console="comconsole,vidconsole"
My notes say "These came from the serial console setup page, and do work for
vt100", however I did not note exactly which man page they came from,
unfortunately. I do not see these lines on syscons(4), sio(4) or dcons(4).
Similar lines are ment
ith the
intention of coming back to determine what is going on (mount points to
now-missing data disks have been removed from /etc/fstab).
In the resulting stripped down system, I have the same behaviour as before -- I
cannot get to single-user mode, but multi-user is fine.
If in multi-user mo
[ Condensation of earlier comments below ]
On 2013-06-06, at 11:18 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:24:52 -0300, Andrew Hamilton-Wright wrote:
>>
>> When I get to the point where the root filesystem is mounted,
>> it hangs right after printing the message:
>> Trying to mount root f
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:24:52 -0300, Andrew Hamilton-Wright wrote:
>
> Strangely, it seems that I cannot boot single user, either
> using "boot -s" from the boot loader, or using the boot menu.
> When I get to the point where the root filesystem is mounted,
> it hangs right after printing the messa
Strangely, it seems that I cannot boot single user, either using "boot -s" from
the boot loader, or using the boot menu. When I get to the point where the
root filesystem is mounted, it hangs right after printing the message:
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ada0s1a
Interestingly, there seem
On Apr 29, 2013, at 4:52 AM, Joe wrote:
Teske, Devin wrote:
On Apr 28, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Joe wrote:
running 9.1 and can not figure how to get into single user mode or safe mode
from the BOOT menu.
After hitting the 5 or 6 keys to select those options, what do you do next to
continue?
Based on
Teske, Devin wrote:
On Apr 28, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Joe wrote:
running 9.1 and can not figure how to get into single user mode or safe mode from the
BOOT menu.
After hitting the 5 or 6 keys to select those options, what do you do next to
continue?
Based on your description it sounds like you
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Teske, Devin wrote:
In single user mode, the root filesystem will be the only one mounted, and
it will be mounted read-only.
If you need to make changes (Correcting a fat-fingered edit to /etc/fstab,
for example), you'll need to mount root rw.
mount -u -o rw /
or
Joshua Isom writes:
> >> mount -u -o rw /
> >
> > or
> >
> > mount -u -rw /
> >
> > (just thought I'd save you 2 keystrokes, nyuk nyuk)
> >
>
> Or
>
> mount -ua
Understand this mounts all filesystems not marked "noauto" in
fstab ... whether that's the right thing or not.
On 4/28/2013 7:50 PM, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Apr 28, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Michael Sierchio wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Polytropon wrote:
mount -u -o rw /
or
mount -u -rw /
(just thought I'd save you 2 keystrokes, nyuk nyuk)
Or
mount -ua
___
On Apr 28, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Joe wrote:
running 9.1 and can not figure how to get into single user mode or safe mode
from the BOOT menu.
After hitting the 5 or 6 keys to select those options, what do you do next to
continue?
Based on your description it sounds like you have the following
Ok
>>_
>>
>> prompt. This is where you enter the command
>>
>>boot -s
>>
>> to go into single-user mode. The kernel will load as you would
>> expect, but no further action (rc.d startup) will be taken. Instead
>> you hav
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Polytropon wrote:
>
> After the BTX loader has started, keep hammering the space
> bar. :-)
>
> At some point, you'll see the
>
> Ok
> _
>
> prompt. This is where you enter the command
>
> boo
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:44:46 -0400, Joe wrote:
> running 9.1 and can not figure how to get into single user mode or safe
> mode from the BOOT menu.
>
> After hitting the 5 or 6 keys to select those options, what do you do
> next to continue?
>
> Hitting enter key just boo
running 9.1 and can not figure how to get into single user mode or safe
mode from the BOOT menu.
After hitting the 5 or 6 keys to select those options, what do you do
next to continue?
Hitting enter key just boots the system without regard to options selected.
Can not find usage of boot
ce method, it is always needed to
> do the "make installworld" step in single user mode. But it seems to
> be that single user is not required with freebsd-update method, in the
> second "freebsd-update install". Someone could explain the reason? Am I
> misunderstandi
For some reason my email hasn't apparently been delivered so I'm re-sending it.
"From: ASV
To: Jose Garcia Juanino
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:Re: Newbie question about freebsd-update: single user mode is
not needed anymore?
Date: Mon, 31 De
Well,
I understand your concern. I've been using the freebsd-update method
since several years now and mostly remotely. I've never encounter a
problem. I haven't recompiled everything many times as I didn't really
found a tangible advantage in this method but I've never thought about
this. I believ
El lunes 31 de diciembre a las 16:27:44 CET, ASV escribió:
> Hi Jose,
>
> with the freebsd-update method you don't need to pass through the "make
> installworld" as it's a binary patch/upgrade system.
> Using "freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RELEASE" for example allows you to
> get your system patch
On 31/12/2012 14:13, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am planning to upgrade from FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE to
> FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE. With upgrade source method, it is always needed to
> do the "make installworld" step in single user mode. But it seems to
> be that
Hi,
I am planning to upgrade from FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE to
FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE. With upgrade source method, it is always needed to
do the "make installworld" step in single user mode. But it seems to
be that single user is not required with freebsd-update method, in the
second "
(or to the directory containing your source
> tree).
> 2. `make buildworld'
> 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is
> GENERIC).
> 4. `make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is
> GENERIC). [steps 3. & 4. can be co
(or to the directory containing your source
> tree).
> 2. `make buildworld'
> 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is
> GENERIC).
> 4. `make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is
> GENERIC). [steps 3. & 4. can be co
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 00:57:04 -0500, Janos Dohanics wrote:
> I have just rebuilt world and kernel according to the Handbook,
> installed the new kernel, rebooted, logged in, issued "sudo shutdown
> now" - the machine entered single user mode, then immediately exited
> without
I have just rebuilt world and kernel according to the Handbook,
installed the new kernel, rebooted, logged in, issued "sudo shutdown
now" - the machine entered single user mode, then immediately exited
without any intervention by me and continued to boot into multiuser
mode.
Here is
cal logins.
I remember why I added kbdmux as module. If not this option will not be
honored:
makeoptions UKBD_DFLT_KEYMAP=uk.iso
And then I don't have my uk.iso keymap on single user mode !
--
David Demelier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.o
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:41:56 +0100, David Demelier wrote:
> When prompted Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh:uhub3:
> 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered
> uhub7: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered
> ugen0.2: at usbus0
> ukbd0:
> on usbus0
> kbd1 at ukbd0
> uhid0:
> on
Hello,
This question may have been asked a lot of time but I have the same
problem, my USB keyboard works well with the loader, when the system has
successfully booted but not in the single user mode.
I don't know if this matters but when the request
When prompted Enter full pathna
; set these both together ...
>>>
>>> For me I added these both to use uk.iso but in single user mode I
>>> still have the standard us layout.
>>
>> Can you try the patch in kern/153459 ? It adds KBDMUX_DFLT_KEYMAP which
>> allows using non-default layout i
On 21/03/2011 12:11, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:45:06 +0100, David Demelier
wrote:
By the way why is kbdmux needed for an usb keyboard? Should not be
managed by ukbd only?
I don't understand .. But thanks for the patch.
Basically, the kbdmux option "wires keyboards in parallel
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:45:06 +0100, David Demelier
wrote:
> By the way why is kbdmux needed for an usb keyboard? Should not be
> managed by ukbd only?
>
> I don't understand .. But thanks for the patch.
Basically, the kbdmux option "wires keyboards in parallel", so
you can use both keyboards (
On 21/03/2011 10:51, Pan Tsu wrote:
David Demelier writes:
The problem when you're using directly kbdmux in the kernel config,
the ATKBD_DFLT_KEYMAP and UKBD_DFLT_KEYMAP are ineffective, you can't
set these both together ...
For me I added these both to use uk.iso but in single u
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:01:27 +0100, David Demelier
wrote:
> The problem when you're using directly kbdmux in the kernel config, the
> ATKBD_DFLT_KEYMAP and UKBD_DFLT_KEYMAP are ineffective, you can't set
> these both together ...
Thanks for the pointer. Really! I know that it worked in the
pas
David Demelier writes:
> The problem when you're using directly kbdmux in the kernel config,
> the ATKBD_DFLT_KEYMAP and UKBD_DFLT_KEYMAP are ineffective, you can't
> set these both together ...
>
> For me I added these both to use uk.iso but in single user mode I
>
On 20/03/2011 12:13, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 09:55:35 +0100, David Demelier
wrote:
Hello,
I just realized that I can't use my USB keyboard if I start FreeBSD in
single user mode. The keyboard is still detected but I can't use it.
It works with the loader of cours
David Demelier writes:
> I just realized that I can't use my USB keyboard if I start
> FreeBSD in single user mode. The keyboard is still detected but I
> can't use it.
My memory says I had this problem several years ago. Back in
5.*, or maybe 6.*?
It
On 20/03/2011 12:13, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 09:55:35 +0100, David Demelier
wrote:
Hello,
I just realized that I can't use my USB keyboard if I start FreeBSD in
single user mode. The keyboard is still detected but I can't use it.
It works with the loader of cours
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 09:55:35 +0100, David Demelier
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just realized that I can't use my USB keyboard if I start FreeBSD in
> single user mode. The keyboard is still detected but I can't use it.
>
> It works with the loader of course. I don&#x
Hello,
I just realized that I can't use my USB keyboard if I start FreeBSD in
single user mode. The keyboard is still detected but I can't use it.
It works with the loader of course. I don't know if it's related to devd
and if it's running.
I also have USB l
On 11 December 2010 16:55, K. Yura wrote:
> 2010/12/11 Chris Rees
>>
>> Have a look at /etc/ttys.
>> Chris
> Thank you very much
No problem. Don't forget that although you've now made it non-trivial
to break into your computer with console access, it's still easy for a
physical attacker to:
-
editor(vi)*
Reboot the box and boot into single user mode, if you wanna test it.
By the way, the keyword "insecure" imply to the console is insecure and thus
required root password to be authenticated before single user mode can be
access. It DOES NOT mean that the console is run insec
-RELEASE #0: Mon Jul 19 02:55:53 UTC
> 2010 r...@almeida.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
>
> Hi. Where can I set up password for single user mode? Thanx.
> ___
> f
password for single user mode? Thanx.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hello Illoai
Am 27.10.2010 18:14, schrieb ill...@gmail.com:
On 20 October 2010 03:50, Martin Schweizer wrote:
Hello
If I start the server in single user mode I get never a prompt/shell (at the
console). After successfully boot in single user mode I see a the last line:
"Trying to mount
Hello
If I start the server in single user mode I get never a prompt/shell (at the
console). After successfully boot in single user mode I see a the last line:
"Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/mfid0s1a". The only thing I can do is
CTRL-ALT-DEL, then the system reboots as usua
I will write a rc.d script. It seems like the correct way to go.
Manual mount is out of the question :)
I will e-mail my end "product"
ps: I know it's a dir and not a folder ;)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:27:02 +0200, claudiu vasadi
wrote:
> ok, so I will make a secondary mount script that would check and mount any
> "non-OS-related" mp's.
>
> This would include setting all "non-OS" mp's to "noauto" in fstab and
> creating a secondary script to read fstab, check if all is i
ok, so I will make a secondary mount script that would check and mount any
"non-OS-related" mp's.
This would include setting all "non-OS" mp's to "noauto" in fstab and
creating a secondary script to read fstab, check if all is in order and
finally mount, or exit in error. This way, the OS sticks t
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 23:12:03 +0200, claudiu vasadi
wrote:
> What happened when a "secondary" hdd cannot be mounted at boot ? From
> experience I know the OS drops to single user mode, which I find incredibly
> stupid because a "non-OS" hdd should not stop the OS f
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 23:12:03 +0200, claudiu vasadi
wrote:
> I added the corresponding fstab entries and then I deliberately
> removed the "/mnt/2" folder.
Sorry for sounding picky, but FreeBSD does not have "folders". Those
are called directories. Please try to use the correct terminology.
You d
Hello fellas,
I have a 8.0 i386 vmware machine for the sake of testing the following
behavior:
What happened when a "secondary" hdd cannot be mounted at boot ? From
experience I know the OS drops to single user mode, which I find incredibly
stupid because a "non-OS" hdd sh
Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:39:57AM +0800, Aiza wrote:
Looking for conformation.
On booting into single user mode all files systems are unmounted except
/ which is mounted read only.
Is this true?
Will dump/restore commands work?
Generally yes. Make sure they are
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:39:57AM +0800, Aiza wrote:
> Looking for conformation.
> On booting into single user mode all files systems are unmounted except
> / which is mounted read only.
> Is this true?
> Will dump/restore commands work?
Generally yes. Make sure they are i
Looking for conformation.
On booting into single user mode all files systems are unmounted except
/ which is mounted read only.
Is this true?
Will dump/restore commands work?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
stallworld as we speak. Should this fail I'll continue with the topic
of this discussion = "while in single-user mode, start enough services
to use 'scp' and 'mv' curcial files over to another machine thereafter
do a fresh install on the failed box in question.
I'm
x' command.
Are your world and kernel matched?
> I'm sure its possible to do what I'm attempting, but given the crippled
> situation of this box, I'm stuck in Single-user mode and need to start
> enough services that will allow the use of 'scp' in order t
#x27;ps'. All I see are
the headers when I issue th 'ps aux' command.
I'm sure its possible to do what I'm attempting, but given the crippled
situation of this box, I'm stuck in Single-user mode and need to start
enough services that will allow the use of &#
:35PM +, John Murphy wrote:
> > > >
> >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for all the tips on this subject. One more question:
> > > >
> > > > How would I enable a local keyboard layout in single user mode?
> > > > I have had to find '/' by trial
subject. One more question:
> > >
> > > How would I enable a local keyboard layout in single user mode?
> > > I have had to find '/' by trial and error on my UK keyboard.
> > >
> >
> > You can use kbdcontrol(1) to load a new keyboard mapping
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:56:33PM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:43:35PM +, John Murphy wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thanks for all the tips on this subject. One more question:
> >
> > How would I enable a local keyboard layout in sing
El lunes 03 de diciembre a las 19:14:12 CET, RW escribió:
> On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:48:33 +0100
> Jorn Argelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Also note that vi doesn't work by default as it needs to write
> > to /tmp. So mount /tmp or re-mount / to RW permissions.
>
> I think vi will also fail
gt; > >> I think vi will also fail unless it has access to termcap, so you'd
> > >> need /usr mounted too.
> > >>
> > > You'd need to mount /usr anyway, as the vi binary is located in /usr/bin
> > > ;-)
> > *cough* /rescue/vi
>
> >>
> > You'd need to mount /usr anyway, as the vi binary is located in /usr/bin ;-)
> *cough* /rescue/vi
Thanks for all the tips on this subject. One more question:
How would I enable a local keyboard layout in single user mode?
I have had to find '/' by tria
--- Begin Message ---
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Jorn Argelo wrote:
RW wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:48:33 +0100
Jorn Argelo [1]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also note that vi doesn't work by default as it needs to write
to /tmp. So mount /tmp or re-mount / to RW permissions.
I
Jorn Argelo wrote:
> RW wrote:
>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:48:33 +0100
>> Jorn Argelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Also note that vi doesn't work by default as it needs to write
>>> to /tmp. So mount /tmp or re-mount / to RW permissions.
>>>
>> I think vi will also fail unless it has acces
RW wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:48:33 +0100
Jorn Argelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also note that vi doesn't work by default as it needs to write
to /tmp. So mount /tmp or re-mount / to RW permissions.
I think vi will also fail unless it has access to termcap, so you'd
need /usr mou
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:48:33 +0100
Jorn Argelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also note that vi doesn't work by default as it needs to write
> to /tmp. So mount /tmp or re-mount / to RW permissions.
I think vi will also fail unless it has access to termcap, so you'd
need /usr mounted too.
Login prompt.
> >
> You simply don't have the commands in your PATH. Type /sbin/mount,
> /sbin/fsck, /sbin/reboot and so on, and it does work. Never tried using
> an setenv PATH /bin:/sbin:usr/bin:/usr/sbin(etc) in single user mode,
> but I reckon it works.
Thanks. Use
emaster phobia, but it didn't seem too
bad this time. I thought I'd broken it after choosing /bin/tcsh as my
shell in single user mode. It grumbled about termcap (I think) and
then gave me a "simple shell" with a % prompt.
...
I'll know to always accept the suggested /bin/sh in
nd
I see what you mean - I do get that. I thought you were saying
that /bin/tcsh wasn't starting.
Personally I just put all the commands for the single-user mode install
into a simple script and run that.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail
e from 7 beta2
> > > to beta3. I've always had a mergemaster phobia, but it didn't seem too
> > > bad this time. I thought I'd broken it after choosing /bin/tcsh as my
> > > shell in single user mode. It grumbled about termcap (I think) and
> > > then ga
mergemaster phobia, but it didn't seem too
> > bad this time. I thought I'd broken it after choosing /bin/tcsh as my
> > shell in single user mode. It grumbled about termcap (I think) and
> > then gave me a "simple shell" with a % prompt.
> > ...
> > I&
seem too
> > bad this time. I thought I'd broken it after choosing /bin/tcsh as my
> > shell in single user mode. It grumbled about termcap (I think) and
> > then gave me a "simple shell" with a % prompt.
> >
> > fsck and mount were unknown comma
/tcsh as my
> shell in single user mode. It grumbled about termcap (I think) and
> then gave me a "simple shell" with a % prompt.
>
> fsck and mount were unknown commands and even though I could change
> directory to /usr or /home they were (apparently) empty! Scary!
> I n
er choosing /bin/tcsh as my
> shell in single user mode. It grumbled about termcap (I think) and
> then gave me a "simple shell" with a % prompt.
> ...
> I'll know to always accept the suggested /bin/sh in future, but I was
> wondering if the only reason a choice of
I've just successfully done the world and kernel upgrade from 7 beta2
to beta3. I've always had a mergemaster phobia, but it didn't seem too
bad this time. I thought I'd broken it after choosing /bin/tcsh as my
shell in single user mode. It grumbled about termcap (I think
I usually end
>>> up copying the file to be edited to a floppy et be able to edit it from
>>> another machine, but there has to ba a way to do it! Everytime I go into
>>> single-user-mode and I have to edit a file, the output to stdout is
>>> messed up (looks lik
achine, but there has to ba a way to do it! Everytime I go into
>> single-user-mode and I have to edit a file, the output to stdout is
>> messed up (looks like there are no \n). I tried several editors (vi, ee,
>> edit (ee I think), and I get the same thing, useless to say that i
loppy et be able to edit it from
> >another machine, but there has to ba a way to do it! Everytime I go into
> >single-user-mode and I have to edit a file, the output to stdout is
> >messed up (looks like there are no \n). I tried several editors (vi, ee,
> >edit (ee I th
On 11/05/07, Gabriel Rossetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have never been able to figure out how to do this, and I usually end
up copying the file to be edited to a floppy et be able to edit it from
another machine, but there has to ba a way to do it! Everytime I go into
singl
Hello,
I have never been able to figure out how to do this, and I usually end
up copying the file to be edited to a floppy et be able to edit it from
another machine, but there has to ba a way to do it! Everytime I go into
single-user-mode and I have to edit a file, the output to stdout is
--- Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 18 September 2006 13:51, backyard wrote:
>
> > By call-back mode do you mean log into the system
> via
> > network and have it call your local system for
> > administration
>
> No modems like the US Robotics V.Everything can
> be programmed wi
On Monday 18 September 2006 13:51, backyard wrote:
> By call-back mode do you mean log into the system via
> network and have it call your local system for
> administration
No modems like the US Robotics V.Everything can be programmed with a
call-back feature. You dial up the modem, it askes
Hi there...
Just to contribute, I also ALWAYS upgrade my systems without single
user mode, for "remote" reasons... ;-)
Same instructions: shut down all services, except inetd/ssh, installworld,
mergemaster and reboot...
I even posted in this list, months ago, a step-by-step to remote
--- Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 17 September 2006 23:51, backyard wrote:
>
> >modems are relatively cheap.
>
> And, if you put it into "call-back" mode, it becomes
> one of the most secure
> methods of doing a remote serial console; plus you
> have the added advantage
> o
On Sunday 17 September 2006 23:51, backyard wrote:
>modems are relatively cheap.
And, if you put it into "call-back" mode, it becomes one of the most secure
methods of doing a remote serial console; plus you have the added advantage
of the remote site footing the bill for the call :-)
Bo
--- Ahmad Arafat Abdullah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Daniel Gerzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: rebooting into single user mo
> - Original Message -
> From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Daniel Gerzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: rebooting into single user mode on a remote server
> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:49:34 +0200
>
>
&g
Daniel Gerzo wrote:
Hello pobox,
Saturday, September 16, 2006, 8:47:04 PM, you wrote:
Hello,
could somebody help me to understand the best way to enter into a single
user mode on a remote server.
I need it for the moment, during rebuilding world, when I have to reboot
into single user
Hello pobox,
Saturday, September 16, 2006, 8:47:04 PM, you wrote:
> Hello,
> could somebody help me to understand the best way to enter into a single
> user mode on a remote server.
> I need it for the moment, during rebuilding world, when I have to reboot
> into single u
Matthew Seaman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
could somebody help me to understand the best way to enter into a single
user mode on a remote server.
I need it for the moment, during rebuilding world, when I have to reboot
into single user mode before 'mergemaster -p'.
e another FreeBSD box
> close by the machine you're trying to update and you can string
> null modem cables between their serial ports ...
>
> iii) Finally, and not to be dismissed without due consideration,
> is the really quite simple approach of /not/ taking the machine
&g
On Sep 17, 2006, at 2:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
could somebody help me to understand the best way to enter into a
single user mode on a remote server.
I need it for the moment, during rebuilding world, when I have to
reboot into single user mode before 'mergemaster -p&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> could somebody help me to understand the best way to enter into a single
> user mode on a remote server.
>
> I need it for the moment, during rebuilding world, when I have to reboot
> into single user mode before 'mergemaster -p&
Hello,
could somebody help me to understand the best way to enter into a single
user mode on a remote server.
I need it for the moment, during rebuilding world, when I have to reboot
into single user mode before 'mergemaster -p'.
The only solution I found so far is to do '
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Vincent Chen thusly...
>
>
> I just upgrade my freebsd 4.11 to 6.0. While using 4.11, I used to
> enter single user mode and run fsck on all filesystem every month.
> Recently, I tried to enter single user mode under 6.0 but can't
&g
Hi, all
I just upgrade my freebsd 4.11 to 6.0. While using 4.11, I used to enter single
user mode and run fsck on all filesystem every month. Recently, I tried to
enter single user mode under 6.0 but can't get a shell to do anything. What
should I do to get it done?
Thanks,
Vincent
Ian Lord wrote:
Hi,
I am currently in a maintenance window trying to rebuildworld...
I am doing it on a dell poweredge with a built in drac wich emulate a
usb keyboard...
When I need to boot on the drac, I need to use boot with usb keyboard in
the menu...
Now I need to boot in single mode
Hi,
I am currently in a maintenance window trying to rebuildworld...
I am doing it on a dell poweredge with a built in drac wich emulate a
usb keyboard...
When I need to boot on the drac, I need to use boot with usb keyboard
in the menu...
Now I need to boot in single mode WITH usb keyboar
this box by remote.
> > >>
> > >> Look into setting up a serial console; this is the "remote single user
> > >> mode" you're looking for.
> > >>
> > > Good morning...
> > >
> > > How remote is "remote"
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
