 9, 2008, at 8:54 AM, DAve wrote:
The issue I am seeing is that my server load, under the same traffic
load, has increased 4 times or more. Where previously we saw a high
load on the servers of 5 to 8, we are now seeing 14 to 17. Since the
upgrade Sendmail has begun t
prad wrote:
i can't seem to boot the cdrom on older hardware (500MHz and down).
i read somewhere that the older drives aren't supported by the
installation cdrom.
i want to create a series of 'dumb terminals' which can ssh -Y into a
faster machine. if necessary i suppose i can floppy in and th
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
FreeBSD 6.2 is I believe slower than 4.11 for single processor systems
and processes which pretty much run single threaded -- ie. exactly what
you're trying to run. This would cause exactly the sort of symptoms
you're
seeing.
Actually I was mistaken: I saw 4.11 and 2.4
Also something to keep in mind, most (all?) new procs have thermal
cuttoffs that will kill themselves before any damage happens. If you
box hasn't shut down in weird ways or underclocked itself, you are
probably good to go. It's something to keep your eye on, but I
wouldn't worry too much about it
On Sat, 03 May 2008 16:46:27 +0200, Gilles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>What command-line FTP client would you recommend for this?
It looks like lftp is not running like I thought it would :/ Until I
ran the following commands manually instead of through CRON, some
files on the remote source FTP se
Thanks for all the replies guys. I called the manufacturer and it turns out
that there's a manual speed controller on the CPU fan. I'm going to take
the top off my case and crank it up all the way at my first opportunity.
That will at least help a little bit. Thanks again. I still think 70
Celc
On Sat, 10 May 2008 01:53:13 +0200, Gilles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>It looks like lftp is not running like I thought it would
Found what it was: The script worked fine when ran manually, but
failed when ran by CRON because it couldn't locate lftp:
Downloading from Source FTP
/var/sync.bash: li
Hi,
I have read the handbook and spent hours on the configuration of ipv6
on laptop, but still can't get it done.
The local network administrator only suggest the following steps to
setup ipv6 on windows xp and it works fine on that platform. I just
don't know to get it work on FreeBSD, would anyon
58 matches
Mail list logo
