Garrett Cooper wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
It will be of academic interest to me to see how people respond to this.
Unfortunately - as documented in my original post - the 4.11 CD will
not even boot on this new motherboard for some reason. Given that, and
that 4.x is no longer actively develop
Hello,
After installing a new system on a 500Gb HDD the partition size I
allocated at install does no match the size after complete system
installation
Disc size comes up as 476937MB
At install I partitioned the disc:
/ 2048Mb
/swap 4096Mb
/var2048Mb
/server 440Gb
/us
N. Harrington wrote:
Hello
I have several systems that are used as squid
caching servers. I have some systems that use SCSI
disks and some that use SATA disks. They are
identical in everyway except for the sata vs SCSI
drives.
At random times, the sata based systems seem to be
freezing. Yo
--- Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> N. Harrington wrote:
> > Hello
> > I have several systems that are used as squid
> > caching servers. I have some systems that use SCSI
> > disks and some that use SATA disks. They are
> > identical in everyway except for the sata vs SCSI
> > dri
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:37:02PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>
> Maybe I'm just getting old ;)
I think that goes without saying. We're *all* getting old, at exactly
the same rate.
Some of us got a head start, though.
--
CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
Thomas McCauley: "
hi,
I really don't know whether this might be related to your problem, but
my proofreading eye was distracted by this in your rc.conf:
> # PPP
> ppp_enable="YES"
> ppp_mode="ddial"
> ppp_nat="NO"
> ppp_profile="ppp`"
What rc would make of that backtick inside quotes, I know not ..
wow!
hi,
The ppp rc.d script resyncs pf and ipfilter, to pick-up new interfaces,
so that shouldn't be needed.
as i'm not entirely clear on the order/function of all yet,
you're saying that's /not/ related to the not-starting-up-on-boot
problem i'm seeing, and thus i shouldn't bother with the rcode
> The /server is 9Gb smaller than I partitioned and the actual free space
> without any files in the partition is shown as 396.5Gb which is another
> 34.5Gb smaller.
The number of disk sectors/blocks allocated to a partition at install
is reduced by the amount of space taken by the system to put
Hi everybody ,
I tried to install Openoffice in my FreeBSD 6.0 Intel p4 desktop
gnome2.18
But I am getting errors as follows
don# cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2
don# ls
Makefilefiles pkg-plist
distinfopkg-descr work
don# make config
===> No option
On 04/06/07, Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The /server is 9Gb smaller than I partitioned and the actual free space
> without any files in the partition is shown as 396.5Gb which is another
> 34.5Gb smaller.
The number of disk sectors/blocks allocated to a partition at install
is re
On 6/5/07, David N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To get isc-dhcpd in a jail you need to give the jail access to /dev/bpf0
so you have to edit /etc/defaults/devfs.rules
add to the end the unhide rules for bpf eg.
[devfsrules_unhide_bpf=5]
add path bpf0 unhide
[devfsrules_dhcp_jail=6]
add include $d
thanks for the ideas, i tried both of your suggestions...i manually ran the
rails.sh file, and everything worked as expected...so i dumped the output to
file...my .sh file looks as such:
#!/bin/sh
case "$1" in
start)
echo "RAILS found start" >> /tmp/test.file
kldload accf_http >>
Yes, It working fine.. Thanks for your help..
inetd_enable="YES"
hostname="test.abc.com"
ifconfig_fxp0="inet 192.168.110.14 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_fxp1="inet 192.168.111.14 netmask 255.255.255.0"
hostname="test.abc.com"
static_routes="net1 net2"
route_net1="-net 10.1.1.1/24 *fxp0*" (
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:46:52 +
"dhaneshk k" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please open http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp
> in a web browser and follow the "Download" link for
> "JDK US DST Timezone Update Tool - 1.1.0" to obtain the
> time zone update file, tzupdater-1.1.0-2007c.zip
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:45:48 +
Robin Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just installed 6.2R and have just about got Xorg going. Is it
> better for me to just remove all my X related packages and try and build
> from the xorg-7.2 meta package or to go through the pain of trying to
> up
101 - 115 of 115 matches
Mail list logo