Wikipedia says,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freebsd
FreeBSD 7.0 is on >> Improved scheduler and locking scalability for 32+ CPU
systems (prototyping)
Does Any One know How Many CPU Does FreeBSD 6.2 Supports ?
THANKS IN ADVANCE
___
freebsd-questions
On Saturday 10 March 2007 22:14, Wojciech Puchar said:
> >> with sshd and rshd it can be set, with telnetd - no success.
> >
> > That is a REALLY BAD idea. Why don't you just publish your
> > address and set the root password to nothing. It's only going to
> > take a cracker a couple of minutes or
On 11/03/07, Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> with sshd and rshd it can be set, with telnetd - no success.
>
> That is a REALLY BAD idea. Why don't you just publish your address and
> set the root password to nothing. It's only going to take a cracker a
> couple of minutes or less
did we not have this question yet?
On Mar 11, 2007, at 4:37 PM, Susanth K wrote:
Wikipedia says,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freebsd
FreeBSD 7.0 is on >> Improved scheduler and locking scalability
for 32+ CPU
systems (prototyping)
Does Any One know How Many CPU Does FreeBSD 6.2 Supports
if you are so intelligent?
There are and have been many known exploits through telnet. The most
recent one a couple of weeks ago affects SunOS where you can, using
telnet, get root privileges without even logging in as root. Telnet
does it affect FreeBSD?
Oh, it's really simple: *If* the machine you're trying to configure
root access via telnet is connected to the internet - in other terms
the telnet port on the machine is accessible from the internet - one
can actually brute force his/her way in.
so please crack me
83.18.148.142 or 2001:4070:1
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
can it be set to make possible to login root to machine through
telnet and without telneting to some user and then su -
?
with sshd and rshd it can be set, with telnetd - no success.
once again - can someone answer my question instead of giving very
"intelligent" commen
once again - can someone answer my question instead of giving very
"intelligent" comments?
___
If I remember correctly, you edit /etc/ttys and set some of your ttyp* (i.e.
network ptys) to be 'SECURE'. It really isn't a good idea though. The reason
i
smf-sav is one sendmail milter which does this:
http://smfs.sourceforge.net/smf-sav.html
SAV v1.3.0 - console utility for e-Mail Sender Address Verification
(also at http://smfs.sf.net/ )
Cheers,
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Kelly Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 20
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
so generalizing that "telnet and rsh is bad" is as stupid as telling
that oxygen is bad as it makes fires.
Well, that's true, but if you have the choice, there are better choices.
You *can* hammer in nails with the butt of a gun, but there's a chance
you'll somehow shoot
There have been *many* problems over the years with rsh and telnet. rsh's
security model comes from a time when people thought computers would never
exactly true. so i use rsh between MY machines and rsh and telnet when
sniffing is not a problem.
wasn't easier just to answer the question?
___
Is it possible to do this? I've already installed linux_base-8 and rpm ports
but when I try to install a "i386.rpm" file the system claims for some libs
(libpopt, libtiff, glibc.so.6 , libxml, bash)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://l
Dear Friends,
When Will The FreeBSD 7.0 be released ?
SUSANTH K
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
for what it's worth, I would suggest *not* adopting this
as an anti-spam technique.
Sender-address verification is _bad_ as an anti-spam technique, in my
opinion. Basically, there's one obvious response for spammers looking to
evade it -- use "real" sender addresses. Where's an easy place to fin
Hi;
Just built a new server and got this error:
Removing stale entries from sendmail host status cache:
/etc/periodic/daily/150.clean-hoststat: purgestat: Permission denied
# ls -al /etc/periodic/daily/150.clean-hoststat
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 588 Jan 12 07:42
/etc/periodic/daily/150.clean-
Hello...
I see you issues about telenet...
I use the inetd+telnet for more than 20 years and using BSD
with RSA, and obviiously with a good password.
I have never been cracked down...
and I have 10 of my /etc/ttys entries setted to "secure"
ttyp0 nonenetwork off secure
Susanth K wrote:
Dear Friends,
When Will The FreeBSD 7.0 be released ?
Check:
http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html
Appears the release process is set to start in june.
What is not yet clear is if RELENG_7 has been branched off yet so we
should all update our supfile? I suppose this w
So. resuming:
1) change some lines in /etc/ttys to:
ttyp0 nonenetwork off secure
ttyp1 nonenetwork off secure
ttyp2 nonenetwork off secure
ttyp3 nonenetwork off secure
ttyp4 none
On 2007-03-11 15:14, Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Susanth K wrote:
>> Dear Friends,
>>
>> When Will The FreeBSD 7.0 be released ?
>
> Check:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html
>
> Appears the release process is set to start in june.
>
> What is not yet clear is if RELENG_7
portupgrade is bombing due to the file tzupdater-1.1.0-2007c.zip not being
found in /usr/ports/distfiles. however, when i visit
http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml, there appears to be no
link or no information about such a file.
does anyone know what the story is, and where
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:04:48 -0600, Edward Ruggeri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:54:55 -0600, Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 7, 2007, at 6:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main application I run is Vim, which I run through Gnome-
Terminal. I frequentl
A month ago I downloaded tzdata2007b.tar.gz, compiled it and installed a new
/etc/localtime. All seemed OK.
Now, after the time change, I've had to restart both 'fetchmail' and 'sendmail'
to get '/var/log/maillog' in-sync with the new time. Not a problem; apparently
these processes use time-
is there any fix for crashing when using jails
i have few jails on one machine, almost nothing running outside jails, and
it crashes.
as far as i found - crash is always when allocating pty - when logging
with ssh telnet etc. to one of jails.
any fixes?
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Jonathan Horne wrote:
portupgrade is bombing due to the file tzupdater-1.1.0-2007c.zip not being
found in /usr/ports/distfiles. however, when i visit
http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml, there appears to be no
link or no information about such a file.
Typ
I use freebsd on an older computer in my home network to run a
webserver, a few web apps (bugzilla, tikiwiki), and samba. I just
installed postfix via the ports collection so I can use the mail
functionality of bugzilla.
Bugzilla does its part correctly; I can see the message in the mailq,
but a
works fine. thank you very much (point 6 wasn't needed)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Dear Friends,
When Will The FreeBSD 7.0 be released ?
when it will be ready.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
"Ed Zwart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I use freebsd on an older computer in my home network to run a
> webserver, a few web apps (bugzilla, tikiwiki), and samba. I just
> installed postfix via the ports collection so I can use the mail
> functionality of bugzilla.
>
> Bugzilla does its part c
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 12:44:38 + Luiz A B de Campos wrote:
> Is it possible to do this? I've already installed linux_base-8 and rpm ports
It is recommended to use linux_base-fc4 nowadays.
> but when I try to install a "i386.rpm" file the system claims for some libs
> (libpopt, libtiff, glibc.s
On Sunday 11 March 2007 10:45, Ed Zwart wrote:
> I use freebsd on an older computer in my home network to run a
> webserver, a few web apps (bugzilla, tikiwiki), and samba. I just
> installed postfix via the ports collection so I can use the mail
> functionality of bugzilla.
>
> Bugzilla does its
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Err, sure; and for completeness, be sure and send the IP back to this
list, and publish it on the front page of your website/blog/whatnot.
and what if i will? do you know my root password?
OK, cynicism aside, why on earth would you want to do this? That's a
fool's e
Sergio Lenzi wrote:
Hello...
I see you issues about telenet...
I use the inetd+telnet for more than 20 years and using BSD
with RSA, and obviiously with a good password.
I have never been cracked down...
and I have 10 of my /etc/ttys entries setted to "secure"
ttyp0 none
Dear Friends,
Is FreeBSD Completely Written in C ?
Is there any part of OS written in C++ ?
And I Guess GCC Compiler is used for compilation; ( Is it so ? )
Please correct me; if am not.
Am new to FreeBSD; ( Sorry; if Any of u find this as a silly Question )
SUSANTH K
_
--On March 11, 2007 11:22:42 AM -0300 Sergio Lenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
7) telnet to your server
should now allow root login
What do you gain by allowing telnet access to your hosts that you don't
get with ssh?
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Information Security Analyst
Th
Hi,
I am having a big problem with the OpenSSH Daemon on my server. Whenever I
am connected to the server and the connection is idle for a few seconds it
gets disconnected. It's almost impossible to work from remote on the server
when the connection is always getting dropped. The server is r
If one wanted to learn Assembly Language Programming, would he be better
served starting with as(1) or nasm(1)? Also, are either of those
applicable to AMD64, or just i386?
TIA,
Patrick
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
ive been a KDE user for as long as i can remember. this week, im off from
work, and want to spend some time trying something new with my laptop. so
far i have it built with 6.2-RELEASE-p2, and xorg up to the minimal desktop.
id like to try to try something thats not gnome, or basically id like
Dear Friends,
Is FreeBSD Completely Written in C ?
Is there any part of OS written in C++ ?
see the sources.
And I Guess GCC Compiler is used for compilation; ( Is it so ? )
Please correct me; if am not.
Am new to FreeBSD; ( Sorry; if Any of u find this as a silly Question )
you need
Jonathan Horne wrote:
ive been a KDE user for as long as i can remember. this week, im off from
work, and want to spend some time trying something new with my laptop. so
far i have it built with 6.2-RELEASE-p2, and xorg up to the minimal desktop.
id like to try to try something thats not gno
Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ive been a KDE user for as long as i can remember. this week, im off from
> work, and want to spend some time trying something new with my laptop. so
> far i have it built with 6.2-RELEASE-p2, and xorg up to the minimal desktop.
>
> id like to try
Jonathan Horne wrote:
ive been a KDE user for as long as i can remember. this week, im off from
work, and want to spend some time trying something new with my laptop. so
far i have it built with 6.2-RELEASE-p2, and xorg up to the minimal desktop.
id like to try to try something thats not gno
Susanth K wrote:
> Dear Friends,
>
> Is FreeBSD Completely Written in C ?
Almost. The kernel and most parts are.
> Is there any part of OS written in C++ ?
There are some but there are not many of them. It's not a matter of
policy but of the individual choice of a developer.
> And I Guess GCC
On Mar 11, 2007, at 6:31 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
for what it's worth, I would suggest *not* adopting this
as an anti-spam technique.
Sender-address verification is _bad_ as an anti-spam technique, in my
opinion. Basically, there's one obvious response for spammers
looking to
evade it -- u
--- Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ive been a KDE user for as long as i can remember.
> this week, im off from
> work, and want to spend some time trying something
> new with my laptop. so
> far i have it built with 6.2-RELEASE-p2, and xorg up
> to the minimal desktop.
>
> id li
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 12:41:48PM -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>
> On Mar 11, 2007, at 6:31 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
>
> >
> >for what it's worth, I would suggest *not* adopting this
> >as an anti-spam technique.
> >
> >Sender-address verification is _bad_ as an anti-spam technique,
On Mar 11, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 12:41:48PM -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net
LLC wrote:
On Mar 11, 2007, at 6:31 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
for what it's worth, I would suggest *not* adopting this
as an anti-spam technique.
Sender-address verification
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 01:43:22PM -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>
> On Mar 11, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 12:41:48PM -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net
> >LLC wrote:
> >>
> >>On Mar 11, 2007, at 6:31 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>for w
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007, Alexander Schlichting wrote:
>
>
>Hi,
>
>
>
>I am having a big problem with the OpenSSH Daemon on my server. Whenever I
>am connected to the server and the connection is idle for a few seconds it
>gets disconnected. It's almost impossible to work from remote on the server.
On 11/03/07, Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There have been *many* problems over the years with rsh and telnet. rsh's
> security model comes from a time when people thought computers would never
exactly true. so i use rsh between MY machines and rsh and telnet when
sniffing is not
Perhaps we are talking about different things, I am talking about
systems which send me an email back requiring me to do steps a, b or c
in order to complete delivery of the email.
that's challenge/response, which has been widely discredited for years.
SAV is a receiving MX probing the MX of
On Mar 11, 2007, at 1:44 PM, John Levine wrote:
Sender verification works and works well.
I suppose that if you define "works" to include mailbombing innocent
third parties, then that might be true.
I have some fairly heavily forged domains, and on a bad day I see
upwards of 300,000 connecti
On Mar 11, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 01:43:22PM -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net
LLC wrote:
On Mar 11, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 12:41:48PM -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net
LLC wrote:
On Mar 11, 2007, at 6:31 AM, Justi
>> I have some fairly heavily forged domains, and on a bad day I see
>> upwards of 300,000 connections from bounces, "validation", and the
>> like attacking the little BSD box under my desk where the MTA is.
>> Gee, thanks a lot.
>
>Verification has nothing to do with bounces and mail bombs. You m
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:20:03 +
Hugo Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Oh well, your server, your password. Just don't say you were not
> warned.
I believe the following sums up my feeling on the matter.
It is not the OS's job to stop you from shooting yourself in the foot.
Rather, if
>Sender verification works and works well.
I suppose that if you define "works" to include mailbombing innocent
third parties, then that might be true.
I have some fairly heavily forged domains, and on a bad day I see
upwards of 300,000 connections from bounces, "validation", and the
like attacki
As a newb to FreeBSD I find that the manual/handbook is not great in detail,
(understatement), and I seem to be relying on this questions list for a lot
of help.
In my opinion it relies on far too high a plateau of knowledge by it's
readers to be of initial use.
Am I really that thick or does any
On Mar 11, 2007, at 2:08 PM, John Levine wrote:
I have some fairly heavily forged domains, and on a bad day I see
upwards of 300,000 connections from bounces, "validation", and the
like attacking the little BSD box under my desk where the MTA is.
Gee, thanks a lot.
Verification has nothing to
On 3/11/07, Andy Kendall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a newb to FreeBSD I find that the manual/handbook is not great in detail,
(understatement), and I seem to be relying on this questions list for a lot
of help.
In my opinion it relies on far too high a plateau of knowledge by it's
readers to b
Patrick Bowen wrote:
Jonathan Horne wrote:
ive been a KDE user for as long as i can remember. this week, im off
from work, and want to spend some time trying something new with my
laptop. so far i have it built with 6.2-RELEASE-p2, and xorg up to
the minimal desktop.
id like to try to tr
ive been a KDE user for as long as i can remember. this week, im off from
work, and want to spend some time trying something new with my laptop. so
far i have it built with 6.2-RELEASE-p2, and xorg up to the minimal desktop.
you should first define what "desktop" is. i use xorg+fvwm2 with much
I believe the following sums up my feeling on the matter.
It is not the OS's job to stop you from shooting yourself in the foot.
boom... i'm dead..
at least for 4 years :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
As a newb to FreeBSD I find that the manual/handbook is not great in detail,
(understatement), and I seem to be relying on this questions list for a lot
of help.
what's missing? i think it's quite detailed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello Jonathan,
I had great help from this mailing list setting up wdm+fluxbox recently.
They're minimalistic and slick to use. If you should need to connect
with a windows box there's Xming. Look in the archives!
Good luck!
Jonathan Horne skrev:
ive been a KDE user for as long as i can re
I phrased it wrong. You are not responsible for the content, but you are
responsible for the mail domain and that includes verifying that mail is
validly from your domain you are responsible for.
Oh, OK. So if someone sends pump and dump with a [EMAIL PROTECTED] return
address, and I do a ca
> What do you gain by allowing telnet access to your hosts that you don't
> get with ssh?
>
> Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Senior Information Security Analyst
> The University of Texas at Dallas
> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
>
> --=7CEE76846768256DC8==--
> !DSPAM
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:46:50 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I believe the following sums up my feeling on the matter.
> >
> > It is not the OS's job to stop you from shooting yourself in the
> > foot.
>
> boom... i'm dead..
> at least for 4 years :)
Sorry to hear th
On Mar 11, 2007, at 2:55 PM, John L wrote:
I phrased it wrong. You are not responsible for the content, but
you are responsible for the mail domain and that includes
verifying that mail is validly from your domain you are
responsible for.
Oh, OK. So if someone sends pump and dump with
onfirmed that the mail is from you, after all
No. His MX has only verified his email address, which does not say he
sent the msg.
Len
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
I'm looking for the driver files for the Realtek ALC660 onboard sound card.
I'm using an ASUS M2V and it works great. Except the sound.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsub
On Sunday 11 March 2007 09:52, Alexander Schlichting wrote:
> I am having a big problem with the OpenSSH Daemon on my server. Whenever I
> am connected to the server and the connection is idle for a few seconds it
> gets disconnected. It's almost impossible to work from remote on the server
> when
--- Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As a newb to FreeBSD I find that the
> manual/handbook is not great in detail,
> > (understatement), and I seem to be relying on this
> questions list for a lot
> > of help.
>
> what's missing? i think it's quite detailed
> _
On 11/03/07, Sergio Lenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you gain by allowing telnet access to your hosts that you don't
> get with ssh?
>
> Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Senior Information Security Analyst
> The University of Texas at Dallas
> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
>
Hello!
FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT is supported sound card ESI MAYA44MK2?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 03/11/2007 13:28, Sean Bryant wrote:
Jonathan Horne wrote:
ive been a KDE user for as long as i can remember. this week, im off
from work, and want to spend some time trying something new with my
laptop. so far i have it built with 6.2-RELEASE-p2, and xorg up to
the minimal desktop.
id
onfirmed that the mail is from you, after all
No. His MX has only verified his email address, which does not say
he sent the msg.
Then what was the point?
"His MX has only verified his email address"
Len
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail
[mailed and posted]
On Mar 11, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Ed Zwart wrote:
I own my_domain.com. I've paid a hoster for the last couple years,
but that's ending in a week or so. Meanwhile, I've used dyndns to
point foo.homedns.org to my IP.
I am going to add my voice to those suggesting that you use
Maybe you are, but even so, do you still use V7 on a PDP/11 or 32V on a VAX,
make dumps to DECtape, or use a VT100? There's something to be said for
i still have (in many places) Wyse 120 terminals i've got for free,
including one at home :)
works at vt220 at 38400 baud, very well
...
;;
;; :;
;:' :;
;:; ;.
,:' ; OOO\
::; ; O\
;:; ;
,;::; ;' / OOO
;:`. ,,,;./ / DOO
Hello Wojciech,
Yes, the handbook is quite detailed; however there are
somethings missing. Not to start a flame war; these
are just a few thoughts and they are in my humble
opinion.
why you don't write such part and fixes?
i am sure it will be included in new releases if you only post them
[mailed and posted]
On Mar 11, 2007, at 11:51 AM, Susanth K wrote:
Am new to FreeBSD; ( Sorry; if Any of u find this as a silly
Question )
Have you been given a course assignment which involves describing
things about FreeBSD (and possibly other systems)?
It certainly seems that way to
Once I setted up a mailserver with more that 2000 users
with a single freebsd sendmailin a small machine (1Ghz,512Mb memory,
Freebsd 4.X) one internet connection.. with virtual users,
mailertable... and it
worked for years... by the way... it had telnetd avaiable...
exactly like me. i do p
a fair bit of eyecandy.
I'll second the E17!
i like to get all icons, menus, frames and windows to minimum, as it
doesn't improve productivity, while taking space of the screen.
as i found (at least with fvwm2) that minimum=ZERO i did this and use that
config for over 3 years (with netbsd
Hi,
I am having a big problem with the OpenSSH Daemon on my server. Whenever I
am connected to the server and the connection is idle for a few seconds it
gets disconnected. It's almost impossible to work from remote on the server
when the connection is always getting dropped. The server is r
about FreeBSD (and possibly other systems)?
It certainly seems that way to me. So from this point on, for any question
for me it looks like writing well scored essay for computer lessons at
school.
it's very common on polish USENET on all computer groups, and it's clearly
evident most case
On 2007-03-11 22:21, Susanth K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Friends,
> Is FreeBSD Completely Written in C ?
Sort of. Great parts of FreeBSD, in fact the vast majority of
the source code, is written in C. But it is not *completely*
written in C.
> Is there any part of OS written in C++ ?
Y
[mailed and posted]
On Mar 10, 2007, at 1:27 PM, Kelly Jones wrote:
To fight spam, I want to validate the address (not necessarily in
real-time) of the a given email sender. Is there a Unix tool that does
this?
The basics are simple: to validate "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", I connect to
the MX record
On Mar 11, 2007, at 2:28 PM, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
[mailed and posted]
On Mar 11, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Ed Zwart wrote:
I own my_domain.com. I've paid a hoster for the last couple years,
but that's ending in a week or so. Meanwhile, I've used dyndns to
point foo.homedns.org to my IP.
If y
Hi,
I have played around with using an EPIA 600-PD (Fanless Dual NICS), with
256MB RAM. Works well, however, a buildworld takes around 4 hours ;-)
I am booting from a 512MB CF card, and run /var and /tmp from a RAM drive.
Upon startup, the CF card /var and /tmp dir. are copied into the ram driv
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:40:47 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have heard it does not scale well above 4
>
> to be clear.
>
> kernel task (disk I/O, network etc.) is always on first processor,
> everything else on any CPU.
>
> so as long as disk I/O network and other
--- Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> > Hello Wojciech,
> > Yes, the handbook is quite detailed; however there
> are
> > somethings missing. Not to start a flame war;
> these
> > are just a few thoughts and they are in my humble
> > opinion.
> >
>
> why you don't write such part
On Mar 11, 2007, at 8:27 PM, jekillen wrote:
If you will allow me to break in on this exchange;
Does this advise [don't run your own direct to MX mail server]
apply if you have static ip service and are running web servers
from these addresses, with the ISP's blessing? (meaning you also
ha
>
> Maybe you are, but even so, do you still use V7 on a PDP/11 or 32V on a VAX,
> make dumps to DECtape, or use a VT100? There's something to be said for
> modern PC hardware, xterms/gnome-terminal/konsole/screen, and yes, ssh.
> (Namely speed, convenience, and security, respectively).
>
> I w
On Mar 11, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
In this case the counter counter measures available to spammers is
so much easier and cheaper than the verification system itself,
that it's not really a good idea to try such verification.
that is always true, at least with existing
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 10:57:59 -0500
"Brian J. Conway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I had exactly the same problem in my acpi-blacklisted motherboard. I
> > disabled acpi and the errors vanished. In my case, this error was not
> > related with NICs, but exclusively with the motherboard.
>
> Inter
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:24:13 +0100
"Alexander Schlichting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am having a big problem with the OpenSSH Daemon on my server. Whenever I
> am connected to the server and the connection is idle for a few seconds it
> gets disconnected. It's almost im
Thanks Bill, Josh and Jeffrey for answering my question. It was my
ISP. (So easy, I wish I had thought of that. I somehow managed to
figure out they were blocking 80 a month or so ago.)
I'm still a little fuzzy on legal entries for hostname and domain. I
set them to be mine, and it worked, an
On 03/11/2007 17:44, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
a fair bit of eyecandy.
I'll second the E17!
i like to get all icons, menus, frames and windows to minimum, as it
doesn't improve productivity, while taking space of the screen.
as i found (at least with fvwm2) that minimum=ZERO i did this and u
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
As a newb to FreeBSD I find that the manual/handbook is not great in
detail,
(understatement), and I seem to be relying on this questions list for
a lot
of help.
what's missing? i think it's quite detailed
I started with Linux years ago. I tried several versions and o
Hello,
After changing my make.conf to list my CPUTYPE as c3 on my
VIA C3 Nehemiah (999.52-MHz 686-class CPU)
system. I did a cvsup for /usr/src tag=RELENG_6_2 and successfully
did a
make buildworld
and
make installworld
I then thought that with my newly compiled tools tuned for the
[mailed and posted]
On Mar 11, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Ed Zwart wrote:
I'm still a little fuzzy on legal entries for hostname and domain. I
set them to be mine, and it worked, and then for kicks, set it to
google.com, and that worked too. I looked at the headers, and can see
that the source can be
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
