Re: is there a 2.3.x package for OO?

2008-02-06 Thread Gary Kline
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 15:37:18 Nikola Lečić wrote: > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:20:53 -0800 > > Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To cut down my email I unsub'd to the OOo mailing list, so I'll ask > > here if there is a new package of the latest or near-latest that I > > can set off at

Evolution slow to start

2008-02-06 Thread E. J. Cerejo
Does anyone know what might be causing evolution to crawl (more than a minute to open up)? It's been a while since I used it but when I did it wasn't this slow to open up. I don't see any error messages, so I can't post any of them. I have a feeling that it's looking for something before it come

Re: Help with router problem

2008-02-06 Thread OutBackDingo
But i still dont see any ipv6 data in the ifconfig for dc0, we had an instance where ipv6 being turned off networking stopped functioning in your ifconfig dc0 should show inet6 data like lo0 does. make sure its commented out of rc.conf and reboot. also is this a generic kernel or did you customize

Re: Evolution slow to start

2008-02-06 Thread James
E. J. Cerejo wrote: Does anyone know what might be causing evolution to crawl (more than a minute to open up)? It's been a while since I used it but when I did it wasn't this slow to open up. I don't see any error messages, so I can't post any of them. I have a feeling that it's looking for so

Re: Ports binary packages

2008-02-06 Thread Oren Almog
Oren Almog wrote: > > Hi > > > > When are new binary packages available? Are they compiled only at > RELEASEs? > > No, they are compiled and updated continuously. > > Kris > Thanks. I understand that the RELEASE directory contains only packages that were compiled with a specific version was relea

Re: Ports binary packages

2008-02-06 Thread Oren Almog
> > > Oren Almog wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > When are new binary packages available? Are they compiled only at > > RELEASEs? > > > > No, they are compiled and updated continuously. > > > > Kris > > > > Thanks. > > I understand that the RELEASE directory contains only packages that were > compiled w

Re: OT: Whats wrong with gmail?

2008-02-06 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 23:44:35 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what is most strange are FreeBSD admins from that list , many of them > really good, unable to just create e-mails for themselves on one of their > servers, but using gmail. just because some people use gmail fo

Re: OT: Whats wrong with gmail?

2008-02-06 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:08:51 -0800 "Kurt Buff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can think of several others - yet I use gmail, because it's so > convenient. Some of this can be mitigated by using a POP3/IMAP client > instead of the web interface. > > 1) can't put a graphic in-line with text > > 2)

Re: Some ideas for FreeBSD

2008-02-06 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:53:28 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > My first is to allow for dynamically resizeable swap > > file of some sort, and via kqueue, a notification > > especially with todays drives - it's waste of time to implement this. > nobody use swap FILES a

Re: Help with router problem

2008-02-06 Thread Eugen
That's what I get when I put ipv6_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf : $ ifconfig -a dc0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8 ether 00:14:cf:52:b4:17 inet6 fe80::214:cfff:fe52:b417%dc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.1.33 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.25

Re: Help with router problem

2008-02-06 Thread OutBackDingo
Yeah you might want to attach the kernel config just to make sure nothing was dropped that needs to be there , when you got this dc0 ip of 192.168.1.33 was that set staticly?? On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 22:48 -0600, Eugen wrote: > That's what I get when I put ipv6_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf : > > $

Re: Some ideas for FreeBSD

2008-02-06 Thread Jason C. Wells
Norberto Meijome wrote: But I agree with Wojciech..do you really want to use swap files? One could mount an md filesystem and then use that as swap. That way you wouldn't need to use any disc space. As a plus, the performance would be way better than disc. Regards, Jason Wells __

Re: is there a 2.3.x package for OO?

2008-02-06 Thread Gaspar Chilingarov
My personal choice is to run 32-bit Linux version of OO under linux emulation (2.4.x branch) First of all it survives FreeBSD base system/gcc/etc updates pretty well :) when using native one you should fiddle with compat libraries sometimes and so on. Second -- it runs faster than native one

Re: Some ideas for FreeBSD

2008-02-06 Thread Heiko Wundram (Beenic)
Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008 07:32:16 schrieb Jason C. Wells: > Norberto Meijome wrote: > > But I agree with Wojciech..do you really want to use swap files? > > One could mount an md filesystem and then use that as swap. That way > you wouldn't need to use any disc space. As a plus, the perform

Re: Some ideas for FreeBSD

2008-02-06 Thread Dominic Fandrey
Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote: Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008 07:32:16 schrieb Jason C. Wells: Norberto Meijome wrote: But I agree with Wojciech..do you really want to use swap files? One could mount an md filesystem and then use that as swap. That way you wouldn't need to use any disc space.

Re: Some ideas for FreeBSD

2008-02-06 Thread Heiko Wundram (Beenic)
Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008 08:26:07 schrieb Dominic Fandrey: > Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008 07:32:16 schrieb Jason C. Wells: > >> Norberto Meijome wrote: > >>> But I agree with Wojciech..do you really want to use swap files? > >> > >> One could mount an md fi

<    1   2