On 11/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Please reply directly to me, as I am not subscribed)
I just bought a VIA external USB enclosure with a Hitachi 200GB ATA drive
to use for disk-based backups. I put it on my test box here, which I just
upgraded to 6.2-Prerelease. All d
If my cvs-upfile reads, and specfically im looking at the default release
line
*default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress
*default delete use-rel-suffix
src-all
ports-all tag=.
doc-all tag=.
Can anyone tell me what release and branch of FreeBSD im tracking. its a 6.1
s
>Also do you know where the "attach returned 6" message is generated? I'm
>>curious to know what condition causes it, but I can't find it in the >source.
> I assume it's in the device attach function but I'm not finding >it. Maybe
>I'm blind.
Google can answer your question, I'm sure.
Regar
Im sure I had this working on 6.1 but Diablo-Jre pkg_add now
complains that javavmwrapper is a later version than required
by it, but installs anyway. No jvm plugin appears in about:plugins
and pkg_delete refuses to remove.
Anyone any suggestions with this - Thanks !
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 11/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > (Please reply directly to me, as I am not subscribed)
> >
> > I just bought a VIA external USB enclosure with a Hitachi 200GB ATA drive
> > to use for disk-based backups. I put it on
Graham,
I did some testing with 6.2 RC1, and was able to install the JRE and
run some Java applications, however others had various errors. I'm
just assuming that they will need to recompile for 6.2 when it's
ready. I don't use FBSD on my desktop so I haven't tested the browser
plugin etc.
--Ni
On 11/21/06, Robert Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If my cvs-upfile reads, and specfically im looking at the default release
line
*default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress
*default delete use-rel-suffix
src-all
ports-all tag=.
doc-all tag=.
Can anyone tell me what rele
Greetings!
I need to bring up FreeBSD 4.11 (or any 4.x really) on a Dell Poweredge 1950.
They are using the LSI PERC 5/i which apparently requires the availability
of the mfi driver.
The 4-STABLE release notes indicate that this driver is supported;
however, I am stuck since apparently the instal
Hi
I need to secure my data and server. Any advice will be highly appreciated.
I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place?
I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might boot machine in single
user mode and steal the data?
How can I make my Server secure that if if boots in si
> I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place?
>
> I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might boot machine in single
> user mode and steal the data?
If the data are so sensible, do notplace the machine in a shared
location.
One could reboot in single mode, or just stop the m
Quoting VeeJay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi
I need to secure my data and server. Any advice will be highly appreciated.
I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place?
I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might boot machine in single
user mode and steal the data?
How can I make m
Quoting VeeJay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi
I need to secure my data and server. Any advice will be highly appreciated.
I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place?
I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might boot machine in single
user mode and steal the data?
How can I make m
El Mar 21 Nov 2006 09:57, Peter A. Giessel escribió:
> man em:
> *** QUOTE ***
> AUTHORS
> The em driver was written by Intel Corporation
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> *** END QUOTE ***
>
> man bge:
> *** QUOTE ***
> AUTHORS
> The bge driver was written by Bill Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
Hi,
Our engineer has submitted the new version driver.
From: "erich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jun Kuriyama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ken Smith"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Gordon Tetlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Peter Wemm"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "David Wolfskill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
But, we still can not fi
Hi all,
Problem:
OS: FreeBSD 4.8
After running the latest ports_supfile I can no longer install new ports.
Here is the error message I receive when trying to install a new package /
port:
===> Building for pkg_install-20060113
===> lib
cc -O -pipe -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prot
On 11/21/06, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Neil Short wrote:
> my FreeBSD date drifts out of sync with the system
> date.
>
> When I set it, it is absolutely correct and matches
> the system (CMOS) date. I then reboot and - shezam!
> it's jumped 12 hours forward. Reboot again - another
> 12 hou
On 11/21/06, Warren Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> As far as I know, there are no freeware utilities that will do this
> for NTFS. The ones that come with FreeBSD will handle fat and fat32
> just fine, but not NTFS.
QTParted says it can resize
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 03:34:32PM -0800, Neil Short wrote:
[...]
> It seems that if I boot into windows, log in and enter
> the windows time/date tool -- make no changes and
> reboot into FreeBSD, the FreeBSD date will lurch
> forward 10 to 12 hours. The CMOS date is still right.
When you boot i
On 11/21/06, Russell E. Meek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting VeeJay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi
>
> I need to secure my data and server. Any advice will be highly appreciated.
>
> I am going to place my FreeBSD server at a shared place?
>
> I am just afraid that any unauthorized person might bo
105Hi;
Okay, I learned from sad experience and you all that the qmail port is junk.
What about ezmlm? Same thing? Or good to go?
TIA,
Rachel
Sponsored Link
$200,000 mortgage for $660/ mo
30/15 yr fixed, red
On 11/22/06, Rachel Florentine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
105Hi;
Okay, I learned from sad experience and you all
that the qmail port is junk. What about ezmlm?
Same thing? Or good to go?
Didn't you know that /usr/ports is a big pile of
junk? The problem is, we can't live without it.
___
> I'm surprised that you're seeing that much of a "hang". Even if the disks
> are busy, the system should slow down all disk processes equally, so no
> one process "blocks", but they're all a little slower.
I collected a bit of data:
While copying a large file from disk1 to disk2,
time ls on a
22 matches
Mail list logo
