On 27/03/06 Lowell Gilbert said:
> Even among scripting languages, perl is unique in its pathological
> lack of backward compatibility. The FreeBSD maintainers do a nice job
> of limiting the pain, but you *do* have to follow their directions.
Python's worse. :(
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[E
"Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As I think I only went from perl 5.6 to 5.8, I'm surprised that so much would
> be out of date. Good to know though. Do the other scripting languages have
> this kind of support? Python?
Even among scripting languages, perl is unique in its patho
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 08:30:04AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> As I think I only went from perl 5.6 to 5.8, I'm surprised that so
> much would be out of date.
That's actually quite a change, as Perl 5.6.2 dates from, I think,
November 2003, while Perl 5.8.8 was released February 2006.
--
Hello Michael,
* Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [26-03-06 08:19]:
> Nope, I didn't do that. How would I know to do that? :)
reading /usr/ports/UPDATING :)
Best regards,
Matthias
pgpOvxufzBn0e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 26/03/06 Matthew Seaman said:
> Did you run the perl-after-upgrade script with the '-f' flag so it
> actually does anything? This symptom occurs when the pkg system
> thinks a package is installed (because there's an entry in
> /var/db/pkgs) but perl can't find the corresponding module, becaus
On 26/03/06 Matthew Seaman said:
> Did you run the perl-after-upgrade script with the '-f' flag so it
> actually does anything? This symptom occurs when the pkg system
> thinks a package is installed (because there's an entry in
> /var/db/pkgs) but perl can't find the corresponding module, becaus
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 10:18:41PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm trying to build spamassassin from ports.
>
> So, I go to /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin and make.
>
> ===> Checking if devel/p5-Test-Harness already installed
> ===> p5-Test-Harness-2.56 is already
Michael P. Soulier writes:
> Whoops. Apparently it doesn't need to upgrade.
>
> Should I make deinstall? And if so, why, since it doesn't need to
> upgrade?
In your shoes I would deinstall/reinstall Test-Harness, then
retry the build of SpamAssassin. My gut reaction os the package
Hi there,
I'm trying to build spamassassin from ports.
So, I go to /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin and make.
===> Checking if devel/p5-Test-Harness already installed
===> p5-Test-Harness-2.56 is already installed
You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again
