On Wednesday 08 July 2009 19:45:05 Manish Jain wrote:
> ==
> Part-1)Immediately after a fresh FreeBSD-7.2#RELEASE install :
>
> I assume you will at some stage or the other install a linux port, eg
> acroread8 or acroread9, linux-ymessenger, etc. Inc
b. f. wrote:
On 7/6/09, manish jain wrote:
2009/7/6 b. f.
After running pkgdb -F, I find that there hundreds of ports depending on
python2.5.
Most of these are probably indirectly dependent, and may not be
seriously affected. Many, for example, may have been dragged in by
On 7/6/09, manish jain wrote:
> 2009/7/6 b. f.
>
> After running pkgdb -F, I find that there hundreds of ports depending on
> python2.5.
Most of these are probably indirectly dependent, and may not be
seriously affected. Many, for example, may have been dragged in by
xorg's silly dependency on
manish jain wrote:
1) How do I find or set PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION ?
It's defined in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk -- the default is 'python2.6'
since 2009-06-08. If you want to use a non-default value you can override
the default by adding eg.:
PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION= python2.5
to /etc/make.
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 02:50:35PM +0530, manish jain wrote:
> 2009/7/6 b. f.
> After running pkgdb -F, I find that there hundreds of ports depending on
> python2.5.
You shouldn't have 2.5 installed at all. It should be upgraded to 2.6 and
changes propagated to all dependent ports, see /usr/ports
2009/7/6 b. f.
> Manish Jain wrote:
>
> >After 3-4 hours, portsnap died on graphics/py-cairo saying :
> >cannot find python headers
>
> I'm guessing you meant "portmaster died" here ...
>
> >/usr/ports/graphics/py-cairo/work/pycairo-1.8.4/config.log says :
> >configure:4734: cc -E -I/usr/local/in
Manish Jain wrote:
>After 3-4 hours, portsnap died on graphics/py-cairo saying :
>cannot find python headers
I'm guessing you meant "portmaster died" here ...
>/usr/ports/graphics/py-cairo/work/pycairo-1.8.4/config.log says :
>configure:4734: cc -E -I/usr/local/include conftest.c
>conftest.c:10:
Hi,
This is not a portmaster problem, but a problem of getting py-cairo
to build following an update in the ports directory.
3 days back I ran 'portsnap fetch extract'. Then yesterday I ran
'portsnap fetch update' followed immediately by 'portmaster -a -B'
After 3-4 hours, portsnap died on
Ian Lord wrote:
>> Does anyone knows what I can try to try to put back system online (at
> least,
>> so I can restore a backup on the disk)
>
> I'm trying to find my vinum notes, but can't as of yet...
>
> What does a:
>
> # fsck -y /dev/gvinum/RAID5
>
> ...yield...anything?
>
> Steve
> ~
> Hi,
>
> We had a power lost even though we have ups and generators (still
> investigating it) and when the machine rebooted one of the disk seems to
be
> failed :
>
> The system complains about fsck repaired failed and that I must run it
> manually. It then boots in single user mode.
>
> I ent
Ian Lord wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We had a power lost even though we have ups and generators (still
> investigating it) and when the machine rebooted one of the disk seems to be
> failed :
>
> The system complains about fsck repaired failed and that I must run it
> manually. It then boots in single user
Hi,
We had a power lost even though we have ups and generators (still
investigating it) and when the machine rebooted one of the disk seems to be
failed :
The system complains about fsck repaired failed and that I must run it
manually. It then boots in single user mode.
I entered gvinum and pres
Hi,
We had a power lost even though we have ups and generators (still
investigating it) and when the machine rebooted one of the disk seems to be
failed :
The system complains about fsck repaired failed and that I must run it
manually. It then boots in single user mode.
I entered gvinum
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:01:15 -0400
"Ian Lord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1- Portupgrade broke the thing ?
portupgrade upgraded libraries that were referenced by other objects...for some
reason, pecl / php stuff is very picky. Maybe the ports need to be updated in
unison / force upgrades of th
-Original Message-
From: B. Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 août 2007 13:54
To: Ian Lord
Subject: Re: Urgent help needed please: pecl-memcache problem after upgrade
of php
Have you tried rebuilding the port?
memcache to reflect your current version of php?
Thats usually what
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:49:48 -0400
"Ian Lord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I just did a portupgrade -a and now memcache doesn't work anymore in php.
best practice is to test upgrades before applying them to production :)
>
>
> Here are the version portupgrade installed:
>
>
Hi,
I just did a portupgrade -a and now memcache doesn't work anymore in php.
Here are the version portupgrade installed:
pecl-memcache-2.1.2
memcached-1.2.2
php5-5.2.3_1
In php/error.log I can see this error message
[13-Aug-2007 10:38:20] PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load d
FIXED, ignore this email..
However no one has answered.
Hello Gurus,
This is an Urgent help, as everything pending, waiting.. a FreeBSD
Solution.
and I appologize if I will explain in details, please be patient with
me.
Just yesterday, our ISP installed 2 routers
Hello Gurus,
This is an Urgent help, as everything pending, waiting.. a FreeBSD
Solution.
and I appologize if I will explain in details, please be patient with
me.
Just yesterday, our ISP installed 2 routers (both 3com) at our main
office.
One router acting for Datalink between
Why is the server trying to connect to localhost, anyway? Did
you do special configuration in order to have Sendmail deliver
mail to 127.0.0.1 as part of your (former) configuration with
Spamassassin? If so, did you undo these statements so that Sendmail
would now deliver normally?
Not quite
Andreas Widerøe Andersen wrote:
Hi,
I had a recent downtime on the mailserver I'm running due to remote
location
and trouble with upgrading FreeBSD. I upgraded from 4.7 STABLE to the
latest
4.11 with complete make world and new kernel, at first the machine didn't
come back up again due to a di
You email didn't state if you rebuilt sendmail too, when you rebuilt
world. This is an option in /etc/make.conf. The current sendmail is
8.13.7 so you may not have rebuilt sendmail.
The logs show that you are not able to authenticate to localhost, but your
email didn't state how you have sen
Hi,
I had a recent downtime on the mailserver I'm running due to remote location
and trouble with upgrading FreeBSD. I upgraded from 4.7 STABLE to the latest
4.11 with complete make world and new kernel, at first the machine didn't
come back up again due to a disk error, but now it's online again.
Ian Lord wrote:
Hi,
I am currently in a maintenance window trying to rebuildworld...
I am doing it on a dell poweredge with a built in drac wich emulate a
usb keyboard...
When I need to boot on the drac, I need to use boot with usb keyboard in
the menu...
Now I need to boot in single mode
Hi,
I am currently in a maintenance window trying to rebuildworld...
I am doing it on a dell poweredge with a built in drac wich emulate a
usb keyboard...
When I need to boot on the drac, I need to use boot with usb keyboard
in the menu...
Now I need to boot in single mode WITH usb keyboar
Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
Now we have a couple of inputs, we just have to figure out which is the proper
combination. Here they are:
1. Use private key for ssh logins (should bring the private key always... and
if it is stolen.)
Private keys can (and should) be passphrase protected.
Mark Jayson Alvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Suggestions are welcome... very much welcome. I just need to collate
> everything.
Start with security(7).
In future, keep up with Security Advisories.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail
Good day again!!
This has something to do with my previous email about finding an IRC bouncer
installed into one of our freebsd servers(4.9). Someone suggested here to run a
rootkit finder... I installed an rkhunter and eventually found an ascii text
file inside the /dev/ named "saux" and to
On Nov 17, 2005, at 7:36 AM, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:16:16PM -0700, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
wrote:
I then create one or more jails that use nullfs to READ ONLY mount
specific parts of the master hierarchy into the jail.
This is very interesting to me, as I are
--On Wednesday, November 16, 2005 20:29:55 -0500 Steve Bertrand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we have a serious problem. One of our old server
running FreeBSD 4.9 have been compromised and is now
connected to an ircd server..
195.204.1.132.6667 ESTABLISHED
Ran into this recently. P
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:16:16PM -0700, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
wrote:
> I then create one or more jails that use nullfs to READ ONLY mount
> specific parts of the master hierarchy into the jail.
This is very interesting to me, as I are currently working on a jail
design and nullfs has a nu
[...]
> > You can easily rebuild a new kernel with:
> >
> > options IPFIREWALL
> > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE
> > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT_1000
> >
> > Then create a script blocking ALL ports exept those what you need.
> > Especially only allowing SSH access to the box from limited
> IP
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 09:51:08PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> > Most *((cr/h)ackers* (and I use that term VERY loosely (aka:
> > script kiddies)) are interested in rooting a box, and setting up a
> > storage/sharing area that is free to them. This may not be
> the case,
> > but it's bette
David Kirchner wrote:
> On 11/16/05, Mark Kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I also see a psyBNC server listening on port 7978:
>>
>>server# sockstat -l4 | grep psybnc
>>USER COMMANDPID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS
>>wicked6 psybnc 15819 3 tcp4 *:7978
Marco Wertejuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
try sockstat | grep 6667 to see which process is
connecting to irc and try to see what this process
is doing with lsof, but depending on what backdoor
or rootkit is used, it's possible to see nothing
because intelligent rootkits hide themself
Ok done thi
On Nov 16, 2005, at 9:38 PM, Will Maier wrote:
OP has some asset that is being threatened or diminished by this
attack, be it his bandwith, CPU cycles, host/network integrity or
self confidence. He needs to identify that asset and work quickly to
protect it. In most cases, this will mean immedi
Steve Bertrand wrote:
>>- "top" lists nothing significant. 97% idle CPU
>
>
> Irrelavent, the process is probably idle right now.
I understand, but I was trying to give you the results of the commands
that you asked Mark Alvarez to run.
>>- "w" only shows myself and one other legit user logged
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 05:16:37PM -0800, Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
> Good Day!
At first I thought I was confused, but then I realized that you had
cross-posted your message to freebsd-security@ and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please don't do this, as it fragments the
discussion.
Good luck.
--
o---
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 09:51:08PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Most *((cr/h)ackers* (and I use that term VERY loosely (aka:
> script kiddies)) are interested in rooting a box, and setting up a
> storage/sharing area that is free to them. This may not be the
> case, but it's better to 'observe' y
Steve Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now what I want to do is to just reinstall the whole
> operating system and secure it as possible as I can. Like
> someone told, its just a waste to try to track it down
> because the intruder might be located somewhere on the other
> side of the w
On 11/16/05, Mark Kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also see a psyBNC server listening on port 7978:
>
> server# sockstat -l4 | grep psybnc
> USER COMMANDPID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS
> wicked6 psybnc 15819 3 tcp4 *:7978*:*
>
> Funny thing i
> Now what I want to do is to just reinstall the whole
> operating system and secure it as possible as I can. Like
> someone told, its just a waste to try to track it down
> because the intruder might be located somewhere on the other
> side of the world.
They are always on the other side of
First, I want to thank you all for replying. For now what I just did is to
just pulled the utp cable from its ethernet port. Now, no one can access it.
However I tried once to put it back and then the ircd connection went up
silently. It is confirmed that we are running "psybnc" like what so
> - "top" lists nothing significant. 97% idle CPU
Irrelavent, the process is probably idle right now.
> - "w" only shows myself and one other legit user logged in
> who is editing config files with vi
Perhaps they aren't currently logged in.
> - "last" shows nothing but myself and that one ot
> > also /var/tmp
>
> Indeed, many people would install with a /var partition,
> which would put /tmp under /var via symlink, but a good point.
My mistake...symlink was the wrong word to use here, for those who
create a /var partition without physically making a /tmp partition.
> > # ls -la /tmp
>
> also /var/tmp
Indeed, many people would install with a /var partition, which would put
/tmp under /var via symlink, but a good point.
> if you run awstats or phpBB - upgrade...
Agreed, but even phpBB may not be the fault. Many problems with PHP come
with the binary, not
Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
> Good Day!
>
> I think we have a serious problem. One of our old
> server running FreeBSD 4.9 have been compromised and
> is now connected to an ircd server..
> 195.204.1.132.6667 ESTABLISHED
I believe I'm having the same issue as you, except on FreeBSD
5.4-RELEASE
>
> # ls -la /tmp
also /var/tmp
look for netstat and rpcd under those...
if you run awstats or phpBB - upgrade...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any ma
> I think we have a serious problem. One of our old server
> running FreeBSD 4.9 have been compromised and is now
> connected to an ircd server..
> 195.204.1.132.6667 ESTABLISHED
Ran into this recently. Please post the entire output from:
# top
# w
# last
# ps -aux
# uname -a
...after tha
Good Day!
I think we have a serious problem. One of our old
server running FreeBSD 4.9 have been compromised and
is now connected to an ircd server..
195.204.1.132.6667 ESTABLISHED
However, we still haven't brought the server down in
an attempt to track the intruder down. Right now we
are clu
Good Day!
I think we have a serious problem. One of our old
server running FreeBSD 4.9 have been compromised and
is now connected to an ircd server..
195.204.1.132.6667 ESTABLISHED
However, we still haven't brought the server down in
an attempt to track the intruder down. Right now we
are clu
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 04:17:38AM -0500, kalin mintchev wrote:
> the machine would come up. then netsat or ping or ssh will crash it...
> the first time i had to add the sshd user and group...
"crash" is about as helpful as "it's broken!". Are core files
generated? Are there any error messages
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 02:40:34PM +0100, Andreas Wider?e Andersen
typed:
>> At 09:35 27.12.2004, you wrote:
>> > PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > upgraded from 4.6 => 4.10 rel
>> >
>> > network programs are craching the new system: netstat, ping, th
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 02:40:34PM +0100, Andreas Wider?e Andersen typed:
> At 09:35 27.12.2004, you wrote:
>
> > PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > upgraded from 4.6 => 4.10 rel
> >
> > network programs are craching the new system: netstat, ping, the qmail tcp
> > server all of them...
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thank you Bill for rplying...
well i did it a few times with the same success. it's not the first time
i'm doing it. it's the first time with the 4.x..
i followed the handbook step by step - rebuild devs too.. and then
cleaned up obj.. to make it all again - t
"kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> upgraded from 4.6 => 4.10 rel
>
> network programs are craching the new system: netstat, ping, the qmail tcp
> server all of them...
> sshd is running but when accessing from outside it panics too... what is
At 09:35 27.12.2004, you wrote:
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
upgraded from 4.6 => 4.10 rel
network programs are craching the new system: netstat, ping, the qmail tcp
server all of them...
sshd is running but when accessing from outside it panics too... what is
it?
can i turn someth
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
upgraded from 4.6 => 4.10 rel
network programs are craching the new system: netstat, ping, the qmail tcp
server all of them...
sshd is running but when accessing from outside it panics too... what is
it?
can i turn something off in the kernel?!
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
upgraded from 4.6 => 4.10 rel
network programs are craching the new system: netstat, ping, the qmail tcp
server all of them...
sshd is running but when accessing from outside it panics too... what is it?
can i turn something off in the kernel?!
--
__
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 02:40:33PM +0100, Didier WIROTH wrote:
> As we use a proxy for "http" connections I've also added this to make.conf:
> FETCH_ENV=HTTP_PROXY=http://ourproxy:8080
> Fetch was also trying to use the proxy for ftp connections?!
>
> Here is the output of my entire make.conf
> C
Hi,
(freebd 5.2-release)
I'm not able to use for example:
/usr/ports/xyz/someport/
make install
The fetch command fails, and it can not retrieve the sources, I can try any
port all fail?!
===> Vulnerability check disabled
>> unzip550.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
>> Attem
Dear Sir,
I'm required to run a.out binaries like foxplus
in a recent Intel based hardware. I have chosen
FreeBSD 5.1 and successfuly installed. But I could
not run a.out binaries like Foxplus. I tried it by
load ibcs modules and aout modules in /boot/kernel
directory. My foxplus did not work.
s! It will clean up this directories
4) pkg_delete or pkg_remove stuff
Good luck
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of shubha mr
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 13:17
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: urgent help
>
>
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, [iso-8859-1] shubha mr wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to install samba on my freeBSD machine and
> it says "/: write file system full " .Looks like the
> hard disk is not sufficient.How do I solve this
> issue,meaning to uninstall a few things?
>
depending on the packages you hav
Hi,
I am trying to install samba on my freeBSD machine and
it says "/: write file system full " .Looks like the
hard disk is not sufficient.How do I solve this
issue,meaning to uninstall a few things?
thanks
shubha
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'l
65 matches
Mail list logo
