On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 10:41:59AM -0600, Jack Barnett wrote:
>
> Anyone get the freeNX server working from nomachine?
>
> When I try to build it from /usr/ports/net/freenx it says it is broken
> under xorg 7.2
>
> I've upgrade to xorg 7.3.x and modified the make file and it builds
> everythin
snowcrash+freebsd wrote:
hi,
i've FBSD/amd64 62Rp9 installed. kernel & world are my own builds
from latest cvsup.
on boot I see:
"FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader"
odd. i'd expect a native loader ...
checking in,
/usr/src/sys/boot > ls
Makefile alpha/arm/ efi/ forth
Thanks, yea, but I don't think he's maintaining it any longer?
In ports it's version 1.4.x, but nomachine.com has latest version has
3.5.x
My friend emailed nomachine.com and he said they refused to support
any of the xBSD or offer any help on getting a working port for the
xBSD
In response to John Webster :
>
> --On Friday, December 21, 2007 13:51:29 -0500 Bill Moran wrote:
>
> > In response to John Webster :
>
> >> > Not generally suitable for cron because it can take longer to slew
> >> > than it does for the next cron execution to occur, which would then
> >> > resu
Hi!
Just a few minutes ago, I noticed one of my machines was stuck with this
message on the console:
GEOM_RAID5: KASSERT in line 1352
panic: incompetent for BIO_WRITE
cpuid = 0
Uptime: 1h33m15s
GEOM_RAID5: raid5/raid5: device is still open, so it cannot be
definitely removed.
GEOM_RAID5: raid5: w
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 03:40:48AM -0600, Jack Barnett wrote:
>
>Thanks, yea, but I don't think he's maintaining it any longer?
>In ports it's version 1.4.x, but nomachine.com has latest version has
>3.5.x
>My friend emailed nomachine.com and he said they refused to support
>an
Hello,
my problem is that I cannot really turn on gjournal for existing
filesystems, just only if the journal is placed onto another partition.
So, how can I make a journaled root filesystem? I have to do the
partitioning manually, since sysinstall does not support that. But how
can I do that
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 11:07:29AM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my problem is that I cannot really turn on gjournal for existing
> filesystems, just only if the journal is placed onto another partition. So,
> how can I make a journaled root filesystem? I have to do the partitioning
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 11:07:29AM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my problem is that I cannot really turn on gjournal for existing
> filesystems, just only if the journal is placed onto another partition. So,
> how can I make a journaled root filesystem? I have to do the partitioning
Warning: overlong message.
I'm moving this to questions@ from security@ as it's a usage issue.
Anyone wishing to follow the up to here can read from:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2007-December/004541.html
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, W. D. wrote:
> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:30:1
Hi,
I want to update some ports. I'm using FreeBSD 6.2.
I was reading in the handbook and there are two ways to update them through
the portupdate and portmanager.
What's the difference between them?
--
Robe.
En el verdadero amor, el alma oculta al cuerpo.
Hello Ivan,
Here is the test result. It seems that the problem is on FreeBSD
(6.2) . Because ö and ş are before then z in Turkish alphabet.
# cat a.c
#include
int main() {
setlocale(LC_COLLATE, "tr_TR.ISO8859-9");
printf("%d\n",strcoll("ö", "z"));
printf("%d\n",strcoll(
On Dec 22, 2007 11:39 AM, Robe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to update some ports. I'm using FreeBSD 6.2.
>
> I was reading in the handbook and there are two ways to update them through
> the portupdate and portmanager.
>
> What's the difference between them?
>
> --
> Robe.
Each one
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:07:29 +0100
Gabor Kovesdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my problem is that I cannot really turn on gjournal for existing
> filesystems, just only if the journal is placed onto another
> partition. So, how can I make a journaled root filesystem?
Is there any pa
On Dec 22, 2007, at 3:32 AM, Bruce Cran wrote:
AMD64 CPUs are backwards compatible with i386; they boot in 16-bit
real mode and only get switched into 64-bit 'long mode' by the kernel
later on. Since both i386 and amd64 start booting in the same way,
there's no need for separate bootloaders.
Hello all,
has anyone tried to compile the Realtek driver (rtl_bsd_drv_v174.tgz) on
FreeBSD 4.x? From
http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/downloadsView.aspx?Langid=1&PNid=7&PFid=7&Level=5&Conn=4&DownTypeID=3&GetDown=false#RTL8100E/RTL8101E/RTL8102E-GR
Readme.txt says:
1. M
On 22/12/2007, Ismail YENIGUL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, LC_COLLATE is link to the ../la_LN.US-ASCII/LC_COLLATE
> in /usr/share/locale/tr_TR.ISO8859-9 directory. Does this mean that
> LC_COLLATE is missing for tr_TR.ISO8859-9 ?
Yes.
__
> What's the difference between them?
The main difference that is relevant to me personally is that portmanager
makes no attempt to be too smart about avoiding compilation, and it is fully
restartable without affecting the results.
It rebuilds ports in such a way that the result is, in theory,
A couple months ago I happened upon what appeared to be a
high end website for audiophiles. All nature of sound clips,
in various formats. Looks like I did not bookmark the site and now
I can't locate it. Does anybody on-list have some preferred
audio
--On December 23, 2007 1:19:21 AM +0100 Peter Schuller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In particular, given a re-build (e.g. upgraded) port X, all ports
depending on X will also be re-built regardless of whether that is
required according to the dependency relation. This is handled in such
a way th
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:47:52 -0600
Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On December 23, 2007 1:19:21 AM +0100 Peter Schuller
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > In particular, given a re-build (e.g. upgraded) port X, all ports
> > depending on X will also be re-built regardless of whethe
Hi all
$ ps -o pri,ni,rtprio,command -p `pgrep amarok`
PRI NI RTPRIO COMMAND
20 0 normal amarokapp
1) Are there are 3 priority values per process, or
just one?
2) How should I read above? Is it Priority=20, ie.
NI=0, RTPRIO=normal? Does it all mean the same thing,
like the bytes=1048576 and K
Hi everyone,
Mi question is because checking the FreeBSD 6.3 and 7.0 Release schedule, I
note that version 6.3 is upcoming and few days later 7.0 will be releaced,
anyone know if this schedule is updated or is in time? or only one of both will
be released?
Thanks and Regards,
--
Julian Bolivar wrote:
> Mi question is because checking the FreeBSD 6.3 and 7.0 Release
> schedule, I note that version 6.3 is upcoming and few days later 7.0
> will be releaced, anyone know if this schedule is updated or is in time?
> or only one of both will be released?
My guess, informed only
> # command >& file
>
> this will redirect both STDERR and STDOUT to file
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Michael mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Thank you to everyone for their help. I have this working now.
Jay
___
freebsd-questions
The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical
examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly
to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people
know what's available on the website. Before you post a question
here it might be a good idea to first search the maili
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 07:09:47PM -0800, Unga wrote:
> Hi all
>
> $ ps -o pri,ni,rtprio,command -p `pgrep amarok`
> PRI NI RTPRIO COMMAND
> 20 0 normal amarokapp
>
> 1) Are there are 3 priority values per process, or
> just one?
There is really only one priority that is used when scheduling
27 matches
Mail list logo
