On 21/07/2013 17:31, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:13:39 +0930
Shane Ambler wrote:
On 21/07/2013 04:42, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
It's a pity there are now only two manufacturers of spinning rust.
I thought there was three left - Seagate WD and Toshiba
I assumed
But then zfs doesn't access every block on the disk does it, only the
allocated ones
On 20 July 2013 21:07, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 20 Jul 2013, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
>
> On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 18:14:20 +0100
>> Frank Leonhardt wrote:
>>
>> It's worth noting, as a warning for a
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 00:27:01 -0700
per...@pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) wrote:
> "Steve O'Hara-Smith" wrote:
>
> > It's a pity there are now only two manufacturers of spinning rust.
>
> I didn't think there were _any_! Haven't oxide-coated platters gone
> the way of the dodo bird?
"Steve O'Hara-Smith" wrote:
> It's a pity there are now only two manufacturers of spinning rust.
I didn't think there were _any_! Haven't oxide-coated platters gone
the way of the dodo bird?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:13:39 +0930
Shane Ambler wrote:
> On 21/07/2013 04:42, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> > It's a pity there are now only two manufacturers of spinning rust.
> >
> I thought there was three left - Seagate WD and Toshiba
I assumed Toshiba were out of the game, I've never
On 21/07/2013 04:42, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
It's a pity there are now only two manufacturers of spinning rust.
I thought there was three left - Seagate WD and Toshiba
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 18:14:20 +0100
Frank Leonhardt wrote:
It's worth noting, as a warning for anyone who hasn't been there, that
the number of times a second drive in a RAID system fails during a
rebuild is higher than would be expected. During
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 18:14:20 +0100
Frank Leonhardt wrote:
> It's worth noting, as a warning for anyone who hasn't been there, that
> the number of times a second drive in a RAID system fails during a
> rebuild is higher than would be expected. During a rebuild the remaining
> drives get thrash
On 16/07/2013 20:48, Charles Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On Jul 16, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Well, "don't do that". :-)
When the server reboots because of a powerfailure at night, then it boots.
Then it starts to rebuild the mirror on its own, and later the fsck kicks in.
Not much i
On Jul 16, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, aurfalien wrote:
>> On Jul 16, 2013, at 2:41 AM, Shane Ambler wrote:
>>>
>>> I doubt that you would save any ram having the os on a non-zfs drive as
>>> you will already be using zfs chances are that non-zfs drives would on
not recommended anymore you should run SU+J if your version supports it
On 17 July 2013 00:08, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> On 07/16/13 21:27, Johan Hendriks wrote:
>
>> Op dinsdag 16 juli 2013 schreef Charles Swiger (cswi...@mac.com) het
>> volgende:
>>
>> Hi--
>>>
>>> On Jul 16, 2013, at 10:33
You would in theory as from what i remember every zfs filesystem takes up
64 kb of ram, so the savings could be massive 8)
On 16 July 2013 10:41, Shane Ambler wrote:
> On 16/07/2013 14:41, aurfalien wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 15, 2013, at 9:23 PM, Warren Block wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, aurf
On 07/16/13 21:27, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Op dinsdag 16 juli 2013 schreef Charles Swiger (cswi...@mac.com) het
volgende:
Hi--
On Jul 16, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Johan Hendriks
>
wrote:
[ ... ]
I would us a zfs for the os.
I have a couple of servers that did not survive a power failure with
gmirror
Hi--
On Jul 16, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Johan Hendriks wrote:
>> Well, "don't do that". :-)
>
> When the server reboots because of a powerfailure at night, then it boots.
> Then it starts to rebuild the mirror on its own, and later the fsck kicks in.
>
> Not much i can do about it.
>
> Maybe i sho
Hi--
On Jul 16, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Johan Hendriks wrote:
[ ... ]
> I would us a zfs for the os.
> I have a couple of servers that did not survive a power failure with
> gmirror.
> The problems i had was when the power failed one disk was in a rebuilding
> state and then when the background fsck s
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, aurfalien wrote:
On Jul 16, 2013, at 2:41 AM, Shane Ambler wrote:
I doubt that you would save any ram having the os on a non-zfs drive as
you will already be using zfs chances are that non-zfs drives would only
increase ram usage by adding a second cache. zfs uses it's own
Op dinsdag 16 juli 2013 schreef Charles Swiger (cswi...@mac.com) het
volgende:
> Hi--
>
> On Jul 16, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Johan Hendriks
> >
> wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > I would us a zfs for the os.
> > I have a couple of servers that did not survive a power failure with
> > gmirror.
> > The problems i h
On Jul 16, 2013, at 2:41 AM, Shane Ambler wrote:
> On 16/07/2013 14:41, aurfalien wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 15, 2013, at 9:23 PM, Warren Block wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, aurfalien wrote:
>>>
... thats the question :)
At any rate, I'm building a rather large 100+TB NAS using Z
Op dinsdag 16 juli 2013 schreef Frank Leonhardt (fra...@fjl.co.uk) het
volgende:
> On 16/07/2013 10:41, Shane Ambler wrote:
>
>> On 16/07/2013 14:41, aurfalien wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 15, 2013, at 9:23 PM, Warren Block wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, aurfalien wrote:
... thats the
On 16/07/2013 10:41, Shane Ambler wrote:
On 16/07/2013 14:41, aurfalien wrote:
On Jul 15, 2013, at 9:23 PM, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, aurfalien wrote:
... thats the question :)
At any rate, I'm building a rather large 100+TB NAS using ZFS.
However for my OS, should I also Z
On 16/07/2013 14:41, aurfalien wrote:
On Jul 15, 2013, at 9:23 PM, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, aurfalien wrote:
... thats the question :)
At any rate, I'm building a rather large 100+TB NAS using ZFS.
However for my OS, should I also ZFS or simply gmirror as I've a
dedicated
On Jul 15, 2013, at 9:23 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, aurfalien wrote:
>
>> ... thats the question :)
>>
>> At any rate, I'm building a rather large 100+TB NAS using ZFS.
>>
>> However for my OS, should I also ZFS or simply gmirror as I've a dedicated
>> pair of 256GB SSD dr
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, aurfalien wrote:
... thats the question :)
At any rate, I'm building a rather large 100+TB NAS using ZFS.
However for my OS, should I also ZFS or simply gmirror as I've a dedicated pair
of 256GB SSD drives for it. I didn't ask for SSD sys drives, this system just
came w
... thats the question :)
At any rate, I'm building a rather large 100+TB NAS using ZFS.
However for my OS, should I also ZFS or simply gmirror as I've a dedicated pair
of 256GB SSD drives for it. I didn't ask for SSD sys drives, this system just
came with em.
This is more of a best practices
24 matches
Mail list logo
