Robert William Vesterman wrote:
Does anyone know of a source control system that is not so
directory-centric? Most of the ones I've seen seem to have a base
assumption that, more or less, "directory" == "project".
But in reality, a directory could be a project, or part of a project,
or part of m
On 2005-01-06 00:22, Robert William Vesterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>On 2005-01-05 20:29, Robert William Vesterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Does anyone know of a source control system that is not so
>>>directory-centric? Most of the ones I've seen seem to have a
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-01-05 20:29, Robert William Vesterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone know of a source control system that is not so
directory-centric? Most of the ones I've seen seem to have a base
assumption that, more or less, "directory" == "project".
[...]
AFAICT, an
On 2005-01-05 20:29, Robert William Vesterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know of a source control system that is not so
> directory-centric? Most of the ones I've seen seem to have a base
> assumption that, more or less, "directory" == "project".
>
> But in reality, a directory could
Does anyone know of a source control system that is not so
directory-centric? Most of the ones I've seen seem to have a base
assumption that, more or less, "directory" == "project".
But in reality, a directory could be a project, or part of a project, or
part of many projects, or merely struct
