> why would ya want to route lo1 127.0.0.1 to a 192.x.x. address ???
> seems to me that there are to many system side processes that listen or
> ocmmunicate thru that...giving access or routing that traffic to a
> internal address ...doesnt seem to smart to me.
> --
>
> I wouldn't; I was using that
Recently I have received this message every time:
None of the archives you requested (freebsd-questions, freebsd-hardware,
freebsd-hackers and freebsd-smp) are available at this time.
Please try again later, or return to the search page and select a
different archive.
_
On Tuesday 05 August 2003 09:36 am, Craig Rose wrote:
> I looked on the archives for something about this, but could not find
> anything.
>
> Are there drivers for this IDE raid card? Or is there a trick I
> should use to get the ver 4.8 to recognize the drives thru this
> controller?
>
> Any help
If you have perl installed,
'perl curnet.pl'
Or, you can do:
chmod 744 curnet.pl and the just run it:
./curnet.pl
The output should look like this:
Current Bandwidth Utilization: IN: [ 46.10 Kb/sec] OUT: [ 23.95 Kb/sec]
--Charlie
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, DanB wrote:
> How do you run this scriip
Hi,
On 03 08 08, K Anderson wrote:
> It's a shame that nobody has thought to add the release candidates as a
> separate port so that if this sort of problem arises things can be
> rectified. Of course they might argue, that's what backing up your
> system is all about. Or don't do RC unless you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+--- On Monday, August 11, 2003 14:56,
| Redmond Militante proclaimed:
|
| hi all
|
| i had a question about the correct procedure to cvsup your machine on
| 5.1-RELEASE
|
| at the end of my cvsup routine on 4.8-REL_ENG, i used to:
|
| ...
| # cd /dev
> I have a problem in running a program compiled by CC compiler on Red
> Hat Linux 8.0 plateform. It is giving binary errors. Basically the program
> sends mail to specified E-Mail address on the specified server. I don't
> know what is the problem, because it runs nicely on the Red Hat Linu
WebDenis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How do u think, FreeBSD 5.1 better then 4.8 stable?
> I think that all of my problem was only from 5.1 And i think that 4.8 better
> then 5.1 maybe I think wrong?
This depends on how you're measuring "better". After all, 4.8 is the
release currently re
Thanks to both of you for your replies however this has raised another
question ! ... (see below)
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:16:54 +0200, "Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Konrad Heuer wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Richard Shea wrote:
[Original Question snipped]
> >
> >Yes, se
Richard Shea wrote:
Thanks to both of you for your replies however this has raised another
question ! ... (see below)
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:16:54 +0200, "Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Konrad Heuer wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Richard Shea wrote:
[Original Question snipped]
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:49:49AM -0700, John DeStefano wrote:
> AFAIK, I have not enabled ldap authentication. But how do I
> confirm?
Well. If it's 2.2.8a then it's defined at compile time (i.e., you
specify you want it, or it autodetects if openldap is installed). Otoh,
if it's samba-devel
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just installed Apache/1.3.28, and now I got a lot of files like these in
> /var/run/:
>
> /var/run/httpd.mm.77920.sem
>
> They look like memory management semaphores of some kind (from mm?). Can I
> safely delete these files, prior to staring the httpd daemon
Hi!
> I insert the 5.0 cd in the drive and have the machine set to boot from
> the cd first... but as the process starts and everything is loading the
> machine HALTS with the error:
>
> ata1-slave: ATAPI identify retries exceeded
> ad0: READ command timeout TAG=0 SERV =0 -resetting
> ata0: res
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 10:18:39AM -0400, Wes Kussmaul wrote:
> Matt Heath wrote in response to Chris's outside-the-box challenge:
>
> > I use plan9 as my development platform as it is a delight to use.
> >
> > Don't expect eye candy, it is an OS to get work done.
>
>
> If the subject is competi
On Tuesday 12 August 2003 09:32, Evan Dower wrote:
> I would consider this to be a desirable feature. Also, I notice that it is
> not documented in script(1). I would very much like to keep the script
> calls, since they allow me to have the output sent to me and store a copy in
> a few well org
Hi there ,
am a user for FreeBSD for about 3 years now and it is my favourite OS ..
and I noticed that the most thing that make new people afraid from using
that OS is the re-compiling kernel for there needs specially the new
hardware ..
so I was thinkign about making shell script that make it eas
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 17:36:14 +0100, Ceri Davies wrote
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 07:59:55AM -0800, admin wrote:
> > FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE
> >
> > My machine crashed last night and upon reboot not all the services that are
> > executable in the /usr/local/etc/rc.d ran. Any clues how I can find out why
17 matches
Mail list logo
