A rule of thumb is to configure as much service as you need (in this
case, dhcpd), with as little overhead as you can get away with (a
simple jail vs. a full-blown VM).
SC
On 2/22/07, Martin McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John Nielsen, referring to running multiple DHCPD's, writes:
> For
John Nielsen, referring to running multiple DHCPD's, writes:
> For what you're talking about, jails make a lot more sense than
> virtualization or emulation.
Thank you! That is exactly the kind of input I was
looking for. As soon as I read yours and Frank Staals' mention
of jails, it cl
John Nielsen wrote:
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 20:50, Martin McCormick wrote:
If one has a FreeBSD system that has 1 gigabyte of RAM
and a 1-GHZ processor, would it be possible to run a couple of
vmware instances of FreeBSD? I want to set up a DHCP server on
each virtual machine a
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 20:50, Martin McCormick wrote:
> If one has a FreeBSD system that has 1 gigabyte of RAM
> and a 1-GHZ processor, would it be possible to run a couple of
> vmware instances of FreeBSD? I want to set up a DHCP server on
> each virtual machine and configure one to
If one has a FreeBSD system that has 1 gigabyte of RAM
and a 1-GHZ processor, would it be possible to run a couple of
vmware instances of FreeBSD? I want to set up a DHCP server on
each virtual machine and configure one to be optimized for DHCP
failover and dynamic leases while the other i
Hello all,
I have just loaded VMWare3 from ports, only because I
could not get the Linux version 4 to load correctly.
But now when I input the license key that I have, it
says that it cannot be found or doesn't match
available licenses.
Has anyone else bumped into this scenario? If so, what
is
