On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, O. Hartmann wrote:
FF is in my case 24, too:
pkg info firefox
firefox-24.0,1
Have you done updating the ports regarding
20130929
in /usr/ports/UPDATING? I did on all boxes and on all boxes I did the
tab-stickyness is present.
Firefox 24 allows tab moves for me on both
El día Monday, October 14, 2013 a las 10:23:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann escribió:
> > I have a 10-CURRENT r255948 from October 1st, with all ports from head
> > too, rev. r328930.
> >
> > FF is version 24.0 in the r328930 ports and the tabs can be moved fine
> > wi
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:50:48 +0200
Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Monday, October 14, 2013 a las 08:54:56AM +0200, O. Hartmann
> escribió:
>
> >
> > After the last major update of www/firefox to version 23 firefox
> > rejects of moving/swapping the tabs. They are sta
El día Monday, October 14, 2013 a las 08:54:56AM +0200, O. Hartmann escribió:
>
> After the last major update of www/firefox to version 23 firefox
> rejects of moving/swapping the tabs. They are static now. I do not
> know whether this has to do with the "great pixman
After the last major update of www/firefox to version 23 firefox
rejects of moving/swapping the tabs. They are static now. I do not
know whether this has to do with the "great pixman update", because
coincidentally I made bot the pixman update and the update of firefox
towards r
I have an ASUS EeePC 1015B with APU C-50, and the core display card is
Readon HD6250.
I want to know whether FreeBSD 9 Stable or 10 Current support it as TTM
working.
BTW, can anybody recommend some Notebooks supporting FreeBSD perfectly?
___
freebsd-qu
Hi,
I am trying to create a virtual machine of PC-BSD release 9.1 64 bit in VMware
Workstation Version 98.02 build-1031769 based on PCBSD9.1-x64-DVD.iso
downloaded from ftp://mirrors.isc.org/pub/pcbsd/9.1/amd64/PCBSD9.1-x64-DVD.iso
in Windows 7 64 bits system. The screen resolution is
Leslie Jensen writes:
> pkg version -vIL
> pkg: option requires an argument -- L
> usage: pkg version [-IPR] [-hoqv] [-l limchar] [-L limchar] [[-X] -s string]
> [-r reponame] [-O origin] [index]
> pkg version -t
> pkg version -T
&
I ran into a little problem with my "old" crontab scripts.
I do the following:
portsnap -I cron update
/usr/local/sbin/portmaster -y --clean-distfiles
/usr/local/sbin/portmaster -aF
pkg version -vIL
After changing to pkg the check for outdated ports fails on the -L flag
pkg ve
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 17:59:39 Robert Huff wrote:
> mrkvrg writes:
> > Is this what you are looking for?
> >
> >clang --version
> >
> >or
> >
> >clang -v
>
> It is.
> However: "clang -help" says &
mrkvrg writes:
> Is this what you are looking for?
>
> clang --version
>
>or
>
>clang -v
It is.
However: "clang -help" says "-v" means
show commands to run and use ver
On Saturday, April 13, 2013 16:40:20 mrkvrg wrote:
> Hello Robert,
>
> Is this what you are looking for?
>
> clang --version
>
> or
>
> clang -v
>
> My system reports the following for both parameters:
>
> FreeBSD clang version 3.0 (branches/rel
Hello Robert,
Is this what you are looking for?
clang --version
or
clang -v
My system reports the following for both parameters:
FreeBSD clang version 3.0 (branches/release_30 142614) 20111021
Target: i386-unknown-freebsd9.0
Thread model: posix
Cheers ...
Marek
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013
Looking at the man page I can find no option for reporting the
version - have I missed something?
Respectfully,
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
RELSZ0x1b0
PLTREL 0x11
JMPREL 0x1240
REL 0x1130
RELSZ 0x110
RELENT 0x8
VERDEF 0x106c
VERDEFNUM 0x5
VERNEED 0x1110
VERNEEDNUM 0x1
VERSYM 0xf8c
RELCOUNT0x1e
Version definitions:
1 0x01 0x09d5f4e6 libz.so.6
2 0x00 0x07e
REL 0x1130
RELSZ 0x110
RELENT 0x8
VERDEF 0x106c
VERDEFNUM 0x5
VERNEED 0x1110
VERNEEDNUM 0x1
VERSYM 0xf8c
RELCOUNT0x1e
Version definitions:
1 0x01 0x09d5f4e6 libz.so.6
2 0x00 0x07e5cf30 ZLIB_1.2.4.0
3 0x00 0x053ecdd0 ZLIBprivate_1.0
ZLIB_1.2.4
g through
> >>1.2.5, 1.2.6 and 1.2.7 with bug fixes.
> >>
> >>Is there any reason for not using Zlib 1.2.7?
> >
> >I don't have a 9.1-RELEASE system nearby, but I think zlib 1.2.7 _should_
> >already be there... Are you sure it's still an old
?
I don't have a 9.1-RELEASE system nearby, but I think zlib 1.2.7 _should_
already be there... Are you sure it's still an old version?
On my machine:
# uname -r
9.1-RELEASE
[It's actually -p1 but I've not bothered replacing the kernel as the
problems were in user spac
27;t have a 9.1-RELEASE system nearby, but I think zlib 1.2.7 _should_
already be there... Are you sure it's still an old version?
The zlib on /head is 1.2.7, merged from the vendor branch on 2012-06-21.
| % svn log --limit 1 svn://svn.fr
The Zlib baked into FreeBSD is Zlib 1.2.4 even on 9.1R.
However, Zlib has gone to 1.2.7 sometime ago after stepping through 1.2.5,
1.2.6 and 1.2.7 with bug fixes.
Is there any reason for not using Zlib 1.2.7?
Thanks.
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebs
hine uses some USB hardware, which is not supported from 8.0
> > onwards.
> >
> > I would say, if it works, use 9.1. If not check out 7.4. If this
> > then works, you could check 10 out.
> >
> > 8.3 is the version which is the most robust one as the new
out 7.4. If this then
> works, you could check 10 out.
>
> 8.3 is the version which is the most robust one as the new stuff did
> not arrive there yet.
>
> Erich
Thanks for this. VBC uses no USB hardware... well, AFAIK. I
=believe= it should work on anythi
a simple reason. It could be that your old
machine uses some USB hardware, which is not supported from 8.0 onwards.
I would say, if it works, use 9.1. If not check out 7.4. If this then
works, you could check 10 out.
8.3 is the version which is the most robust one as the new stuff did
not arrive
> I want the Gnome Desktop, espeak, and gvim. If there is a CD
> or DVD with 9.x, can somebody give me a URL?
The usual place:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/announce.html
I'm typing this on a Thinkpad X200, which works well under 9.0.
___
guys,
I used my EEE-900a [[last year]] to wow the medical team downtown
with my unfinished VBC program. since nobody seems willing to
volunteer to test the (*almost*)-finished version, I figure I
ms well use my 2005 Thinkpad. it is reasonably fast at
On 07/12/2012 15:52, Walter Hurry wrote:
> $ pkg query %v pkg
> 1.0.3
> $ pkg -v
> 1.0.2
This is due to a mistake in the release process: we forgot to update the
version number in the source code. Ooops.
Will be rectified in version 1.0.4, if not sooner.
Cheers,
$ pkg query %v pkg
1.0.3
$ pkg -v
1.0.2
$
Why the discrepancy?
By the way:
## SVN ## - update to 1.0.3
## SVN ## - changes:
## SVN ## * Accept to query _https._tcp srv records
## SVN ## * Fix diskspace change calculation in pkg upgrade
## SVN ## * Fix pkg info -s -F apackage
Excellent. T
> Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 17:20:26 -0500
> From: ajtiM
> To: Polytropon
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: before new version
> Message-ID: <201211031720.27182.lum...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On S
applications and more
and more which I don't use and I don't need) but I complain about freezing
ports too early before new release came out and after that rebuilt 5000 ports
for example just because png new version is coming out. Or am I wrong?
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 12:25:12 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> On Saturday 03 November 2012 12:18:35 Polytropon wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:23:12 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Could someone explain, please why ports should be frozen before a new
> > &
On Saturday 03 November 2012 12:18:35 Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:23:12 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Could someone explain, please why ports should be frozen before a new
> > version of FreeBSD came out?
>
> The idea is to make sure
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:23:12 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Could someone explain, please why ports should be frozen before a new version
> of FreeBSD came out?
The idea is to make sure that RELEASE can be shipped with
installation media (CD, DVD) for offline use which requires
ports
Hi!
Could someone explain, please why ports should be frozen before a new version
of FreeBSD came out?
It happened all the time and after update (if you update or not) there are so
many ports for updating. In case for very long waiting for version 9.1 will be
thousands of them.
Thank you very
On Mon 2012-10-22 11:31:36 UTC+0900, Rei Okamoto (okam...@mix-net.co.jp) wrote:
> I want to build the test server as close to the
> actual server as possible, such as considering the
> OS's version 4.11 to be close enough to 4.7, but
> as I try to install PHP4 with a followi
solution. But do not forget that it could be possible
to run a supported FreeBSD version on the current hardware.
Erich
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
t; I want to build the test server as close to the
> actual server as possible, such as considering the
> OS's version 4.11 to be close enough to 4.7, but
> as I try to install PHP4 with a following command,
>
> pkg_add -r php4-4.3.6.tgz
>
> I get an error message below.
&
est server in my local PC and got the network connected.
>
> I want to build the test server as close to the
> actual server as possible, such as considering the
> OS's version 4.11 to be close enough to 4.7, but
> as I try to install PHP4 with a following command,
>
>
Dear Rei,
> One of the clients is running the web site using
> FreeBSD 4.7.
>[...]
> pkg_add -r php4-4.3.6.tgz
>
> I get an error message below.
>
> Error: FTP Unable to get
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.11-release/Latest/php4-4.3.6.tgz:
> File unavailable (e.g., file
so
> because of money.
There is still the option to use a supported version of FreeBSD. You
can have a try with 7.4. Some hardware support was taken out with 8.
But if 8 works, take 8.3.
>
> as I try to install PHP4 with a following command,
I doubt that you will get this anywhere an
ecause of money.
So a long story short, because I need to do some testing,
I've installed FreeBSD 4.11 to the VirtualBox as a
test server in my local PC and got the network connected.
I want to build the test server as close to the
actual server as possible, such as considering the
OS's
, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> >
> > > I got sent a pdf file, version 1.6, with annotations.
> > > xpdf can view the file, but not the annotations.
> > > Please suggest a pdf viewer from ports that might help.
> >
> > I
From m...@ozzmosis.com Thu Oct 4 07:56:05 2012
On Wed 2012-10-03 11:26:38 UTC+0200, Polytropon (free...@edvax.de)
wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:50:16 +0100 (BST), Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>
> > I got sent a pdf file, version 1.6, with
On Wed 2012-10-03 11:26:38 UTC+0200, Polytropon (free...@edvax.de) wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:50:16 +0100 (BST), Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>
> > I got sent a pdf file, version 1.6, with annotations.
> > xpdf can view the file, but not the annotations.
> > Please s
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 03:45:30PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:50:16 +0100 (BST)
> Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> >
> > I got sent a pdf file, version 1.6, with annotations.
> > xpdf can view the file, but not the annotations.
> > Please sugges
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:28:06 +0100, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> [ Polytropon wrote on Wed 3.Oct'12 at 11:26:38 +0200 ]
>
> > On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:50:16 +0100 (BST), Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > > I got sent a pdf file, version 1.6, with annotations.
> > >
On 3 October 2012 03:50, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I got sent a pdf file, version 1.6, with annotations.
> xpdf can view the file, but not the annotations.
> Please suggest a pdf viewer from ports that might help.
>
I'm not sure it has enough things it depends upon,
but print
[ Polytropon wrote on Wed 3.Oct'12 at 11:26:38 +0200 ]
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:50:16 +0100 (BST), Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > I got sent a pdf file, version 1.6, with annotations.
> > xpdf can view the file, but not the annotations.
> > Please suggest a pdf viewer
On 10/03/12 10:22, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
From erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com Wed Oct 3 09:53:17 2012
Hi,
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:50:16 +0100 (BST)
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I got sent a pdf file, version 1.6, with annotations.
> xp
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:50:16 +0100 (BST), Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I got sent a pdf file, version 1.6, with annotations.
> xpdf can view the file, but not the annotations.
> Please suggest a pdf viewer from ports that might help.
I haven't checked, but the "Adobe Reader&quo
From erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com Wed Oct 3 09:53:17 2012
Hi,
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:50:16 +0100 (BST)
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I got sent a pdf file, version 1.6, with annotations.
> xpdf can view the file, but not the annot
Hi,
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:50:16 +0100 (BST)
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I got sent a pdf file, version 1.6, with annotations.
> xpdf can view the file, but not the annotations.
> Please suggest a pdf viewer from ports that might help.
>
evince? Did you try it? I do not have it inst
I got sent a pdf file, version 1.6, with annotations.
xpdf can view the file, but not the annotations.
Please suggest a pdf viewer from ports that might help.
Thanks
Anton
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
(like the xzgv image viewer where the last usable version
> > has been xzgv-0.8_9).
>
> Thank you.
> I will try it.
If you use portsnap to keep your ports up to date then you can add a "REFUSE"
line in /etc/portsnap.conf to stop new versions of
2012. szeptember 29. 13:16 napon Polytropon írta:
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:48:49 +0200, Istvan Gabor wrote:
> > Hello:
> >
...
> > But I would like to use/keep with libreoffice 3.4 (since I don't like the
> > interface changes they made in version 3.5 and 3
erent releases, which
> reflect the version at the time of the release.
Yes. There are both the RELEASE packages (as found on the
installation CDs and DVDs) as well as the STABLE packages,
regularly created from a snapshot of the continuously
developing ports tree.
> But I would like to us
Hello:
I am a freebsd beginner.
As I understood correctly there is only one ports tree which contains
the most up to date (and stable) versions of programs.
And there are compiled packages for the different releases, which
reflect the version at the time of the release.
For example the ports
What is the method in a repository of pkg there to split packages for
difference minor version? At present PACKAGESSITE set to
http://pkg.freebsd.org/${ABI}/latest, where $ABI forming URL on 9.0 or
9.1/amd64 into http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:9:x86:64/latest/
How it is possible to specify
[HEADS UP] merging projects/pf into head
Some good news:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2012-September/006740.html
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin
On 02/09/2012 14:33, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> To have the 9.1-RC1 source code, use the stable-supfile in
> /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ and build world and kernel using that
> source tree. That will give you a 9.1-RC1 system. So that would be a
> RELENG_9 tag if you look in that stable-supfile. Th
On 09/02/12 16:19, Walter Hurry wrote:
Thanks for the reply. No, I haven't rebuilt kernel and world, nor do I
intend to for the moment. I'm happy to stick with generic.
By using the RELENG_9 tag, you're tracking the STABLE development
branch. By pulling in the sources for the STABLE development
[ Walter Hurry wrote on Sun 2.Sep'12 at 13:19:44 + ]
> On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:51:33 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>
> > On 09/02/2012 03:21 AM, Walter Hurry wrote:
> >> My standard-
> >> supfile (copied from examples with only the default host changed) says
> >> 'tag=RELENG_9'.
> >>
>
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:51:33 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On 09/02/2012 03:21 AM, Walter Hurry wrote:
>> My standard-
>> supfile (copied from examples with only the default host changed) says
>> 'tag=RELENG_9'.
>>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html
>
On 09/02/2012 03:21 AM, Walter Hurry wrote:
My standard-
supfile (copied from examples with only the default host changed) says
'tag=RELENG_9'.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html
RELENG_9
The line of development for FreeBSD-9.X, also known as FreeBSD 9-ST
I am having trouble with virtualbox-ose-additions. This is 9.1-RC1 on
amd64 in a VirtualBox VM.
It builds from the port (DISTVERSION= 4.1.20), but on reboot, the kernel
module refuses to load,, complaining of a version mismatch with the
kernel.
When I install the binary version (4.1.18) using
I seem to have seen no replies.
Would anyone kindly confirm they've got the same problem so we can get
a PR filled ?
# named -V
BIND 9.6.-ESV-R5-P1 built with '--prefix=/usr'
'--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--enable-threads'
'--enable-getifaddrs' '--disable-linux-caps
On 27 August 2012 10:11, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> Hello list,
>
>
>
> We're currently running Nessus PCI DSS scans on our infrastructure to
> eliminate known vulnerabilities and problems.
>
> The scan reports that my version of BIND is vulnerable to exploits I
>
Hello list,
We're currently running Nessus PCI DSS scans on our infrastructure to
eliminate known vulnerabilities and problems.
The scan reports that my version of BIND is vulnerable to exploits I
*know* it isn't.
The problem, to me, seems to be with the version number as reported b
TRANSLATIONS "copy / paste" in: www.translate.google.com
Through the system: Version 2.0 (V 2.0); We provide the adequate support for
selling or monetizing bonds, negotiated in privately = operations: "OFF THE
MARKET". All "private operators and / or owners&quo
t problems.
I would encourage you to use 9-STABLE so that you may do the same and
ensure the stability of future releases.
I would agree with that philosophy up to a point. It is definitely a
matter of personal preference; however, for myself, I NEVER install
version X.0 of any software if said softwar
I finally decided to take off my FreeBSD 7.2 server which is onlin esince 2009.
I will go for a new FreeBSD version and will move out all data.
you mean just new freebsd or new server? if first there is no need to move
data at all
Which version do you recommend?
Shall I go for 9 ?
or 8.3
message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-Stable-production-version-tp5729696p5729739.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 07:18:13PM +0800, lei yang wrote:
>
> Aha,I just want to learn want to know how to build the netcat for
> freebsd version on a no-freebsd platform
I'm really curious, now:
Why?
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://ow
> > I will go for a new FreeBSD version and will move out all data.
> >
> > My Server is mainly is a MAIL server, sendmail.
> > and ofcourse few websites, data.etc..
> >
> > Which version do you recommend?
> > Shall I go for 9 ?
> > or 8.3
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Marwan Sultan wrote:
>
> Well, I also like your philosophy of waiting x.1 !
> its a very good point.
>
> Maybe 8.3-R would be the best.
>
> I will wait to hear more comments.
>
>
For cowards, yes!
Whoever said that -RELEASE is bad is a joker, too.
Now, what the h
@seibercom.net
>> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stable production version.
>>
>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:19:53 +0200
>> Damien Fleuriot articulated:
>>
>>> I'd say it's a matter of personal preference.
>>>
&
e production version.
>
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:19:53 +0200
> Damien Fleuriot articulated:
>
> > I'd say it's a matter of personal preference.
> >
> > We're mostly running 8.3 in production here.
> >
> > I've recently installed 9-STABLE se
s.
>
> I would encourage you to use 9-STABLE so that you may do the same and
> ensure the stability of future releases.
I would agree with that philosophy up to a point. It is definitely a
matter of personal preference; however, for myself, I NEVER install
version X.0 of any software if sa
On 7/25/12 1:13 PM, Marwan Sultan wrote:
>
> Hello all and Good Morning, Afternoon or evening :)
>
> I finally decided to take off my FreeBSD 7.2 server which is onlin esince
> 2009.
>
> I will go for a new FreeBSD version and will move out all data.
>
> My
Hello all and Good Morning, Afternoon or evening :)
I finally decided to take off my FreeBSD 7.2 server which is onlin esince 2009.
I will go for a new FreeBSD version and will move out all data.
My Server is mainly is a MAIL server, sendmail.
and ofcourse few websites, data.etc
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:13:00 +0800, lei yang wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 23:29:38 +0800, lei yang wrote:
> >> Yes, the second version I post is using the source from you supplied,
> >> then I compiled it, but it
The same as in 9-STABLE?
$ cc -v
FreeBSD clang version 3.1 (branches/release_31 156863) 20120523
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.0
Thread model: posix
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com
On 24/07/2012 14:36, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 07:13:00PM +0800, lei yang wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 23:29:38 +0800, lei yang wrote:
Yes, the second version I post is using the source from you supplied,
then I compiled
This is nominally more suited for current@, but:
As of midnight US Pacific Time, what is the version of clang in
HEAD?
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
>>>>> I want to build a "netcat" on my local pc (ubuntu) with gcc, is it
>>>>> possible? I'm new to free bsd
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> it has no "-U" flag, can you point me where I get this version
>
uot; on my local pc (ubuntu) with gcc, is it
>>>> possible? I'm new to free bsd
>>>
>>
>>
>> it has no "-U" flag, can you point me where I get this version
>>
> Have you checked the other version of netcat already available? A quick
thing you
> run on Linux will run on FreeBSD and there are also Desktop-friendly
> distros of FreeBSD such as PC-BSD which, in Linux terms, is to FreeBSD
> somewhat akin to what Ubuntu is to Debian.
>
Aha,I just want to learn want to know how to build the netcat for
freebsd version on a
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 23:29:38 +0800, lei yang wrote:
>> Yes, the second version I post is using the source from you supplied,
>> then I compiled it, but it has no
>> "-U" flag like what I post, it seems a version
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 23:29:38 +0800, lei yang wrote:
> Yes, the second version I post is using the source from you supplied,
> then I compiled it, but it has no
> "-U" flag like what I post, it seems a version different casued this.
Yes. The version distributed by the ports coll
ree bsd
>>
>
>
> it has no "-U" flag, can you point me where I get this version
>
Have you checked the other version of netcat already available? A quick
check shows these four versions for Ubuntu:
netcat: TCP/IP swiss army knife -- transitional package
netcat-open
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:29 AM, lei yang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Polytropon wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:59:55 +0800, lei yang wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Polytropon wrote:
>>> > On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 22:41:57 +0800, lei yang wrote:
>>> >> Hi,
[...]
>
>
ast.cs.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/netutils/netcat/
>> >
>> > ftp://ftp.cuhk.edu.hk/pub/packages/security/purdue/netutils/netcat/
>> >
>> > http://www.planetmirror.com/pub/lprng/TOOLS/
>> >
>> > You could try to use that source distributio
;
> > http://www.planetmirror.com/pub/lprng/TOOLS/
> >
> > You could try to use that source distribution as well.
> >
> >
>
>
> Thanks for the great help, I have built it successfully on my ubuntu.
> I find it's not the version I want
> I wan
.cs.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/netutils/netcat/
>
> ftp://ftp.cuhk.edu.hk/pub/packages/security/purdue/netutils/netcat/
>
> http://www.planetmirror.com/pub/lprng/TOOLS/
>
> You could try to use that source distribution as well.
>
>
Thanks for the great help, I have built it
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun Jul 22 09:44:21 2012
> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 22:41:57 +0800
> From: lei yang
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: help about free bsp version netcat to work it on ubuntu
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to build a "netc
or.com/pub/lprng/TOOLS/
You could try to use that source distribution as well.
> I have to quesion:
> 1)where to download it's source it for "netcat"
They can be found in /usr/src/contrib/netcat/ once you have
extracted the source distribution of FreeBSD. Depending on
which v
Hi,
I want to build a "netcat" on my local pc (ubuntu) with gcc, is it
possible? I'm new to free bsd
I have to quesion:
1)where to download it's source it for "netcat"
2)how to build it on ubuntu with gcc? only make?
Thanks
Lei
___
freebsd-questions@fr
Ok thank you for your answer...
the "problem" is in the postgres code and not
in a compile switch or something like that...
I will upgrade all my 8.2 to 8.3... systems
to do this, I build an 8.3 from ground zero,
and than do a rsync from this one to the others,
directories: /usr/obj /usr/src
th
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Jun 18 08:21:38 2012
> From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:20:09 -0300
> Subject: libc version
>
> Hello...
>
> I upgrade the server from version 8.2 to 8.3, and
Hello...
I upgrade the server from version 8.2 to 8.3, and rebuild all packages..
it all works...
Then I installed a binary package (8.3) in an old 8.2 ...
every package works... gnome, nautilus, wget about 800 of them
the only one that does not work is postgesql84-server
when I try to run
There are two advantages that come to mind quickly.
With amd64 you could install more than 4 gigs of ram and have it
recognized. With i386 if you need to do this pae would need to be
installed, which FreeBSD doc pages say is if beta quality.
I bet that amd64 will get more dev attention.
On Jun 1
1 - 100 of 1558 matches
Mail list logo
