>> On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:49:31 -0500,
>> Adam Vande More said:
A> A shot in dark at the problem is upgrading firefox also upgraded perl
A> from 5.8.8 to 5.8.9(possibility w/ threaded perl).
No, I installed perl-5.8.8 by hand back when the ports version was
somewhere around 5.8.4; this ha
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Karl Vogel wrote:
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:44:14 +0200,
Polytropon said:
P> Why don't you use echo -n which suppresses the newline instead of involving
P> another program to do something that echo can do on its own? This is how
P> FreeBSD does it in its system scripts.
Karl Vogel wrote:
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:31:06 -0500,
Adam Vandemore said:
A> How do you handle major builds that use FBSD specific patches
A> asterisk for example?
Fortunately I haven't had to build asterisk or anything else that large.
If I did, I'd probably try building un
2009/4/9 Gary Gatten :
> Yup - tried samba3 and a couple others. None of them liked a function about
> current_time in krb5.
>
> What's up with the top posting thing? You don't like the most recent stuff
> at the top?
>
No, top posting is horrible! And frowned upon in this community
http:
>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:44:14 +0200,
>> Polytropon said:
P> Why don't you use echo -n which suppresses the newline instead of involving
P> another program to do something that echo can do on its own? This is how
P> FreeBSD does it in its system scripts.
Some of my scripts date back to 199
>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:31:06 -0500,
>> Adam Vandemore said:
A> How do you handle major builds that use FBSD specific patches
A> asterisk for example?
Fortunately I haven't had to build asterisk or anything else that large.
If I did, I'd probably try building under Solaris first, an
Just a small sidenote according to your shell script:
You're defining
# echo without newline
necho () {
echo "$*" | tr -d '\012'
}
Why don't you use echo -n which suppresses the newline instead
of involving another program to do something that echo can do
Karl Vogel wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:21:17 -0500,
"Gary Gatten" said:
G> I've been playing with various flavors of *nix off and on for almost twenty
G> years, but not doing much development the make process often causes me
G> issues - as is the case with samba.
This is why I only
>> On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:21:17 -0500,
>> "Gary Gatten" said:
G> I've been playing with various flavors of *nix off and on for almost twenty
G> years, but not doing much development the make process often causes me
G> issues - as is the case with samba.
This is why I only use the ports system
ginal Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Gary Gatten
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:08 PM
To: Vasadi I. Claudiu Florin
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: sorta newb help compiling samba
Latest error below.
eebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: sorta newb help compiling samba
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:39:55 +0300, Gary Gatten
wrote:
> I found a 3.3.1 package - if my current attempts at the port upgrades
> fails I'll try this route.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Gary
Hey,
If I wer
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:39:55 +0300, Gary Gatten
wrote:
I found a 3.3.1 package - if my current attempts at the port upgrades
fails I'll try this route.
Thanks again!
Gary
Hey,
If I were you, first of all, I would try the "make clean; make
distclean;make rmconfig; make install clean"
Good afternoon,
I've been playing with various flavors of *nix off and on for almost
twenty years, but not doing much development the make process often
causes me issues - as is the case with samba.
I'm running freebsd 6.0. I've tried installing three different versions
of samba from ports
13 matches
Mail list logo
